Protamine titration to optimize heparin antagonization after cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVES: To optimize protamine titration for heparin antagonization after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: A prospective, observational trial. SETTING: Single-center, non-university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients presenting for elective on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with or without single valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: At the end of CPB, the residual amount of heparin in the patient was estimated using a Bull-curve. The total protamine dose was calculated as 1 unit of protamine for 1 unit of heparin. Protamine was administered as 5 aliquots containing 20% of the total protamine dose each, with 2-min intervals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Activated Clotting Time (ACT) values were measured 2 min after administration of each aliquot. ROTEM(®)-analysis was performed after the full dose of protamine had been administered. After 60% of the total protamine dose had been administered, ACT values were normalized in 86.5% of patients. After the complete dose of protamine had been administered, 61.1% of patients displayed signs of protamine overdose on ROTEM(®)-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who present for on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with or without single valve surgery, a 0.6-to-1 ratio of protamine-to-heparin to antagonize heparin may be sufficient and beneficial for patients.

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation in severe heart failure: MitraClip versus minimally invasive surgical approach.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of MitraClip versus minimally invasive surgical mitral valve repair in high-risk patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and severe heart failure in a centre having pilot versus extensive experience with the MitraClip and the minimally invasive surgical approach, respectively. METHODS: The MitraClip group consisted of 24 high-surgical-risk patients [age 75 ± 9 years, 75% males, NYHA III/IV 88%, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 31 ± 9%, EuroSCORE II 18 ± 14%], while the surgical group consisted of 48 patients matched for age, NYHA class and LV ejection fraction. RESULTS: Patients undergoing MitraClip versus those undergoing surgical repair showed higher prevalence of ischaemic LV dysfunction and larger LV end-diastolic diameter (both P < 0.05). Both the MitraClip and the surgical repair groups had similar 30-day mortality rates (4 vs 13%, P = 0.41) and prevalence of serious adverse events (25 vs 38%, P = 0.43). The median follow-up was 1028 days (IQR: 272-1564 days) in the MitraClip group and 890 days (IQR: 436-1381 days) in the surgical group (P = 0.95). Total all-cause mortality (54 vs 60%, log-rank P = 0.64) and rates of rehospitalizations for heart failure (42 vs 29%, log-rank P = 0.68) did not differ significantly between groups. Both techniques were associated with significant decrease in NYHA class and severity of FMR (P < 0.001 for all) and with a similar degree of stabilization of LV remodelling (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Despite the significant baseline differences in accumulated expertise and risk profile between the surgical and the MitraClip groups, both minimally invasive techniques were associated with similar 30-day and long-term outcomes.

Accuracy of a feasibility version of an intravenous continuous glucose monitor in volunteers with diabetes and hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: A feasibility version of the GlucoClear™ continuous glucose monitoring system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), the intravenous blood glucose (IVBG) system, developed to facilitate glycemic management, was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two pilot studies were conducted. Ten volunteers with diabetes (1,725 matched pairs) and 10 patients scheduled for intensive care unit (ICU) admission following surgery (1,393 matched pairs) were studied. The patients' blood glucose concentrations were monitored by the IVBG system every 5 min for up to 72 h. The accuracy of the IVBG system was calculated and compared with the Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) (Yellows Springs, OH) and Radiometer (Copenhagen, Denmark) measurements to determine the percentage of matched pairs that met 15/20%, 10/15%, 12/12.5%, and 10/10% assessment criteria. Performance was calculated as the percentage of the total measurements that would have been displayed in an unblinded study. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: The accuracy of the IVBG system met the International Organization for Standardization ISO 15197 15/20% criterion (99.07% in volunteers, 99.43% in the ICU, and both vs. YSI) and the stricter 10/15% criterion (96.17% in volunteers, 96.77% in the ICU, and both vs. YSI) over the 72-h period and across a broad range of blood glucose concentrations. Performance was 89.97% in the ICU study. The adverse device effects included induration of the peripheral vein, mild bruising, and mild hematoma. In the volunteers, there were patency problems with six catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The IVBG system is safe, accurate, and reliable. This minimally invasive system was not affected by potentially interfering medications. Real-time measurements, alarms, and trends provided by the IVBG system might support glycemic control protocols and prevent glycemic events in critically ill patients.

Management of tight intraoperative glycemic control during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

OBJECTIVES: To optimize intra- and postoperative insulin management in cardiac surgical patients. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study. SETTING: A large nonuniversity hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty diabetics and 60 nondiabetics undergoing off-pump cardiac bypass surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Intra- and postoperative tight glycemic control were achieved using different approaches with a modified insulin protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nondiabetics were divided randomly: in the ND-ind group (n = 30), insulin was started at induction according to preinduction blood glucose (BG) concentrations. In group ND >110 (n = 30), insulin was started when BG concentrations exceeded 110 mg/dL during surgery. Up to 85% of the ND >110 group started on insulin intraoperatively. Intraoperatively, the ND-ind group had more BG within target (80-110 mg/dL) (p = 0.002), less BG >130 mg/dL (p = 0.015), and more BG between 70 and 79 mg/dL (p = 0.002). In diabetics, BG concentration was checked every 30 (DM-30), n = 30) versus 60 minutes (DM-60, n = 30) to improve the protocol's performance. Intraoperatively, there were more BG concentrations within target (80-110 mg/dL) (p = 0.02) and less >130 mg/dL (p = 0.0002) in the DM-30 group. During surgery, the hyperglycemic index and the glycemic penalty index were lower in the ND-ind group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the mean BG concentrations, hyperglycemic index, and glycemic penalty index in diabetics and nondiabetics were comparable between groups (p < 0.05). In the overall 2,641 BG samples, the lowest BG concentration in the operating room was 71 and in the intensive care unit (ICU) it was 61 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, tight perioperative glycemic control is feasible and efficient, with minimal risks for hypo- and hyperglycemia. In nondiabetics, starting insulin therapy from induction onwards results in more measurements within target, without affecting the mean BG. In diabetics, decreasing the sampling interval from 60 to 30 minutes results in more measurements within target and in a mean blood glucose within target at ICU arrival.

Perioperative blood glucose management in patients undergoing tumor hepatectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether our institutional insulin management (modified Atlanta) protocol is efficient and safe in controlling blood glucose levels in the perioperative period in surgical patients undergoing tumor hepatectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Large community hospital. PATIENTS: 20 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastasis, or other hepatobiliary tumors. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: All patients continuously received intravenous glucose (5% dextrose in water, one mL/kg/hr); insulin was administered according to a strict algorithm, and dose adjustments were based on measurements of whole-blood glucose intraoperatively at one-hour intervals, and in the intensive care unit (ICU). Lower and upper blood glucose limits were set at 85 mg/dL and 110 mg/dL, respectively, in the operating room (OR). In the ICU, lower and upper limits were 90 mg/dL and 140 mg/dL, respectively. MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperatively, 51.3% of measurements were within the target range. In the ICU, 75.2% of measurements showed a blood glucose level of 90 - 140 mg/dL. Two of 78 (2.6%) and two of 363 (0.5%) measurements had a blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL in the OR and ICU, respectively. The lowest blood glucose levels were 65 mg/dL (OR) and 66 mg/dL (ICU). CONCLUSIONS: The modified Atlanta protocol is efficient and safe in controlling blood glucose levels in the perioperative period of hepatic tumor resection. Because of decreased insulin needs in the ICU, the use of a more liberal algorithm successfully reduced the risk of hypoglycemia.

Intraoperative real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic measurement of hemodynamic, anatomic and functional changes after aortic valve replacement.

The traditional intraoperative two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2DTEE) has limitations in measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) because measurements rely on geometric assumptions. The availability of online software and real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) makes intraoperative LVEF measurements fast and easy. This is the first report of intraoperative measurement of LVEF and aortic valve area (AVA) by RT3-DTEE in a patient who received transcatheter-based transapical aortic valve implantation.

Tight glycaemic control: clinical implementation of protocols.

Implementation of tight glycaemic control in hospitalised patients presents a huge challenge. It concerns many patients, there are many interfering factors and many health-care professionals are involved. The current literature provides little practical guidance. This article offers the clinical anesthesiologist direction for the organisation of inpatient blood glucose control in acute situations, in the perioperative setting and in the intensive care unit. An effective, safe and user-friendly algorithm for intravenous insulin administration is presented that can be executed by regular nurses and used in many situations. Practical advice is offered for the use of subcutaneous basal-bolus insulin, for fasting orders and for transition to discharge care. The main safety considerations are discussed.

Tight perioperative glucose control is associated with a reduction in renal impairment and renal failure in non-diabetic cardiac surgical patients.

INTRODUCTION: Acute renal failure after cardiac surgery increases in-hospital mortality. We evaluated the effect of intra- and postoperative tight control of blood glucose levels on renal function after cardiac surgery based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage kidney failure (RIFLE) criteria, and on the need for acute postoperative dialysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed two groups of consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between August 2004 and June 2006. In the first group, no tight glycemic control was implemented (Control, n = 305). Insulin therapy was initiated at blood glucose levels > 150 mg/dL. In the group with tight glycemic control (Insulin, n = 745), intra- and postoperative blood glucose levels were targeted between 80 to 110 mg/dL, using the Aalst Glycemia Insulin Protocol. Postoperative renal impairment or failure was evaluated with the RIFLE score, based on serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate and/or urinary output. We used the Cleveland Clinic Severity Score to compare the predicted vs observed incidence of acute postoperative dialysis between groups. RESULTS: Mean blood glucose levels in the Insulin group were lower compared to the Control group from rewarming on cardiopulmonary bypass onwards until ICU discharge (p < 0.0001). Median ICU stay was 2 days in both groups. In non-diabetics, strict perioperative blood glucose control was associated with a reduced incidence of renal impairment (p = 0.01) and failure (p = 0.02) scoring according to RIFLE criteria, as well as a reduced incidence of acute postoperative dialysis (from 3.9% in Control to 0.7% in Insulin; p < 0.01). The 30-day mortality was lower in the Insulin than in the Control group (1.2% vs 3.6%; p = 0.02), representing a 70% decrease in non-diabetics (p < 0.05) and 56.1% in diabetics (not significant). The observed overall incidence of acute postoperative dialysis was adequately predicted by the Cleveland Clinic Severity Score in the Control group (p = 0.6), but was lower than predicted in the Insulin group (1.2% vs 3%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In non-diabetic patients, tight perioperative blood glucose control is associated with a significant reduction in postoperative renal impairment and failure after cardiac surgery according to the RIFLE criteria. In non-diabetics, tight blood glucose control was associated with a decreased need for postoperative dialysis, as well as 30-day mortality, despite of a relatively short ICU stay.

Usefulness of intraoperative real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography allow to obtain real-time 3D transesophageal (RT3DTEE) images intraoperatively. METHODS: Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed: hypertrophic ventricular septum (TTE:19.3 mm), systolic anterior motion (SAM) not causing obstruction and malcoaptation of the anterior mitral valve leaflet (AMVL), and posterior mitral valve leaflet (PMVL) with severe mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: Intraoperative TEE with a x7-2t MATRIX-array transducer (Philips, Andover, MA, USA) with a transducer frequency of x7-2 t mHz, connected to a iE33 (Philips), shows us that the main mechanism and site of regurgitation was an AMVL cleft. We also measured a 24.3-mm thickness of the ventricular septum and analyzing the 3D full volume acquisition revealed that there was no SAM. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative RT3DTEE permitted comprehensive 3D viewing of the mitral valve revealing the mechanism of mitral valve regurgitation, SAM, and the exact width of the hypertrophic ventricular septum.

Dynamic tight glycemic control during and after cardiac surgery is effective, feasible, and safe.

BACKGROUND: Tight blood glucose control reduces mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients, but intraoperative glucose control during cardiac surgery is often difficult, and risks hypoglycemia. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a nurse-driven insulin protocol (the Aalst Glycemia Insulin Protocol) for achieving a target glucose level of 80-110 mg/dL during cardiac surgery and in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We included 483 nondiabetics and 168 diabetics scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. To anticipate rapid perioperative changes in insulin requirement and/or sensitivity during surgery, we developed a dynamic algorithm presented in tabular form, with rows representing blood glucose ranges and columns representing insulin dosages based on the patients' insulin sensitivity. The algorithm adjusts insulin dosage based on blood glucose level and the projected insulin sensitivity (e.g., reduced sensitivity during cardiopulmonary bypass and normalizing sensitivity after surgery). RESULTS: A total of 18,893 blood glucose measurements were made during and after surgery. During surgery, the mean glucose level in nondiabetic patients was within targeted levels except during (112 +/- 17 mg/dL) and after rewarming (113 +/- 19 mg/dL) on cardiopulmonary bypass. In diabetics, blood glucose was decreased from 121 +/- 40 mg/dL at anesthesia induction to 112 +/- 26 mg/dL at the end of surgery (P < 0.05), with 52.9% of patients achieving the target. In the ICU, the mean glucose level was within targeted range at all time points, except for diabetics upon ICU arrival (113 +/- 24 mg/dL). Of all blood glucose measurements (operating room and ICU), 68.0% were within the target, with 0.12% of measurements in nondiabetics and 0.18% in diabetics below 60 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia < 50 mg/dL was avoided in all but four (0.6%) patients (40 mg/dL was the lowest observed value). CONCLUSIONS: The Aalst Glycemia Insulin Protocol is effective for maintaining tight perioperative blood glucose control during cardiac surgery with minimal risk of hypoglycemia.

Intraoperative real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of right atrial tumor.

Right atrial myxomas are uncommon heart tumors that can simulate nonspecific symptoms, such as fever, paroxysmal palpitations, chronic anemia, weight loss, and may escape timely diagnosis until the development of severe complications due to embolism. We present a patient with a history of palpitations. In search for the source of palpitations, a 2D transthoracic echocardiography was performed, showing a right atrial mass. Real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3DTEE) was performed intraoperative and demonstrated very accurate information about the size and the morphology of the tumor. This is the first case report of a right atrial myxoma visualized intraoperatively by RT3DTEE.

Preinduction glycemia and body mass index are important predictors of perioperative insulin management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether preinduction glucose is an important predictor for perioperative insulin management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Large community hospital. PATIENTS: 80 consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were subdivided into those with a preinduction blood glucose of 110 mg/dL or lower with or without history of diabetes (group 1) and those with a preinduction blood glucose of above 110 mg/dL with or without history of diabetes (group 2). In group 1, there were no known diabetics. In group 2, 31% (11/35) had diabetes (group 2DM), while 24/35 (69%) did not (group 2NDM). An insulin infusion was started intraoperatively and adjusted according to a strict protocol in order to maintain normoglycemia (80-110 mg/dL) until discharge from intensive care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with preinduction glucose above 110 mg/dL, whether or not previously treated for diabetes, perioperative insulin requirements were higher, and intraoperative insulin management was more difficult than in those with lower preinduction glucose. In patients with a preinduction glucose above 110 mg/dL, hospital stay was longer, and inhospital mortality was significantly higher than in those with lower preinduction glucose. Multivariate analyses showed that preinduction glycemia was a good predictor of intraoperative insulin consumption, as was the body mass index (BMI) for intensive care and total insulin needs. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgical patients with a preinduction glucose above 110 mg/dL, even if diabetes was not previously suspected, perioperative insulin requirements were higher, and intraoperative insulin management is more difficult than in those with a preinduction glucose 110 mg/dL or lower. Preinduction glycemia and BMI are good predictors of perioperative insulin management. Preinduction glycemia above 110 mg/dL predicts difficult perioperative glucose control and, moreover, that a preinduction blood glucose of 110 mg/dL or lower is associated with less insulin need.

The coronary and myocardial effects of remifentanil and sufentanil in the erythrocyte-perfused isolated rabbit heart.

Remifentanil-induced hypotension may be associated with adverse ischemic myocardial events. Although these events can be easily attributed to a decrease in coronary pressure perfusion, we tested the hypothesis that remifentanil could directly affect coronary vasomotor tone. Therefore, we assessed intrinsic coronary and myocardial in vitro effects of remifentanil on a Langendorff's rabbit model and compared these effects with those provoked by similar intracoronary concentrations of sufentanil. Under general anesthesia, hearts from New Zealand rabbits were rapidly excised and mounted on an erythrocyte-perfused and isolated heart preparation. The hearts were then exposed to increasing concentrations (10-1000 nM) of either remifentanil (n = 10) or sufentanil (n = 8). Between each concentration, hearts were allowed to return to baseline status. The maximal coronary and myocardial effects of each concentration of both drugs were noted. Baseline values of coronary blood flow and myocardial performances were comparable between groups. Neither remifentanil nor sufentanil induced significant coronary and myocardial effects. These results suggest that myocardial ischemia, which may occur during remifentanil-induced hemodynamic disturbances, especially in cardiac patients, is only related to a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure provoked by peripheral hemodynamic changes.

Poor intraoperative blood glucose control is associated with a worsened hospital outcome after cardiac surgery in diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Tight perioperative control of blood glucose improves the outcome of diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Because stress response and cardiopulmonary bypass can induce profound hyperglycemia, intraoperative glycemic control may become difficult. The authors undertook a prospective cohort study to determine whether poor intraoperative glycemic control is associated with increased intrahospital morbidity. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive diabetic patients undergoing on-pump heart surgery were enrolled. A standard insulin protocol based on subcutaneous intermediary insulin was given the morning of the surgery. Intravenous insulin therapy was initiated intraoperatively from blood glucose concentrations of 180 mg/dl or greater and titrated according to a predefined protocol. Poor intraoperative glycemic control was defined as four consecutive blood glucose concentrations greater than 200 mg/dl without any decrease in despite insulin therapy. Postoperative blood glucose concentrations were maintained below 140 mg/dl by using aggressive insulin therapy. The main endpoints were severe cardiovascular, respiratory, infectious, neurologic, and renal in-hospital morbidity. RESULTS: Insulin therapy was required intraoperatively in 36% of patients, and poor intraoperative glycemic control was observed in 18% of patients. Poor intraoperative glycemic control was significantly more frequent in patients with severe postoperative morbidity (37% vs. 10%; P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for severe postoperative morbidity among patients with a poor intraoperative glycemic control as compared with patients without was 7.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-19.0). CONCLUSION: Poor intraoperative control of blood glucose concentrations in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery is associated with a worsened hospital outcome after surgery.

Comparative cardiac effects of terlipressin, vasopressin, and norepinephrine on an isolated perfused rabbit heart.

BACKGROUND: Terlipressin, a synthetic analog of arginine-vasopressin (AVP), has been proposed as an effective vasopressive therapy in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Although beneficial effects of terlipressin on systemic arterial pressure have been clearly demonstrated, its intrinsic effects on coronary circulation and myocardial performances remain unknown. METHODS: The authors compared the coronary and myocardial effects of terlipressin (1-100 nM, n = 10), AVP (10-1000 pM, n = 10), and norepinephrine (1-100 nM, n = 10) on an erythrocyte-perfused isolated rabbit heart. The cardiac effects of terlipressin were also assessed in erythrocyte-perfused hearts in which the myocardial oxygen delivery was maintained constant and buffer-perfused hearts. Finally, the cardiac effects of terlipressin and AVP were studied in hearts pretreated by [d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)]AVP (0.1 microM), a selective V1a receptor antagonist. RESULTS: Norepinephrine induced a biphasic coronary effect associated with a concentration-dependent increase in myocardial performances. AVP and terlipressin significantly decreased coronary blood flow and impaired myocardial performances from 30 pM and 30 nM, respectively (P < 0.05). The cardiac side-effects of terlipressin were confirmed in buffer-perfused hearts but the maintenance of a constant myocardial oxygen delivery constant abolished its effects on myocardial performances. The cardiac effects induced by terlipressin and AVP were nearly completely abolished on hearts pretreated by [d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)]AVP. CONCLUSIONS: On isolated rabbit heart, terlipressin induced a coronary vasopressor effect and in turn myocardial depression only at supratherapeutic concentrations (> or =30 nM). Its effects are mainly mediated via V1a receptors. However, these potential negative side effects on the heart were less pronounced than were those of AVP.

Predictive performance and variability of the cardiac anesthesia risk evaluation score.

BACKGROUND: The Cardiac Anesthesia Risk Evaluation (CARE) score, a simple Canadian classification for predicting outcome after cardiac surgery, was evaluated in 556 consecutive patients in Paris, France. The authors compared its performance to those of two multifactorial risk indexes (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE] and Tu score) and tested its variability between groups of physicians (anesthesiologists, surgeons, and cardiologists). METHODS: Each patient was simultaneously assessed using the three scores by an attending anesthesiologist in the immediate preoperative period. In a blinded study, the CARE score category was also determined by a cardiologist the day before surgery, by a surgeon in the operating room, and by a second anesthesiologist at arrival in intensive care unit. Calibration and discrimination for predicting outcomes were assessed by goodness-of-fit test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, respectively. The level of agreement of the CARE scoring between the three physicians was then assessed. RESULTS: The calibration analysis revealed no significant difference between expected and observed outcomes for the three classifications. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for mortality were 0.77 with the CARE score, 0.78 with the EuroSCORE, and 0.73 with the Tu score (not significant). The agreement rate of the CARE scoring between two anesthesiologists, between anesthesiologists and surgeons, and between anesthesiologists and cardiologists were 90%, 83%, and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its simplicity, the CARE score predicts mortality and major morbidity as well the EuroSCORE. In addition, it remains devoid of significant variability when used by groups of physicians of different specialties.

Remifentanil induces systemic arterial vasodilation in humans with a total artificial heart.

BACKGROUND: To assess intrinsic vascular effects of remifentanil, increased concentrations were infused in critically ill patients with a total artificial heart. METHODS: In the early postoperative period after implantation of a total artificial heart, nine ventilated patients requiring short general anesthesia were included in this study. After anesthesia was induced with 0.3 mg/kg intravenous etomidate, the artificial heart settings were modified to render cardiac output "preload-independent." While maintenance of anesthesia was ensured by a continuous infusion of etomidate, increased concentrations of remifentanil (from 0.1 to 1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) were infused in steps of 5 min under hemodynamic monitoring, including left and right atrial pressures, systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, and left and right cardiac indices. The invasive procedure was started under the highest concentration of remifentanil tolerated by the patient. Infusion of remifentanil was stopped at the end of the invasive procedure, while etomidate infusion was maintained. New hemodynamic measurements were performed at the end of the 12-min recovery period. RESULTS: Remifentanil produced a dose-dependent and significant decrease in systemic arterial pressure and vascular resistances (n = 9) from a concentration of 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). No significant changes were observed on pulmonary vascular resistances (n = 6). Neither right (n = 9) nor left (n = 6) atrial pressures were affected by remifentanil infusion. Hemodynamic variables returned to baseline value over the 12-min recovery period. CONCLUSIONS: In humans with a total artificial heart, remifentanil induces a systemic arterial vasodilation without significant effect on the capacitance vessels.

Amplification by hyperoxia of coronary vasodilation induced by propofol.

UNLABELLED: We tested the hypothesis that in vitro coronary and myocardial effects of propofol (10-300 microM) should be significantly modified in an isolated and erythrocyte-perfused rabbit heart model in the absence (PaO(2) = 137 +/- 16 mm Hg, n = 12) or in the presence (PaO(2) = 541 +/- 138 mm Hg, n = 12) of hyperoxia. The induction of hyperoxia provoked a significant coronary vasoconstriction (-13% +/- 7%). Propofol induced increased coronary vasodilation in the presence of hyperoxia. Because high oxygen tension has been reported to induce a coronary vasoconstriction mediated by the closure of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels, we studied the effects of propofol in 2 additional groups of hearts (n = 6 in each group) pretreated by glibenclamide (0.6 microM) and cromakalim (0.5 microM) in the absence and presence of hyperoxia, respectively. The pretreatment by glibenclamide induced a coronary vasoconstriction (-16% +/- 7%) which did not affect propofol coronary vasodilation. The pretreatment by cromakalim abolished the amplification of propofol coronary vasodilation in the presence of hyperoxia. Propofol induced a significant decrease in myocardial performance for a concentration >100 micro M both in the absence and presence of hyperoxia. We conclude that propofol coronary vasodilation is amplified in the presence of hyperoxia. This phenomenon is not explained by the previous coronary vasoconstriction induced by glibenclamide. However, the pretreatment of hearts by cromakalim abolished the amplification of propofol coronary vasodilation in the presence of hyperoxia. The myocardial effects of propofol were not affected by the presence of hyperoxia. IMPLICATIONS: Propofol induced a coronary vasodilation that was amplified in the presence of hyperoxia. This phenomenon does not seem to be related to previous coronary vasoconstriction. The myocardial effects of propofol were not significantly modified in the presence of hyperoxia.