ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons with opioid use disorders (OUD) and persons with substance use disorders (SUD) who inject substances have a reduced life expectancy of up to 25 years compared with the general population. Chronic liver diseases are a substantial cause of this. Screening strategies based on liver stiffness measurements (LSM) may facilitate early detection, timely intervention, and treatment of liver disease. This study aims to investigate the extent of chronic liver disease measured with transient elastography and the association between LSM and various risk factors, including substance use patterns, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, alcohol use, body mass index, age, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol among people with OUD or with SUD who inject substances. METHODS: Data was collected from May 2017 to March 2022 in a cohort of 676 persons from Western Norway. The cohort was recruited from two populations: Persons receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) (81% of the sample) or persons with SUD injecting substances but not receiving OAT. All participants were assessed at least once with transient elastography. A linear mixed model was performed to assess the impact of risk factors such as HCV infection, alcohol use, lifestyle-associated factors, and substance use on liver stiffness at baseline and over time. Baseline was defined as the time of the first liver stiffness measurement. The results are presented as coefficients (in kilopascal (kPa)) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: At baseline, 12% (n = 83) of the study sample had LSM suggestive of advanced chronic liver disease (LSM ≥ 10 kPa). Advanced age (1.0 kPa per 10 years increments, 95% CI: 0.68;1.3), at least weekly alcohol use (1.3, 0.47;2.1), HCV infection (1.2, 0.55;1.9), low HDL cholesterol level (1.4, 0.64;2.2), and higher body mass index (0.25 per increasing unit, 0.17;0.32) were all significantly associated with higher LSM at baseline. Compared with persistent chronic HCV infection, a resolved HCV infection predicted a yearly reduction of LSM (-0.73, -1.3;-0.21) from baseline to the following liver stiffness measurement. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-tenth of the participants in this study had LSM suggestive of advanced chronic liver disease. It underscores the need for addressing HCV infection and reducing lifestyle-related liver risk factors, such as metabolic health factors and alcohol consumption, to prevent the advancement of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis in this particular population.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology , Liver/pathology , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The recommended treatment duration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a (GT1a) infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in the presence of a high baseline viral load and resistance associated substitutions (RAS) is 16 weeks with ribavirin added. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without ribavirin and regardless of baseline viral load and RAS testing. METHOD: This retrospective, observational cohort study was performed at five Norwegian hospitals that did not systematically utilize RAS testing. All adult patients with chronic HCV GT1a and compensated liver disease who had received 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without ribavirin and baseline RAS testing, were included. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12), or if not available, at week 4 (SVR4). RESULTS: We included 433 patients and attained SVR data on 388. The mean age was 45.7 years (22-73 years). 67.2% were male. HIV co-infection was present in 3.8% (16/424) and cirrhosis in 4% (17/424). The viral load was >800 000 IU/mL in 55.0% (235/427) of patients. Overall SVR was achieved in 97.2% (377/388). SVR was achieved in 98.3% (169/172) of those with viral load ≤800 000 IU/mL and in 96.2% (202/210) of those with viral load >800 000 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: We observed high SVR rates among patients with HCV GT1a infection treated with EBR/GZR for 12 weeks without ribavirin, with no regard to baseline viral load and no RAS testing.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , GenotypeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The standard pathways of testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in tertiary healthcare are not easily accessed by people who inject drugs (PWID). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of integrated treatment of chronic HCV infection among PWID. METHODS AND FINDINGS: INTRO-HCV is a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants recruited from opioid agonist therapy (OAT) and community care clinics in Norway over 2017 to 2019 were randomly 1:1 assigned to the 2 treatment approaches. Integrated treatment was delivered by multidisciplinary teams at opioid agonist treatment clinics or community care centers (CCCs) for people with substance use disorders. This included on-site testing for HCV, liver fibrosis assessment, counseling, treatment, and posttreatment follow-up. Standard treatment was delivered in hospital outpatient clinics. Oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications were administered in both arms. The study was not completely blinded. The primary outcomes were time-to-treatment initiation and sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after treatment completion, analyzed with intention to treat, and presented as hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Among 298 included participants, 150 were randomized to standard treatment, of which 116/150 (77%) initiated treatment, with 108/150 (72%) initiating within 1 year of referral. Among those 148 randomized to integrated care, 145/148 (98%) initiated treatment, with 141/148 (95%) initiating within 1 year of referral. The HR for the time to initiating treatment in the integrated arm was 2.2 (1.7 to 2.9) compared to standard treatment. SVR was confirmed in 123 (85% of initiated/83% of all) for integrated treatment compared to 96 (83% of initiated/64% of all) for the standard treatment (OR among treated: 1.5 [0.8 to 2.9], among all: 2.8 [1.6 to 4.8]). No severe adverse events were linked to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated treatment for HCV in PWID was superior to standard treatment in terms of time-to-treatment initiation, and subsequently, more people achieved SVR. Among those who initiated treatment, the SVR rates were comparable. Scaling up of integrated treatment models could be an important tool for elimination of HCV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov.no NCT03155906.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Drug Users , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/rehabilitation , Adult , Female , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/diagnosis , Sustained Virologic Response , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Viral LoadABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to calculate cumulative hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment coverage among individuals enrolled in opioid agonist therapy (OAT) in Norway between 2013 and 2017 and to document the treatment transition to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents. Moreover, we aimed to describe adherence to DAAs in the same cohort. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, registry data. SETTING: Specialist healthcare service (secondary) PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOMES: This observational study was based on data from The Norwegian Prescription Database. We studied dispensed OAT and HCV treatment annually to calculate the cumulative frequency, and employed secondary sources to calculate prevalence, incidence and HCV treatment coverage from 2013 to 2017, among the OAT population. Factors associated with adherence to DAAs were identified a priori and subject to logistic regression. RESULTS: 10 371 individuals were identified with dispensed OAT, 1475 individuals of these were identified with dispensed HCV treatment. Annual HCV treatment coverage increased from 3.5% (95% CI: 3.2 to 4.4) in 2013 to 17% (95% CI: 17 to 20) in 2017, giving a cumulative HCV coverage among OAT patients in Norway of 38.5%. A complete shift to interferon-free treatment regimens occurred, where DAAs accounting for 32% of HCV treatments in 2013 and 99% in 2017. About two-thirds of OAT patients were considered adherent to their DAA regimens across all genotypes. High level of OAT continuity was associated with improved adherence to DAAs (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI: 1 to 2, p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: A large increase in HCV treatment coverage attributed by a complete shift to interferon-free regimens among the Norwegian OAT population has been demonstrated. However, treatment coverage is inadmissibly too low and a further substantial scale-up in HCV treatment is required to reach the universal targets of controlling and eliminating the HCV endemic.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Humans , Norway/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Universal Health InsuranceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people who inject drugs (PWID) living with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have not been treated. It is unknown whether inclusion of HCV diagnostics and treatment into integrated substance use disorder treatment and care clinics will improve uptake and outcome of HCV treatment in PWID. The aim is to assess the efficacy of integrating HCV treatment to PWID and this paper will present the protocol for an ongoing trial. METHODS: INTRO-HCV is a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial that will compare the efficacy of integrated treatment of HCV in PWID with the current standard treatment. Integrated treatment includes testing for HCV, assessing liver fibrosis with transient elastography, counselling, treatment delivery, follow-up and evaluation provided by integrated substance use disorder treatment and care clinics. Most of these clinics for PWID provide opioid agonist therapy while some clinics provide low-threshold care without opioid agonist therapy. Standard care involves referral to further diagnostics, treatment and treatment follow-up given in a hospital outpatient clinic with equivalent medications. The differences between the delivery platforms in the two trial arms involve use of a drop-in approach rather than specific appointment times, no need for additional travelling, less blood samples taken during treatment, and treatment given from already known clinicians. The trial will recruit approximately 200 HCV infected individuals in Bergen and Stavanger, Norway. The primary outcomes are time to treatment initiation and sustained virologic response, defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after end of treatment. Secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness, treatment adherence, changes in quality of life, fatigue and psychological well-being, changes in drug use, infection related risk behaviour, and risk of reinfection. The target group is PWID with HCV diagnosed receiving treatment and care within clinics for PWID. DISCUSSION: This study will inform on the effects of an integrated treatment program for HCV in clinics for PWID compared to standard care aiming to increase access to treatment and improving treatment adherence. If the integrated treatment model is found to be safe and efficacious, it can be considered for further scale-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov.no. NCT03155906.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/drug therapy , Aftercare , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling , Female , Hepatitis C/etiology , Humans , Male , Norway , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Sustained Virologic Response , Treatment Adherence and ComplianceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Various integrated care models have been used to improve treatment completion of medications for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB), and Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among people with substance use disorders (SUD). We have conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether integrated models have impacts of the treatment of infectious diseases among marginalized people with SUD. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed (1946 to 2018, on July 26, 2018) and Embase (from 1974 to 2018, on July 26, 2018) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating diverse integrated models' effects on sustained virological response (SVR), HIV suppression, HBV curation or suppression, completion of TB treatment regimen among people with SUD. The included studies were assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: Altogether, 1640 studies, and references to 1135 related reviews and RCTs were considered, and only seven RCTs and three cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We identified nine integrated care models. Two studies, one RCT and one cohort study, showed a significant effect of their integrated models. The RCT evaluated psychosocial treatment, opioid agonist treatment (OAT) and directly observed TB treatment, and found a significant increase in TB treatment completions among intervention group compared to control group (60% versus 13%, p < 0.01). The cohort study including OAT and TB treatments had an effect on TB treatment completion in hospitalized patients (89% versus 73%, p = 0.03). Eight out of ten studies showed no significant effects of their integrated care models on defined outcomes. One of which having included 363 participants in a RCT showed no effect on SVR compared to the control group when the results adjusted for active substance use and alcohol dependence in a post-hoc analysis (11% versus 7%, p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate uncertainty on the effects of integrated care models' on treatment for severe infectious diseases among people with SUD. Some studies point toward that integrated models could improve care of people with SUD, yet high-quality studies and preferably, sufficiently sized clinical trials are needed to conclude on the degree of impact.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Communicable Diseases/complications , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/mortality , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Sustained Virologic Response , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Norway, the epidemiological situation of candidemia is followed closely. We have previously demonstrated the highest incidence of candidemia in elderly >65 years of age. However, knowledge of other aspects of this infection is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this nationwide, retrospective study was to examine risk factors, therapeutic practice and outcome in adult candidemia patients according to age. METHODS: We retrieved data from medical records from patients who developed candidemia in Norway between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012. Data were analyzed according to age, younger patients being between 18 and 65 years, elderly being ≥65 years of age. RESULTS: From 771 eligible patients, 738 patients (95.7%) were included (58% men, mean age 65.2 years, 58.1% being ≥65 years). Exposure to health-care related risk factors for candidemia were significantly more common in the younger patients (neutropenia, central venous catheter, mechanical ventilation and chemotherapy) who received empirical treatment more often than the elderly (29.8% vs. 21.7%, p = .01). More elderly did not received any antifungal therapy (27.3% vs 16.8%, p < 0001) and had higher mortality compared to younger patients (45.5% vs 23.9%, p < .0001). In the study population, mortality was higher with age (per 10-years increase, OR 1.43;1.28-1.59, p < 0.0001), in patients not receiving targeted therapy (OR 2.5; CI 1.82-3.36, p < .0001) or any therapy at all (OR 4.64; 3.23-6.68, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for candidemia, treatment and outcome differed significantly according to age. Given the increasing numbers of elderly, scrutiny on our clinical practice is warranted.
Subject(s)
Age Factors , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Candidemia/mortality , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/complications , Norway/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultSubject(s)
Erysipelas/complications , Fetus/pathology , Malacoplakia/pathology , Mothers , Adult , Female , Fetal Development/physiology , Humans , Malacoplakia/diagnosisSubject(s)
Burns/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Sepsis/microbiology , Wound Infection/microbiology , Adult , Burns/complications , Burns/therapy , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Fatal Outcome , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Norway , Pakistan , Patient Transfer , Sepsis/drug therapy , Wound Infection/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Direct-acting antiviral agents have improved treatment outcomes for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; however, head-to-head comparisons are limited. The C-EDGE Head-2-Head Study compared the safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) with sofosbuvir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin (SOF/PR) in patients with HCV infection. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Two hundred fifty-seven patients with HCV genotype (GT)1 or 4 infection and baseline viral load >10,000IU/ml were randomized to receive 12weeks of EBR/GZR 50mg/100mg once daily (n=129) or sofosbuvir (400mg once daily) plus PR (n=128). Primary efficacy objective was sustained virologic response 12weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12, HCV RNA <15IU/ml). The primary safety objective was the proportion of patients experiencing a tier 1 safety event. RESULTS: The majority of patients were non-cirrhotic (83.1%), treatment-naïve (74.9%) and had HCV GT1b infection (82.0%). SVR12 rates were 99.2% (128/129) and 90.5% (114/126) in the EBR/GZR and SOF/PR groups, respectively. The estimated adjusted difference in SVR12 was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-15.3%). Because the lower bound of the 1-sided 1-sample exact test was greater than -10% and greater than zero, both non-inferiority and superiority of EBR/GZR vs. SOF/PR were established. The frequency of tier 1 safety events was lower among patients receiving EBR/GZR than SOF/PR (0.8% vs. 27.8%, between group difference, 27.0% [95% CI, -35.5% to -19.6%; p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: EBR/GZR has a superior efficacy and safety profile in patients with HCV GT1 or 4 infection compared with SOF/PR. LAY SUMMARY: The combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12weeks was highly effective in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C, genotypes 1 or 4 infection. This regimen was more effective than sofosbuvir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin for 12weeks, and was notably superior in patients regarded as difficult to treat, including those with previous treatment failure, cirrhosis, or a high baseline viral load. The combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir also demonstrated a superior safety and tolerability profile based on fewer serious adverse events, no serious drug-related adverse events, and no treatment discontinuations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT02358044.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Antiviral Agents , Benzofurans , Drug Therapy, Combination , Genotype , Hepacivirus , Humans , Imidazoles , Interferons , Quinoxalines , RNA, Viral , Ribavirin , SofosbuvirSubject(s)
Acetamides/adverse effects , Acidosis, Lactic/chemically induced , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Oxazolidinones/adverse effects , Acetamides/administration & dosage , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Acidosis, Lactic/therapy , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Critical Illness , Hemodiafiltration , Humans , Linezolid , Liver Failure/chemically induced , Male , Oxazolidinones/administration & dosage , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency/chemically induced , Sepsis/drug therapy , Toes/pathology , Toes/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patient selection and management of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in Norwegian outpatient clinics is not well studied. The aim of the study was to characterize CHC patients referred to a large university hospital in Norway, identify treatment barriers, and investigate the course and outcomes of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, all anti-HCV-positive patients referred to Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, for treatment evaluation during the period 2007-2010 were included. Demographics, clinical, laboratory, and treatment results were obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were included. The patients were young (mean age 36 ± 10.3), with a high prevalence of genotypes 3 (55%) and 1 (43%) and low levels of fibrosis (77% Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
, Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy
, Patient Compliance
, Adult
, Age Factors
, Ambulatory Care
, Biopsy
, Female
, Genotype
, Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology
, Humans
, Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology
, Male
, Middle Aged
, Norway/epidemiology
, Patient Selection
, Prevalence
, Referral and Consultation
, Registries
, Retrospective Studies
, Risk Factors
, Treatment Outcome
Subject(s)
Headache/diagnosis , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnosis , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Aneurysm, False/diagnosis , Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Infected/diagnosis , Aneurysm, Infected/microbiology , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Cavernous Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Angiography , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Sphenoid Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sphenoid Sinusitis/microbiology , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Endocan is a soluble proteoglycan expressed only by vascular endothelium and is also found circulating in the bloodstream. Inflammatory cytokines as well as proangiogenic growth factors increase its expression, and increased serum levels are found in immunocompetent patients with sepsis. We investigated serum endocan levels in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and AML patients during chemotherapy-induced bone marrow failure. We observed increased levels in 40 AML patients compared with healthy controls, which was also confirmed in a second cohort. The serum levels decreased after intensive chemotherapy and subsequent severe chemotherapy-induced cytopenia, and increased levels were thereafter observed during bone marrow regeneration. However, even for these severely immunocompromized patients, serum endocan levels increased during complicating bacterial infections before a decrease was seen during antibiotic therapy. To conclude, serum endocan is a disease marker in AML, but serum levels are also affected by complicating infections and bone marrow regeneration.