White Noise-Is Anxiety in Late-Life Associated With White Matter Hyperintensity Burden?

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationship between anxiety phenotypes (global anxiety, worry, and rumination) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH), with special consideration for the roles of age and executive function (EF). Our hypotheses were 1) anxiety phenotypes would be associated with WMH and 2) EF would moderate this relationship. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the local community (Pittsburgh, PA). PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 110 older adults (age ≥ 50) with varying worry severity and clinical comorbidity. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics (age, sex, race, education), clinical measures (cumulative illness burden, global anxiety, worry, and rumination), EF, and WMH quantified with magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Lower global anxiety and worry severity were significantly correlated with higher WMH volume, though the global anxiety relationship was not significant after controlling for age. Rumination as not associated with WMH burden. EF was not correlated with either global anxiety, worry, rumination, or WMH. However, in those with advanced age and/or greater WMH burden, there was an association between worry and EF as well as EF and WMH. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal studies are needed in order to clarify the complex interactions between anxiety phenotypes, WMH, and EF.

Reading the Mind in the Eyes: A Population-Based Study of Social Cognition in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Social cognition indicates the cognitive processes involved in perceiving, interpreting, and processing social information. Although it is one of the six core DSM-5 cognitive domains for diagnosing neurocognitive disorders, it is not routinely assessed in older adults. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test assesses Theory of Mind, the social cognition mechanism which forms the root of empathy. OBJECTIVES: To describe the distribution of, and factors associated with, scores on a 10-item version of Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET-10) in older adults. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Small-town communities in Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 66-105 years (N = 902, mean age = 76.6). MEASUREMENTS: The assessment included RMET-10, demographics, cognitive screening, literacy, depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, cognitive composites derived from a neuropsychological test battery, Social Norms Questionnaire, and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). RESULTS: RMET-10 score was normally distributed in our overall study sample. Normative RMET-10 scores among those rated as CDR = 0 were calculated by age, sex, and education. RMET-10 score was significantly higher with younger age, higher education, white race, higher cognitive screening scores, literacy, social norms scores, higher scores in all five domains in cognitive composites, and lower CDR. RMET-10 score was also significantly higher with fewer depression and anxiety symptoms after adjusting for demographics. CONCLUSIONS: The RMET is a potentially useful measure of social cognition for use in the research assessment of older adults. With appropriate calibration it should also have utility in the clinical setting.

Inappropriate utilization of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging on the USA-Mexico border.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology published revised appropriate use criteria (AUC) for SPECT MPI in 2009. We assessed adherence to these guidelines and factors associated with inappropriate utilization at the University Medical Center. METHODS: The AUC was applied retrospectively to 420 SPECT MPI studies. Two-sample t test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariable logistic regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 322 appropriate (86%) and 54 (14%) inappropriate studies. The odds of having an inappropriate test increased with younger age (P < .001) and female gender (P < .001). Subjects with diabetes (P = .007) and chest pain (P < .001) were less likely to have an inappropriate test. Academic outpatients were three times more likely to have an inappropriate study (P = .123), while community PCPs were 5.6 times (P = .011) and community cardiologists eight times more likely to order inappropriate tests (P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate SPECT MPI in low risk younger women is an important issue on the USA-Mexico border. Initiatives to reduce inappropriate SPECT MPI should focus on a few indications and evaluation of cardiovascular symptoms in younger age women in outpatient/community practices.