'Totality of Evidence' Approach in the Development of GP2017, an Approved Adalimumab Biosimilar.

INTRODUCTION: Hyrimoz®, (GP2017 [SDZ-ADL]), is a biosimilar to Humira® (REF-ADL). SDZ-ADL was approved in 2018 by both the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the indications of REF-ADL not protected by orphan exclusivity. In 2023, the US FDA and EMA also approved a citrate-free high-concentration formulation (HCF) of SDZ-ADL. TOTALITY OF EVIDENCE-THE APPROACH: Approval of SDZ-ADL was based on data gathered using the US FDA, EMA and World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended step-wise Totality of Evidence approach. This approach is a robust dataset confirming high confidence in analytical, functional, pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical biosimilarity between the biosimilar and reference medicine determined through analytical and clinical investigation. EVIDENCE OF BIOSIMILARITY: Evidence supporting the biosimilarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL was reported at each stage of investigation. Comprehensive comparative analytical and functional assessments demonstrated that SDZ-ADL was analytically indistinguishable from REF-ADL in required critical quality attributes, including receptor binding. Phase I clinical data showed PK similarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL in healthy volunteers, with similar safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles. Phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety studies, ADACCESS (included in US/EU dossiers) and ADMYRA (separate to US/EU dossiers), both confirmed that SDZ-ADL's efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity matched REF-ADL in all patient groups with no clinically meaningful differences. More recently, this data package was the basis for a citrate-free HCF of SDZ-ADL to be developed, and its PK, safety and immunogenicity were confirmed against the initially approved formulation of SDZ-ADL. CONCLUSION: Overall, the Totality of Evidence provided for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the analytical, functional and clinical similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL, supporting its regulatory approval and providing a data bridge with which to evaluate and support the approval of citrate-free HCF SDZ-ADL for clinical use.

A biosimilar is a type of medicine that is designed to match the structure and function of a 'reference' biologic medicine. Hyrimoz^® (SDZ-ADL) is a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference medicine, Humira^® ([REF-ADL]). SDZ-ADL was approved in the US and Europe in 2018. For SDZ-ADL to be approved, a collection of evidence needed to be created, called the 'Totality of Evidence.' The purpose of this collection of data is to show there is a high confidence that the new biosimilar medicine matches the reference medicine, from the structure of the medicine to the effect of the medicine on the human body. For SDZ-ADL, this investigation started with comparing the physical structure and other functional properties of SDZ-ADL versus REF-ADL and ended with clinical studies in both healthy volunteers and in patients with diseases treated with adalimumab. This Totality of Evidence gathered for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL and therefore supported the approval of SDZ-ADL. In 2018, a citrate-free high-concentration version (high concentration formulation [HCF]) of REF-ADL was launched that matched REF-ADL. HCF REF-ADL has since become the primary formulation of REF-ADL used in practice. In 2023, a HCF version of SDZ-ADL was also approved in the US and EU based on evidence confirming that HCF SDZ-ADL matched SDZ-ADL. As SDZ-ADL had been previously confirmed to match the reference medicine, this meant that HCF SDZ-ADL could be directly compared against SDZ-ADL to confirm biosimilarity and support its approval.

Signal-to-noise ratio to assess magnitude, kinetics and impact on pharmacokinetics of the immune response to an adalimumab biosimilar.

Background: The antidrug antibody (ADA) signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio was explored as a novel immunogenicity measure to evaluate the immune response of healthy subjects to a single dose of GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar. Methodology/results: Bioanalytical methods used for the analysis of ADA S/N ratios and ADA titers were validated for sensitivity, precision and drug interference. ADA S/N ratios strongly correlated with ADA titers. Correlations between ADA area under the curve and ADAmax and pharmacokinetics (PK) were stronger for ADA S/N ratio than for ADA titers. Conclusion: ADA S/N ratio allowed for a more sensitive evaluation of the magnitude and kinetics of the immune response, was better correlated with adalimumab PK and was superior to ADA titers in assessing the impact of the immune response on PK.

A plain language summary describing how two different concentrations of GP2017, a biosimilar adalimumab medicine, are associated with similar drug levels within the body.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This plain language summary explains, in simple terms, the results of a study from 2022 discussing a biosimilar medicine called GP2017 (called SDZ-ADL in this summary, sold as Hyrimoz®). This medicine is used to treat people with inflammatory conditions. This study investigated a new, high-concentration formulation of GP2017 (SDZ-ADL-HCF) in order to show that the high concentration option acts the same way in the body as SDZ-ADL. SDZ-ADL-HCF has been submitted for regulatory approval to health authorities on the basis of this study and was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for people with the inflammatory conditions that SDZ-ADL is used to treat. This newly developed formulation provides the option for receiving injections less often with reduced volumes which can have a positive impact on the injection experience and increase patient convenience. WHAT WAS THE AIM OF THE CURRENT STUDY?: This study looked at the pharmacokinetics of SDZ-ADL and SDZ-ADL-HCF, meaning it compared how the active medicine behaved in the body at different times after the injection of each of the formulations. The study also looked at how each formulation was recognized by the body's immune system (known as immunogenicity), and the side effects associated with each formulation. This study was randomly assigned and double-blinded, meaning that neither the participants nor the researchers knew which formulation each participant received. This reduces the risk of bias in the results. WHAT WERE THE FINDINGS FROM THE CURRENT STUDY?: The study found that an injection of SDZ-ADL-HCF resulted in similar amounts of the medicine being present within the blood as an injection of SDZ-ADL. This information was needed for the approval of SDZ-ADL-HCF. Participants also experienced similar immune reactions and the number of participants with side effects was similar between both concentrations of medicine. The results confirmed that SDZ-ADL-HCF behaves in the same way in the body and is expected to have the same treatment effects as SDZ-ADL, while at the same time offering an improved formulation with a more positive injection experience and increased patient convenience.

GP2017-HCF, a high concentration formulation, demonstrates similar pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety to GP2017, an approved adalimumab biosimilar.

BACKGROUND: GP2017 is an adalimumab biosimilar. The objective of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GP2017 in its approved formulation and GP2017-high concentration formulation (HCF) in a randomized, double-blind, two-arm PK bridging study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy male subjects received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of either GP2017-HCF (n = 162) or GP2017 (n = 168). PK, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals [CIs] of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for Cmax, AUC0-inf, AUC0-360 and AUC0-last were within the pre-defined margin of 0.80 to 1.25; thus, PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 was demonstrated. Subgroup analysis of PK comparability by anti-drug antibody (ADA) subpopulation showed that the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for Cmax, AUC0-inf, AUC0-360 and AUC0-last were within the margin of 0.80 to 1.25 in ADA-positive and ADA-negative subjects. The proportions of subjects with positive ADA responses and with neutralizing antibodies were comparable between the GP2017-HCF and GP2017 groups. GP2017-HCF and GP2017 were well tolerated, and there were no reports of deaths or other serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results show PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 and comparable safety and tolerability.

Treatment with SDZ-ADL, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis: Results of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures from Two Phase III Studies (ADMYRA and ADACCESS).

BACKGROUND: SDZ-ADL (GP2017; Sandoz GmbH, Austria) is an EMA-/FDA-approved adalimumab biosimilar. The effect of SDZ-ADL on quality of life (QoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was assessed as part of two phase III studies, one in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PsO; ADACCESS) and the other in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; ADMYRA). Additionally, ADACCESS included patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: ADACCESS included 465 patients with PsO, whereas ADMYRA included 353 patients with RA. Both studies evaluated and confirmed equivalent efficacy, similar safety, and immunogenicity of SDZ-ADL with reference adalimumab (ref-ADL). A third of patients underwent multiple (four) treatment switches between study treatments starting at Week 17 (ADACCESS); all patients switched from ref-ADL to SDZ-ADL at Week 24 (ADMYRA). Assessed PROs included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and EuroQol five-dimension health status questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in ADACCESS, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) score in ADMYRA, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in both studies. RESULTS: In both studies, baseline scores for all PRO assessments were comparable between the two treatment groups. In ADACCESS, mean DLQI decreased from baseline in both groups, and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) percent reductions from baseline in DLQI were comparable between groups at Week 17 (SDZ-ADL, - 64.5 [80.3]; ref-ADL, - 70.6 [41.7]), which were sustained after the switch at Week 51 ('continued SDZ-ADL,' - 79.7 [36.2]; 'continued ref-ADL,' - 80.8 [44.6]; 'switched to SDZ-ADL,' - 70.7 [32.2]; 'switched to ref-ADL,' - 69.3 [49.6]). In ADACCESS, the proportion of patients with an EQ-5D-5L score of 1 (no problems) increased from baseline for all five dimensions in all treatment groups and was comparable between treatment groups at Week 51. In ADACCESS, in patients with PsA at baseline, mean (SD) HAQ-DI scores decreased from baseline in both treatment groups, and scores were comparable between groups at Week 17 (SDZ-ADL, 0.5 [0.6]; ref-ADL, 0.5 [0.6]) and after switching at Week 51 ('continued SDZ-ADL,' 0.4 [0.5]; 'continued ref-ADL,' 0.4 [0.6]; 'switched to SDZ-ADL,' 0.5 [0.8]; 'switched to ref-ADL,' 0.7 [0.6]). In ADMYRA, proportion of patients achieving HAQ-DI in the normal range (≤ 0.5) was comparable between treatment groups at Week 24 (SDZ-ADL, 37.8%; ref-ADL, 36.3%) and after switching at Week 48 ('SDZ-ADL,' 41.6%; 'ref-ADL/switched to SDZ-ADL,' 40.0%). In ADMYRA, mean FACIT-Fatigue scores increased from baseline in both treatment groups. At Week 24, mean (SD) percent change from baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue scores was 75.4 (135.5) in SDZ-ADL and 73.0 (96.3) in ref-ADL groups; the scores were sustained after switching at Week 48. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SDZ-ADL and ref-ADL resulted in comparable improvements in PROs as well as QoL scores across the three diseases, PsO, PsA, and RA. Switching between SDZ-ADL and ref-ADL had no negative impact on PROs across the reported period. CLINICAL TRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02744755, NCT02016105.

Differences in immunogenicity associated with non-product related variability: insights from two pharmacokinetic studies using GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar.

Introduction: Antidrug antibody (ADA) development is known to occur with adalimumab treatment and impacts adalimumab exposure. Here, we compare the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics (PK) across two randomized PK studies of GP2017, an approved biosimilar adalimumab, in healthy subjects. Methods: Healthy male subjects (N= 107 in study GP17-104; N= 90 in study GP17-103) received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of the same GP2017 drug product batch. Cross-study PK comparison was performed for log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-360h, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf, using an ANCOVA model. Results: The proportion of ADA-positive subjects was higher in GP17-103 (in total 71.1%) vs. GP17-104 (57.9%). Comparison of GP2017 PK between studies showed that the exposure was lower in GP17-103 vs GP17-104, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios of AUC0-last and AUC0-inf being outside the range of 0.80-1.25. A subgroup analysis showed that in ADA-negative subjects 90% CIs for all PK parameters were within range, with geometric mean ratios close to 1.00. Conclusion: The differences in GP2017 PK between the two groups are not considered to be product-related, but may be due to currently unknown factors related to differences between the two study populations.

GP2017, an adalimumab biosimilar: pharmacokinetic similarity to its reference medicine and pharmacokinetics comparison of different administration methods.

Background: To compare the pharmacokinetics of Sandoz biosimilar adalimumab (GP2017) with reference adalimumab (Humira) in healthy volunteers (PK similarity study) and to compare the pharmacokinetics of GP2017 administered by autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringe (PFS; delivery study). Methods: Healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of GP2017, US-licensed or EU-authorized reference adalimumab (US/EU-Humira; PK similarity study) or a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of GP2017 via AI or PFS (delivery study). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection. Results: The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax and AUC0-inf were 1.05 (0.99-1.11) and 1.04 (0.96-1.13) for GP2017/EU-Humira and 1.00 (0.94-1.06) and 1.08 (1.00-1.18) for GP2017/US-Humira, all within the prespecified margin of 0.80-1.25 (PK similarity study). Pharmacokinetic parameters of GP2017 matched between AI and PFS (delivery study). Safety and immunogenicity were similar across groups in both studies. Conclusion: PK similarity between GP2017, EU- and US-Humira was demonstrated. The safety profile of GP2017 was consistent with previous reports for Humira. These results contribute to the 'totality-of-the-evidence' supporting biosimilarity of GP2017 to Humira. PK and tolerability were equivalent for GP2017 dosed by AI or PFS. Trial registration: PK similarity study EudraCT no. 2015-000579-28; Delivery study: EudraCT no. 2014-002879-29.

Dynamic 18F-FET PET in suspected WHO grade II gliomas defines distinct biological subgroups with different clinical courses.

In suspected grade II gliomas, three distinct patterns of time-activity curves (TAC) on O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-1-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) positron emission tomography (PET) have been delineated (i) increasing TAC homogeneously throughout the tumor, and decreasing TAC, (ii) either homogeneously throughout the tumor or (iii) only focally within otherwise increasing TAC patterns. Increasing TAC was associated with low-grade histology and decreasing TAC with high-grade histology. This prospective study analyzed whether these patterns correlate with distinct biological tumor subtypes and differential outcome. (18)F-FET PET-guided biopsies were used for stepwise histopathological evaluation. Molecular-genetic evaluation included O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) mutational and 1p/19q codeletion status. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were obtained from multivariate regression models. 98 adult patients were included. Homogeneous increasing, focal decreasing and homogeneous decreasing TAC were seen in 51, 19 and 28 patients. The corresponding 1-year (2-years) PFS were 92% (85%), 89% (51%) and 50% (28%; p = 0.002). IDH1/2 mutations were more frequent in tumors with homogeneous increasing (90%) and focal decreasing (79%) TAC, but were rare in those exhibiting homogeneous decreasing TAC (25%; p < 0.001). Overall, TAC patterns, IDH1/2 mutational and 1p/19q codeletion status were powerful and independent prognostic factors. Dynamic (18)F-FET PET might be an important and independent imaging biomarker for patients with suspected WHO grade II gliomas and offers perspectives for stratified diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Tumors with focal decreasing TAC need highly targeted surgical interventions to avoid undergrading and undertreatment.