Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Can J Vet Res ; 84(1): 60-66, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31949329

ABSTRACT

The urokinase plasminogen activator system (uPAS) has been poorly investigated in veterinary oncology. The aim of this study was to determine uPA serum concentrations in healthy and oncologic cats to understand the potential value of uPA as a cancer biomarker. Serum samples were collected from 19 healthy cats and 18 cats with spontaneous malignant neoplasms and uPA was measured through a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The differences between uPA values and their relation with intrinsic factors and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent t-test. The average serum concentration of uPA in cancerous cats (0.54 ± 0.22 ng/mL) differed from that of healthy cats (1.10 ± 1.16 ng/mL) but was not significantly influenced by cats' clinicopathological parameters or by the presence of metastases. This study describes, for the first time, the serum concentrations of uPA in cats and proposes directions for future studies to uncover the relevance of uPAS in feline carcinogenesis.


Le système activateur de plasminogène de type urokinase (uPAS) a été peu étudié en oncologie vétérinaire. L'objectif de la présente étude était de déterminer les concentrations sériques d'uPA chez des chats en santé et oncologiques afin de comprendre la valeur potentielle d'uPA comme marqueur de cancer. Des échantillons de sérum furent prélevés de 19 chats en santé et de 18 chats avec des néoplasmes malins spontanés et l'uPA fut mesuré à l'aide d'une trousse immuno-enzymatique. Les différences entre les valeurs d'uPA et leur relation avec des facteurs intrinsèques et des paramètres clinico-pathologiques furent analysées par analyse de variance (ANOVA) et test de t indépendant. La concentration moyenne d'uPA chez les chats avec cancer (0,54 ± 0,22 ng/mL) différait de celle des chats en santé (1,10 ± 1,16 ng/mL) mais n'était pas influencée de manière significative par les paramètres clinico-pathologiques des chats ou la présence de métastases. Cette étude décrit, pour la première fois, les concentrations sériques d'uPA chez les chats et propose des orientations pour des études ultérieures afin de révéler la pertinence d'uPAS dans la carcinogénèse chez les chats.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Cat Diseases/blood , Neoplasms/veterinary , Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/blood , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Cat Diseases/diagnosis , Cats , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Male , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prospective Studies
3.
Vet World ; 10(8): 918-923, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28919683

ABSTRACT

AIM: Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) has been scarcely studied in veterinary oncology. The aim of this study was to determine the uPA serum concentrations in healthy and oncologic canine patients and to investigate its potential value as a tumor biomarker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum uPA concentrations of healthy and oncologic canine patients were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Their relationships with the dogs' health status and tumor characteristics were analyzed through ANOVA and independent t-test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between mean serum values (±standard deviation) of healthy dogs (0.19±0.13 ng/ml) and oncologic canine patients (0.22±0.33 ng/ml), or between dogs with benign or malignant tumors, and with or without metastases, although the latter tended to show higher uPA serum levels. CONCLUSION: This is the first study describing the uPA serum levels in dogs. Although its results do not support uPA as a tumor biomarker, higher uPA levels in dogs with metastatic neoplasms may reflect the role of the enzyme in tumor progression.

4.
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc ; 51(6): 365-71, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26535454

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the most prevalent coagulase-positive Staphylococcus inhabitant of the skin and mucosa of dogs and cats, causing skin and soft tissue infections in these animals. In this study, coagulase-positive Staphylococcus species were isolated from companion animals, veterinary professionals, and objects from a clinical veterinary environment by using two particular culture media, Baird-Parker RPF agar and CHROMagar Staph aureus. Different morphology features of colonies on the media allowed the identification of the species, which was confirmed by performing a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Among 23 animals, 15 (65.2%) harbored coagulase-positive Staphylococcus, being 12 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius carriers. Four out of 12 were methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP). All veterinary professionals had coagulase-positive Staphylococcus (CoPS) species on their hands and two out of nine objects sampled harbored MRSP. The antimicrobial-resistance pattern was achieved for all isolates, revealing the presence of many multidrug-resistant CoPS, particularly S. pseudintermedius . The combined analysis of the antimicrobial-resistance patterns shown by the isolates led to the hypothesis that there is a possible crosscontamination and dissemination of S. aureus and S. pseudintermedius species between the three types of carriers sampled in this study that could facilitate the spread of the methicillin-resistance phenotype.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cat Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary , Staphylococcus/classification , Animals , Bacteriological Techniques , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Carrier State/veterinary , Cats , Coagulase/metabolism , Dogs , Environmental Microbiology , Hospitals, Animal , Humans , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/enzymology
6.
Prev Vet Med ; 117(1): 28-39, 2014 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25294317

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global public health problem, which is caused by the use of antimicrobials in both human and animal medical practice. The objectives of the present cross-sectional study were as follows: (1) to determine the prevalence of resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from the feces of pets from the Porto region of Portugal against 19 antimicrobial agents and (2) to assess the individual, clinical and environmental characteristics associated with each pet as risk markers for the AMR of the E. coli isolates. From September 2009 to May 2012, rectal swabs were collected from pets selected using a systematic random procedure from the ordinary population of animals attending the Veterinary Hospital of Porto University. A total of 78 dogs and 22 cats were sampled with the objective of isolating E. coli. The animals' owners, who allowed the collection of fecal samples from their pets, answered a questionnaire to collect information about the markers that could influence the AMR of the enteric E. coli. Chromocult tryptone bile X-glucuronide agar was used for E. coli isolation, and the disk diffusion method was used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility. The data were analyzed using a multilevel, univariable and multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). Several (49.7%) of the 396 isolates obtained in this study were multidrug-resistant. The E. coli isolates exhibited resistance to the antimicrobial agent's ampicillin (51.3%), cephalothin (46.7%), tetracycline (45.2%) and streptomycin (43.4%). Previous quinolone treatment was the main risk marker for the presence of AMR for 12 (ampicillin, cephalothin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, tetracycline, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and aztreonam) of the 15 antimicrobials assessed. Coprophagic habits were also positively associated with an increased risk of AMR for six drugs, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cephamycin, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In summary, pets with a record of one or more previous quinolone treatments and exhibiting coprophagic habits were at an increased risk of harboring multidrug-resistant E. coli strains in their feces compared to pets without these characteristics. AMR is a serious global problem, and assessing the risk markers for the presence of drug-resistant bacteria in pets, a very close source of resistance determinants to humans, is essential for the implementation of safe handling procedures for companion animals and for the prudent selection of antimicrobial compounds in veterinary practice.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cats , Dogs , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Animals , Carrier State , Models, Biological , Portugal , Risk Factors
7.
Microb Drug Resist ; 20(5): 501-7, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24617521

ABSTRACT

Advances in veterinary medicine have resulted in the survival of many animals with severe illness or infectious diseases. In addition, increased usage of antimicrobial agents for veterinary purposes has contributed to the worldwide problem of increasing antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to contribute to better understand the potential and implications for the spread of antimicrobial-resistant enterococci between pets receiving antimicrobial treatments and their owners. Three household aggregates (HA A, B, and C) were selected for this study. Information was collected on individual and clinical parameters of both humans and animals that cohabit. For this study, samples of feces, oral secretions, skin and fur of pets, as well as owners' feces and hands and exposed household surfaces and objects were also collected. All enterococci isolates were analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility. Based on the antimicrobial resistance patterns and origin of isolates, ERIC-PCR analysis was performed on selected isolates to evaluate phylogenetic relationships. In all three HA, Enterococcus faecalis clonal spread was detected between pets and the respective owners, confirming the in-home interanimal species dissemination. Additionally, fecal enterococci colonization of other body parts of the same animal and dissemination of those same enterococci to household surfaces and objects were also observed. Our results demonstrate that enterococcal clones were found in pets in multiple body sites, their human cohabitants, and shared domestic objects.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Enterococcus faecalis/classification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Aminoglycosides/pharmacology , Animals , Dogs , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Enterococcus faecalis/genetics , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Hair/microbiology , Humans , Male , Metronidazole/pharmacology , Phylogeny , Portugal/epidemiology , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL