Cultural Influences on the Creation and Use of Psychiatric Advance Directives.

Little published research exists on how culture influences mental health service users when they create or use psychiatric advance directives (PADs). This column reports the results of a study (N=38 participants) of cultural factors that might encourage New Zealand Maori who engage in mental health services to make greater use of PADs in their care. The most important factor identified was the inclusion of family and friends in decision making during PAD creation and use. Discussions revealed multiple culturally important themes that were synthesized into a conceptual model, pou herenga (mooring place), which focuses on the importance of reassessing all aspects of one's life journey when creating a PAD.

Use of advance directives to promote supported decision-making in mental health care: Implications of international trends for reform in New Zealand.

Advance directives are advocated, in many jurisdictions, as a way to promote supported decision-making for people who use mental health services and to promote countries' compliance with their obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities promotes the use of tools to further personal autonomy which would include integrating the use of advance directives into mental health law, to clarify the effect (or force) an advance directive carries when its maker comes under the relevant mental health legislation. In addition, securing the active use of advance directives requires adoption of certain supportive practices and policies within health services. Here, we discuss a number of approaches taken to advance directives in revised mental health legislation, and the associated practices we think are required.

Help and Hindrances to Completion of Psychiatric Advance Directives.

Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) allow service users to participate in their own mental health care in the event that they have a future mental health crisis and are deemed incompetent to make decisions, but few patients complete these documents. This Open Forum reports on factors that have helped or hindered completion of PADs in New Zealand. Perceived barriers to completion include resource limitations, procedural issues, access and storage problems, and mistrust between clinicians and service users regarding implementation. Having management and nursing "champions" of the process and organizing outreach meetings for all interested parties appear to aid completion. Targeted education and training promote creation and use of PADs, address negative attitudes, and assist service users in creating these documents. Information technology support is vital to having PADs uploaded and accessed in medical records.

The content of Mental Health Advance Preference statements (MAPs): An assessment of completed advance directives in one New Zealand health board.

BACKGROUND: Mental health advance directives support service users' autonomy and provide a voice in their care choices when they may not have capacity to give informed consent. New Zealand's Southern District Health Board has recently introduced advanced directives in mental health services. METHOD: Completed advance directives (n = 53) and additional demographic data were accessed from clinical records. ANALYSIS: Each advance directive was read and analysed by three members of the research team. The advance directive instrument has eight possible fields which could be completed, covering such topics as who should be contacted in a crisis; people service users do, or do not, want involved in their treatment; what service users would, or would not like to have happen should they become unwell; management of personal affairs; other specific preferences; and provision of further relevant information. The number of preferences stated in each field was also calculated. RESULTS: The advance directives provided expressions of preferences which were personally meaningful for service users and provided practical guidance for clinicians. Service users expressed mainly positive preferences, though some expressed negative treatment preferences, and many service users expressed preferences relating to personal affairs. Friends, family members and clinicians were nominated as preferred contacts in a crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Service users will engage with advance directives if supported to do so. This study's results should help promote the wider availability of advance directives in New Zealand and the current reform of our mental health legislation.

Service user, whanau and peer support workers' perceptions of advance directives for mental health.

Advance directives allow users of mental health services to make statements for their future care. In New Zealand, use of advance directives is supported by the Health and Disability Commissioner and was identified in the 2012 Blueprint as a key mechanism for service users to advocate for responses they find most helpful. This study used a qualitative descriptive methodology involving focus groups to explore the perceptions of service users, whanau and peer support workers concerning advance directives. Thematic analysis revealed certain belief patterns about what should or could be included in an advance directive, and about how and with whom one should be created. It revealed generally positive perceptions about how they can uphold service users' right to have preferences considered, to plan flexibly around dynamic needs, and about their value and utility. We conclude that advance directives can support services users' expressions of their preferences for care, but they need to be supported by clinicians if they are to realize this potential. Our findings can also inform service provision in New Zealand, and the planned reform of mental health legislation.

A MAP to mental health: the process of creating a collaborative advance preferences instrument.

AIMS: To document the process of developing a local advance directive for mental health care, which we are calling a MAP (Mental-health Advance Preferences statement). METHODS: Data on advance directive preferences were collected from consumers and service providers using online surveys and analysed using quantitative methods. RESULTS: Both groups reported strong overall support for advance directives. They particularly favoured inclusion of items concerning personal support at difficult times. Consumers strongly advocated inclusion of statements regarding treatment options. There was broad agreement that advance directives could increase consumers' sense of autonomy and empowerment, but service providers were less inclined to believe they helped consumers engage with mental health services or improve self-management skills. There was a highly significant divergence between service providers and consumers on whether the powers under the Mental Health Act should be able to override the consumer's instructions. CONCLUSIONS: MAPs aimed at facilitating treatment decisions have good acceptability from consumers and mental health clinicians. The use of peer support workers as facilitators may be an important step in successful completion of an advance directive. Future research will aim to examine national implementation of MAPs.

Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: The Problem with "Fast Cars".

Prenatal screening and its technological counterpart, prenatal diagnosis (PND), have been the subject of extensive debate since their inception, particularly given PND's inextricable links with abortion. Despite this, prenatal screening policy and practice has evolved over the last few decades and is now well established. However, a new permutation of prenatal testing, first performed in 2011 and subject to rapid commercialisation, potentially heralds a new era. This article provides an introduction to non-invasive prenatal testing and outlines some of the ethical and legal issues associated with the early clinical integration of this rapidly evolving technology.

Lessons from export to New Zealand of the second opinion appointed doctor scheme.

Aims and method We compared findings of an audit of New Zealand's version of the second opinion appointed doctor (SOAD) scheme with published information on the equivalent scheme for England and Wales, to consider what might be learnt from the different jurisdictions' experience. Results Strong similarities exist between the two schemes in the demographic profile of individuals subject to the SOAD process and rates of approval of compulsory treatment. The clearer legal framework for the English scheme and its supervision by an independent national agency may offer significant advantages in terms of consistency and transparency, compared with the informal, decentralised structure of New Zealand's scheme. Clinical implications Clinicians may not always favour greater formality or elaborate national structures for administering the Mental Health Act, but there are advantages in promoting clarity and consistency in a mandatory statutory process designed to protect compulsory patients' rights.

When the mandatory second opinion fails to approve compulsory treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To examine situations in which compulsory treatment was not approved by the second opinion required under New Zealand's Mental Health Act. METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 11 index cases where full approval of treatment was not given and of 33 matched controls. RESULTS: The reasons for non-approval of treatment were diverse. Following non-approval, intensive consultation occurred, reflecting significant disagreement between clinicians. The process of resolution included discharge from the Act, patients consenting to treatment and alternative treatment plans. Compared with controls, index cases had significantly lower rates of being mentally well in the community over the subsequent year. CONCLUSIONS: Non-approval marks a group of patients with very poor clinical outcome. Explicit processes are needed to manage non-approval of compulsory treatment plans.