Blunt bowel and mesenteric trauma: role of clinical signs along with CT findings in patients' management.

BACKGROUND: Bowel and/or mesentery injuries represent the third most common injury among patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Delayed diagnosis increases morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of clinical signs along with CT findings as predictors of early surgical repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2014 and February 2017, charts and CT scans of consecutive patients treated for blunt abdominal trauma in two different trauma centers were reread by two experienced radiologists. We included all adult patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis with CT findings of blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI). We divided CT findings into two groups: the first included three highly specific CT signs and the second included six less specific CT signs indicated as "minor CT findings." The presence of abdominal guarding and/or abdominal pain was considered as "clinical signs." Reference standards included surgically proven BBMI and clinical follow-up. Association was evaluated by the chi-square test. A logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirty-four (4.1%) out of 831 patients who sustained blunt abdominal trauma had BBMI at CT. Twenty-one out of thirty-four patients (61.8%) underwent surgical repair; the remaining 13 were treated conservatively. Free fluid had a significant statistical association with surgery (p = 0.0044). The presence of three or more minor CT findings was statistically associated with surgery (OR = 8.1; 95% CI, 1.2-53.7). Abdominal guarding along with bowel wall discontinuity and extraluminal air had the highest positive predictive value (100 and 83.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients without solid organ injury (SOI), the presence of free fluid along with abdominal guarding and three or more "minor CT findings" is a significant predictor of early surgical repair. The association of bowel wall discontinuity with extraluminal air warrants exploratory laparotomy.

Splenosis of the abdomen and pelvis complicated by torsion of a splenic implant clinically mimicking an acute bowel ischemia.

We present a case of splenosis of the abdomen and pelvis complicated by torsion of a splenic implant in a young female patient clinically mimicking an acute bowel ischemia. Splenosis is a benign condition defined as heterotopic auto-transplantation of splenic tissue throughout different body areas. It may occur after rupture of the spleen, either traumatic or secondary to surgical procedures. Although the presence of heterotopic splenic tissue is often asymptomatic and an incidental finding, it may present with sudden abdominal pain and bleeding. CT and MRI play a critical role in the detection of splenosis-related complications, such as torsion of the vascular pedicle and infarction. Splenosis torsion is extremely rare and it is still a diagnostic dilemma; the complication of abdominal splenosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with previous splenectomy.

Multiple primary synchronous malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary multiple malignancies are progressively increasing due to prolonged survival of cancer patients and to the advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic options. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a 66 year-old caucasian patient with four synchronous primary malignant tumors affecting the lung, oropharynx, large bowel and prostate gland, respectively, treated with multidisciplinary approach. CONCLUSIONS: The increased incidence of multiple malignant tumors is a real challenge to the clinician and clinical attention should be made to avoid a misdiagnosis. In addition an early diagnosis is essential to achieve a radical treatment. We believe that the treatment modality should be carefully made and tailored on the individual patient suffering from this disease.

Can the unenhanced phase be eliminated from dual-phase CT angiography for chest pain? Implications for diagnostic accuracy in acute aortic intramural hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to retrospectively assess the frequency of acute aortic intramural hematoma and evaluate whether the elimination of the unenhanced imaging acquisition series from the dual-phase MDCT angiography (CTA) protocol for chest pain might affect diagnostic accuracy in detecting intramural hematoma and justify the reduced radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2006 to November 2012, 306 patients (mean age, 65.0 years) with acute chest pain underwent emergency CTA with a 64-MDCT scanner. Two experienced cardiovascular radiologists, blinded to the diagnosis, assessed the images in two different sessions in which enhanced (single-phase CTA) and combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced (dual-phase CTA) findings were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy along with 95% CIs were calculated. Surgical and pathologic diagnoses, including findings at clinical follow-up and any subsequent imaging modality, were used as reference standards. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were suspected of having intramural hematoma; 16 patients underwent both surgery and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and the remaining 20 underwent TEE. Single-phase CTA showed a higher number of false-negative and false-positive results than dual-phase CTA. With intramural hematoma frequency of 12% (95% CI, 8.38-15.91%), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 94.4% (81.3-99.3%), 99.3% (97.4-99.9%), and 98.7% (96.7-99.6%) for combined dual-phase CTA and 68.4% (51.4-82.5%), 96.3% (93.2-98.2%), and 92.8% (89.3-95.4%) for single-phase CTA. Dual-phase was significantly better than single-phase CTA with respect to sensitivity (p=0.002), specificity (p=0.008), overall accuracy (p<0.001), and interrater agreement (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The frequency of acute aortic intramural hematoma is similar to that previously reported. The acquisition of unenhanced images during the chest pain dual-phase CTA protocol significantly improves diagnostic accuracy over single-phase CTA.

Acute bowel ischemia: analysis of diagnostic error by overlooked findings at MDCT angiography.

To retrospectively evaluate the frequency and type of findings that were missed in the original reports of multi-detector CT angiography (MDCTA) in patients with suspected acute bowel ischemia. From January 2007 to March 2011, a series of 35 patients who underwent MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis and had surgery were included. The reports of the initial CT were retrospectively compared with the discharge diagnosis and surgical reports. Discrepant or missing findings were re-evaluated and divided into relevant or not relevant regarding the diagnosis. In 23 of the 35 patients (66 %), all findings were correctly diagnosed in the initial MDCTA report. In the remaining 12 of the 35 patients (34 %), lesions that were not reported were present at surgery. In 10 of the 12 (83 %) patients, the overlooked findings were relevant and subtle: gas in the portal vein (n = 3), gas in the bowel wall (n = 3), gas in the portal vein and bowel wall (n = 2), thrombotic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (n = 1), and thrombotic occlusion of the inferior mesenteric artery (n = 1). In 2 of the 12 (17 %) patients in whom the MDCTA-overlooked findings were classified as non-relevant, bowel ischemia was found at surgery. With retrospective image interpretation, 83 % of the patients with occlusive mesenteric ischemia at surgery were correctly identified, whereas the remaining 17 % with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia at surgery showed non-relevant findings at MDCTA. About 33 % of relevant findings of bowel ischemia were overlooked by the initial MDCTA interpretation, most were subtle findings. However, secondary reading revealed most of these findings and can serve to improve diagnostic performance.