Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 27, 2022 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence regarding the role of respirators in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We analysed the impact of filtering facepiece class 2 (FFP2) versus surgical masks on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition among Swiss healthcare workers (HCW). METHODS: Our prospective multicentre cohort enrolled HCW from June to August 2020. Participants were asked about COVID-19 risk exposures/behaviours, including preferentially worn mask type when caring for COVID-19 patients outside of aerosol-generating procedures. The impact of FFP2 on (1) self-reported SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal PCR/rapid antigen tests captured during weekly surveys, and (2) SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion between baseline and January/February 2021 was assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 3259 participants from nine healthcare institutions, whereof 716 (22%) preferentially used FFP2. Among these, 81/716 (11%) reported a SARS-CoV-2-positive swab, compared to 352/2543 (14%) surgical mask users; seroconversion was documented in 85/656 (13%) FFP2 and 426/2255 (19%) surgical mask users. Adjusted for baseline characteristics, COVID-19 exposure, and risk behaviour, FFP2 use was non-significantly associated with decreased risk for SARS-CoV-2-positive swab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-1.0) and seroconversion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0); household exposure was the strongest risk factor (aHR 10.1, 95% CI 7.5-13.5; aOR 5.0, 95% CI 3.9-6.5). In subgroup analysis, FFP2 use was clearly protective among those with frequent (> 20 patients) COVID-19 exposure (aHR 0.7 for positive swab, 95% CI 0.5-0.8; aOR 0.6 for seroconversion, 95% CI 0.4-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Respirators compared to surgical masks may convey additional protection from SARS-CoV-2 for HCW with frequent exposure to COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Masks , Respiratory Protective Devices , Adolescent , Adult , Aerosols , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Seroconversion , Switzerland , Young Adult
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(9): 1336-1344, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34020033

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Protecting healthcare workers (HCWs) from coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is critical to preserve the functioning of healthcare systems. We therefore assessed seroprevalence and identified risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositivity in this population. METHODS: Between 22 June 22 and 15 August 2020, HCWs from institutions in northern/eastern Switzerland were screened for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We recorded baseline characteristics, non-occupational and occupational risk factors. We used pairwise tests of associations and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: Among 4664 HCWs from 23 healthcare facilities, 139 (3%) were seropositive. Non-occupational exposures independently associated with seropositivity were contact with a COVID-19-positive household (adjusted OR 59, 95% CI 33-106), stay in a COVID-19 hotspot (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.2) and male sex (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). Blood group 0 vs. non-0 (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8), active smoking (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7), living with children <12 years (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) and being a physician (aOR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5) were associated with decreased risk. Other occupational risk factors were close contact to COVID-19 patients (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.4), exposure to COVID-19-positive co-workers (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-2.9), poor knowledge of standard hygiene precautions (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9) and frequent visits to the hospital canteen (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8). DISCUSSION: Living with COVID-19-positive households showed the strongest association with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. We identified several potentially modifiable work-related risk factors, which might allow mitigation of the COVID-19 risk among HCWs. The lower risk among those living with children, even after correction for multiple confounders, is remarkable and merits further study.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/immunology , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Sex Characteristics , Socioeconomic Factors , Switzerland/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(5): 604-608, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33028454

ABSTRACT

In this prospective cohort of 1,012 Swiss hospital employees, 3 different assays were used to screen serum for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Seropositivity was 1%; the positive predictive values of the lateral-flow immunoassay were 64% (IgG) and 13% (IgM). History of fever and myalgia most effectively differentiated seropositive and seronegative participants.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Immunoassay , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Rev Saude Publica ; 50: 17, 2016.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27191153

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to describe the digital disease detection and participatory surveillance in different countries. The systems or platforms consolidated in the scientific field were analyzed by describing the strategy, type of data source, main objectives, and manner of interaction with users. Eleven systems or platforms, developed from 1996 to 2016, were analyzed. There was a higher frequency of data mining on the web and active crowdsourcing as well as a trend in the use of mobile applications. It is important to provoke debate in the academia and health services for the evolution of methods and insights into participatory surveillance in the digital age.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/instrumentation , Mobile Applications , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Brazil , Data Collection/trends , Humans , Internet , Medical Informatics , Mobile Applications/classification , Mobile Applications/trends , Public Health
5.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 2(1): e10, 2014 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25099881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using the Android platform as a notification instrument for diseases and disorders forms a new alternative for computerization of epidemiological studies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to construct a tool for gathering epidemiological data on schistosomiasis using the Android platform. METHODS: The developed application (app), named the Schisto Track, is a tool for data capture and analysis that was designed to meet the needs of a traditional epidemiological survey. An initial version of the app was finished and tested in both real situations and simulations for epidemiological surveys. RESULTS: The app proved to be a tool capable of automation of activities, with data organization and standardization, easy data recovery (to enable interfacing with other systems), and totally modular architecture. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed Schisto Track is in line with worldwide trends toward use of smartphones with the Android platform for modeling epidemiological scenarios.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL