Allogeneic Cell Therapy Applications in Neonates: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal cell therapy applications are increasing; however, data on allogeneic cell therapy are limited. OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence on allogeneic cell therapy in term and preterm neonates. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Ovid Medline, and various registries were searched for studies investigating the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of allogeneic cell therapy in neonates. Two authors independently selected the articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: Twelve published (153 infants) and 21 ongoing studies were included. These studies predominantly sourced allogeneic cells from umbilical cord blood (UCB). Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were the main cell type used (134 of 153 infants); others included UCB-derived total nucleated cells (TNCs) and human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs). Applications included bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD; 113 infants), Krabbe disease (13 infants), intraventricular haemorrhage (10 infants), perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (10 infants), hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (6 infants), and necrotizing enterocolitis (1 infant). Nine out of 12 studies did not report any serious adverse events (SAEs) related to cell administration. Three studies reported SAEs, such as graft versus host disease (GVHD) in 5 infants (UCB-derived TNCs for Krabbe disease); and transient cardiorespiratory compromise in 1 infant (hAECs for BPD). Data on efficacy outcomes were limited. CONCLUSION: The safety and feasibility of allogeneic cell therapy applications in neonates are available, mainly from the use of MSCs. Further safety data for other cell types are required, and the risk of GVHD in different settings needs to be determined. Efficacy studies are largely lacking for all cell types. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023397876), the international prospective register for systematic reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Timing of the First Dose of the Hepatitis B Vaccine in Preterm Infants.

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends all newborn infants receive the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 h of birth irrespective of maternal hepatitis B carrier status. However, the physiological immaturity of the immune system in preterm infants may influence the immune responses to the vaccine particularly in the first few days and weeks of life, and adverse events may occur following vaccination that are not observed in infants born at term. Objectives: To review existing published guidelines surrounding timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine in preterm infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen negative (HBsAg-negative) mothers. Methods: A search was performed for relevant papers and guidelines published between January 2002 and July 2022 on the Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases and through targeted searches. Two authors independently reviewed the search results to identify relevant sources, which were then analysed and described through narrative synthesis. Results: Twenty-seven relevant papers and guidelines regarding 15 countries and regions were included. Of these, 13.3% of guidelines, which represented 16.8% of the overall population of 4.1 billion people covered by the identified guidelines, recommended a nationwide birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine to all preterm infants. In 40.0% of guidelines (77.9% of the overall population), the birth dose was only recommended for infants with a birth weight of more than 2000-2200 g. Another 33.3% of countries and regions (covering 4.4% of the population) recommended no universal birth dose for all infants, including preterm infants, whilst 13.3% (1.0% of the population) had guidelines that varied between jurisdictions and hospitals within their country/region. Conclusions: Existing guidelines surrounding the timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine in preterm infants vary substantially between countries and regions. Further research comparing the immunogenicity and safety of different hepatitis B vaccine schedules is needed to provide concrete evidence to provide guidance regarding the timing of vaccination against hepatitis B in preterm infants.

Decreasing Hypothermia-Related Escalation of Care in Newborn Infants Using the BEMPU TempWatch: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether incorporating BEMPU TempWatch into the care of LBW/SGA neonates for continuous temperature monitoring decreases the rate of hypothermia requiring escalation of care. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled trial conducted in a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were late preterm and term LBW/SGA neonates on the postnatal wards. Neonates were randomly assigned to receive either the BEMPU TempWatch in addition to standard care, or to receive standard care alone for the first 28 days of life. The primary outcome was hypothermia requiring escalation of care during initial hospital stay after birth. RESULTS: Trial was discontinued after planned interim feasibility analysis, due to very low rates of hypothermia requiring escalation of care. In total, 75 neonates were included, with 36 in the intervention (TempWatch) group and 39 in the control group. The rate of hypothermia requiring escalation of care was 2/36 (5.6%) in the TempWatch group and 1/39 (2.6%) in the control group (relative risk (RR) 2.17, 95% CI 0.21 to 22.89). Rates of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge were 22/36 (61.1%) in the TempWatch and 13/39 (33.3%) in the control group (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07, p = 0.02). All other secondary outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of hypothermia requiring escalation of care in a tertiary, high-income setting meant it was not feasible for studying the effects of the TempWatch for this outcome. TempWatch may have a role in promoting exclusive breastfeeding, and this needs to be explored further.

Temperature Monitoring Devices in Neonates.

Introduction: Accurate temperature monitoring of neonates is vital due to the significant morbidities and mortality associated with neonatal hypothermia. Many studies have compared different thermometers in neonates, however, there is a lack of consensus regarding which of the currently available thermometers is most suitable for use in neonates. Objectives: The aim of this review was to identify and compare current methods available for temperature monitoring of neonates beyond the delivery room, including the accuracy, advantages and disadvantages of each. Methods: A recent search and narrative synthesis of relevant studies published between January 1, 1949 and May 5, 2021 on the OVID Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Results: A total of 160 papers were retrieved for narrative synthesis. The main methods available for temperature monitoring in neonates are human touch and mercury-in-glass, electronic, infrared tympanic and other infrared thermometers. Newer innovations that are also available include liquid crystal thermometers and the BEMPU TempWatch. This paper discusses the current evidence available regarding the utility of these devices, and identifies barriers to valid comparison of different thermometry methods. Conclusion: Many methods for temperature monitoring in neonates are currently available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. However, the accuracies of different devices are hard to determine due to variable methodologies used in relevant studies and hence, further research that addresses these gaps is needed.