Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 4720, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830847

ABSTRACT

Bioadhesive materials and patches are promising alternatives to surgical sutures and staples. However, many existing bioadhesives do not meet the functional requirements of current surgical procedures and interventions. Here, we present a translational patch material that exhibits instant adhesion to tissues (2.5-fold stronger than Tisseel, an FDA-approved fibrin glue), ultra-stretchability (stretching to >300% its original length without losing elasticity), compatibility with rapid photo-projection (<2 min fabrication time/patch), and ability to deliver therapeutics. Using our established procedures for the in silico design and optimization of anisotropic-auxetic patches, we created next-generation patches for instant attachment to tissues while conforming to a broad range of organ mechanics ex vivo and in vivo. Patches coated with extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells demonstrate robust wound healing capability in vivo without inducing a foreign body response and without the need for patch removal that can cause pain and bleeding. We further demonstrate a single material-based, void-filling auxetic patch designed for the treatment of lung puncture wounds.


Subject(s)
Tissue Adhesives , Wound Healing , Animals , Humans , Elasticity , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Mice , Fibrin Tissue Adhesive , Male , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry
2.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther ; 390(2): 260-275, 2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858089

ABSTRACT

Radiation therapy, a standard treatment option for many cancer patients, induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), leading to cell death. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase is a key regulator of DSB repair, and ATM inhibitors are being explored as radiosensitizers for various tumors, including primary and metastatic brain tumors. Efficacy of radiosensitizers for brain tumors may be influenced by a lack of effective drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. The objective of this study was to evaluate the systemic pharmacokinetics and mechanisms that influence the central nervous system (CNS) distribution of WSD0628, a novel and potent ATM inhibitor, in the mouse. Further, we have used these observations to form the basis of predicting effective exposures for clinical application. We observed a greater than dose proportional increase in exposure, likely due to saturation of clearance processes. Our results show that WSD0628 is orally bioavailable and CNS penetrant, with unbound partitioning in CNS (i.e., unbound tissue partition coefficient) between 0.15 and 0.3. CNS distribution is not limited by the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistant protein. WSD0628 is distributed uniformly among different brain regions. Thus, WSD0628 has favorable pharmacokinetic properties and potential for further exploration to determine the pharmacodynamics-pharmacokinetics efficacy relationship in CNS tumors. This approach will provide critical insights for the clinical translation of WSD0628 for the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study evaluates the preclinical systemic pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, and mechanisms influencing CNS distribution of WSD0628, a novel ATM inhibitor for the treatment of brain tumors. Results indicate that WSD0628 is orally bioavailable and CNS penetrant without efflux transporter liability. We also observed a greater than dose proportional increase in exposure in both the plasma and brain. These favorable pharmacokinetic properties indicate WSD0628 has potential for further exploration for use as a radiosensitizer in the treatment of brain tumors.


Subject(s)
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins , Brain Neoplasms , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents , Animals , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Mice , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/pharmacokinetics , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Tissue Distribution , Central Nervous System/metabolism , Central Nervous System/drug effects , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/antagonists & inhibitors , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/metabolism , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(15): 3287-3297, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743766

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are targeted therapies with robust efficacy in solid cancers, and there is intense interest in using EGFR-specific ADCs to target EGFR-amplified glioblastoma (GBM). Given GBM's molecular heterogeneity, the bystander activity of ADCs may be important for determining treatment efficacy. In this study, the activity and toxicity of two EGFR-targeted ADCs with similar auristatin toxins, Losatuxizumab vedotin (ABBV-221) and Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), were compared in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and normal murine brain following direct infusion by convection-enhanced delivery (CED). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: EGFRviii-amplified and non-amplified GBM PDXs were used to determine in vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo efficacy, and bystander activities of ABBV-221 and Depatux-M. Nontumor-bearing mice were used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity of ADCs using LC-MS/MS and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: CED improved intracranial efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-221 in three EGFRviii-amplified GBM PDX models (Median survival: 125 to >300 days vs. 20-49 days with isotype control AB095). Both ADCs had comparable in vitro and in vivo efficacy. However, neuronal toxicity and CD68+ microglia/macrophage infiltration were significantly higher in brains infused with ABBV-221 with the cell-permeable monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), compared with Depatux-M with the cell-impermeant monomethyl auristatin F. CED infusion of ABBV-221 into the brain or incubation of ABBV-221 with normal brain homogenate resulted in a significant release of MMAE, consistent with linker instability in the brain microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR-targeting ADCs are promising therapeutic options for GBM when delivered intratumorally by CED. However, the linker and payload for the ADC must be carefully considered to maximize the therapeutic window.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Bystander Effect , ErbB Receptors , Glioblastoma , Immunoconjugates , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Animals , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/pathology , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Immunoconjugates/pharmacokinetics , Immunoconjugates/pharmacology , Immunoconjugates/administration & dosage , Humans , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Mice , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Female
4.
Pharm Res ; 40(11): 2731-2746, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37589827

ABSTRACT

The lack of effective chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of brain tumors is a serious unmet medical need. This can be attributed, in part, to inadequate delivery through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the tumor-cell barrier, both of which have active efflux transporters that can restrict the transport of many potentially effective agents for both primary and metastatic brain tumors. This review briefly summarizes the components and function of the normal BBB with respect to drug penetration into the brain and the alterations in the BBB due to brain tumor that could influence drug delivery. Depending on what is rate-limiting a compound's distribution, the limited permeability across the BBB and the subsequent delivery into the tumor cell can be greatly influenced by efflux transporters and these are discussed in some detail. Given these complexities, it is necessary to quantify the extent of brain distribution of the active (unbound) drug to compare across compounds and to inform potential for use against brain tumors. In this regard, the metric, Kp,uu, a brain-to-plasma unbound partition coefficient, is examined and its current use is discussed. However, the extent of active drug delivery is not the only determinant of effective therapy. In addition to Kp,uu, drug potency is an important parameter that should be considered alongside drug delivery in drug discovery and development processes. In other words, to answer the question - How much is enough? - one must consider how much can be delivered with how much needs to be delivered.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Brain , Humans , Blood-Brain Barrier , Membrane Transport Proteins , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Biological Transport , Pharmaceutical Preparations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL