Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
3.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 39(6): 642-647, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749909

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photopatch testing represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD). We aimed to identify common photoallergens in our tertiary dermatological referral centre from 2012 to 2021, to compare this to the preceding period studied, and data from other communities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all 90 patients who underwent photopatch testing at the National Skin Centre, Singapore, between 2012 and 2021. RESULTS: Of 90 patients, 19 (21.1%) were male, and the mean age was 41.6 years. Eighty-four (93.3%) underwent testing to our standard sunscreen series, 10 (11.1%) to our extended series, and 73 (81.1%) to their own items. Seventeen (18.9%) were diagnosed with PACD (i.e., photocontact allergy with present or past relevance), 12 (13.3%) with ACD, and 4 (4.4%) with photoaugmented ACD. Relevant reactions were commonest to oxybenzone (8, 9.5%) and mexenone (3, 3.6%). Eleven (15.1%) had PACD to their own items, with 3 of 4 (75%) tested to ketoprofen diagnosed with PACD and the remaining 1 (25%) with photoaugmented ACD. Age, race, sex, atopy, and site of involvement were not associated with photocontact allergy. Compared to the preceding time period, the overall frequency of photocontact allergy and PACD decreased, but rates of photoallergic reactions to individual photoallergens were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Organic ultraviolet absorbers such as oxybenzone and mexenone remained the most relevant photoallergens. Personal item testing was valuable, and testing to ketoprofen should be considered.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Photoallergic , Ketoprofen , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Retrospective Studies , Singapore , Patch Tests , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/etiology , Sunscreening Agents
8.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol ; 12(7): 52-58, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31531162

ABSTRACT

Objective: We compared the irritancy potential of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-free aqueous cream to SLS-containing aqueous cream and other moisturizers. Design: This was a double-blind, intraindividual occlusive study. SLS-containing aqueous cream; SLS-free aqueous cream; white soft paraffin; urea cream; Physiogel® (Stiefel Laboratories, Brentford, United Kingdom); QV cream (Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd., Braeside, Australia); Cetaphil RestoraDerm® (Galderma Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas); Ceradan® (Hyphens Pharma International Ltd., Singapore); normal saline; and SLS 1% aqueous were applied with Finn chamber occlusion to different sites on each participant's back for 72 hours. Skin assessments were carried out on Day 0 preapplication and Day 3 and Day 7 postapplication. Participants: Twelve healthy adult volunteers were included in this study. Measurements: Study subjects were clinically evaluated by an experienced dermatologist using a four-point severity scale to assess the severity of erythema, dryness, desquamation, stinging or burning, and pruritus. Corneometer® and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) readings were taken to assess skin hydration and skin barrier integrity, respectively. All measurements were performed on Days 0, 3, and 7. Results: Application of the SLS-free aqueous cream resulted in no significant changes in TEWL or Corneometer® readings throughout the study period. The SLS-containing aqueous cream resulted in a significant increase in TEWL from Day 0 to Days 3 and 7. All test moisturizer creams showed no significant changes in their clinical assessment scores. Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that SLS-free aqueous cream has a lower irritancy potential than SLS-containing aqueous cream, with the same level of maintenance of skin barrier integrity and hydration. SLS-free aqueous cream also appears to be less irritating to the skin than other non-SLS generic and commercial moisturizers tested.

9.
Dermatitis ; 25(2): 77-82, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24603520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preservatives are indispensable agents used to prevent bacterial and fungal contamination of cosmetics, personal care products, domestic preparations, and industrial products. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated patch-test data at the National Skin Centre, Singapore, from 2006 to 2011 to identify the trends in preservative contact allergies. METHODS: All patients with suspected contact dermatitis were patch tested to 4 preservatives within the modified European standard series. Patients were also tested with 7 preservatives from our special series if clinically indicated. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred seventy-seven patients were tested to preservatives in the standard series. Sensitization frequencies were all greater than 1%: parabens (2.58%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (1.75%), quaternium 15 (1.43%), and methyldibromoglutaronitrile (1.2%). There was no change in trends in sensitization frequencies from 2006 to 2011, with no increase in sensitization frequency to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. The sensitization frequencies for methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol and diazolidinylurea were 2.03% and 1.37%, respectively, and remained less than 1% for bronopol, imidazolidinyl urea, and 2-phenoxyethanol. A rate of 0% was seen for 1,3-dimethylol-5,5-dimethyl hydantoin and formaldehyde; 9.4% of positive patch-test results became positive only at day 7. CONCLUSIONS: Preservatives are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis. This should be considered when introducing new preservatives into the market. Day 7 readings are important to detect late reactions.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Patch Tests , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Ethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Facial Dermatoses/epidemiology , Female , Formaldehyde/adverse effects , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Humans , Hydantoins/adverse effects , Male , Methenamine/adverse effects , Methenamine/analogs & derivatives , Middle Aged , Neck , Nitriles/adverse effects , Parabens/adverse effects , Prevalence , Propylene Glycols/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Singapore/epidemiology , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Time Factors , Urea/adverse effects , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Young Adult
10.
Int J Trichology ; 5(1): 35-7, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23960396

ABSTRACT

Trichothiodystrophy (TTD) is an autosomal recessive condition characterized by brittle and sparse sulfur deficient hair. The disorder is due to a known genetic mutation in DNA nucleotide excision repair (NER) in up to 83% of cases. We describe a 13-month-old girl presenting with hair fragility and hair loss since age 3 months, and discuss the overlap between TTD and other NER diseases. This case report highlights the importance of early diagnosis of occult learning disorder in young children with TTD and the need for early assessment and involvement of multidisciplinary team to target the child's educational needs.

11.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 29(3): 116-20, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23651271

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photopatch testing is important for diagnosing photoallergic contact dermatitis. We aimed to evaluate the use of photopatch test at the National Skin Centre, Singapore. METHODS: All patients who had photopatch tests done between 2007 and 2011 at the National Skin Centre were included. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included. The mean age was 40.2. Female : male ratio was 3.4. The ethnic groups were Chinese (68%), Malay (4%), Indian (14%) and others (14%). Ten out of 22 patients (45.5%) had a positive photopatch test. There were 20 positive photopatch test reactions found in these 10 patients, and all 20 positive reactions were of current relevance. The frequencies of the positive photopatch test reactions were 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (oxybenzone) (n = 6), 2-hydroxymethoxymethylbenzophenone (mexenone) (n = 3), 2-ethylhexyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate (n = 1), ketoprofen gel (n = 1) and the patient's own product (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that sunscreen is the most common photoallergen to date as opposed to musk ambrette, which was the most common photoallergen in our earlier study in 1991-1993. This finding is similar to the recent European Multicentre Photopatch Test Study.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/diagnosis , Dinitrobenzenes/adverse effects , Mutagens/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Allergens/administration & dosage , Child , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/pathology , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/physiopathology , Dinitrobenzenes/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutagens/administration & dosage , Singapore , Skin Tests
12.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 24(4): 278-82, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22384983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adapalene gel 0.1% is an efficacious treatment for acne vulgaris in Asians. It is generally well tolerated, but may still cause cutaneous side effects among patients with sensitive skin. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a moisturizing lotion (Cetaphil®) in improving the local tolerance of adapalene. METHODS: In this 4-week, randomized, investigator-blinded, split-face study among 30 healthy volunteers of Chinese origin, adapalene gel was applied once daily to the whole face and the moisturizing lotion was applied once daily to only one side of the face according to the randomization scheme. RESULTS: At each study visit, both investigators and subjects reported better tolerance on the side of moisturizing lotion + adapalene gel than the side of adapalene gel only, with significant differences reported by the subjects during the first 2 weeks (p = 0.039 and 0.013, respectively). Global worst score, defined as the average of worst scores for erythema, desquamation, dryness, stinging/burning and pruritus, was significantly lower for the side of moisturizing lotion + adapalene gel than for the side of adapalene gel alone (0.43 ± 0.34 vs. 0.59 ± 0.44, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: The adjunctive usage of an effective moisturizer improves local tolerance of adapalene gel and may contribute to better adherence.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Asian People/ethnology , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Naphthalenes/therapeutic use , Propylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate/therapeutic use , Acne Vulgaris/ethnology , Adapalene , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , China , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Gels/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
13.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 36(11): 942-6, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18071606

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Leg ulcers are a chronic condition affecting the older population. In Singapore, the use of topical traditional Chinese medicaments (TTCM) is common amongst those older than 65 years of age. We study the role of TTCM as contact sensitisers in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers and its impact in the clinical management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with chronic leg ulcers attending the Wound and Ulcer Clinic at the National Skin Centre (NSC) between October 2005 and April 2006 were patch-tested to the NSC TTCM series. They were also patch-tested for other allergens from the NSC Standard Series, Medicament Series, Steroid Series and wound dressings. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were patch-tested. Seventeen of the 44 (38.7%) patients were using or had used at least 1 TTCM. Seven patients (15.9%) had at least 1 positive patch test (PT) reading to TTCM, giving a sensitisation rate of 41% (7 of 17). A significantly high proportion of the patients, 94.1% (16 of 17) with a positive history of TTCM usage had at least 1 positive PT reading compared to those without a history of TTCM usage, 45.8% (11 of 24). CONCLUSION: TTCM play an important role as contact sensitisers in our patients with chronic venous leg ulcers and may be a significant factor in non- or poor-healing leg ulcers. In such patients, a history of TTCM usage should be sought for and patch testing should include the commonly used TTCM where relevant.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Leg Ulcer/drug therapy , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/adverse effects , Varicose Ulcer/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Singapore/epidemiology
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 56(2): 94-8, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17244077

ABSTRACT

Contact sensitization rates are high in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Allergic contact dermatitis poses a significant hindrance to the healing of the wounds. There are no published studies examining the rate of contact sensitization in Asian patients. Our objective was to determine the rate of contact sensitization in patients with chronic venous leg ulcer in Singapore and the variation in the common allergens based on local practices in comparison with Western countries. 44 patients were patch tested to the National Skin Centre standard series, steroid series, medicaments, topical Chinese medicaments, and to modern wound dressings used. The overall rate of contact sensitization was 61.4%. The common allergen groups were topical antibiotics (18.2%) and topical traditional Chinese medicaments (TTCM) (15.9%). Individually, colophony (11.3%), Saw Hong Choon skin ointment (Kam Bo Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong) (11.3%), Balsam of Peru (9.1%), and povidone iodine (9.1%) were among the most frequent allergens. The sensitization rate among users of TTCM was notably high (41%). A high rate of contact sensitization was found in our study, similar to previous reports from the West. TTCM play a major role as possible allergens in our patients. In Asian patients, a history of its usage should be elicited, and patch testing should include the commonly used TTCM where possible.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Leg Ulcer/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allergens/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/complications , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies , Singapore/epidemiology
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 55(5): 291-4, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17026695

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was first recognized in February 2003. It is the first severe and readily transmissible new disease to emerge in the 21st century. Healthcare workers in affected countries were exposed to the regular use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as the N95 mask, gloves, and gowns. Our aim was to study the prevalence of adverse skin reactions to PPE among healthcare workers in Singapore during the SARS outbreak. Healthcare staff in the National Skin Centre and Tan Tock Seng Hospital were surveyed using questionnaires. Of those asked to participate, 322 (94.7%) agreed. 14.3% of the respondents were doctors, 73.0% nurses, and 12.7% other ancillary staff. Mean age of respondents was 32.4 years, with the majority being women (85.7%) and Chinese (53.7%). 109 (35.5%) of the 307 staff who used masks regularly reported acne (59.6%), facial itch (51.4%), and rash (35.8%) from N95 mask use. 64 (21.4%) of the 299 who used gloves regularly reported dry skin (73.4%), itch (56.3%), and rash (37.5%). The use of PPE is associated with high rates of adverse skin reactions. There is a need to find suitable alternatives for affected staff and to encourage awareness among staff of the role of dermatologists in their care.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Masks/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Protective Clothing/adverse effects , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Skin Diseases/etiology , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Singapore/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 35(4): 279-81, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16710501

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Few reports have documented allergic hypersensitivity reactions after barium gastrointestinal studies. Of these, the barium suspension, its additives or intravenous glucagon given for bowel relaxation has been implicated as possible allergens. We report a patient with delayed hypersensitivity reaction after barium enema and discuss the reasons supporting glucagon as the possible allergen. CLINICAL PICTURE: A 74-year-old Chinese woman presented with pruritic rashes, 1 day after a barium enema. Intravenous glucagon (GlucaGen, Novo Nordisk, Denmark) was administered during the barium enema. Physical examination revealed palpable purpuric rashes on the legs with erythematous papules and plaques on the arms and trunk. Skin biopsy demonstrated superficial perivascular infiltrates of lymphocytes and eosinophils, consistent with a drug eruption. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: The rashes resolved with antihistamines and topical corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: This report highlights the potential of glucagon to cause hypersensitivity reactions. Awareness of this entity is important for the prevention and recognition of complications during barium gastrointestinal studies.


Subject(s)
Barium Compounds , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Enema , Glucagon/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/etiology , Parasympatholytics/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Aged , Female , Glucagon/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Parasympatholytics/administration & dosage , Time Factors
17.
Skin Res Technol ; 10(1): 64-6, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14731251

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) measurements in experimentally induced allergic contact reactions and irritant contact reactions. The degree of correlation between visual scores and LDPI measurements was also studied. METHODS: Fifteen patients with known contact allergy to nickel or fragrance were patch tested with nickel sulfate 5% pet., fragrance mix 8% pet., sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) 0.5% pet., SLS 1.0% pet. and two empty control chambers. Visual readings and LDPI measurements were taken at 0, 48 and 96 h. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between visual scores and LDPI measurement in the nickel sulfate and fragrance mix patch test sites. However, no correlation between visual scores and LDPI measurements was seen in the SLS 0.5% and SLS 1.0% patch test sites. There was no significant difference (P=0.125) in LDPI measurements between contact-allergic reactions and contact-irritant reactions. CONCLUSION: LDPI correlates with visual scoring in contact-allergic reactions, but not in irritant reactions. LDPI is not useful in distinguishing between allergic and irritant reactions.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry , Patch Tests , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Humans , Irritants/adverse effects , Nickel/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL