ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) with or without adjuvant immunosuppressant agents are standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in minimizing steroid-related adverse events (AEs) is unproven. OBJECTIVES: To utilize data collected in a French investigator-initiated, phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and seek approval for its use in PV. METHODS: This was an independently conducted post hoc analysis of the moderate-to-severe PV subset enrolled in the Ritux 3 study. Patients were randomized to rituximab plus 0·5 or 1·0 mg kg-1 per day prednisone tapered over 3 or 6 months, or 1·0 or 1·5 mg kg-1 per day prednisone alone tapered over 12 or 18 months, respectively (according to disease severity). The primary end point was complete remission at month 24 without CS (CRoff) for ≥ 2 months, and 24-month efficacy and safety results were also reported. RESULTS: At month 24, 34 of 38 patients (90%) on rituximab plus prednisone achieved CRoff ≥ 2 months vs. 10 of 36 patients (28%) on prednisone alone. Median total cumulative prednisone dose was 5800 mg in the rituximab plus prednisone arm vs. 20 520 mg for prednisone alone. Eight of 36 patients (22%) who received prednisone alone withdrew from treatment owing to AEs; one rituximab-plus-prednisone patient withdrew due to pregnancy. Overall, 24 of 36 patients (67%) on prednisone alone experienced a grade 3/4 CS-related AE vs. 13 of 38 patients (34%) on rituximab plus prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe PV, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was more effective than prednisone alone. Patients treated with rituximab had less CS exposure and were less likely to experience severe or life-threatening CS-related AEs. What's already known about this topic? Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. Corticosteroids, a standard first-line treatment for PV, have significant side-effects. Although their effects are unproven, adjuvant corticosteroid-sparing agents are routinely used to minimize steroid exposure and corticosteroid-related side-effects. There is evidence that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is effective in the treatment of patients with severe recalcitrant pemphigus and in patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus. What does this study add? This study provides a more detailed analysis of patients with PV enrolled in an investigator-initiated trial. Rituximab plus prednisone had a steroid-sparing effect and more patients achieved complete remission off prednisone. Fewer patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 steroid-related adverse events than those on prednisone alone. This collaboration between academia and industry, utilizing independent post hoc analyses, led to regulatory authority approvals of rituximab in moderate-to-severe PV.
Subject(s)
Pemphigus , Humans , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Pemphigus/drug therapy , Prednisone , Rituximab/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This investigation shows that, in most cases, the floor cleaning procedure of typical restaurants could be improved, resulting in a better cleaning efficiency and a better floor friction. This simple approach could help reduce slips and falls in the workplace. Food safety officers visited ten European style restaurants in the London Borough of Bromley (UK) to identify their floor cleaning procedure in terms of the cleaning method, the concentration and type of floor cleaner and the temperature of the wash water. For all 10 restaurants visited, the cleaning method was damp mopping. Degreasers were used in three sites while neutral floor cleaners were used in seven sites. Typically, the degreasers were over diluted and the neutrals were overdosed. The wash water temperature ranged from 10 to 72 degrees C. The on-site cleaning procedures were repeated in the laboratory for the removal of olive oil from new and sealed quarry tiles, fouled and worn quarry tiles and new porcelain tiles. It is found that in 24 out of 30 cases, cleaning efficiency can be improved by simple changes in the floor cleaning procedure and that these changes result in a significant improvement of the floor friction. The nature of the improved floor cleaning procedure depends on the flooring type. New and properly sealed flooring tiles can be cleaned using damp mopping with a degreaser diluted as recommended by the manufacturer in warm or hot water (24 to 50 degrees C). But as the tiles become worn and fouled, a more aggressive floor cleaning is required such as two-step mopping with a degreaser diluted as recommended by the manufacturer in warm water (24 degrees C).
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Cooking , Floors and Floorcoverings , Friction , Household Work/methods , Household Work/standards , Humans , United KingdomABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term impact on physical function of a single course of rituximab in rheumatoid factor, seropositive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite ongoing methotrexate treatment. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial comparing rituximab alone [1,000 mg intravenously (iv) on days 1 and 15, n= 40], or in combination with cyclophosphamide (750 mg iv on days 3 and 7, n= 41) or oral methotrexate (> or =10 mg/week, n= 40) with placebo + methotrexate (> or =10 mg/week, n= 40), resulted in significant reductions in disease activity at weeks 24 and 48. Sustained improvements in physical function and standard effect sizes (SES) for changes in components of ACR and EULAR criteria were evaluated over 2 yrs. RESULTS: More patients receiving rituximab + methotrexate completed a 2-yr follow-up without further treatment than those receiving placebo + methotrexate (45% vs 15%, respectively), rituximab alone (10%) or rituximab + cyclophosphamide (22%). This reflected a higher percentage of patients receiving rituximab + methotrexate reporting improvements in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index > or = minimum clinically important difference at 1 and 2 yrs (68% and 30%, respectively) compared with placebo + methotrexate (28% and 15%), rituximab monotherapy (43% and 10%) or rituximab + cyclophosphamide (39% and 12%). SES were high in all rituximab groups and revealed differing patterns of response over time. CONCLUSION: A single course of rituximab with continuing methotrexate in patients with active RA provided clinically meaningful improvements in physical function over 2 yrs, with lower discontinuation rates and larger SES for improvements in ACR and EULAR criteria components.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function , Rituximab , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Slips and trips are a major cause of injury and lost time, and remain so despite specific initiatives. The work presented here focuses on how accident subjects and their managers each perceive the circumstances of an accident with respect to causal responsibility. To investigate this issue, a research questionnaire was designed, piloted and then applied to 33 occupational slip and trip accidents reported to a Local Authority Inspectorate. The results showed important differences in the attribution of causal responsibility between those who experience and those who investigate slips and trip accidents. The levels of agreement between individual accident subjects and their managers was at best fair (using kappa). The consequences of this and the limited scope of investigation carried out by managers is highlighted and the need for improved training and the development of a practical model of risk assessment and investigation for managers is advanced.