ABSTRACT
Objectives: A growing body of evidence highlights the effects of air pollution on chronic and acute cardiovascular diseases, such as associations between PM10 and several cardiovascular events. However, evidence of the impact of fine air pollutants on the development and progression of peripheral arterial aneurysms is not available. Methods: Data were obtained from the multicenter PAA outcome registry POPART and the German Environment Agency. Means of the mean daily concentration of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and O3 concentrations were calculated for 2, 10, and 3650 days prior to surgery for each patient. Additionally, weighted ten-year averages were analyzed. Correlation was assessed by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients, and regression analyses were conducted as multiple linear or multiple logistic regression, depending on the dependent variable. Results: For 1193 patients from the POPART registry, paired air pollution data were available. Most patients were male (95.6%) and received open surgical repair (89.9%). On a regional level, the arithmetic means of the daily means of PM10 between 2000 and 2022 were neither associated with average diameters nor runoff vessels. Negative correlations for mean PAA diameter and mean NO2, as well as a positive correlation with mean O3, were found; however, they were not statistically significant. On patient level, no evidence for an association of mean PM10 exposure over ten years prior to inclusion in the registry and PAA diameter or the number of runoff vessels was found. Weighted PM10, NO2, and O3 exposure over ten years also did not result in significant associations with aneurysm diameter or runoff vessels. Short-term air pollutant concentrations were not associated with symptomatic PAAs or with perioperative complications. Conclusions: We found no indication that long-term air pollutant concentrations are associated with PAA size or severity, neither on a regional nor individual level. Additionally, short-term air pollution showed no association with clinical presentation or treatment outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral aneurysm. However, due to its rarity, the cumulative body of evidence regarding patient patterns, treatment strategies, and perioperative outcomes is limited. This analysis aims to investigate distinct phenotypical patient profiles and associated treatment and outcomes in patients with a PAA by performing an unsupervised clustering analysis of the POPART (Practice of Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair and Therapy) registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cluster analysis (using k-means clustering) was performed on data obtained from the multicenter POPART registry (42 centers from Germany and Luxembourg). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore validity and stability. Using 2 clusters, patients were primarily separated by the absence or presence of clinical symptoms. Within the cluster of symptomatic patients, the main difference between patients with acute limb ischemia presentation and nonemergency symptomatic patients was PAA diameter. When using 6 clusters, patients were primarily grouped by comorbidities, with patients with acute limb ischemia forming a separate cluster. Despite markedly different risk profiles, perioperative complication rates appeared to be positively associated with the proportion of emergency patients. However, clusters with a higher proportion of patients having any symptoms before treatment experienced a lower rate of perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The conducted analyses revealed both an insight to the public health reality of PAA care as well as patients with PAA at elevated risk for adverse outcomes. This analysis suggests that the preoperative clinic is a far more crucial adjunct to the patient's preoperative risk assessment than the patient's epidemiological profile by itself.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm , Popliteal Artery , Registries , Humans , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Aneurysm/epidemiology , Aneurysm/surgery , Aneurysm/diagnosis , Male , Female , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Germany/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment , Aged, 80 and over , Endovascular Procedures , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Popliteal Artery AneurysmABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Only 5% of patients with popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are female. Evidence on PAA treatment and outcomes in women is therefore scarce. The POPART Registry provides one of Europe's largest data collections regarding PAA treatment. Data on clinical presentation, aneurysm morphology, and perioperative outcomes after open surgical PAA repair in women will be presented. METHODS: POPART is a multicenter, noninterventional registry for open and endovascular PAA repair, with 42 participating centers in Germany and Luxembourg. All patients aged >18 years who have been treated for PAA since 2010 are eligible for study inclusion. Data collection is based on an online electronic case report form. RESULTS: Of the 1236 PAAs, 58 (4.8%) were in women. There were no significant differences in age or cardiopulmonary comorbidities. However, female patients had a lower prevalence of contralateral PAAs and abdominal aortic aneurysms (P < .05). PAAs in women were more likely to be symptomatic before surgery (65.5% vs 49.4%; P = .017), with 19% of women presenting with acute limb ischemia (vs 11%; P = .067). Women had smaller aneurysm diameters than men (22.5 mm vs 27 mm; P = .004) and became symptomatic at smaller diameters (20 mm vs 26 mm; P = .002). Only 8.6% of women and 11.6% of men underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (P > .05); therefore, the perioperative outcome analysis focused on open surgical repair. In total, 23.5% of women and 16.9% of men developed perioperative complications (P > .05). There were no differences in major cardiovascular events (P > .05), but women showed a higher incidence of impaired wound healing (15.7% vs 7.2%; P = .05) and major amputation (5.9% vs 1.1%; P = .027). Female sex was significantly associated with the need for nonvascular reinterventions within 30 days after surgery (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.88), whereas no significant differences in the odds for vascular reinterventions were observed (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-5.77). In the multiple logistic regression model, female sex, symptomatic PAAs, poor quality of outflow vessels, and graft material other than vein graft were independently associated with perioperative reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: Women have smaller PAAs, are more likely to be symptomatic before treatment, and are more often affected by nonvascular reinterventions in the perioperative course. As our understanding of aneurysmatic diseases in women continues to expand, sex-specific treatment strategies and screening options for women in well-selected cohorts with modified screening protocols should be continuously re-evaluated.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Arterial Occlusive Diseases , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Popliteal Artery Aneurysm , Male , Humans , Female , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) has become a popular custom-made treatment option for juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysms. It has been previously investigated whether octogenarians as a distinct subgroup are at increased risk for adverse outcomes after FEVAR. With diverging results and an inconclusive understanding of age as a risk factor in general, an analysis of the historical data of a single center was conducted to add to the available body of evidence and further investigate the effect of age as a continuous risk factor. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center database of all patients who underwent FEVAR at a single department of vascular surgery was performed. The main endpoint was post-operative survival. In addition to association analyses, potential confounders such as co-morbidities, complication rates, or aneurysm diameter were examined. In terms of sensitivity analyses, logistic regression models were created for the dependent variables of interest. RESULTS: During the observation period from April 2013 to November 2020, 40 patients over the age of 80 and 191 patients under the age of 80 were treated by FEVAR. The 30-day survival showed no significant difference between the groups (95.1% in octogenarians and 94.3% in patients under 80 years of age). The sensitivity analyses conducted also showed no difference between the two groups, and complication and technical success rates were comparable. The aneurysm diameter was 67 ± 13 mm in the study group and 61 ± 15 mm in those under 80 years of age. Additionally, the sensitivity analyses showed that age as a continuous variable exhibits no effect on the outcomes of interest. DISCUSSION: In the present study, age was not associated with adverse peri-operative outcomes after FEVAR, including mortality, lower technical success rates, complications, or length of hospital stay. Essentially, the most highly associated factor with hospital and ICU length of stay was time spent in surgery. However, octogenarians had a significantly larger aortic diameter at the time of treatment, which might indicate the potential introduction of bias by pre-interventional patient selection. Nevertheless, the usefulness of research on octogenarians as a distinct subgroup might be questionable regarding the scalability of results, and future studies might focus on age as a continuous risk factor instead.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 resulted in postponement and cancellation of elective operations in all surgical disciplines worldwide, especially in the first weeks of the pandemic. The specific situation in vascular surgery clinics in Germany during this period has not yet been described. Objective: The purpose of the survey was to record the provision of vascular surgery services in the period from March 2020 to December 2020 as well as logistical and infrastructural changes that resulted from the pandemic situation. The focus of the survey was on mapping the supply situation as realistically as possible based on the assessment of the lead vascular surgeons. Material and methods: In cooperation with the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG), the senior medical staff of all vascular centers in Germany were asked to take part in the survey. The questions were answered anonymously. Results: COVID-19 and corresponding measures resulted in relevant cancellations and postponements of operations, a loss of capacities and an increased workload. During the observational period there was a delay in the treatment of vascular surgical diseases and an increased occurrence of severe clinical stages compared to the corresponding period of the previous year. All levels of care were and continue to be affected. Discussion: In order to counteract the structural weakening and the restrictions in patient care, clinical processes, patient education and prioritization must be optimized. New concepts such as telemedicine and closer clinical control may make sense. A necessary infrastructure for emergency management (COVID) must not negatively affect the quality of care for (vascular) surgical patients in everyday life.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is a rare disease with a prevalence of 0.1% to 1%. Within previous years, endovascular repair (ER) of PAAs has been performed more frequently despite the lack of high-level evidence compared with open surgical repair (OSR). In 2014, the POPART registry was initiated to validate the current treatment options for PAA repair. METHODS: POPART is a multinational multicenter registry of the peri- and postoperative outcomes of ER and OSR for PAAs. Data sets were recorded using the online survey tool SurveyMonkey (available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/). Regular monitoring and plausibility checks of the data sets are performed to ensure reliability. The aim of the present study was to report the findings from the POPART registry, which includes data from 41 centers. RESULTS: From June 2014 to August 2019, 794 cases had been recorded in the POPART registry. OSR had been performed in 662 patients and ER in 106 patients; 23 patients had been treated conservatively. Of the 106 patients in the primary ER group, 4 had required conversion to OSR. The ER patients were significantly older (ER, median, 71 years; OSR, median, 67 years; P < .05). No other significant differences were present in the demographic data, comorbidities, or aneurysm morphology between the two groups. Of the 662 patients in the OSR group, 50.3% were symptomatic compared with 29.2% of the 106 patients in the ER group (P < .05). Emergency treatment because of acute ischemia, critical ischemia, or rupture was necessary for 149 patients (22.5%) in the OSR group and 11 patients (10.3%) in the ER group. The most frequent postoperative complications were impaired wound healing (OSR, n = 47 [7.1%]; ER, n = 3 [2.8%]; P > .05) and major bleeding (OSR, n = 26 [3.9%]; ER, n = 3 [2.8%]; P > .05). The in-hospital length of stay was significantly longer for the OSR group than for the ER group (median, 10 days; range, 3-65 days; vs median, 7 days; range, 1-73 days). The overall patency for the OSR and ER groups after 12 and 24 months was 83.2% and 44.7% (P < .005) and 74.2% and 29.1% (P < .005), respectively. The outcomes with a prosthetic graft vs an autologous vein were significantly poorer in the OSR group (primary patency, 71.4% vs 88.1% at 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: To evaluate new treatment techniques such as ER for PAAs, real-world data are of essential importance. The present analysis of the first results for the POPART registry shows good perioperative results for endovascular treatment of PAA in asymptomatic patients with good outflow vessels. The perioperative complication rate is low and the postoperative hospital stay is shorter than after OSR. However, the patency rates after 12 and 24 months are low in the ER group compared to patients treated with open repair. More follow-up data is required for further interpretation; the completion of the data sets in the registry is ongoing.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Aneurysm/complications , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Humans , Ischemia , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Registries , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
Peripheral arterial aneurysms are rare vascular pathologies characterised by focal dilatation of at least 1.5-fold relative to the diameter of the native vessel. Primary arterial aneurysms can affect any segment of the arterial trunk. Diagnostic tests include duplex sonography, CT and MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. It is essential that the influx and efflux to the aneurysm should be mapped as precisely as possible. The most common type of peripheral arterial aneurysms are popliteal artery aneurysms, which frequently occur with aorta aneurysms. Peripheral arterial aneurysms are more common in patients with connective tissue disease or autoimmune disease (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome, Behçet's disease). The current gold standard for therapy is surgery, although endovascular therapies have also been described. As the condition is rare, there is insufficient evidence to compare these approaches. Results from several register studies and single centre studies in patients with popliteal aneurysms indicate that endovascular therapy can give similar outcomes to open therapy if patients are carefully selected. Nevertheless, open surgery remains the gold standard. Therapy of aneurysms of the extremities must consider individual treatment criteria, such as the morphology of the aneurysm, its anatomical localisation - particularly with respect to mobilise segments, vascular efflux and the patient's general condition.