ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bedaquiline, delamanid and fluoroquinolones are associated with increased QTcF. Whether clofazimine is associated with QTcF prolongation is less clear. METHODS: All patients with rifampicin-resistant TB enrolled between May 2017 and Dec 2019 were included. ECGs were performed at baseline, month 1, month 3 and month 6 for patients treated with conventional regimens, and at additional timepoint for patients treated with bedaquiline, delamanid and short regimen. We estimated the maximum increase of QTcF and constructed cox proportional hazards models to assess factors associated with QTcF≥501ms. RESULTS: Among 321 patients, 59 (18.4%) patients had QTcF≥501ms during a mean follow-up of 242 days (median 189, range 4-1091). The median maximum increase of QTcF was 43.4 ms (IQR 31.3-65.9) in patients treated with clofazimine. Treatment with clofazimine was significantly associated with QTcF≥501ms as compared to without clofazimine (adjusted hazards ratio (adjHR) 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01-9.44). Among patients not treated with bedaquiline and delamanid, those treated with clofazimine and a fluoroquinolone (adjHR 3.43, 95% CI 1.61-7.34) and those treated with clofazimine and high dose moxifloxacin (adjHR 6.54, 95% CI 2.43-17.60) had a significantly higher risk of QTcF≥501ms as compared to those treated with a fluoroquinolone without other QTcF prolonging agents. Four (1.6%) patients had documented ventricular tachycardia, in which one was Torsade de pointes. One patient was found to have sudden death during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Clofazimine was significantly associated with an increased risk of QTcF prolongation. QTcF≥501ms was potentially associated with fatal event and needed to be managed cautiously.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for 3 months (3HP) improves completion rate of latent tuberculosis infection treatment, but flu-like symptoms are common. The novel 1HP regimen, involving daily rifapentine plus isoniazid for 28 days, has demonstrated low toxicity in HIV-infected populations. We aimed to investigate whether 1HP has a lower incidence rate of systemic drug reaction (SDR) compared with 3HP during treatment in non-HIV populations. METHODS: This randomized, multicentre trial compared the completion rate and risks of SDRs of 1HP and 3HP in aged ≥13 years non-HIV subjects with latent tuberculosis infection between September 2019 and September 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04094012). We also investigated associations between SDRs and plasma levels of drugs and their metabolites. RESULTS: A total of 251 and 239 individuals were randomly assigned to 1HP and 3HP groups, respectively, with completion rates of 82.9% (208/251) and 84.5% (202/239), respectively. Among them, 12.7% (32/251) and 10.9% (26/239) of 1HP and 3HP groups experienced SDRs, respectively (p 0.522), predominantly urticaria in 1HP group (59.4% [19/32]) and flu-like syndrome in 3HP group (80.8% [21/26]). Among participants experiencing SDRs, 43.8% (14/32) and 34.6% (9/26) in 1HP and 3HP groups, respectively, completed treatment (p 0.470). Cutaneous reactions were more common in 1HP than 3HP group (32.7% [82/251] vs. 13.0% [31/239], p < 0.001). In 1HP group, urticaria was associated with a higher plasma desacetyl-rifapentine level (ug/mL) at both 2 (median [interquartile range]: 36.06 [17.46-50.79] vs. 22.94 [14.67-31.65], p 0.018) and 6 hours (26.13 [15.80-53.06] vs. 29.83 [18.13-34.01], p 0.047) after dosing. DISCUSSION: In non-HIV population, the incidence rate of SDR under 1HP is not lower than 3HP. Notably, urticaria, rather than flu-like syndrome, was the predominant SDR associated 1HP. The findings of this study underscore the feasibility of 1HP regimen in non-HIV populations with a high-completion rate exceeding 80%.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Few real-world studies have investigated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The interactions encompass drugs inducing or inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 and permeability glycoprotein. These agents potentially modulate the breakdown and elimination of NOACs. This study investigated the impact of DDIs on thromboembolism in this clinical scenario. Method: Patients who had NVAF and were treated with NOACs were selected as the study cohort from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Cases were defined as patients hospitalised for a thromboembolic event and who underwent a relevant imaging study within 7 days before hospitalisa-tion or during hospitalisation. Each case was matched with up to 4 controls by using the incidence density sampling method. The concurrent use of a cytochrome P450 3A4/permeability glycoprotein inducer or inhibitor or both with NOACs was identified. The effects of these interactions on the risk of thromboembolic events were examined with univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regressions. Results: The study cohort comprised 60,726 eligible patients. Among them, 1288 patients with a thromboembolic event and 5144 matched control patients were selected for analysis. The concurrent use of a cytochrome P450 3A4/permeability glycoprotein inducer resulted in a higher risk of thromboembolic events (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.51). Conclusion: For patients with NVAF receiving NOACs, the concurrent use of cytochrome P450 3A4/ permeability glycoprotein inducers increases the risk of thromboembolic events.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Drug Interactions , Thromboembolism , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/etiology , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Aged , Administration, Oral , Taiwan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/metabolism , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Pyridones/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB), defined as multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone (FQ) is difficult to treat. We assessed whether the use of new or repurposed drugs (bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, carbapenem, clofazimine, pretomanid) mitigated treatment failure of pre-XDR-TB. METHODS: MDR-TB patients managed in the Taiwan MDR-TB consortium between July 2009-December 2019 were eligible. Treatment outcomes at 30 months were assessed. Logistic regression models were constructed to investigate factors associated with treatment outcomes. RESULTS: 109 patients with FQ-resistant MDR-TB and 218 patients with FQ-susceptible MDR-TB were included. 60 (55.1%) patients with FQ-resistant MDR-TB and 63 (28.9%) patients with FQ-susceptible MDR-TB have been treated with new or repurposed drugs (p < 0.01). Of the 218 patients with FQ-susceptible MDR-TB, 187 (85.8%) had treatment success, 30 (13.8%) died, no treatment failure, and 1 (0.5%) was loss-to-follow-up; of the 109 patients with FQ-resistant MDR-TB, 78 (71.6%) had treatment success, 21 (19.3%) died, 9 (8.3%) had treatment failure, and 1 (0.9%) was loss-to-follow-up (p < 0.01). The use of new or repurposed drugs was not associated with treatment outcomes among patients with FQ-susceptible MDR-TB. No patients with FQ-resistant MDR-TB treated with ≥2 new or repurposed drugs within 6 months of treatment initiation had treatment failure (p = 0.03). Patients with FQ-resistant MDR-TB treated with 1 new or repurposed drugs was more likely to have treatment failure as compared with patients not treated with new or repurposed drugs (adjOR 7.06, 95% CI 1.72-29.06). CONCLUSIONS: Proper use of new or repurposed anti-TB drugs can mitigate treatment failure in FQ-resistant MDR-TB.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Treatment Failure , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Male , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Taiwan , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Drug Repositioning , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel mono-pegylated proline-interferon. This clinical study aimed to evaluate its antiviral efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label study. Adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with initial cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30 and symptom onset within 4 days were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single 250-µg dose of ropeginterferon alfa-2b subcutaneously plus standard of care (SOC) or to receive SOC alone. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a negative RT-PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 or discharged from the hospital before Day 8. Change in clinical status based on the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale and pulmonary infiltrations through chest radiograph were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were enrolled and treated with study medication. Higher percentages of patients who achieved Ct ≥ 30 or were discharged from the hospital were observed on Day 8 and every other time point of assessment, i.e., Days 5, 11, 15, and 22, in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group compared to the SOC alone group. However, the difference was statistically significant on Day 11 but not on Day 8. The primary endpoint was not met. The ropeginterferon alfa-2b group showed a higher improvement rate in lung infiltration on Day 5 (27.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.0087) and a higher improvement rate in WHO clinical progression scores on Day 8 (69.4% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.03) than those in the SOC group. No ropeginterferon alfa-2b-related serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSION: Our data show that ropeginterferon alfa-2b with SOC shortened the duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding compared with SOC alone. In addition, ropeginterferon alfa-2b as an additional therapy could be beneficial by improving lung infiltration.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunomodulatory agents, such as tocilizumab (TCZ), exert promising effects against SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, growing evidence indicates that using TCZ may carry higher risks of secondary bloodstream infection (sBSI). This study determined whether TCZ is associated with an increased risk of sBSI. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the demographic and clinical data of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from two Taiwanese hospitals. The time-to-incident sBSI in the TCZ users and nonusers was compared using the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was performed to identify independent risk factors for sBSI. RESULTS: Between May 1 and August 31, 2021, among 453 patients enrolled, 12 (2.65 %) developed sBSI. These patients were in hospital for longer duration (44.2 ± 31.4 vs. 17.6 ± 14.3 days, p = 0.014). Despite sBSI being more prevalent among the TCZ users (7.1 % vs. 1.6 %, p = 0.005), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model both revealed no significant difference in risks of sBSI between the TCZ users and nonusers [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.32 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.29-6.05), p = 0.724]. Female sex [aHR = 7.00 (95 % CI = 1.45-33.92), p = 0.016], heavy drinking [aHR = 5.39 (95 % CI = 1.01-28.89), p = 0.049], and mechanical ventilation [aHR = 5.65 (95 % CI = 1.67-19.30), p = 0.006] were independently associated with a higher sBSI risk. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence indicates that in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, TCZ does not significantly increase the risk of sBSI.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Sepsis , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
Antibody glycosylation plays a crucial role in the humoral immune response by regulating effector functions and influencing the binding affinity to immune cell receptors. Previous studies have focused mainly on the immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype owing to the analytical challenges associated with other isotypes. Thus, the development of a sensitive and accurate analytical platform is necessary to characterize antibody glycosylation across multiple isotypes. In this study, we have developed an analytical workflow using antibody-light-chain affinity beads to purify IgG, IgA, and IgM from 16 µL of human plasma. Dual enzymes, trypsin and Glu-C, were used during on-bead digestion to obtain enzymatic glycopeptides and protein-specific surrogate peptides. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was used in order to determine the sensitivity and specificity. Our platform targets 95 glycopeptides across the IgG, IgA, and IgM isotypes, as well as eight surrogate peptides representing total IgG, four IgG classes, two IgA classes, and IgM. Four stable isotope-labeled internal standards were added after antibody purification to calibrate the preparation and instrumental bias during analysis. Calibration curves constructed using serially diluted plasma samples showed good curve fitting (R2 > 0.959). The intrabatch and interbatch precision for all the targets had relative standard deviation of less than 29.6%. This method was applied to 19 human plasma samples, and the glycosylation percentages were calculated, which were comparable to those reported in the literature. The developed method is sensitive and accurate for Ig glycosylation profiling. It can be used in clinical investigations, particularly for detailed humoral immune profiling.
Subject(s)
Glycopeptides , Immunoglobulin G , Humans , Glycosylation , Immunoglobulin G/metabolism , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Mass Spectrometry , Glycopeptides/metabolism , Digestion , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin MABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is a common manifestation in COVID-19 patients and can significantly impact their quality of life. Corticosteroids have been proposed as a potential treatment, but their efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to comprehensively analyze the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy for treating COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up to March 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of corticosteroids on olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the olfactory score at the end of follow-up, and the secondary outcomes were the duration and the rate of recovery from olfactory dysfunction. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials with 999 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, corticosteroid treatment resulted in a statistically significant improvement in olfactory score with a standardized mean difference of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.95). Topical corticosteroids were found to be effective, but systemic corticosteroids were not. In addition, longer durations and higher dosages of corticosteroids treatment may also be associated with significant improvements in olfactory scores. No significant effect was observed on the duration or recovery rate of olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that topical corticosteroid treatment is a viable option for improving COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction, but further research is needed to investigate optimal treatment protocols and safety profiles.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , Humans , Quality of Life , COVID-19/complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids , Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy , Olfaction Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones, crucial components of treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), are associated with QT interval prolongation and risks of fatal cardiac arrhythmias. However, few studies have explored dynamic changes in the QT interval in patients receiving QT-prolonging agents. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited hospitalized patients with TB who received fluoroquinolones. The study investigated the variability of the QT interval by using serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded four times daily. This study analyzed the accuracy of intermittent and single-lead ECG monitoring in detecting QT interval prolongation. RESULTS: This study included 32 patients. The mean age was 68.6 ± 13.2 years. The results revealed mild-to-moderate and severe QT interval prolongation in 13 (41%) and 5 (16%) patients, respectively. The incremental yields in sensitivity of one to four daily ECG recordings were 61.0%, 26.1%, 5.6%, and 7.3% in detecting mild-to-moderate QT interval prolongation, and 66.7%, 20.0%, 6.7%, and 6.7% in detecting severe QT interval prolongation. The sensitivity levels of lead II and V5 ECGs in detecting mild-to-moderate and severe QT interval prolongation exceeded 80%, and their specificity levels exceeded 95%. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a high prevalence of QT interval prolongation in older patients with TB who receive fluoroquinolones, particularly those with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Sparsely intermittent ECG monitoring, the prevailing strategy in active drug safety monitoring programs, is inadequate owing to multifactorial and circadian QT interval variability. Additional studies performing serial ECG monitoring are warranted to enhance the understanding of dynamic QT interval changes in patients receiving QT-prolonging anti-TB agents.
Subject(s)
Long QT Syndrome , Tuberculosis , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Long QT Syndrome/diagnosis , Long QT Syndrome/epidemiology , ElectrocardiographyABSTRACT
AIM: A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) study of the correlation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with the 3HP regimen (weekly high-dose rifapentine plus isoniazid for 12 doses) for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) remains lacking. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of rifapentine or isoniazid concentration and ADRs. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, observational study enrolled LTBI contacts receiving 3HP treatment between January 2017 and August 2020. The concentrations of rifapentine, isoniazid and their metabolites (25-desacetyl-rifapentine and acetyl-isoniazid) in plasma samples collected monthly after 3HP treatment were determined. A PPK model was constructed to predict the maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC). Their association with ADRs was evaluated by applying three multivariate logistic regression models with adjustment for various covariates. RESULTS: A total of 415 LTBI cases were ultimately enrolled; 355 (85.5%) completed the 3HP treatment. Among them, 47 (11.3%) experienced systemic drug reactions and 291 (70.0%) experienced one or more flu-like symptom. The plasma concentration-time profiles of isoniazid, rifapentine and their metabolites were adequately described by the developed models. A higher Cmax of isoniazid was significantly correlated with a higher risk of any ADR (adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval: 3.04 [1.07-8.65]) and any or at least two flu-like symptoms (all severity grades) (2.76 [1.06-7.17]). CONCLUSIONS: Isoniazid may be responsible for ADRs, especially flu-like symptoms, during 3HP treatment.
Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Latent Tuberculosis , Humans , Isoniazid/adverse effects , Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Latent Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Latent Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiologyABSTRACT
The clinical impact of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests on reducing delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) has rarely been investigated. PTB patients were classified into a frontline NAA group, an add-on NAA group, and a no NAA group. The outcomes of interest were the proportion of PTB case died before anti-TB treatment, the interval between sputum examination and initiation of treatment, and misdiagnosis of PTB. A total of 2192 PTB patients were enrolled, including 282 with frontline NAA, 717 with add-on NAA, and 1193 with no NAA tests. Patients with NAA tests had a lower death rate before treatment initiation compared to those without NAA tests (1.6% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001) in all cases. Patients with frontline NAA compared to those with add-on NAA and those without NAA, had a shorter interval between sputum examination and treatment initiation in all cases (3 days vs. 6 days (p < 0.001), vs 18 days (p < 0.001)), and less misdiagnosis in smear-positive cases (1.8% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.039), vs 6.5% (p = 0.026)). In conclusion, NAA tests help prevent death before treatment initiation. Frontline NAA tests perform better than add-on NAA and no NAA in avoiding treatment delay in all cases, and misdiagnosis of PTB in smear-positive cases.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Delayed Diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Sputum , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapyABSTRACT
Bisphosphonates are considered an effective inhibitor of glutamine synthetase and thus can be used for treating tuberculosis (TB). However, its clinical benefit in TB remains unknown. We conducted a population-based cohort study by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and TB databases of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. Patients with osteoporosis and a history of bone fracture from 2007 to 2014 were identified. Among them, bisphosphonate users and propensity score-matched nonusers were selected. A stratified multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was employed to investigate the independent predictors of TB. Among 218 908 patients with osteoporosis and bone fracture, 46 842 bisphosphonate users and 46 842 propensity score-matched nonusers were selected. Within the 2-year follow-up, 723 patients-348 in the user group and 375 in the nonuser group-developed TB. Bisphosphonate use was not an independent predictor of TB in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.71-1.04); however, male sex, older age, being bedridden, and steroid use were independent risk factors. The real-world data revealed that bisphosphonate use did not protect patients with osteoporosis against TB.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Osteoporosis , Tuberculosis , Cohort Studies , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Fractures, Bone/chemically induced , Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase , Humans , Incidence , Male , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Steroids , Taiwan/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We conducted an updated network meta-analysis to elucidate the best regimen for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases on 16 August 2021 to perform an updated network meta-analysis. Only randomised controlled trials on populations with LTBI that reported the efficacy for preventing incident tuberculosis or the completion rates of treatment regimens were included. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias. We tested for possible global inconsistency with a χ2 test and local inconsistency by calculating inconsistency factors for each comparison in closed loops. The probability of each regimen being at each possible rank was estimated. Comparison-adjusted funnel plots were obtained to assess publication bias, and sensitivity analysis was performed. The major outcomes were the efficacy for preventing incident tuberculosis and the completion rates of treatment regimens. RESULTS: We identified 27 studies that matched our inclusion criteria; the risk of bias was mostly low. Rifampicin for four months (RFMP-4) was the most likely to be effective (probability: 56.3%) and the second most likely treatment to be completed (probability: 22.4%). By applying a multidimensional scaling approach for ranking based on a scatterplot with the surface under the cumulative ranking values for efficacy and completion rates, RFMP-4 was deemed the best choice for treating LTBI. Similar results were demonstrated after sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: This updated network meta-analysis revealed RFMP-4 to be the best choice for treating LTBI, per simultaneous consideration of efficacy and completion rates.
Subject(s)
Latent Tuberculosis , Humans , Latent Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Network Meta-Analysis , Rifampin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Several nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) complex (MTBC) are available in Taiwan; however, their performances may differ and have not been extensively evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to explore the accuracy of NAATs overall followed by comparison between platforms commonly used in Taiwan. METHODS: This study enrolled presumptive pulmonary TB patients with NAATs throughout Taiwan. The diagnostic performance of smear microscopy and NAATs was assessed using sputum culture as a reference standard. To investigate the performance of NAATs in excluding non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), we quantified the false-positive proportion of NAATs in patients infected with NTM. RESULTS: Of the 4126 enrollees, 860 (20.8%) had positive NAATs. The sensitivity and specificity of NAATs were 83.2% and 96.7%, respectively, compared to 81.5% and 55.3% for smear. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between the NAATs and smear; however, the specificity of smear was significantly lower than that of the NAATs [difference 41.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 39.6-43.2%]. There was no significant difference in sensitivity among Roche Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay (Amplicor), Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) and in-house polymerase chain reaction (in-house PCR) (82.2% versus 83.8% versus 82.4%); however, in-house PCR was significantly less specific than Amplicor (difference 5.3%, 95% CI 2.4-8.2%) and Xpert (difference 5.8%, 95% CI 3.1-8.5%). The sensitivity of NAATs among smear-negative cases was 33.1% (95% CI 26.0-40.3%). In-house PCR had a significantly higher false-positive rate among specimens that were culture positive for NTM than Amplicor (7.7% versus 0.3%; difference 7.4%, 95% CI 3.4-11.5%) and Xpert (7.7% versus 0.7%; difference 7.0%, 95% CI 2.9-11.0%). CONCLUSION: The NAATs overall had a relatively high sensitivity and specificity in detecting MTBC while Amplicor and Xpert performed better than in-house PCR in excluding NTM. Our findings will be useful for the development of national policy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systemic drug reaction (SDR) is a major safety concern with weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for 12 doses (3HP) for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Identifying SDR predictors and at-risk participants before treatment can improve cost-effectiveness of the LTBI program. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 187 cases receiving 3HP (44 SDRs and 143 non-SDRs). A pilot cohort (8 SDRs and 12 non-SDRs) was selected for generating whole-blood transcriptomic data. By incorporating the hierarchical system biology model and therapy-biomarker pathway approach, candidate genes were selected and evaluated using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Then, interpretable machine learning models presenting as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were applied for SDR risk prediction. Finally, an independent cohort was used to evaluate the performance of these predictive models. RESULTS: Based on the whole-blood transcriptomic profile of the pilot cohort and the RT-qPCR results of 2 SDR and 3 non-SDR samples in the training cohort, 6 genes were selected. According to SHAP values for model construction and validation, a 3-gene model for SDR risk prediction achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.972 and 0.947, respectively, under a universal cutoff value for the joint of the training (28 SDRs and 104 non-SDRs) and testing (8 SDRs and 27 non-SDRs) cohorts. It also worked well across different subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model for 3HP-related SDRs serves as a guide for establishing a safe and personalized regimen to foster the implementation of an LTBI program. Additionally, it provides a potential translational value for future studies on drug-related hypersensitivity.