Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization.

Objective: Many potential predictors have been identified and proposed for predicting late reduction loss in distal radius fractures. However, no report exists on whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm correlates with the loss of reduction in distal radius fractures. This study aimed to investigate whether forearm BMD can be used as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization. Methods: Ninety patients with distal radius fractures were divided into two groups according to the maintenance or loss of reduction evaluated from radiographs taken at least 6 weeks after their injury. Lumbar and forearm BMD (total and metaphysis) T-scores were measured and compared between the maintenance of reduction (MOR) group and the loss of reduction (LOR) group. Additionally, serologic markers (C-terminal telopeptide, osteocalcin, vitamin D) and radiologic risk factors (intra-articular fracture, ulnar fracture, dorsal comminuted fracture, volar hook) were evaluated and a logistic multiple regression analysis was performed to know the main risk factors of reduction loss. Results: Reduction loss was observed in 38 patients (42.2%). The total and metaphyseal BMD of the forearm was less in the LOR group than in the MOR group. However, the difference was not statistically significant [-2.9 vs. -2.5 for total (p = 0.18), -2.3 vs. -2.0 for metaphysis (p = 0.17)]. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed initial dorsal comminution (p = 0.008) and ulnar variance (p = 0.01) were the main risk factors for reduction loss. Conclusions: Forearm BMD was not a valuable prognostic factor for reduction loss in distal radius fractures. Initial dorsal comminution and ulnar variance rather than forearm BMD should be considered preferentially when predicting which patients are at high risk of reduction loss in distal radius fractures.

Prognostic factors of septic arthritis of hip in infants and neonates: minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted the present study to identify clinical and radiological prognostic factors in infants and neonates with septic arthritis of the hip. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 patients with septic arthritis of the hip. All of the patients were younger than 18 months old. Follow-up periods ranged from 5 to 17 years. The following potential variables for predicting the prognosis were included in the assessment: gender, age, underlying diseases, duration of symptoms, changes of hip joint in X-ray, concomitant osteomyelitis, elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, sepsis, pus drainage, synovial fluid culture, and infecting organisms. Clinical and radiological prognoses were analyzed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated that radiological prognoses were poorer in patients who had underlying diseases, a longer duration of symptoms, and pus drainage. However, on multivariate analysis, only the variable-duration of symptoms-was found to be statistically related with a poor radiological prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although poor prognosis for patients with several underlying diseases and radiological changes has already been established, a favorable outcome might be expected with prompt surgical drainage and appropriate antibiotics.

Outcomes of long retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging because of osteopenia and the limited bone available for distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures treated with long retrograde intramedullary nailing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 25 patients who were treated with a long retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following TKA. Clinical evaluation included range of motion of knee, Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) score, and radiologic evaluation including time to union, coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral component, lower limb alignment, and implant loosening. The mean duration of follow-up after the fracture repair was 39 months (range 12-47). RESULTS: All 25 fractures were united with a mean time of 12 weeks (range 8-20). At the last follow-up, the mean knee flexion was 111° (range 60°-130°), the mean KSS was 81.5 (range 50-100), and the mean WOMAC score was 30.2 (range 5-55). Four (16%) of the 25 patients developed malalignment according to Rorabeck and Taylor criteria, but all patients had a knee flexion of more than 90°. Coronal and sagittal alignments of femoral component and lower limb alignment did not differ significantly between before and after the fracture repair. Complications included the loosening or breakage of distal interlocking screws in three patients. No deep infection or prosthesis loosening was detected at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following TKA with long retrograde intramedullary nailing resulted in high union rates and encouraging functional outcomes.