ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Surveys based on hypothetical situations suggest that health-care providers agree that disclosure of errors and adverse events to patients and families is a professional obligation but do not always disclose them. Disclosure rates and reasons for the choice have not previously been studied. OBJECTIVE: To measure the proportion of errors disclosed by neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals to parents and identify motives for and barriers to disclosure. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study nested in a randomised controlled trial (Study on Preventing Adverse Events in Neonates (SEPREVEN); ClinicalTrials.gov). Event disclosure was not intended to be related to the intervention tested. SETTING: 10 NICUs in France with a 20-month follow-up, starting November 2015. PARTICIPANTS: n=1019 patients with NICU stay ≥2 days with ≥1 error. EXPOSURE: Characteristics of errors (type, severity, timing of discovery), patients and professionals, self-reported motives for disclosure and non-disclosure. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Rate of error disclosure reported anonymously and voluntarily by physicians and nurses; perceived parental reaction to disclosure. RESULTS: Among 1822 errors concerning 1019 patients (mean gestational age: 30.8±4.5 weeks), 752 (41.3%) were disclosed. Independent risk factors for non-disclosure were nighttime discovery of error (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.75 to 3.30), milder consequence (for moderate consequence: OR 1.85; 95% CI 0.89 to 3.86; no consequence: OR 6.49; 95% CI 2.99 to 14.11), a shorter interval between admission and error, error type and fewer beds. The most frequent reported reasons for non-disclosure were parental absence at its discovery and a perceived lack of serious consequence. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In the particular context of the SEPREVEN randomised controlled trial of NICUs, staff did not disclose the majority of errors to parents, especially in the absence of moderate consequence for the infant. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02598609.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care, Neonatal , Medical Errors , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Prospective Studies , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Truth Disclosure , Intensive Care Units, NeonatalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are at high risk of adverse events. The effects of medical and paramedical education programmes to reduce these have not yet been assessed. METHODS: In this multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial done in France, we randomly assigned 12 NICUs to three clusters of four units. Eligible neonates were inpatients in a participating unit for at least 2 days, with a postmenstrual age of 42 weeks or less on admission. Each cluster followed a 4-month multifaceted programme including education about root-cause analysis and care bundles. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events per 1000 patient-days, measured with a retrospective trigger-tool based chart review masked to allocation of randomly selected files. Analyses used mixed-effects Poisson modelling that adjusted for time. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02598609. FINDINGS: Between Nov 23, 2015, and Nov 2, 2017, event rates were analysed for 3454 patients of these 12 NICUs for 65â830 patient-days. The event rate per 1000 patient-days reduced significantly from the control to the intervention period (33·9 vs 22·6; incidence rate ratio 0·67; 95% CI 0·50-0·88; p=0·0048). INTERPRETATION: A multiprofessional safety-promoting programme in NICUs reduced the rate of adverse events and severe and preventable adverse events in highly vulnerable patients. This programme could significantly improve care offered to critically ill neonates. FUNDING: Solidarity and Health Ministry, France.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel/education , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Interprofessional Education , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , MaleSubject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Neonatal Nursing/organization & administration , Sibling Relations , Siblings/psychology , Visitors to Patients/psychology , Academic Medical Centers , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Protocols , France , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal/organization & administration , Intensive Care, Neonatal/psychology , Organizational Policy , Visitors to Patients/educationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that prophylactic treatment of neutropenic premature neonates with recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (rG-CSF) would reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections (NIs). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 25 neonatal intensive care units participated in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Premature infants of gestational age (GA) Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use
, Infant, Premature, Diseases/drug therapy
, Neutropenia/drug therapy
, Cross Infection/prevention & control
, Double-Blind Method
, Female
, Gestational Age
, Humans
, Infant, Newborn
, Infant, Premature
, Infant, Premature, Diseases/diagnosis
, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
, Leukocyte Count
, Male
, Neutropenia/diagnosis
, Recombinant Proteins
, Treatment Outcome