Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 136(2): 167-172, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35001862

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for salivary gland carcinoma are poorly understood. Although links between background radiation, smoking and obesity have been previously suggested, no studies have so far established any significant results. This study aimed to establish correlations between common environmental and lifestyle risk factors and different subtypes of salivary gland carcinoma. METHOD: A study of population data in Wales spanning 27 years was conducted; 2 national databases were used to identify 356 cases of primary salivary gland carcinoma over this period. Histological subtype of cancer and geographical location of each case was recorded. Public health data was used to establish radon levels, smoking, obesity and activity levels of populations in each geographical location. A population matched multivariate analysis of variance analysis was performed using histological subtype and risk factor data for each geographical location. RESULTS: A significantly higher incidence of mucoepidermoid cancer in populations with higher background radon levels (p = 0.006), epithelial-myoepithelial cancer in populations with higher smoking levels (p = 0.029) and adenoid cystic cancer in populations with higher obesity levels (p = 0.028) was found. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to establish significant links between background radiation, smoking and obesity with different subtypes of salivary gland carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/epidemiology , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinogens, Environmental , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/pathology , Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid/pathology , Humans , Myoepithelioma/epidemiology , Myoepithelioma/pathology , Radon Daughters , Risk Factors , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Wales/epidemiology
2.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 40(5): 420-1, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25639608

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It is generally accepted that paediatric intranasal foreign bodies should be removed in the emergency setting. In the case of a difficult to access dissolvable foreign body in an uncooperative child, the question must be raised regarding whether or not a watch and wait strategy is more appropriate. We ask: How long does it take for popular sweets (candy) to dissolve in the human nose? METHODS: Five popular UK sweets were placed in the right nasal cavity of a 29-year-old male (the author) with no sino-nasal disease. Time taken to dissolve was recorded. RESULTS: All five sweets were completely dissolved in under one hour. DISCUSSION: A watch and wait strategy in favour of examination under anaesthetic may be a viable option in some cases. Limitations of the study include the age of the participant and size of the sweets. It is also important in practice that the clinician is able to elicit an accurate history regarding the exact nature of the foreign body. CONCLUSION: It remains prudent to perform an examination under anaesthetic of an uncooperative child with a solid or unknown nasal foreign body. However, if the clinician can be certain the foreign body is a small sugar or chocolate based sweet only, a watch and wait strategy may be a reasonable choice.


Subject(s)
Candy , Foreign Bodies , Nose , Adult , Autoexperimentation , Chemical Phenomena , Child , Humans , Male , Time Factors , United Kingdom
3.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 38(3): 278-9, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23745540
5.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 93(6): 441-4, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21929913

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal soft food bolus obstruction (OSFBO) is a surgical emergency. However, no national guidelines exist regarding its management. This paper systematically reviews the literature with respect to the management of OSFBO. METHODS: Relevant studies included were identified from the the Cochrane Library, the National Center for Biotechnology Information and the US National Library of Medicine resources. A systematic review was performed on 8 November 2010. RESULTS: This systematic review of the management of OSFBO shows no evidence that any medical intervention is more effective than a 'watch and wait' policy in enabling spontaneous disimpaction. Furthermore, the use of hyoscine butylbromide for OSFBO probably stems from a misquoted textbook. Surgical removal of an OSFBO is effective but not without potential risk. There is some evidence to support surgical intervention within 24 hours to prevent complications deriving from the initial obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for large double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled trials of drugs used in the medical management of OSFBO. Until the results from such trials are available, the treatment of OSFBO will remain based on inconsistent clinical judgement.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Esophagus , Food , Foreign Bodies/therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Butylscopolammonium Bromide/therapeutic use , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/methods , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Glucagon/therapeutic use , Humans , Parasympatholytics/therapeutic use , Watchful Waiting
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...