Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Semin Nephrol ; 43(1): 151396, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37573769

ABSTRACT

Offering and providing effective conservative kidney management (CKM) for patients with end-stage kidney disease who do not want dialysis is a foundational skill that all nephrology fellows should learn during fellowship training. However, the current educational landscape in fellowship training programs is sparse and is not recognized currently as a skill within the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) guidelines. Moreover, there is no standardized curriculum, methods of assessment of this learning objective, and no structure for implementation within general and subspecialty nephrology training programs. In this article, we discuss the current educational resources available for fellowship training programs, including interactive communication skills workshops such as NephroTalk, that address core concepts of CKM and assess communication skills and attitudes of trainees. Additional assessment tools should be prioritized when developing a CKM curriculum, including assessment of symptom management and medical knowledge acquisition. We propose that the ACGME nephrology milestones specifically highlight CKM as an important component within the ACGME nephrology milestones, thus ensuring that trainees understand how and when to offer CKM (knowledge), implement it effectively (skills), and conceptualize it as an appropriate course for patients in a number of varied situations (attitudes). We also outline a subspecialty pathway for palliative nephrology, to align with the recent American Society of Nephrology Task Force Recommendation to provide subspecialty training beyond core competencies, for those interested in pursuit of advanced training that ultimately can shape the CKM landscape in education and policy making.

4.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(4): 517-528, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861792

ABSTRACT

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) improve the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging. Although initially believed to be without major adverse effects, GBCA use in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) was demonstrated to cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Restrictive policies of GBCA use in CKD and selective use of GBCAs that bind free gadolinium more strongly have resulted in the virtual elimination of NSF cases. Contemporary studies of the use of GBCAs with high binding affinity for free gadolinium in severe CKD demonstrate an absence of NSF. Despite these observations and the limitations of contemporary studies, physicians remain concerned about GBCA use in severe CKD. Concerns of GBCA use in severe CKD are magnified by recent observations demonstrating gadolinium deposition in brain and a possible systemic syndrome attributed to GBCAs. Radiologic advances have resulted in several new imaging modalities that can be used in the severe CKD population and that do not require GBCA administration. In this article, we critically review GBCA use in patients with severe CKD and provide recommendations regarding GBCA use in this population.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Gadolinium/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnostic imaging , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Contrast Media/metabolism , Gadolinium/metabolism , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy/diagnostic imaging , Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy/metabolism , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/metabolism , Risk Factors
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 76(6): 851-860, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32659245

ABSTRACT

Dietary supplement use is high among US adults, with the intention by users to promote overall health and wellness. Kidney donors, who are selected based on their overall good health and wellness, can have high utilization rates of dietary supplements. We provide a framework for the evaluation of living kidney donors and use of dietary supplements. In this review, dietary supplements will include any orally administered dietary or complementary nutritional products, but excluding micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), food, and cannabis. Use of dietary supplements can influence metabolic parameters that mask future risk for chronic illness such as diabetes and hypertension. Dietary supplements can also alter bleeding risk, anesthesia and analgesic efficacy, and safety in a perioperative period. Finally, postdonation monitoring of kidney function and risk for supplement-related nephrotoxicity should be part of a kidney donor educational process. For practitioners evaluating a potential kidney donor, we provide a list of the most commonly used herbal supplements and the effects on evaluation in a predonation, perioperative donation, and postoperative donation phase. Finally, we provide recommendations for best practices for integration into a comprehensive care plan for kidney donors during all stages of evaluation. We recommend avoidance of dietary supplements in a kidney donor population, although there is a paucity of data that identifies true harm. Rather, associations, known mechanisms of action, and common sense suggest that we avoid use in this population.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors , Humans , Nephrectomy
8.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 75(2): 245-255, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31601429

ABSTRACT

With an increasingly aging population and improved mortality in individuals with end-stage kidney disease, more surgeries are being performed on patients with all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This high-risk population carries unique risk factors that have been associated with increased adverse perioperative outcomes, including acute kidney injury, cardiovascular events, and mortality. In this article, we review the literature describing absolute risks associated with common surgeries performed in patients with CKD and patients receiving maintenance dialysis. We also review perioperative optimization with special risk assessment including evaluation of cardiovascular and bleeding risk evaluation, hypertension management, and timing of dialysis. Predictive model scores are reviewed as a method to stratify risk for acute kidney injury, major adverse cardiac events, or other serious complications with elective surgeries. A multidisciplinary approach with individualized counseling is necessary to counsel the patient with advanced CKD or patients treated with maintenance dialysis considering elective surgery.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Renal Dialysis/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Risk Assessment/methods , Disease Progression , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
9.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 75(1): 105-113, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31473019

ABSTRACT

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has long been observed in both experimental and clinical studies. However, recent observational studies have questioned the prevalence and severity of CIN following intravenous contrast exposure. Initial studies of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast were limited by the absence of control groups or contained control groups that did not adjust for additional acute kidney injury risk factors, including prevalent chronic kidney disease, as well as accepted prophylactic strategies. More contemporary use of propensity score-adjusted models have attempted to minimize the risk for selection bias, although bias cannot be completely eliminated without a prospective randomized trial. Based on existing data, we recommend the following CIN risk classification: patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) ≥ 45mL/min/1.73m2 are at negligible risk for CIN, while patients with eGFRs<30mL/min/1.73m2 are at high risk for CIN. Patients with eGFRs between 30 and 44mL/min/1.73m2 are at an intermediate risk for CIN unless diabetes mellitus is present, which would further increase the risk. In all patients at any increased risk for CIN, the risk for CIN needs to be balanced by the risk of not performing an intravenous contrast-enhanced study.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Administration, Intravenous/statistics & numerical data , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Injections, Intra-Arterial/statistics & numerical data , Mortality , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
11.
Hemodial Int ; 23(1): 93-100, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762294

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are hospitalized nearly twice yearly, and 35% of these patients are rehospitalized within 30-days postdischarge. We hypothesized that monitored oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) during HD treatment may decrease readmissions. METHODS: A cohort of maintenance HD patients, treated at a large dialysis organization, who were hospitalized with a postdischarge albumin of ≤3.5 g/dL, without documented ONS use 90 days prior to the index hospitalization were identified. Individuals who received monitored intradialytic ONS postdischarge were compared to those without receipt of ONS. The outcome of interest was 30-day hospital readmissions. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between ONS receipt and 30-day readmission events, with adjustment for case-mix and laboratory variables. FINDINGS: Of 5479 eligible patients, ONS was prescribed to 1420 individuals. Mean age was 64.6 ± 14.1 (SD) years; median dialysis vintage was 3.9 years. There were 274 (19%) readmissions among ONS recipients vs. 1571 (38.7%) among controls during the 30-day follow-up period. Individuals who did not receive ONS had increased odds of readmission [OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.02, 2.53)] in 30 days, as compared to those who did receive ONS postdischarge. In sensitivity analyses using a propensity score matched cohort, the odds ratio of readmissions within 30 days postdischarge was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.42, 2.07) for individuals who did not receive ONS as compared to those who received ONS. DISCUSSION: Consumption of ONS during HD sessions is associated with reduced hospital readmission rates among in-center maintenance HD with severe hypoalbuminemia at 30 days post-hospital discharge.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/standards , Hospitalization/trends , Patient Readmission/trends , Renal Dialysis/methods , Administration, Oral , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
13.
Semin Dial ; 30(4): 290-304, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28382626

ABSTRACT

Contrast exposure in a population with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires additional consideration given the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after exposure to iodinated contrast as well as systemic injury with exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). Strategies to avoid CIN, and manage patients after exposure, including extracorporeal removal of contrast media, may differ among an advanced CKD population as compared to a general population. There is strong evidence to support the use of isotonic volume expansion and the lowest dose of low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media possible to decrease CIN. The current literature on other newer prophylactic strategies such as statins, remote ischemic preconditioning, discontinuation of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade, and RenalGuard is limited thus these strategies cannot currently be recommended as routine prophylaxis for CIN. The use of extracorporeal removal of contrast agents as prophylaxis to reduce CIN has been the subject of multiple studies; however, data do not support a beneficial effect in reduction in CIN. Immediate removal of contrast by dialysis in a maintenance dialysis population is also not recommended, unless an individual's cardiopulmonary status is dependent on strict volume management. In patients with reduced renal function, GCBA exposure increases the risk of NSF. In patients with AKI, CKD stage 3 or greater (eGFR <30 ml/minute/1.73 m2 ), or patients on dialysis, we do not recommend the use of GBCA and alternative imaging modalities should be considered. If patients absolutely need magnetic resonance imaging with GBCA, we recommend the use of the lowest dose possible of the newer macrocylic, ionic agents (gadoterate meglumine) as well as immediate postprocedural HD in patients already on HD or peritoneal dialysis or with stage 5 CKD and with a functioning dialysis access already in place.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnostic imaging , Radiography
14.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 69(3): 341-349, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27233381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low urine potassium excretion, as a surrogate for dietary potassium intake, is associated with higher risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease in a general population. Few studies have investigated the relationship of urine potassium with clinical outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: The MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study was a randomized controlled trial (N = 840) conducted in 1989 to 1993 to examine the effects of blood pressure control and dietary protein restriction on kidney disease progression in adults aged 18 to 70 years with CKD stages 2 to 4. This post hoc analysis included 812 participants. PREDICTOR: The primary predictor variable was 24-hour urine potassium excretion, measured at baseline and at multiple time points (presented as time-updated average urine potassium excretion). OUTCOMES: Kidney failure, defined as initiation of dialysis therapy or transplantation, was determined from US Renal Data System data. All-cause mortality was assessed using the National Death Index. RESULTS: Median follow-up for kidney failure was 6.1 (IQR, 3.5-11.7) years, with 9 events/100 patient-years. Median all-cause mortality follow-up was 19.2 (IQR, 10.8-20.6) years, with 3 deaths/100 patient-years. Baseline mean urine potassium excretion was 2.39±0.89 (SD) g/d. Each 1-SD higher baseline urine potassium level was associated with an adjusted HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-1.04) for kidney failure and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.94) for all-cause mortality. Results were consistent using time-updated average urine potassium measurements. LIMITATIONS: Analyses were performed using urine potassium excretion as a surrogate for dietary potassium intake. Results are obtained from a primarily young, nondiabetic, and advanced CKD population and may not be generalizable to the general CKD population. CONCLUSIONS: Higher urine potassium excretion was associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality, but not kidney failure.


Subject(s)
Potassium/urine , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/urine , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...