ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim was to describe fatigue-related problems reported by post-cardiac arrest adults with chronic fatigue and energy conservation strategies generated using an Energy Conservation plus Problem Solving Therapy intervention. METHODS: Following an introduction to the intervention process outlined in a Participant Workbook, participants engaged in the telephone intervention by identifying one to two fatigue-related problems. They then brainstormed with the interventionist to identify potential strategies to reduce fatigue, tested them, and either modified the strategies or moved to the next problem over three to five sessions. RESULTS: Eighteen cardiac arrest survivors with chronic fatigue identified instrumental activities of daily living and leisure activities as fatigue-related activities more frequently than basic activities of daily living. Energy Conservation strategies used most frequently were: plan ahead, pace yourself, delegate to others, and simplify the task. CONCLUSION: Post-cardiac arrest adults living in the community with chronic fatigue can return to previous daily activities by using energy conservation strategies such as planning ahead, pacing tasks, delegating tasks, and simplifying tasks.
Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Fatigue/etiology , Heart Arrest/complications , Problem Solving , Survivors/psychology , Adult , Chronic Disease , Fatigue/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Leisure Activities , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , TelephoneABSTRACT
AIM: The primary aim was to examine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining participants for an Energy Conservation+Problem Solving Therapy (EC+PST) intervention delivered over the telephone, to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention, and to assess the appropriateness of the outcome measures. The secondary aim was to evaluate the preliminary intervention effect on fatigue impact, activity performance, and participation in daily activities in post-cardiac arrest (CA) adults with chronic fatigue. METHODS: This feasibility study used a prospective, pre-post experimental design. Individuals who were at least 3 months post-CA with moderate-to-severe fatigue were eligible to participate. By participating in EC+PST intervention sessions, participants learned how to apply EC strategies to solve their fatigue-related problems. Participants were assessed before and after completing the intervention using outcome measures assessing fatigue, activity performance, and participation in daily activities. RESULTS: Eighteen CA survivors with chronic fatigue successfully completed the intervention and the assessments with high satisfaction. We observed a 15% recruitment rate and ceiling effects on two outcome measures of perceived-performance in daily activities. Significant decreases in the impact of physical (p=.001) and cognitive (p=.006) fatigue of CA survivors were observed with small to moderate effect sizes of r=0.23-0.25 after receiving the EC+PST intervention. CONCLUSION: The delivery of EC+PST intervention over the telephone is feasible, and the intervention is highly acceptable to CA survivors with chronic fatigue. Also, the EC+PST intervention seems promising in reducing the impact of physical and cognitive fatigue of CA survivors.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Fatigue/psychology , Fatigue/therapy , Heart Arrest/psychology , Problem Solving , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Survivors/psychology , TelephoneABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial of an Internet-based manualized intervention to teach individuals with traumatic brain injury to manage their fatigue. SETTING: Community dwelling. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one participants randomized to Maximizing Energy (MAX) intervention group (n = 20) and Health Education group (n = 21). INTERVENTION: The experimental group (MAX intervention) received an 8-week program that combined education and Problem-Solving Therapy to teach individuals to manage fatigue-related problems. The attention control group received health education. MEASURES: Primary outcome measures pertained to the feasibility of conducting the trial. Secondary outcomes were fatigue impact and fatigue severity assessed at baseline and postintervention. RESULTS: Of the 65 participants referred, 41 were enrolled (63% recruitment rate), of which 3 withdrew (92% retention rate). Participants in the experimental and control groups completed their homework 75% and 85% of the time, respectively, and were equally engaged in the sessions. Participants in the experimental group were able to learn and implement the MAX intervention steps. Effect sizes for all measures ranged from small (-0.17) to medium (-0.58) in favor of the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Findings from the study suggest that the MAX intervention is feasible to administer to individuals with post-traumatic brain injury fatigue.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/physiopathology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Fatigue/therapy , Adult , Fatigue/etiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Research Design , Single-Blind MethodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. We sought to understand activity choices of older adults when they were depressed. METHOD. Each community-dwelling participant (n = 27) completed one semistructured interview while in recovery for at least 3 mo. but less than 7 mo. Transcripts were coded to identify relevant themes. RESULTS. Six themes emerged that explained activities participants continued while depressed, and four themes described activities they stopped. CONCLUSION. Older adults maintained many instrumental activities of daily living while depressed, and some actively adapted activities so they could continue them. Some intentionally stopped activities to direct limited energy to their highest priority activities. To guide effective intervention, it is critical for occupational therapy practitioners to complete a client-centered qualitative assessment to understand what and, most important, why activities are continued or stopped. Each theme for activities continued and activities stopped lends itself to intervention strategies.