Subject(s)
Antiracism , Decision Making , Documentation , Patient Care , Humans , Documentation/methods , Patient Care/methods , Patient Care/standardsSubject(s)
Racism , Humans , Racism/prevention & control , Quality Improvement , Implementation Science , Healthcare Disparities , HeartABSTRACT
Importance: Communication with caregivers is often not established or standardized during hospitalization. The Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act is a state-level policy designed to facilitate communication among patients, caregivers, and clinical care teams during hospitalization to improve patient experience; 42 states have passed this policy since 2014, but whether it was associated with achieving these goals remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether passage of the CARE Act was associated with improvements in patient experience. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a difference-in-differences analysis of short-term, acute-care US hospitals from 2013 to 2019 to analyze changes in patient experience before vs after CARE Act implementation in hospitals located in states that passed the CARE Act compared with those in states that did not. Analyses were performed between September 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022. Exposure: Time-varying indicators for whether a hospital was in a state that passed the CARE Act. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported experience via the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. Results: A total of 2763 hospitals were included, with 2188 hospitals in CARE Act states and 575 in non-CARE Act states. There were differential improvements in patient experience in the measures of communication with nurses (unadjusted mean [SD] score, 78.40% [0.42%]; difference, 0.18 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.07-0.29 percentage points; P = .002), communication with physicians (mean [SD] score, 80.00% [0.19%]; difference, 0.17 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.06-0.28 percentage points; P = .002), and receipt of discharge information (mean [SD] score, 86.40% [0.22%]; difference, 0.11 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.02-0.21 percentage points; P = .02) among CARE Act states compared with non-CARE Act states after policy passage. In subgroup analyses, improvements were larger among hospitals with lower baseline Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems performance on measures of communication with nurses, communication with physicians, and overall hospital rating. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that implementation of the CARE Act was associated with improvements in several measures of patient experience. Policies that formally incorporate caregivers into patient care during hospitalization may improve patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Hospitals , Humans , Cohort Studies , Hospitalization , Patient Outcome AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The medical case vignette has long been used in medical student education and frequently includes demographic variables such as race, ethnicity and gender. However, inclusion of demographic variables without context may reinforce assumptions and biases. Yet, the absence of race, sexual orientation, and social determinants of health may reinforce a hidden curriculum that reflects cultural blindness. This replication study compared proportions of race, ethnicity, and gender with University of Minnesota (UMN) findings. This study sought to determine if there has been progress in the representation of demographic characteristics in case vignettes. METHODS: University of North Carolina (UNC) case vignettes from 2015-2016 were analyzed and compared to UMN case vignettes from 1996-1998. Data included mentions of race, ethnicity, gender and social determinants of health. RESULTS: In the 278 UNC vignettes, white race was noted in 19.7% of cases, black race was in 7.9% cases, and 76.6% of cases were unspecified. In the 983 UMN vignettes, white race was recorded in 2.85% cases, and black race in 0.41% cases. The institutions were significantly different in the proportion of their cases depicting race (0.20; 95% CI (0.15, 0.25)). Males were represented in the majority of vignettes. DISCUSSION: Comparing case vignettes results from two medical schools suggests that reporting explicit demographic diversity was not significantly different. The findings illustrate that sex was the demographic characteristic consistently described, where males were over-represented. Based on these findings, greater cultural diversity as it intersects with social determinants of health is needed in medical student education.
