Single-centre experience of transbronchial cryobiopsy as a first choice method for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of interstitial lung disease is based on clinical and biological analysis associated with computed tomography (CT) pattern after discussion in multidisciplinary discussion. Lung transbronchial cryobiopsy has emerged with acceptable diagnostic reliability and low morbidity and mortality. The goal of our work is to describe our experience with lung cryobiopsy. METHODS: This is monocentric and retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on epidemiological, clinical, biological, CT, respiratory and histological features of patients with lung transbronchial cryobiopsy between January 1st, 2017, and July 1st, 2020. RESULTS: Lung transbronchial cryobiopsy has been done for 23 patients with sex ratio M/F of 1.1, majority of smoker/former smoker. Thirty-nine percent of procedures were complicated by pneumothorax. On the haemorrhagic level, we reported 1 grade 2 bleeding (no serious bleeding). An histological diagnosis was obtained for 19 patients (82%). Only 4 patients needed to discuss surgical lung biopsy: 2 (8.6%) surgical lung biopsy, 1 refused surgical lung biopsy and 1 patient lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that transbronchial lung cryobiopsy may be considered the first diagnostic modality instead of surgical lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease in appropriate patients. Larger studies are, however, needed to confirm our observations.

How did we take care of our older cancer patients during the first COVID-19 wave? The French experience.

BACKGROUND: The management of older cancer patients has been highly challenging for clinicians in a health-care system operating at maximum capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 9 different institutions. The primary endpoint was to assess the prevalence of adapted patient care during the pandemic for elderly cancer patients. The secondary endpoint was to assess the incidence of hospitalization and mortality due to COVID-19. All patients were older than 65years of age. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 332 outpatients' case files between 9th of March and 30th of April 2020. The median age was 75years (range: 65-101) and 53% were male. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than half of the outpatients received modified patient care, defined as postponement or cancellation of surgery, irradiation scheme adapted, systemic treatment or the use of telemedicine. Among patients with localized cancer, 60% had a change in management strategy due to the pandemic. Changes in management strategy were made for 53% of patients at the metastatic stage. GCSF was used , in 83% of patients, increasing considerably in the context of the pandemic. Sixty-nine percent of physicians used telemedicine. In the final analysis, only one patient was hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. No deaths due to COVID-19 were reported in elderly cancer patients during this time period. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to assess modification of patient care in elderly cancer outpatients during an epidemic. With this unprecedented crisis, our objective is to protect our patients from infection via protective barrier measures and social distancing, but also to guarantee the continuity of cancer care without overexposing this fragile population. Physicians were able to adapt their practice and used new forms of management, like telemedicine.

Evaluation of medical practices in oncology in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in France: Physicians' point of view: the PRATICOVID study.

The cancer population seems to be more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and have worse outcomes. We had to adapt our medical practice to protect our patients without compromising their cancer prognosis. The national PRATICOVID study aims to describe the adaptation of cancer patient care for this population. We analyzed data from nine different institutions. The primary endpoint was to assess the prevalence of adapted patient care during the pandemic. The secondary endpoints were to describe the point of view of clinicians and patients during and after the pandemic. We analyzed 435 medical procedures between 9th of March and 30th of April. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, 47.6% of the outpatients received modified patient care. Twenty-four percent of scheduled surgeries were postponed, or were performed without perioperative chemotherapy, 18.4% followed a hypofractioned schedule, and 57% had an adaptive systemic protocol (stopped, oral protocol, and spacing between treatments). Seventy percent of physicians used telemedicine. During this period, 67% of the physicians did not feel distressed taking care of their patients. However, 70% of physicians are worried about the aftermath of the lockdown, as regards future patient care. The PRATICOVID study is the first to assess modification of patient care in cancer outpatients during an epidemic. With this unprecedented crisis, physicians were able to adapt their practice in order to protect their patients against the virus while ensuring continuity of patient care. But physicians are worried about the aftereffects of the lockdown specifically in regard to care pathway issues.

[Results and lessons of an innovating chemotherapy-induced nauseas and vomiting management strategy]. / Résultats et enseignements d'une stratégie innovante de prise en charge des nausées et vomissements chimio-induits.

Current chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting management guidelines recommend taking into account the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy employed as well as individual risk factors to such effects. We performed an interventional prospective study to assess the impact of an innovating therapeutic optimization strategy. The latter combines current guidelines application to a specific consultation in order to individualize the treatment. This study included 170 patients and covered a total of 1,746 days of various chemotherapies. Among these patients, 86.5% never vomited and 53.8% never had any nausea or vomiting. These results seem generally better than the ones found in the literature with all kinds of chemotherapies. Regarding them, we have attempted to highlight the determining criteria for a successful antiemetic treatment.

[The non-surgical treatment of lung cancer]. / Le traitement non chirurgical du cancer du poumon.

Advances in the treatment of lung cancer concern mainly non-small cell cancers. Surgery, radiotherapy or drugs are offered alone or in combination depending on the patient and the extent of the disease. Involved in their implementation, the oncology nurse supports the patient throughout his or her treatment pathway.