Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Does Surgeon Subspecialty Affect Perioperative Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if surgeon subspecialty training affects perioperative outcomes for displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: One health system with 2 hospitals (Level I and Level III trauma centers). PATIENT AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were treated with hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures between October 2012 and September 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES: Leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, estimated blood loss (EBL), incidence of blood transfusion, time to surgery, operative time, and length of stay. Data were analyzed based on the treating surgeon's subspecialty training [arthroplasty (A), trauma (T), other (O)]. Hierarchical regression was used to compare the groups and control for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients who received hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were included (A = 158; T = 73; O = 61). Surgeon subspecialty had a statistically significant effect on operative time, with arthroplasty surgeons completing the procedure 9.6 minutes faster than trauma surgeons and 17.7 minutes faster than other surgeons (P < 0.01; ΔR = 0.03). Surgeon subspecialty did not significantly affect other outcomes, including leg length discrepancy (P = 0.26), femoral offset (P = 0.37), EBL (P = 0.10), incidence of transfusion (P = 0.67), time to surgery (P = 0.10), or length of stay (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that arthroplasty-trained surgeons perform hemiarthroplasty slightly faster than other subspecialists, but subspecialty training does not affect other perioperative outcomes, including leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, EBL, transfusion rate, time to surgery, or length of stay. This suggests that hemiarthroplasty can be adequately performed by various subspecialists, and deferring treatment to an arthroplasty surgeon might not have a clinically significant benefit in the perioperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors Predictive of Blocking Screw Placement in Retrograde Nailing of Distal Femur Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: (1) Identify factors that predict blocking screw placement in the treatment of a distal femur fracture with retrograde nail fixation and (2) determine whether acceptable alignment and stability were achieved in fractures that received blocking screws. DESIGN: Retrospective Comparative Study. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Between 2011 and 2017, we identified 84 patients with distal third femur fractures treated with a retrograde femoral nail. Data were analyzed according to those who did (BLOCK, n = 30) and did not (NO BLOCK, n = 54) receive blocking screws. Patients in both groups were treated by orthopaedic trauma surgeons; postoperative weight-bearing radiographs were obtained of every patient. INTERVENTION: Fixation using a retrograde femoral nail with or without blocking screws. Blocking screws were placed at the discretion of the treating surgeon to reduce malaligned fractures or improve stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: (1) Demographics, radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG), space available for the nail (SAFN), and distal segment length [as a ratio of bicondylar width (BCW)]; and (2) post-operative alignment and stability (change in alignment over time). RESULTS: Patients treated with blocking screws had a higher body mass index (BMI) (BLOCK: 29.0, NO BLOCK 25.7, P = 0.03). In addition, the BLOCK group had larger RABGs (BLOCK: 8.2 mm, NO BLOCK: 3.6 mm, P = 0.02), more SAFN (BLOCK: 51.4 mm, NO BLOCK: 39.8 mm, P = 0.02), and shorter distal segments (BLOCK: 1.7 × BCW, NO BLOCK: 2.0 × BCW, P = 0.01). In a multivariable logistic regression, the combination of these factors was significantly predictive of blocking screw placement with a large effect size (R = 0.36, P < 0.01). A distal segment length ≤ ×2 BCW was 77% sensitive for blocking screw placement, and a BMI ≥25 kg/m was 70% sensitive. Negative predictive values for blocking screw placement were distal segment length > ×2 BCW (79%), BMI <25 kg/m (77%), RABG <4 mm (76%), and SAFN <50 mm (71%). Patients that received blocking screws had acceptable postoperative alignment and stability, similar to fractures that did not receive blocking screws (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study of distal femur fractures treated with retrograde nails identified several factors that can be used to predict when blocking screw placement may be useful for increasing stability and maintaining alignment in distal third femur fractures treated with retrograde IM nails. Patients treated with blocking screws had a higher BMI, greater cortical bone loss, more SAFN, and shorter distal segments. There was no difference in postoperative alignment or stability between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Locked Plates Versus Nonlocked Plates for the Treatment of High-Energy Pilon Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiographic and functional outcome of patients with high-energy pilon fractures treated with locked versus nonlocked plates. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. SETTING: Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Between December 2006 and December 2008, 60 consecutive patients with 62 AO/OTA type A, B, and C tibial pilon fractures were enrolled in the study. Thirty-two of the fractures were treated using locked plates and 29 were treated with nonlocked plates. Follow-up data were available for 33 of the 60 patients. INTERVENTION: Treatment with locked versus nonlocked plates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AHS). Radiographic measurements on anteroposterior and lateral views for the quality of reduction and maintenance of alignment immediately postoperatively compared with the latest follow-up. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the mechanism or injury pattern, average age of the patients, ratio of males to females, tourniquet time, operative time, interval to surgery, AHS, or SMFA scores. One of 15 fractures in the locked plate group lost reduction at the latest follow-up compared with 3 of 19 fractures in the nonlocked group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there seems to be no difference between the 2 constructs. Thus, one must question the routine use of locked plates in the treatment of high-energy pilon fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fix it or discard it? A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes after surgically treated patella fractures comparing ORIF with partial patellectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare functional outcomes of patients with patella fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with those treated with partial patellectomy (PP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Seventy-three patients with isolated displaced patella fractures underwent operative treatment between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2009, at our institution. Of these, 52 (71%) patients with isolated patella fractures with minimum 1-year follow-up agreed to participate and were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTION: PP or ORIF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients completed outcome questionnaires and participated in a physical examination. Outcome instruments included the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale, Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, and SF Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Survey. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent PP and 26 underwent ORIF. There were no significant differences in any of the functional outcome instruments, including Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ORIF: 64.1 ± 11, PP: 62.1 ± 7.9, P = 0.76), SF-36 physical component score (ORIF: 40.8 ± 5.4, PP: 41.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.94), SF-36 mental component (ORIF: 47.7 ± 5.1, PP: 51.8 ± 4.9, P = 0.19), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) Function Index (ORIF: 28.6 ± 9.1, PP: 27.7 ± 6.7, P = 0.78), or SMFA Bother Index (ORIF: 26.0 ± 9.7, PP: 23.6 ± 8.8, P = 0.72). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that functional impairment persists after operative treatment of patella fractures. Both ORIF and PP demonstrated similar final range of motion, functional scores, and complication rates. Despite its purported benefits, in this study, ORIF did not result in superior outcomes compared with PP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Operative treatment of unstable pediatric pelvis and acetabular fractures.

The management of unstable pediatric pelvic and acetabular fractures continues to be controversial. Recent reports have suggested that closed management of unstable pelvic and acetabular fractures can result in significant long-term morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of operative stabilization of unstable pelvic and acetabular fractures in children and adolescents. Eighteen patients less than 16 years of age with unstable pelvic and acetabular fractures were treated operatively over a 7-year period. Fracture healing, time to union, complications, and functional outcome were assessed. All fractures healed by 10 weeks. No patients suffered wound complications, infection, or growth arrest at an average follow-up of 30 months. These results support operative fixation of unstable pediatric pelvic and acetabular fractures to restore pelvic symmetry and periarticular anatomy. Favorable clinical results can be achieved with a low incidence of complications.

The thermal effects of intramedullary reaming.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of tourniquet control on intramedullary reaming. DESIGN: An experimental prospective nonsurvival animal study was performed using 5 mongrel dogs. A pneumatic tourniquet was randomized to either the right or left hind limb. Tibial intramedullary reaming was performed with progressively larger reamers. Cortical temperatures were measured using thermocouples inserted into the tibial diaphyseal cortex. Thermocouples were connected to an analog to digital converter that output continuous data that was collected on a computer. Upon completion of the procedure, the animals were killed. RESULTS: The peak and low temperatures for each thermocouple with each reamer passage were recorded. Reamer sizes larger than the internal diameter of the intramedullary canal produced higher peak temperatures. The mean delta t (peak temperature minus low temperature) was calculated for each reamer passage. This measurement represents the overall amount of heat generated during each reamer passage. There were no significant differences between the 2 conditions (P = 0.8, paired t test). Temperatures decreased in between reamer exchange but did not return to baseline levels. CONCLUSIONS: Because similar temperatures were measured both with and without a tourniquet, the risk of thermal necrosis appears to be related more to the process of intramedullary reaming than to the tourniquet. Higher temperatures were measured with reamer sizes larger than the internal diameter of the intramedullary canal. Increasing the time interval between the passage of successive reamers may allow heat to dissipate and decrease the risk of thermal necrosis. The clinical practice of limited reaming ("ream-to-fit") should minimize the occurrence of this complication.

The modified ilioinguinal approach.

A modified ilioinguinal approach for acetabular fractures is presented. The approach allows surgical exposure of the anterior column as well as the contralateral rami, the symphysis pubis, and the medial wall of the acetabulum. Direct access to the quadrilateral surface and retroacetabular surface for plate or screw application is also possible.