ABSTRACT
As cancer therapies increase in effectiveness and patients' life expectancies improve, balancing oncologic efficacy while reducing acute and long-term cardiovascular toxicities has become of paramount importance. To address this pressing need, the Cardiology Oncology Innovation Network (COIN) was formed to bring together domain experts with the overarching goal of collaboratively investigating, applying, and educating widely on various forms of innovation to improve the quality of life and cardiovascular healthcare of patients undergoing and surviving cancer therapies. The COIN mission pillars of innovation, collaboration, and education have been implemented with cross-collaboration among academic institutions, private and public establishments, and industry and technology companies. In this report, we summarize proceedings from the first two annual COIN summits (inaugural in 2020 and subsequent in 2021) including educational sessions on technological innovations for establishing best practices and aligning resources. Herein, we highlight emerging areas for innovation and defining unmet needs to further improve the outcome for cancer patients and survivors of all ages. Additionally, we provide actionable suggestions for advancing innovation, collaboration, and education in cardio-oncology in the digital era.
ABSTRACT
Background Despite the belief that heart failure therapies are not effective in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, data are limited. We tested the association of neurohormonal blockade use with survival. Methods and Results A total of 309 consecutive patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis were identified. Medication inventory was obtained at baseline and subsequent visits. Exposure included a neurohormonal blockade class (ß-blocker [ßB], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, and mineralocorticoid antagonist) at baseline and subsequent visits. ßB was modeled as baseline use, time-varying use, and in an inverse probability treatment weighted model. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality analyzed with adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Continuing compared with stopping ßB during follow-up was tested. Mean age was 73.2 years, 84.1% were men, and 17.2% had atrial fibrillation/flutter at baseline. At the time of study entry, 49.8% were on ßBs, 35.0% were on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and 23.9% were on mineralocorticoid antagonists. For the total cohort, there was a trend toward harm in the unadjusted model for baseline ßB use, but this was neutral after adjustment. When ßB use was analyzed as a time-varying exposure, there was no association with mortality. ßB discontinuation was associated with decreased mortality for the total cohort. Findings were consistent in inverse probability treatment weighted models. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or mineralocorticoid antagonist use, there was no association with mortality after adjustment for the total cohort. Conclusions There was no association of neurohormonal blockade use with survival in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. For the total cohort, deprescribing ßB may be associated with improved survival. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Aged , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial/drug therapy , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial/mortality , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
AIMS: There is conflicting evidence whether heart failure (HF) is a risk factor for incident cancer. Despite population-based cohorts demonstrating this association, an analysis of the Physician's Health Study found no association in a cohort of mostly healthy males. We investigated the association of HF with incident cancer among a large cohort of post-menopausal women. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study of 146 817 post-menopausal women age 50 to 79 years enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative from 1993-1998, and followed through 2015. The primary exposure was adjudicated incident HF diagnosis, including preserved and reduced ejection fraction in a sub-cohort. The primary outcome was adjudicated incident total and site-specific cancers. Hazard ratios were calculated using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models. Over a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 3272 and 17 474 women developed HF and cancer, respectively. HF developed in 235 women prior to cancer. HF was associated with subsequent incident cancer [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.48]. Associations were observed for obesity-related cancers (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.51), as well as lung and colorectal cancers (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.30 and HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02-2.27, respectively). HF with preserved ejection fraction (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.67), but not HF reduced ejection fraction (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74-1.34), was associated with total cancer. CONCLUSION: Heart failure was associated with an increase in cancer diagnoses in post-menopausal women. This association was strongest for lung cancer. Further research is needed to appreciate the underlying mechanisms responsible for this association.