ABSTRACT
Background: Individuals experienced increased social isolation resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies have found social isolation and loneliness to be strongly associated with anxiety and depression, which have been associated with increased smoking and vaping rates among young adults, including college students.Objectives: To examine relationships between psychological distress and nicotine use within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey (n = 4634; 77.9% female) was used to collect nicotine use and psychological measures from students enrolled at a large Midwestern university. Timeline follow-back data were collected from students reporting current cigarette or electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use in the week before and immediately following the closure of campus due to the pandemic. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the interaction between nicotine use and psychological symptoms across the 2-week period.Results: Both cigarette (Rate ratio (RR) = 1.115, 95% CI = 1.061, 1.171, p < .0001) and e-cigarette (ß = 0.258, 95% CI = 0.166, 0.351, p < .0001) use increased significantly following campus closure. Students experiencing higher levels of depression reported greater increases in e-cigarette use frequency over time as compared to students reporting fewer symptoms of depression (ß = 0.018, 95% CI = 0.006, 0.030, p = .004).Conclusions: Increases in nicotine use were found immediately following the implementation of public health safety measures that closed most university campuses. Additional and/or increased stressors have potentially impacted young adults who are college students as a result of campus closures resulting from the pandemic, which may have contributed to further increases in nicotine use.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Psychological Distress , Tobacco Products , Vaping , Young Adult , Humans , Female , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , Vaping/epidemiology , Nicotine , Universities , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Rates of e-cigarette use among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) remain high despite several federal policy changes intended to limit their availability and appeal. The current study examined how restricting flavors would affect current AYA users' intentions to discontinue vaping, as a function of their current flavor preference. METHOD: In a national cross-sectional survey, AYA e-cigarette users (N = 1,414) completed measures of e-cigarette use, device type, e-liquid flavor (tobacco, menthol, cool mint, fruit ice, fruit/sweet), and intent to discontinue e-cigarette use in response to hypothetical federal product standards (i.e., tobacco and menthol or tobacco-only e-liquid). Logistic regression was used to model the association of preferred flavor with odds of discontinuing e-cigarette use (vs. continuing), for menthol and tobacco hypothetical product standards. RESULTS: Overall, 38.8% of the sample reported intent to discontinue using their e-cigarette if tobacco and menthol-flavored e-liquid were the only options available, whereas 70.8% would discontinue under a tobacco-only product standard. AYAs preferring fruit/sweet flavor were most sensitive to either restricted scenario, with odds of discontinuing use ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.22 to aOR = 2.38 under a tobacco and menthol product standard and aOR = 1.33 to aOR = 2.59 under a tobacco-only product standard, compared with other flavor preferences. In addition, AYAs using cooling flavors (e.g., fruit ice) reported higher odds of discontinuing use under a tobacco-only product standard, compared with menthol flavor users, indicating an important distinction between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate potential for flavor restrictions to reduce use of e-cigarettes among AYAs and suggest that a tobacco flavor product standard may result in the greatest discontinuation of use.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Tobacco Products , Humans , Young Adult , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ice , MentholABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have found positive associations between internalizing and externalizing symptoms and the initiation of tobacco use among adolescents. However, few studies have examined the relationship between these symptoms and sustained tobacco use patterns or how they may vary as a function of sex. The current study examined whether these symptoms predict initiation and sustained use of multiple tobacco products within a longitudinal cohort design. METHOD: Waves 1-3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-2016) were used to assess relationships between internalizing and externalizing symptoms, sex, and tobacco use categories (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, poly-tobacco use, other tobacco use) in 6,170 adolescents (M age = 13.42, SD = 1.10) who were tobacco naive at Wave 1. RESULTS: Internalizing and externalizing symptoms predicted initiation of several tobacco categories at the 2-year follow-up. Examining sustained use patterns revealed a more consistent relationship with externalizing symptoms across tobacco categories, whereas associations with internalizing symptoms were limited. Sex moderated the relationship between elevated internalizing symptoms and increased odds of subsequent e-cigarette and poly-tobacco initiation, with stronger relationships observed among females. In addition, the relationship between elevated externalizing symptoms and sustained other tobacco use was stronger in females as compared with males. CONCLUSIONS: Although both internalizing and externalizing symptoms predict tobacco initiation across several product categories, externalizing symptoms may reflect a more reliable signal of sustained tobacco use in adolescents. Mental health symptoms and subsequent tobacco use differed by sex, with females demonstrating stronger relationships for several products.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Tobacco Products , Adolescent , Male , Female , Humans , Child , Nicotiana , Longitudinal Studies , Tobacco Use/epidemiology , Tobacco Use/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in treating several Substance Use Disorders including Tobacco Use Disorder. However, questions remain regarding how to optimize treatment outcomes. Enhancement of working memory by rTMS is a potential therapeutic mechanism. The current pilot study examined whether rTMS plus a cognitive training program could enhance the effects of rTMS on smoking behaviors using a controlled, factorial design. AIMS AND METHODS: We hypothesized that cognitive training plus stimulation would improve control over smoking behaviors, resulting in enhanced cognitive performance and increased latency to smoke on a delay to smoking analog task. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, nicotine dependent smokers (n = 43) were randomized to receive 10 sessions of active (10 Hz) or sham rTMS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, plus active or sham working memory training (WMT) prior to and following stimulation. RESULTS: Contrary to hypotheses, we observed a significant interaction effect, indicating that combining the two active interventions (rTMS+WMT) resulted in worse performance on the smoking analog task (B = -33.0, 95% CI = -64.39, -1.61, p < .05), compared to delivering either intervention alone. Additionally, although active rTMS (compared to sham rTMS) improved letter-sequencing performance (B = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.08-2.38, p < .05), and active WMT (compared to sham WMT) improved back-digit task performance (B = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.02-3.05, p < .05), combining interventions worsened the effect of each on a back-digit task (B = -3.01, 95% CI = -5.96, -0.052, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicate potential iatrogenic effects of combining rTMS and this working memory training intervention and underscore the need for rigorous evaluation of substance specific conceptual frameworks when selecting future combination interventions. IMPLICATIONS: Counter to hypothesis, this study found no additional benefit of adding a working memory training program to a rTMS protocol in a sample of daily smokers. The combination condition (active rTMS + active training) resulted in worse performance on a delay to smoking analog task and a measure of working memory performance compared to delivering either intervention alone. These preliminary findings inform strategies for optimizing rTMS in smokers and highlight the need for future studies to consider several key components of candidate combination interventions, including effects on regulation of substance use. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION (IF ANY): The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03337113).
Subject(s)
Memory, Short-Term , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Cognition , Feasibility Studies , Pilot Projects , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Smoking , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective: To examine changes in psychological distress of college students as a function of demographic and psychological variables over time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants: Subjects were recruited from a large public university in Northeast Ohio using electronic surveys administered at three time points in 2020. Methods: Demographics, positive psychological metrics (flourishing, perceived social support, and resilience) and psychological distress were collected and a mixed linear model was run to estimate their effect on change in distress. Results: Psychological distress did not change significantly across time. Females experienced more psychological distress than males. Higher levels of flourishing, perceived social support, and resilience were associated with less distress overall. Conclusions: Although psychological distress did not change across observed time, previous data suggests heightened psychological distress that remained elevated across observed time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Positive psychological variables were shown to mitigate psychological distress, and the relationship was stable over time.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examined caregiver perception of harm and child secondhand exposure to nicotine in a sample of e-cigarette-exclusive, cigarette-exclusive, and non-tobacco/nicotine users (non-users). METHODS: Cigarette-exclusive (n = 19), e-cigarette-exclusive (n = 12), and non-users (n = 20) and their children (N = 51, Mage = 10.47) completed self-report questionnaires about perceptions of harm, child secondhand exposure, and provided urine to assess child nicotine exposure (cotinine). ANOVAs examined differences between caregiver use status on tobacco harm perceptions and child cotinine levels. Independent samples t-test compared differences in caregiver-reported child secondhand exposure in the home and car. RESULTS: All 3 caregiver groups rated cigarettes as highly harmful (P = .14), but e-cigarette users rated all 3 types of e-cigarette products (Cartridge-based: P < .001; Tank: P < .001; Box Mod: P < .001) as less harmful than cigarette users and non-users. Caregivers from the e-cigarette user group reported greater child secondhand exposure than caregivers using cigarettes (past 7-day in-home exposure (P = .03); past 7-day exposure in-home + in-car exposure (P = .02); in-home exposure by caregivers and other people exposure (P = .02)). Children from the cigarette user group had significantly higher levels of cotinine (M = 16.6, SD = 21.7) compared to children from the Non-User group (M = .43, SD = .95; P = .001), but no significant difference when compared to children from the E-Cigarette User group (M = 6.5, SD = 13.5). DISCUSSION: In this sample, caregivers who used e-cigarettes perceived them as less harmful, reported using them more frequently at home and in the car, even when their children were present, compared to cigarette users. As a result, children appear to be exposed to nicotine at levels similar to children living with cigarette users. Future caregiver prevention and intervention efforts should target education around the potential harms of secondhand e-cigarette aerosol to children.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The current study examined differences between individuals identifying as transgender and people identifying as cisgender in terms of (1) psychological distress (eg, anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation), (2) rates of combustible and e-cigarette use, and (3) the potential for elevated psychological distress stemming from transgender identification to be associated with increased rates of smoking and vaping. METHOD: This was a secondary analysis of data from a study examining behavioral health, perceptions and behaviors associated with alcohol and other drug use, and mental health status at a large mid-western university. Differences in current use of cigarette and e-cigarette products were examined between self-identified transgender (n = 253) and cisgender (n = 18 371) respondents. RESULTS: Overall, 17.2% (n = 2727) of the sample endorsed past 30-day use of cigarettes or e-cigarettes. Results demonstrated a significant effect of gender identity, with individuals identifying as transgender reporting higher odds of using cigarettes or e-cigarettes (AOR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.26-6.31). Regression analyses revealed significant effects of transgender identity on symptoms of anxiety (b = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.64, 5.25, P < .001.); depression, (b = 4.14, 95% CI = 2.21, 6.07, P < .001); and suicidal ideation, (b = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.48, 3.55, P < .001.), respectively. Finally, we observed significant indirect effects of transgender identity on cigarette and e-cigarette product use via increased symptoms of depression (indirect effect = 0.13, 95% CI [0.07, 0.19], P < .05), and suicidal ideation (indirect effect = 0.22, 95% CI [0.15, 0.28], P < .05), but not symptoms of anxiety. DISCUSSION: This is the first study of our knowledge to examine the association between psychological symptoms and smoking and vaping products with transgender identity. The results of this study support previous findings that transgender individuals are at risk for elevated substance use and extend the literature by demonstrating this this risk is associated with elevated psychological distress.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Youth nicotine dependence may vary by e-cigarette device used. METHODS: E-cigarette device type ("JUUL," "similar pod/JUUL like device (i.e., pod mod)," or "other type of e-cigarette" (i.e., tank, mod)), nicotine dependence (Hooked on Nicotine Checklist; HONC), frequency of e-cigarette use (i.e., weekly, daily, monthly), and covariates were examined via a convenience sample of youth who use e-cigarettes in the United States via an online Qualtrics panel survey from April 2019 to May 2019. RESULTS: Youth aged 13-17 (Mean age = 15.9 years, SD = 1.0 year; n = 185) were mostly 72.4% female. Primary device used by category was endorsed as follows: JUUL n = 87, pod mod n = 42, and other type of e-cigarette n = 56. Participants endorsed an average of 4.5 / 10 HONC symptoms (SD = 3.6). Compared to other e-cigarettes, youth who used JUUL and pod mod devices endorsed more dependence symptoms, even when adjusting for current smoking status (JUUL IRR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.30-2.97; pod mod device IRR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.08-2.87). In total, HONC symptoms significantly differed by device for 8/10 symptoms, with JUUL and pod mod users reporting higher frequency of items compared to other e-cigarette devices. CONCLUSIONS: Features of nicotine dependence experienced by youth (i.e., feeling a stronger urge to vape) differed by primary device used, with those using JUUL and pod-mods reporting a greater level of dependence. Regulation of features of e-cigarette devices that may increase nicotine delivery and subsequent development of dependence among youth warrant urgent consideration.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Tobacco Use Disorder , Vaping , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Negative emotion and craving to smoke are established factors driving the maintenance of combustible cigarette use and dependence. The current study aimed to examine whether these findings extend to e-cigarette use. Toward that aim, change in vaping urge following abstinence was examined as a function of negative emotion. Additionally, a mediation model which previously demonstrated relationships between negative emotion, craving, and combustible cigarette dependence was tested in e-cigarette users. METHOD: Daily e-cigarette users (N = 32, Mage = 21 years, SDage = 7 years; 78% white) completed a battery of psychological, behavioral, and smoking-related measures in a human laboratory setting. Using their personal devices, participants completed a 5-minute ad-libitum vaping session, a baseline measure of vaping urge, followed by a 2-hour observed abstinence period and a final assessment of vaping urge. RESULTS: Multivariate regression and two mediation models were utilized to examine factors associated with vaping dependence. The results of these models indicated that negative affect predicted vaping urge following observed abstinence. The relationship between negative affect and measures of vaping dependence and habit, respectively, were significantly mediated by changes in urge during the abstinence period. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate that psychological constructs underlying vaping dependence are similar to those previously found to be associated with combustible cigarette dependence. Further research examining whether these constructs, namely negative affect and change in urge following abstinence, will be important variables to target for vaping cessation treatments is needed.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Smoking Cessation , Vaping , Adult , Child , Emotions , Humans , Smokers , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created disruptions to daily life resulting in wide-spread unemployment and psychological distress. Recent studies have reported high rates of alcohol use during this time; however, longitudinal data remain scarce and factors associated with increases in high-risk drinking observed over time are unknown. AIMS: The current study examined changes in high-risk drinking patterns across four 7-day observation periods, prior to and following a university wide campus closure. Additionally, factors associated with changes in alcohol use patterns were examined including financial distress, psychological distress, impact of racial tensions and virus-related fears. METHOD: Students (N = 1001) in the Midwestern USA completed repeated assessments between March and June 2020. Each survey included a timeline follow-back measure of alcohol use. Pandemic-related distress spanning several factors was assessed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Risky drinking patterns increased significantly over time. Overall, psychological distress and impact of racial tensions were associated with higher rates of risky drinking, whereas COVID-19-related fears were associated with lower rates. However, only financial-related distress was associated with an increase in risky drinking patterns over time. CONCLUSIONS: Increased risky drinking patterns observed in the current study may signal problems that are likely to persist even after the direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily life ends. Individuals experiencing financial distress may represent a particularly high-risk group. Interventions targeting the cross-section of job loss, financial stress and problematic alcohol use will be important to identify.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Fear , Psychological Distress , Race Relations/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Income , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Risk-Taking , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Students , Universities , Young AdultABSTRACT
Amidst the coronavirus pandemic, universities across the country abruptly closed campuses and transitioned to remote learning. The effects of these unprecedented closures are unknown. The current study examined reported alcohol consumption during the week prior to and after campus closure at a public university in Northeast Ohio. Analysis of data from 1,958 students, who endorsed using alcohol in the past 30 days, demonstrates that alcohol consumption (amount and frequency) increased as time progressed. Those with more symptoms of depression and anxiety reported greater increases in alcohol consumption (assessed via retrospective timeline follow-back) compared to students with fewer symptoms. Furthermore, students with greater perceived social support reported less alcohol consumption. Together, these findings highlight the need for universities to offer services and programs to students that will minimize risk factors and maximize protective factors in order to reduce or prevent alcohol abuse during the coronavirus pandemic.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking in College/psychology , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Social Support , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Students/psychology , Adult , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Ohio , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Students/statistics & numerical data , Universities , Young AdultABSTRACT
The current study examined changes in prevalence of e-cigarette use and perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarette and combustible cigarettes following a campus-wide tobacco ban. Undergraduate students completed surveys of tobacco use and perceived product harmfulness. Four samples were collected: in 2013 prior to the ban (n = 792) and in fall 2014 (n = 310), 2015 (n = 208), and 2016 (n = 417). E-cigarette use increased in the years following the ban (p = .01) while combustible cigarette use decreased from 2013 to 2016 (p = .02). Men were more likely than women to use both products (ps < .05). Students' perceptions of the harmfulness of combustible and electronic cigarettes remained stable in the years following the ban (p > .05). This study is the first to examine the impact of including e-cigarettes in tobacco free policies. Combustible cigarette use declined, but e-cigarette use increased in the years following the e-cigarette ban. Prospective research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of e-cigarette bans.
Subject(s)
Smoke-Free Policy , Students/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Products/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Smoking/epidemiology , Vaping/epidemiology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Perception , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Sex Factors , Universities , Young AdultABSTRACT
There is growing interest in non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) as a novel treatment option for substance-use disorders (SUDs). Recent momentum stems from a foundation of preclinical neuroscience demonstrating links between neural circuits and drug consuming behavior, as well as recent FDA-approval of NIBS treatments for mental health disorders that share overlapping pathology with SUDs. As with any emerging field, enthusiasm must be tempered by reason; lessons learned from the past should be prudently applied to future therapies. Here, an international ensemble of experts provides an overview of the state of transcranial-electrical (tES) and transcranial-magnetic (TMS) stimulation applied in SUDs. This consensus paper provides a systematic literature review on published data - emphasizing the heterogeneity of methods and outcome measures while suggesting strategies to help bridge knowledge gaps. The goal of this effort is to provide the community with guidelines for best practices in tES/TMS SUD research. We hope this will accelerate the speed at which the community translates basic neuroscience into advanced neuromodulation tools for clinical practice in addiction medicine.
Subject(s)
Addiction Medicine/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/standards , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/standards , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methodsABSTRACT
The inability to stop or reduce substance use despite motivation to do so is thought to result, in part, from self-control failure and can be understood within the framework of dual process models of addiction. These models view addictive behavior as the relative balance between automatic impulses and executive decision processes. This review focuses on treatments that aim to improve executive decision processes which often become dysregulated and ineffective in individuals with substance use disorders. It is posited that improving these executive function deficits should restore control over automatic impulses and drug seeking behavior.
Subject(s)
Behavior, Addictive , Drug Therapy , Executive Function/physiology , Mindfulness , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Humans , MotivationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Complete abstinence from alcohol as well as smoking cessation have been shown to predict reductions in depressive symptoms over time. However, whether reducing alcohol use or smoking positively affect depressive symptoms has yet to be examined. The current study examined depressive symptoms as a function of time-varying changes in alcohol use and smoking status following a pharmaco-behavioral treatment addressing smoking cessation and alcohol reduction. METHODS: Participants were heavy-drinking smokers (n = 150) followed for 26 weeks after their quit smoking date, with assessments of smoking, alcohol use, and depressive symptoms at baseline and 2, 8, 16, and 26 weeks. RESULTS: Abstinence from smoking was associated with significantly lower depressive symptoms, as compared to little to no reduction in smoking (B = -6.1) as well as significant reductions in smoking (B = 4.01). Exploratory analyses, which excluded observations in which a participant was abstinent, revealed a significant effect of percent change in cigarettes smoked, modeled continuously, on depressive symptoms, (B = 4.39). By contrast, no differences were observed in depressive symptoms in relation to changes in alcohol use. CONCLUSION: It appears that smoking abstinence is associated with improvements in depression as compared to any level of sustained or reduced use and that the magnitude of smoking reduction may be associated with lower depressive symptoms among those who did not quit successfully. If replicated, these findings may inform treatment for individuals for whom depression is a major barrier to cessation and who have been unable or are unwilling to be completely abstinent from smoking.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/therapy , Behavior Therapy/trends , Depression/therapy , Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Tobacco Smoking/therapy , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Adult , Alcohol Deterrents/therapeutic use , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Behavior Therapy/methods , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Time Factors , Tobacco Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The relationship between depression and coping-oriented substance use is extensively documented; however, the cognitive processes moderating this bidirectional relationship are not well-understood. The present study investigated whether internal attribution bias coupled with a tendency to use drugs and/or alcohol to cope predicts increases in depression and daily-levels of general negative affectivity, sadness, and hostility. METHOD: Sixty-seven adults diagnosed with depression were recruited from out-patient treatment settings (66% female, 81% White, Mageâ¯=â¯31, SDageâ¯=â¯13.2). Participants completed measures on substance-related coping, depression, attributional style, and daily affect over a three-week period. RESULTS: Substance use to cope predicted increases in depression among individuals with high-level internal attribution bias. Further, coping via substance use moderated the relationship between internal attribution bias and daily-level sadness, such that sadness was highest among individuals with a high internal attribution bias coupled with greater levels of coping via substance use. A modest, yet, non-significant upward trend in daily-level hostility was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggested that depressed individuals who habitually perceive themselves as being responsible or blameworthy for negative life events are at an increased risk of worsening depressive symptoms and experiencing greater daily levels of sadness over a relatively brief period of time, particularly, when tending to engage in substance use as a mechanism to cope. This interaction effect can elicit greater daily-level sadness as well. Findings may aid in the identification and treatment of individuals at risk of maintaining or worsening their depressive symptoms.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological/drug effects , Affect/drug effects , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Self ReportABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cognitive susceptibility to cigarette smoking has been demonstrated to predict future cigarette initiation in adolescents. Examining this construct prior to tobacco product initiation may provide useful information on the differential risk of individuals initiating cigarette vs. e-cigarette products. Additionally, examining how susceptibility and tobacco product use relate to perceived harm cognitions will increase understanding of risk predisposition among adolescents. METHOD: Data were taken from a longitudinal study of middle school students (nâ¯=â¯1023; ageâ¯=â¯12.1, 52.2% female, 72.1% white) in the Northeastern U.S. Likelihood of e-cigarette and cigarette ever-use in high school was examined as a function of a validated index of cigarette smoking susceptibility among tobacco naïve students in middle school. Prospective associations between cognitive susceptibility to smoking and subsequent perceived harm of e-cigarettes (assessed in high school), and cross-sectional associations between concurrent tobacco product ever-use status and perceived harm of e-cigarettes were examined. RESULTS: Adolescents classified as susceptible to cigarette smoking in middle school were more likely to initiate use of cigarettes (ORâ¯=â¯2.53) and e-cigarettes (ORâ¯=â¯1.95) as compared to adolescents classified as non-susceptible; cigarette smoking susceptibility did not differentially predict use of one product over the other. Adolescents endorsing e-cigarette use, reported significantly less perceived harm associated with e-cigarettes vs. cigarettes, while those who endorsed cigarette only or dual use did not. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that cognitive susceptibility to cigarette smoking may index a broad risk factor for using either cigarettes or e-cigarettes in the future, and is prospectively associated with perceived harm of e-cigarette use. Overall, those who used any tobacco product perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful when compared to abstainers. Individual facets of perceived harm (addiction potential and harm vs. cigarettes) differ between cigarette only users and e-cigarette users and may help to explain the choice to use one product vs. the other. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to examine prospective associations between cognitive susceptibility to cigarette smoking, predating tobacco use, and subsequent likelihood of cigarette vs. e-cigarette initiation. This study demonstrates that initiation of either product is elevated among youth who are susceptible to smoking; thus susceptibility to smoking may serve as a useful marker of vulnerability to tobacco product use. Furthermore, this study provides novel information on the relationship between tobacco product onset and specific harm perceptions associated with e-cigarettes versus cigarettes among adolescents.
Subject(s)
Awareness , Cognition , Risk-Taking , Smoking/psychology , Vaping/psychology , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , New England , Smoking/adverse effects , Vaping/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Three key domains including negative emotionality, incentive salience, and executive function form the core functional elements of addictive behaviors. Variables related to these broader domains have been studied extensively in relation to one another; however, no studies to date, have examined models including variables from all three domains, in relation to nicotine dependence. METHOD: Smokers (N = 117), 65.8% female, 78% white, mean age of 44.4 (SD = 10.8), enrolled in a smoking cessation program completed measures of negative affect (a component of negative emotionality), urge to smoke (incentive salience), and working memory (WM; a core executive function), during a baseline assessment period prior to initiating treatment. RESULTS: Negative affect was associated with greater urge to smoke, and this elevated urge to smoke was associated with higher levels of nicotine dependence. Further, a significant moderated mediation indicated that WM moderated the relationship between increased urge to smoke and nicotine dependence. For those with low to average WM, urge to smoke was significantly related to nicotine dependence; however, for those with higher WM (+1 SD), urge to smoke stemming from negative affect was not associated with nicotine dependence. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first reported relationship between negative affect, urge to smoke, WM, and nicotine dependence. Although preliminary, results indicate that WM may moderate the relationship between urge to smoke associated with negative affect and nicotine dependence. Treatments targeting WM may be particularly useful for individuals with average to low WM who experience urge to smoke related to negative affect.
Subject(s)
Affect/physiology , Craving/physiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Adult , Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
The comorbidity between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is well-established, and the 2 disorders share many similarities. However, there are also differences across disorders: most notably, BPD is diagnosed more frequently in women and ASPD in men. We investigated if (a) comorbidity between BPD and ASPD is attributable to 2 discrete disorders or the expression of common underlying processes, and (b) if the model of comorbidity is true across sex. Using a clinical sample of 1,400 drug users in residential substance abuse treatment, we tested 3 competing models to explore whether the comorbidity of ASPD and BPD should be represented by a single common factor, 2 correlated factors, or a bifactor structure involving a general and disorder-specific factors. Next, we tested whether our resulting model was meaningful by examining its relationship with criterion variables previously reported to be associated with BPD and ASPD. The bifactor model provided the best fit and was invariant across sex. Overall, the general factor of the bifactor model significantly accounted for a large percentage of the variance in criterion variables, whereas the BPD and AAB specific factors added little to the models. The association of the general and specific factor with all criterion variables was equal for men and women. Our results suggest common underlying vulnerability accounts for both the comorbidity between BPD and AAB (across sex), and this common vulnerability drives the association with other psychopathology and maladaptive behavior. This in turn has implications for diagnostic classification systems and treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record
Subject(s)
Antisocial Personality Disorder/physiopathology , Borderline Personality Disorder/physiopathology , Psychometrics/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/physiopathology , Adult , Antisocial Personality Disorder/epidemiology , Borderline Personality Disorder/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Whether well-documented patterns of mental health comorbidity with adolescent combustible cigarette use extend to e-cigarette use is unclear. Demonstrating associations between e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use with mental health symptomatology across adolescence may be important for promoting accurate perceptions of populations at risk for and potential consequences of tobacco product use. Adolescents (N=2460; mean age at baseline=14.1; 53.4% female; 44.1% Hispanic) who had never previously used combustible or e-cigarettes were assessed at baseline, and 6- and 12-month follow-ups in Los Angeles, CA (2013-2014). Logistic regression was used to examine associations between baseline depressive symptoms and onset of e-cigarette and cigarette single product and dual use at follow-ups. Latent growth modeling was used to examine associations between sustained use of either product (vs. non-use) and changes in depressive symptoms over 12-months. Higher baseline depressive symptoms predicted subsequent onset of cigarette (OR=1.024, 95% C.I.=1.009-1.055), e-cigarette (OR=1.015, C.I.=1.003-1.023), and dual use of both products (OR=1.021, C.I.=1.003-1.043). Sustained use of e-cigarettes over the 12-month observation (vs. non-use) was associated with a greater rate of increase in depressive symptoms over time (b=1.272, SE=0.513, p=0.01). Among those who sustained use of e-cigarettes, higher frequency of use was associated with higher depressive symptoms at the final follow-up (B=1.611, p=0.04). A bi-directional association of depressive symptoms with e-cigarette use onset across mid adolescence was observed. Further research on the causal nature, etiological underpinnings, and intervention implications of mental health and tobacco product use comorbidity is warranted.