Clinical Significance of Global Wasted Work in Patients with Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between myocardial work assessment using pressure-strain loops by echocardiography before cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and response to CRT has been recently revealed. Among myocardial work parameters, the impact of left ventricular myocardial global wasted work (GWW) on response to CRT and outcome following CRT has been seldom studied. Hence, the authors evaluated the relationship between preprocedural GWW and outcome in a large prospective cohort of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction receiving CRT. METHODS: The study included 249 patients with HF. Myocardial work indices including GWW were calculated using speckle-tracking strain two-dimensional echocardiography using pressure-strain loops. End points of the study were (1) response to CRT, defined as left ventricular reverse remodeling and/or absence of hospitalization for HF, and (2) all-cause death during follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 48 months (interquartile range, 43-54 months). Median preoperative GWW was 281 mm Hg% (interquartile range, 184-388 mm Hg%). Preoperative GWW was associated with CRT response (area under the curve, 0.74; P < .0001), and a 200 mm Hg% threshold discriminated CRT nonresponders from responders with 85% specificity and 50% sensitivity, even after adjustment for known predictors of CRT response (adjusted odds ratio, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.91-8.68; P < .001). After adjustment for established predictors of outcome in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction receiving CRT, GWW < 200 mm Hg% remained associated with a relative increased risk for all-cause death compared with GWW ≥ 200 mm Hg% (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P = .0245). Adding GWW to a baseline model including known predictors of outcome in CRT resulted in an improvement of this model (χ2 to improve 4.85, P = .028). The relationship between GWW and CRT response and outcome was stronger in terms of size effect and statistical significance than for other myocardial work indices. CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative GWW (<200 mm Hg%) is associated with absence of CRT response in CRT candidates and with a relative increased risk for all-cause death. GWW appears to be a promising parameter to improve selection for CRT of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

Clinical Significance of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony and QRS Narrowing in Patients With Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony amenable to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and QRS narrowing immediately after CRT are both correlated and have a cumulative impact on response and outcome after CRT. METHODS: A total of 233 CRT candidates (heart failure New York Heart Association classes II-IV, ejection fraction < 35%, QRS ≥ 120 milliseconds, 44% women, 71 ± 11 years old) were prospectively included. Preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony amenable to CRT was assessed by septal deformation patterns using speckle tracking echocardiography. QRS narrowing was calculated from 12-lead electrocardiograms before and immediately after CRT implantation. The primary endpoint was overall mortality during long-term follow-up. The NTC clinical trial number is NCT02986633. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of patients with preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony experienced QRS narrowing after CRT (118/136), whereas 69% of patients without preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony (67/97) experienced QRS narrowing after CRT (P < 0.001). By Cox multivariate analysis, both preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony and lack of postoperative QRS narrowing were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-3.50 and HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.38, respectively). Compared with patients with preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony, patients without both electromechanical dyssynchrony and postoperative QRS narrowing experienced a considerable increased risk of mortality during follow-up (adjusted HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.96-6.97). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of postoperative QRS narrowing after CRT is associated with preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony. Both preoperative electromechanical dyssynchrony and postoperative QRS narrowing have a favourable cumulative impact on outcome after CRT.

Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) varies widely across studies. The impact of misalignment of aortic flow and pressure recovery phenomenon on the frequency of low-gradient severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been evaluated in prospective studies. AIMS: To investigate prospectively the impact of aortic flow misalignment by Doppler and lack of pressure recovery phenomenon correction on the frequency of low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved LVEF. METHODS: Aortic jet velocities and mean pressure gradient (MPG) were obtained by interrogating all windows in 68 consecutive patients with normal LVEF and severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] ≤1cm2) on the basis of the apical imaging window alone (two-dimensional [2D] apical approach). Patients were classified as having LG or high-gradient (HG) AS according to MPG <40mmHg or ≥40mmHg, and normal flow (NF) or low flow (LF) according to stroke volume index >35mL/m2 or ≤35mL/m2, on the basis of the 2D apical approach, the multiview approach (multiple windows evaluation) and AVA corrected for pressure recovery. RESULTS: The proportion of LG severe AS was 57% using the 2D apical approach alone. After the multiview approach and correction for pressure recovery, the proportion of LG severe AS decreased from 57% to 13% (LF-LG severe AS decreased from 23% to 3%; NF-LG severe AS decreased from 34% to 10%). As a result, 25% of patients were reclassified as having HG severe AS (AVA ≤1cm2 and MPG ≥40mmHg) and 19% as having moderate AS. Hence, 77% of patients initially diagnosed with LG severe AS did not have "true" LG severe AS when the multiview approach and the pressure recovery phenomenon correction were used. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic flow misevaluation, resulting from lack of use of multiple windows evaluation and pressure recovery phenomenon correction, accounts for a large proportion of incorrectly graded AS and considerable overestimation of the frequency of LG severe AS with preserved LVEF.

Time course of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: Impact on long-term outcome beyond left ventricular reverse remodelling.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) at baseline versus immediately after and several months after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), beyond left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling, has yet to be investigated. AIM: To evaluate the clinical significance of secondary MR before and at two timepoints after CRT in a large cohort of consecutive patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced LV ejection fraction. METHODS: A total of 198 patients were recruited prospectively into a registry, and underwent echocardiography at baseline and immediately after CRT (on the day of hospital discharge). Echocardiography was also performed 9 months after CRT in 172 patients. The impact of significant secondary MR (≥moderate) on all-cause death, cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF was studied at each stage. RESULTS: The frequency of significant secondary MR decreased from 23% (n=45) to 8% (n=16) immediately after CRT. Among the 172 patients who underwent echocardiography 9 months after CRT, 17 (10%) had significant secondary MR. During a median follow-up of 48 months, 49 patients died and 36 were hospitalized for HF. Patients with significant secondary MR immediately after or 9 months after CRT had an increased risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF during follow-up (P<0.05 for all endpoints). After adjustment for LV reverse remodelling, significant secondary MR 9 months after CRT remained associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.77; P=0.014), cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 5.36; P=0.037), and hospitalization for HF (adjusted HR 7.33; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant secondary MR despite CRT provides important prognostic information beyond LV reverse remodelling. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of new percutaneous procedures for mitral valve repair in improving outcome in these very high-risk patients.

Relationship between exercise pressure gradient and haemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We hypothesized that large exercise-induced increases in aortic mean pressure gradient can predict haemodynamic progression during follow-up in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area<1.5cm2 or<1cm2) and normal ejection fraction, who underwent an exercise stress echocardiography at baseline with a normal exercise test and a resting echocardiography during follow-up. The relationship between exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient and annualised changes in resting mean pressure gradient during follow-up was investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (mean age 66±15 years; 45% severe aortic stenosis) were included. Aortic mean pressure gradient significantly increased from rest to peak exercise (P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 1.6 [1.1-3.2] years, resting mean pressure gradient increased from 35±13mmHg to 48±16mmHg, P<0.0001. Median annualised change in resting mean pressure gradient during follow-up was 5 [2-11] mmHg. Exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient did correlate with annualised changes in mean pressure gradient during follow-up (r=0.35, P=0.01). Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis was faster in patients with large exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient (≥20mmHg) as compared to those with exercise-induced increase in aortic mean pressure gradient<20mmHg (median annualised increase in mean pressure gradient 19 [6-28] vs. 4 [2-10] mmHg/y respectively, P=0.002). Similar results were found in the subgroup of 30 patients with moderate aortic stenosis. CONCLUSION: Large exercise-induced increases in aortic mean pressure gradient correlate with haemodynamic progression of stenosis during follow-up in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Further studies are needed to fully establish the role of ESE in the decision-making process in comparison to other prognostic markers in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis.

Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: Implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies.

BACKGROUND: Speckle tracking can be used to measure left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS). AIMS: To study the effect of speckle tracking software product upgrades on GLS values and intervendor consistency. METHODS: Subjects (patients or healthy volunteers) underwent systematic echocardiography with equipment from Philips and GE, without a change in their position. Off-line post-processing for GLS assessment was performed with the former and most recent upgrades from these two vendors (Philips QLAB 9.0 and 10.2; GE EchoPAC 12.1 and 13.1.1). GLS was obtained in three myocardial layers with EchoPAC 13.1.1. Intersoftware and intervendor consistency was assessed. Interobserver variability was tested in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Among 73 subjects (65 patients and 8 healthy volunteers), absolute values of GLS were higher with QLAB 10.2 compared with 9.0 (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.88; bias: 2.2%). Agreement between EchoPAC 13.1.1 and 12.1 varied by myocardial layer (13.1.1 only): midwall (ICC: 0.95; bias: -1.1%), endocardium (ICC: 0.93; bias: 1.6%) and epicardial (ICC: 0.80; bias: -3.3%). Although GLS was comparable for QLAB 9.0 versus EchoPAC 12.1 (ICC: 0.95; bias: 0.5%), the agreement was lower between QLAB 10.2 and EchoPAC 13.1.1 endocardial (ICC: 0.91; bias: 1.1%), midwall (ICC: 0.73; bias: 3.9%) and epicardial (ICC: 0.54; bias: 6.0%). Interobserver variability of all software products in a subset of 20 patients was excellent (ICC: 0.97-0.99; bias: -0.8 to 1.0%). CONCLUSION: Upgrades of speckle tracking software may be associated with significant changes in GLS values, which could affect intersoftware and intervendor consistency. This finding has important clinical implications for the longitudinal follow-up of patients with speckle tracking echocardiography.

Prognostic value of left ventricular reverse remodeling and performance improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the respective value of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (changes in LV end-systolic volume relative to baseline (ΔLVESV)) or LV performance improvement (ΔLV ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) or ΔGlobal longitudinal strain (GLS)) to predict long-term outcome in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients receiving routine cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: One hundred and seventy heart failure patients (NYHA classes II-IV, LVEF ≤ 35%, QRS width ≥ 120 ms) underwent echocardiography before and 9 months after CRT. The relationships between ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF, ΔGLS and outcome (all-cause mortality and/or CHF hospitalization, overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, CHF hospitalization) were investigated. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 32 months, 20 patients died and 27 were hospitalized for heart failure. ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF or ΔGLS were significantly associated with all-cause mortality or CHF hospitalization (adjusted hazard's ratio (HR) per standard deviation 0.58 (0.43-0.77), 0.39 (0.27-0.57) or 0.55 (0.37-0.83) respectively, all p < 0.01) and all other endpoints (all p < 0.01). Patients with ΔLVESV≥15%, ΔLVEF ≥ 10% and ΔGLS ≥ 1% had a reduced risk of mortality or CHF hospitalization (adjusted HR=0.25 (0.12-0.51), p < 0.001, adjusted HR = 0.26 (0.13-0.54), p < 0.001 and adjusted HR 0.38 (0.19-0.75), p = 0.006 respectively). Overall performance of multivariate models was better using ΔLVESV or ΔLVEF compared with ΔGLS. Interobserver agreement was excellent for ΔLVESV (Intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC-0.91) and ΔGLS (ICC 0.90) but modest for ΔLVEF (ICC 0.76) in a sample of 20 patients from the study population. CONCLUSIONS: LV reverse remodeling assessed by ΔLVESV is a strong and reproducible predictor of outcome following CRT. Compared with ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF and ΔGLS have important shortcomings: poorer reproducibility or lower predictive value.

Quantitative Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation Secondary to Mitral Valve Prolapse by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography.

The present prospective study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitant fraction (MRF) by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in the modern era using as reference method the blinded multiparametric integrative assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) MRF by echocardiography (2D echo MRF and 3D echo MRF) were obtained by measuring the difference in left ventricular (LV) total stroke volume (obtained from either 2D or 3D acquisition) and aortic forward stroke volume normalized to LV total stroke volume. MRF was calculated by cMRI using either (1) (LV stroke volume - systolic aortic outflow volume by phase contrast)/LV stroke volume (cMRI MRF [volumetric]) or (2) (mitral inflow volume - systolic aortic outflow volume)/mitral inflow volume (cMRI MRF [phase contrast]). Six patients had 1 + MR, 6 patients had 2 + MR, 12 patients had 3 + MR, and 10 had 4 + MR. A significant correlation was observed between MR grading and 2D echo MRF (r = 0.60, p <0.0001) and 3D echo MRF (r = 0.79, p <0.0001), cMRI MRF (volumetric) (r = 0.87, p <0.0001), and cMRI MRF (phase contrast r = 0.72, p <0.001). The accuracy of MRF for the diagnosis of MR ≥3+ or 4+ was the highest with cMRI MRF (volumetric) (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.98), followed by 3D echo MRF (AUC = 0.96), 2D echo MRF (AUC = 0.90), and cMRI MRF (phase contrast; AUC = 0.83). In conclusion, MRF by cMRI (volumetric method) and 3D echo MRF had the highest diagnostic value to detect significant MR, whereas the diagnostic value of 2D echo MRF and cMRI MRF (phase contrast) was lower. Hence, the present study suggests that both cMRI (volumetric method) and 3D echo represent best approaches for calculating MRF.

Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes: a three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic pilot study.

AIMS: To investigate the value of assessment of mitral regurgitant fraction (RF) using left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) to quantify primary mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with primary MR in sinus rhythm were prospectively enrolled. RF was calculated using either 2DE or 3DE LV volumes obtained as follows: (LV total stroke volume - LV forward stroke volume by Doppler)/LV total stroke volume. Severity of MR was graded independently by two cardiologists blinded to LV volumetric data using an integrative approach, as recommended by current guidelines. Sixty patients with LV ejection fraction >50% and no MR were also studied. In patients without MR, 3D total LV stroke volume was more strongly correlated with LV forward stroke volume than 2D total LV stroke volume (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001 vs. r = 0.62, P < 0.0001, respectively). The 3D method had a feasibility of 90% in patients with MR. Inter-reader concordance for MR grading (four grades) was excellent with a Kappa-value of 0.90, P < 0.0001. A significant correlation was observed between grade of MR severity and 3D RF (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) and 2D RF (r = 0.74, P < 0.0001). Comparisons between individual grades for 3D RF were significant (P < 0.05) except for 3+ vs. 4+ MR (P = 0.213). All patients with 3D RF ≥40% had ≥3+ or 4+ MR and those with 3D RF ≤30% had 1+ or 2+ MR with a 'grey' overlap zone between 30 and 40%. CONCLUSIONS: RF can be routinely determined using 3D LV volumes with a high feasibility in patients with primary MR and is reliable for identification of Grade 3+ or Grade 4+ MR. The incorporation of this parameter into the currently recommended multiparametric integrative approach might be helpful to discriminate significant MR.