ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In 2020, a list of Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics, known as the "KIDs List," was published. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate institutional compliance with the -recommendations in this publication and identify areas for improvement. METHODS: Medications in the KIDs List were compared to the institutional formulary at a large academic medical center caring for pediatric and adult patients. Medications listed in the formulary were then -evaluated for order comments and restrictions related to their use in pediatric patients. Oral liquid products and a group of commonly used intravenous (IV) medications were reviewed for potentially inappropriate excipients through available manufacturer information. The pediatric clinical specialists were then solicited to review and make recommendations for medications that had not been addressed. RESULTS: Of the 67 medications or classes listed in the KIDs List, 47 (70.1%) of the medications are listed in our formulary and available for use. Of these 47 medications, 4 (8.5%) included warnings related to their use in pediatric patients. Of the 270 oral liquid medications reviewed, 206 (76.3%) contained at least 1 -potentially inappropriate excipient. Of the 20 commonly used IV medications, 3 (15%) contained at least 1 potentially inappropriate excipient. CONCLUSIONS: This review found that many medications listed in the KIDs List are included in our -institution's formulary and that few have warnings for pediatric patients built into the institutional electronic health record. Further review of medications in the formulary will be conducted to determine the next steps to implementing KIDs List recommendations.
ABSTRACT
Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) require prompt surgical debridement and antimicrobial therapy. Indicated antimicrobial therapy involves broad-spectrum coverage against common pathogens and toxin inhibition. Linezolid provides both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage and toxin inhibition, however, there is limited evidence evaluating its role in empiric treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of empiric linezolid use for NSTIs on the total duration of MRSA-active therapy. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included adult surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients treated with empiric vancomycin and clindamycin or linezolid along with gram-negative and anaerobe coverage for NSTIs. The primary end point of this study was the duration of MRSA-active therapy. Secondary end points included ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS; days), new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI), and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Results: There were 21 patients in the vancomycin/clindamycin cohort and 28 patients in the linezolid cohort. The average duration of vancomycin was 3.9 days versus 2.9 days of linezolid (p = 0.04). The average hospital LOS for the vancomycin/clindamycin cohort was somewhat longer than the linezolid cohort, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07), and the incidence of new-onset AKI during hospitalization was higher in the vancomycin/clindamycin cohort (38.1% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). No differences were observed for ICU LOS or CDI. Conclusions: Empiric linezolid use for NSTI was associated with one less day of MRSA-active therapy and lower incidence of new-onset AKI during hospitalization. Linezolid was a safe and effective alternative to vancomycin/clindamycin for empiric treatment of NSTIs.
