Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
1.
Tomography ; 10(5): 686-692, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787013

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Bacterial contamination has been shown to occur during angiographies, although data on its frequency and relevance are sparse. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of bacterial contamination of syringes used under sterile conditions during neuroangiographies. We sought to differentiate between contamination of the outside of the syringes and the inside and to detect the frequency, extent and germ spectrum of bacterial contamination. (2) Methods: We prospectively collected 600 samples from 100 neuroangiographies. Per angiography, fluid samples from the three routinely used syringes as well as the syringes themselves were analyzed. We analyzed the frequency and extent of contamination and determined the germ spectrum. (3) Results: The majority of samples (56.9%) were contaminated. There was no angiography that showed no contamination (0%). The outer surfaces of the syringes were contaminated significantly more frequently and to a higher extent than the inner surfaces. Both the frequency and extent of contamination of the samples increased with longer duration of angiographic procedures. Most of the bacterial species were environmental or skin germs (87.7%). (4) Conclusions: Bacterial contamination is a frequent finding during neuroangiographies, although its clinical significance is believed to be small. Bacterial contamination increases with longer duration of angiographic procedures.


Subject(s)
Equipment Contamination , Syringes , Syringes/microbiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Cerebral Angiography/methods , Radiography, Interventional/methods
2.
GMS Hyg Infect Control ; 18: Doc14, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405250

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate general shortcomings and faculty-specific pitfalls as well as to improve antibiotic prescription quality (ABQ) in non-ICU wards, we performed a prospective cluster trial. Methods: An infectious-disease (ID) consulting service performed a prospective investigation consisting of three 12-week phases with point prevalence evaluation conducted once per week (=36 evaluations in total) at seven non-ICU wards, followed by assessment of sustainability (weeks 37-48). Baseline evaluation (phase 1) defined multifaceted interventions by identifying the main shortcomings. Then, to distinguish intervention from time effects, the interventions were performed in four wards, and the 3 remaining wards served as controls; after assessing effects (phase 2), the same interventions were performed in the remaining wards to test the generalizability of the interventions (phase 3). The prolonged responses after all interventions were then analyzed in phase 4. ABQ was evaluated by at least two ID specialists who assessed the indication for therapy, the adherence to the hospital guidelines for empirical therapy, and the overall antibiotic prescription quality. Results: In phase 1, 406 of 659 (62%) patients cases were adequately treated with antibiotics; the main reason for inappropriate prescription was the lack of an indication (107/253; 42%). The antibiotic prescription quality (ABQ) significantly increased, reaching 86% in all wards after the focused interventions (502/584; nDf=3, ddf=1,697, F=6.9, p=0.0001). In phase 2 the effect was only seen in wards that already participated in interventions (248/347; 71%). No improvement was seen in wards that received interventions only after phase 2 (189/295; 64%). A given indication significantly increased from about 80% to more than 90% (p<.0001). No carryover effects were observed. Discussion: ABQ can be improved significantly by intervention bundles with apparent sustainable effects.

3.
J Med Internet Res ; 24(3): e34098, 2022 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based infectious disease and intensive care management is more relevant than ever. Medical expertise in the two disciplines is often geographically limited to university institutions. In addition, the interconnection between inpatient and outpatient care is often insufficient (eg, no shared electronic health record and no digital transfer of patient findings). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish and evaluate a telemedical inpatient-outpatient network based on expert teleconsultations to increase treatment quality in intensive care medicine and infectious diseases. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (February 2017 to January 2020) to establish a telemedicine inpatient-outpatient network among university hospitals, hospitals, and outpatient physicians in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Patients aged ≥18 years in the intensive care unit or consulting with a physician in the outpatient setting were eligible. We provided expert knowledge from intensivists and infectious disease specialists through advanced training courses and expert teleconsultations with 24/7/365 availability on demand respectively once per week to enhance treatment quality. The primary outcome was adherence to the 10 Choosing Wisely recommendations for infectious disease management. Guideline adherence was analyzed using binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 159,424 patients (10,585 inpatients and 148,839 outpatients) from 17 hospitals and 103 outpatient physicians were included. There was a significant increase in guideline adherence in the management of Staphylococcus aureus infections (odds ratio [OR] 4.00, 95% CI 1.83-9.20; P<.001) and in sepsis management in critically ill patients (OR 6.82, 95% CI 1.27-56.61; P=.04). There was a statistically nonsignificant decrease in sepsis-related mortality from 29% (19/66) in the control group to 23.8% (50/210) in the intervention group. Furthermore, the extension of treatment with prophylactic antibiotics after surgery was significantly less likely (OR 9.37, 95% CI 1.52-111.47; P=.04). Patients treated by outpatient physicians, who were regularly participating in expert teleconsultations, were also more likely to be treated according to guideline recommendations regarding antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.56; P<.001) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (OR 9.31, 95% CI 3.79-25.94; P<.001). For the other recommendations, we found no significant effects, or we had too few observations to generate models. The key limitations of our study include selection effects due to the applied on-site triage of patients as well as the limited possibilities to control for secular effects. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine facilitates a direct round-the-clock interaction over broad distances between intensivists or infectious disease experts and physicians who care for patients in hospitals without ready access to these experts. Expert teleconsultations increase guideline adherence and treatment quality in infectious disease and intensive care management, creating added value for critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03137589; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03137589.


Subject(s)
Outpatients , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Adult , Critical Care , Critical Illness/therapy , Disease Management , Humans
4.
Intern Med J ; 51(6): 965-967, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34155764

ABSTRACT

As data about microbiological testing and the cellular composition of the broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in patients ventilated due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are lacking, this was investigated in a retrospective analysis (n = 58). Co-infection with pathogens was detected in 31 patients, whereas the analysis of BAL cellularity showed an increased total cell count and an alveolitis dominated by neutrophils. None of the physicians performing bronchoscopies in COVID-19 patients had serological evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid , Humans , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Therapeutic Irrigation
6.
SN Compr Clin Med ; 2(12): 2540-2545, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33134846

ABSTRACT

To the best of our knowledge, here, we describe the first hospital-wide outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 that occurred in Germany in April 2020. We aim to share our experience in order to facilitate the management of nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks in healthcare facilities. All patients and hospital workers were screened for SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly. An infection control team on the side was installed. Strict spatial separation of patients and intensified hygiene training of healthcare workers (HCW) were initiated. By the time of reporting, 26 patients and 21 hospital workers were infected with a cluster of cases in the geriatric department. Fourteen patients developed COVID-19 consistent symptoms and five patients with severe pre-existing medical conditions died. The outbreak was successfully contained after intensified infection control measures were implemented and no further cases among patients were detected over a period of 14 days. Strict application of standard infection control measures proved to be successful in the management of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.

9.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 117(22-23): 389-395, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Only limited evidence has been available to date on the accuracy of systematic low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) use in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with non-specific clinical symptoms. METHODS: The COVID-19 Imaging Registry Study Aachen (COVID-19-Bildgebungs-Register Aachen, COBRA) collects data on imaging in patients with COVID-19. Two of the COBRA partner hospitals (RWTH Aachen University Hospital and Dueren Hospital) systematically perform reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal swabs as well as LDCT in all patients presenting with manifestations that are compatible with COVID-19. In accordance with the COV-RADS protocol, the LDCT scans were prospectively evaluated before the RT-PCR findings were available in order to categorize the likelihood of COVID-19. RESULTS: From 18 March to 5 May 2020, 191 patients with COVID-19 manifestations (117 male, age 65 ± 16 years) underwent RT-PCR testing and LDCT. The mean time from the submission of the sample to the availability of the RT-PCR findings was 491 minutes (interquartile range [IQR: 276-1066]), while that from the performance of the CT to the availability of its findings was 9 minutes (IQR: 6-11). A diagnosis of COVID-19 was made in 75/191 patients (39%). The LDCT was positive in 71 of these 75 patients and negative in 106 of the 116 patients without COVID-19, corresponding to 94.7% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [86.9; 98.5]), 91.4% specificity [84.7; 95.8], positive and negative predictive values of 87.7% [78.5; 93.9] and 96.4% [91.1; 98.6], respectively, and an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.959 [0.930; 0.988]. The initial RT-PCR test results were falsely negative in six patients, yielding a sensitivity of 92.0% [83.4; 97.0]; these six patients had positive LDCT findings. 47.4% of the LDCTs that were negative for COVID-19 (55/116) exhibited pathological pulmonary changes, including infiltrates, that were correctly distinguished from SARS-CoV-2 related changes. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptoms compatible with COVID-19, LDCT can esablish the diagnosis of COVID-19 with comparable sensitivity to RT-PCR testing. In addition, it offers a high specificity for distinguishing COVID-19 from other diseases associated with the same or similar clinical symptoms. We propose the systematic use of LDCT in addition to RT-PCR testing because it helps correct false-negative RT-PCR results, because its results are available much faster than those of RT-PCRtesting, and because it provides additional diagnostic information useful for treatment planning regardless of the type of the infectious agent.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics
10.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 117(16): 271-278, 2020 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32519944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The type of pneumonia (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) that is caused by the new coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) is now spreading across the world in a pandemic. Many patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the University Hospital Aachen during an outbreak that first struck the Heinsberg district in February 2020. METHODS: A comparative presentation of the clinical features of the first 50 COVID-19 patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who were hospitalized in the University Hospital Aachen. RESULTS: 24 intubated patients were treated in the intensive care unit for ARDS of varying degrees of severity, while 26 patients who were breathing spontaneously without ARDS, but nevertheless needed supplemental oxygen, were treated in a separate isolation ward. The median age of the patients was 65 (IQR 58-76). The median latency from symptom onset to hospitalization was four days (IQR 1-8). Patients with ARDS had preexisting respiratory diseases more commonly than patients without ARDS (58% [95% confidence interval: 39; 76] versus 42% [26; 61]) and were more commonly overweight or obese (83% [64; 93] versus 42% [26; 61]). The two groups did not differ in viral burden but displayed significant differences in laboratory findings: ARDS patients had persistently elevated values for leukocytes, interleukin-6, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, and D-dimers over the period of observation. Patients without ARDS had persistently elevated inflammatory parameters and fever for at least one week, with an accompanying need for supplemental oxygen. Three of the patients with ARDS died of multiorgan failure, while four in the non-ARDS group died of respiratory insufficiency. CONCLUSION: This initial description of a cohort of COVID-19 patients with and without ARDS in Germany reveals that those with ARDS more commonly have preexisting respiratory diseases and obesity, as well as persistently elevated inflammatory markers. COVID-19 patients without ARDS may likewise require prolonged hospitalization because of persistently elevated inflammatory values with a simultaneous need for supplemental oxygen.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics
12.
Infection ; 48(1): 117-124, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31721022

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational study examined the implementation of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) on the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of a specialized academic teaching hospital. METHODS: Application density of antimicrobial agents (ADA), substance class change, development of resistance, and clinical outcomes were investigated with reference to ABS in three intervals over a 10-year period: the pre-intervention phase (2008-2010), the intervention phase (2011-2014), and the post-intervention phase (2015-2017). RESULTS: Following the introduction of ABS, ADA was reduced from 89.3 recommended daily doses/100 patient days (RDD/100 PD) at the pre-intervention phase to 68.0 RDD/100 PD at the post-intervention phase. The antibiotic ADA (AB-ADA) similarly showed a significant decrease from 83.3 to 62.0 RDD/100 PD (p < 0.0001). The case mix index (CMI), which describes the average case severity across patients and mortality on the SICU was not significantly different comparing intervention and post-intervention phase. It was also possible to achieve a substance class change following the introduction of ABS. There was no obvious change in bacterial resistance rates. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates a sustainable effect of the implementation of ABS, which was sustained through the post-intervention phase.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units , Germany , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Retrospective Studies
13.
Infection ; 47(3): 425-433, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30649684

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We studied the incidence, morbidity and mortality of all patients presenting in our teaching hospital with proven influenza virus and/or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection during the influenza epidemic season 2018 which was characterized by a predominant incidence of influenza virus B type B of the Yamagata line. METHODS: In the fall of 2017, specific precaution measures in addition to standard measures were implemented, including standardized testing for influenza virus A,B and RSV by multiplex PCR of pharyngeal swabsData from all consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall 651 patients were examined for the presence of influenza virus and RSV; 214 patients had influenza virus A (n = 36), B (n = 152), and/or RSV (n = 30), including four patients with dual infection. 86% of cases had influenza virus (80% B), and 14% RSV infection. N = 23 cases were treated as outpatients. The rate of acute viral respiratory infections (influenza virus and RSV) was 191 of 2776 (6.9%) admissions to medical wards. Of n = 191 hospitalized cases, n = 44 cases (20.6%) had nosocomial infection. Viral infections were associated with a high morbidity (pneumonia 28.5%, mortality 4.7%). Independent predictors of prolonged hospitalization were the presence of pneumonia, NIV and renal complications, and independent predictors of pneumonia were age ≥ 65 years, bedridden status and CRP ≥ 2.9 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nosocomial cases was high despite established precaution measures. RSV was associated with morbidity and mortality comparable to influenza. Pneumonia remains the main complication of acute viral respiratory infections, and antimicrobial treatment should include both antiviral as well as antibacterial agents.


Subject(s)
Coinfection/epidemiology , Epidemics , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Acute Disease/epidemiology , Acute Disease/mortality , Adult , Aged , Coinfection/mortality , Coinfection/virology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/virology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Influenza A virus/physiology , Influenza B virus/physiology , Influenza, Human/mortality , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/mortality , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/virology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
14.
Infection ; 47(1): 7-11, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30178076

ABSTRACT

In recent years, an increase in invasive VRE infections has been reported worldwide, including Germany. The most common gene encoding resistance to glycopeptides is VanA, but predominant VanB clones are emerging. Although neither the incidence rates nor the exact routes of nosocomial transmission of VRE are well established, screening and strict infection control measures, e.g. single room contact isolation, use of personal protective clothing by hospital staff and intensified surface disinfection for colonized individuals, are implemented in many hospitals. At the same time, the impact of VRE infection on mortality remains unclear, with current evidence being weak and contradictory. In this short review, we aim to give an overview on the current basis of evidence on the clinical effectiveness of infection control measures intended to prevent transmission of VRE and to put these findings into a larger perspective that takes further factors, e.g. VRE-associated mortality and impact on patient care, into account.


Subject(s)
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Patient Care/methods , Vancomycin Resistance , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/physiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Humans , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/drug effects
16.
BMC Pulm Med ; 18(1): 141, 2018 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30126392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia and septic pneumonic shock are the most common indications for long-term mechanical ventilation and prolonged weaning, independent of any comorbidities. Multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria are emerging as a cause of pneumonia or occur as a consequence of antimicrobial therapy. The influence of MDR bacteria on outcomes in patients with prolonged weaning is unknown. METHODS: Patients treated in a specialized weaning unit of a university hospital between April 2013 and April 2016 were analyzed. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and weaning unit, ventilator-free days and mortality rates were determined in prolonged weaning patients with versus without MDR bacteria (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, [MRSA]; extended spectrum beta lactamase [ESBL]- and Gyrase-producing gram negative bacteria resistant to three of four antibiotic groups [3 MRGN]; panresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria resistant to all four antibiotic groups [4 MRGN]). Weaning failure was defined as death or discharge with invasive ventilation. RESULTS: Of 666 patients treated in the weaning unit, 430 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. A total of 107 patients had isolates of MDR bacteria suspected as causative pathogens identified during the treatment process. Patients with MDR bacteria had higher SAPS II values at ICU admission and a significantly longer ICU LOS. Four MRGN P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanii were the most common MDR bacteria identified. Patients with versus without MDR bacteria had significantly higher arterial carbon dioxide levels at the time of weaning admission and a significantly lower rate of successful weaning (23% vs 31%, p < 0.05). Mortality rate on the weaning unit was 12.4% with no difference between the two patient groups. There were no significant differences between patient groups in secondary infections and ventilator-free days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pneumonia or septic pneumonic shock undergoing prolonged weaning, infection with MDR bacteria may influence the weaning success rate but does not appear to impact on patient survival.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pneumonia/microbiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Ventilator Weaning/adverse effects , Aged , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/complications , Pneumonia/mortality , Survival Rate , Ventilator Weaning/mortality
17.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(10): 1192-1194, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29779691

ABSTRACT

Innovative methods to ensure better compliance in hand hygiene are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to determine if WiFi-based hand hygiene dispenser-driven self-assessment systems (Wireless Fidelity, WiFi-dispenser) can support the work of infection control teams. Our results suggest that the continuous monitoring of dispenser usage can be a valuable addition to infection prevention and control programs, when used in a bundle in combination with conventional hand hygiene training.


Subject(s)
Hand Hygiene/instrumentation , Hand Hygiene/methods , Infection Control/standards , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Equipment and Supplies , Guideline Adherence , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hospitals, University , Humans
18.
Infection ; 46(2): 225-230, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29250713

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The adequate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery is still under discussion due to the wide range of hard and soft tissue procedures as well as contaminated, semi-contaminated and clean surgical sides. Perioperative antibiosis is an easy applicable tool that can be used to decrease nosocomial morbidity and mortality by reducing the rate of infections. We compared strictly perioperative antibiosis with an extended postoperative prophylactic antibiosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 901 consecutive patients, from a tertiary care maxillofacial surgery department were included and distributed into two groups: The first group received peri- and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PP; n = 365) from the day of operation until the fifth day postoperatively. The second group was treated with single shot prophylaxis with intraoperative repetition as needed (SSP; n = 536) only. Furthermore, the patients were grouped according to their main diagnosis and surgical procedure. For comparison, general anamnestic data, cultured bacteria and resistances, number of surgical site infections and duration of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in general diseases or extent of surgery between the groups. There was no statistical difference in the surgical site infections between the groups regardless of their diagnosis. There were significant correlations between tracheotomised patients (p < 0.001) as well as patients with a higher BMI (p = 0.009) and the incidence of surgical site infections. Most common cultured bacteria were staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the study, we believe that a perioperative antibiosis delivers a sufficient prophylaxis for patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery procedures.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Young Adult
19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28413631

ABSTRACT

To assess the scope of infection control measures for multidrug-resistant bacteria in high-risk settings, a survey among university hospitals was conducted. Fourteen professionals from 8 sites participated. Reported policies varied largely with respect to the types of wards conducting screening, sample types used for screening and implementation of contact precautions. This variability among sites highlights the need for an evidence-based consensus of current infection control policies.

20.
Infection ; 45(3): 263-268, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28290130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: "Choosing Wisely" is a growing international campaign aiming at practice changes to improve patient health and safety by both, conduct of essential and avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic procedures. The goal is to create an easily recognizable and distributable list ("Choosing Wisely items") that addresses common over- and underuse in the management of infectious diseases. METHODS: The German Society of Infectious Diseases (DGI) participates in the campaign "Klug Entscheiden" by the German Society of Internal Medicine. Committee members of the (DGI) listed potential 'Choosing Wisely items'. Topics were subjected to systematic evidence review and top ten items were selected for appropriateness. Five positive and negative recommendations were approved via individual member vote. RESULTS: The final recommendations are: (1) Imperatively start antimicrobial treatment and remove the focus in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. (2) Critically ill patients with signs of infection need early appropriate antibiotic therapy. (3) Annual influenza vaccination should be given to individuals with age >60 years, patients with specific co-morbidities and to contact persons who may spread influenza to others. (4) All children should receive measles vaccine. (5) Prefer oral formulations of highly bioavailable antimicrobials whenever possible. (6) Avoid prescribing antibiotics for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections. (7) Do not treat asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics. (8) Do not treat Candida detected in respiratory or gastrointestinal tract specimens. (9) Do not prolong prophylactic administration of antibiotics in patients after they have left the operating room. (10) Do not treat an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin with antibiotics for patients without signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians will reduce potential harm to patients and increase the value of health care when implementing these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases/therapy , Global Health , Health Promotion , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care , Germany , Humans , Public Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...