Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 78(10): 1636-1641, 2023 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37326391

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This paper models cognitive aging, across mid and late life, and estimates birth cohort and sex differences in both initial levels and aging trajectories over time in a sample with multiple cohorts and a wide span of ages. METHODS: The data used in this study came from the first 9 waves of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, spanning 2002-2019. There were n = 76,014 observations (proportion male 45%). Dependent measures were verbal fluency, immediate recall, delayed recall, and orientation. Data were modeled using a Bayesian logistic growth curve model. RESULTS: Cognitive aging was substantial in 3 of the 4 variables examined. For verbal fluency and immediate recall, males and females could expect to lose about 30% of their initial ability between the ages of 52 and 89. Delayed recall showed a steeper decline, with males losing 40% and females losing 50% of their delayed recall ability between ages 52 and 89 (although females had a higher initial level of delayed recall). Orientation alone was not particularly affected by aging, with less than a 10% change for either males or females. Furthermore, we found cohort effects for initial ability level, with particularly steep increases for cohorts born between approximately 1930 and 1950. DISCUSSION: These cohort effects generally favored later-born cohorts. Implications and future directions are discussed.


Subject(s)
Aging , Sex Characteristics , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Longitudinal Studies , Bayes Theorem , Aging/psychology , Cognition
2.
Behav Genet ; 35(2): 211-7, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15685433

ABSTRACT

DeFries-Fulker (DF) Analysis for unselected populations is reformulated as a no-intercept model with centered variables and only two independent variables. The reformulation serves three purposes. First, the original formulation implicitly estimated two different values for c2 and two values for h2. The new formulation resolves this ambiguity. Second, because the original formulation estimated h2 with the coefficient from a regression-interaction term, whether to center the interaction variables was unclear. The new formulation explicitly resolves this issue. Finally, the new formulation estimates fewer parameters, and therefore improves estimation efficiency and statistical power.


Subject(s)
Models, Genetic , Fertility/genetics , Humans , Least-Squares Analysis , Models, Psychological , Regression Analysis , Twin Studies as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...