Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 189(2): 551-560, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34196901

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality, but a successful screening programme depends on both high participation and a sufficient follow-up of abnormalities. This study investigated patterns of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography in Denmark, and whether the variation was associated with health care resource use. METHODS: We included 19,458 women aged 50-69 years with an abnormal screening mammography during a 3-year period of 2014-2016. Women were followed until the end of 2018. Their follow-up pathway was categorized in terms of the timeliness, appropriateness (i.e. whether all recommended diagnostic tests were utilized), and the ratio of benign vs. malignant surgeries. Further, we estimated health care resource use including post-diagnostic imaging and surgery procedures. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of women had a diagnostic follow-up test within 6 months and 94% of those had diagnostic procedures in accordance with the recommendations. The proportion with timely follow-up (i.e. within 1 month) was 83%, but varied significantly between administrative regions (p < 0.001), and also between women with a screen-detected cancer and those with a false-positive mammogram (87% vs. 81%, p < 0.001). The ratio between having a benign versus a malignant surgery was 1:8, but it varied depending on which tests were used for diagnosis. The average number of procedures was, generally, in accordance with the recommendations. CONCLUSION: In most cases, follow-up after abnormal screening mammography followed national recommendations. We nevertheless found that this was not always the case in certain subgroups and administrative regions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammography , Breast , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mass Screening
2.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 897, 2017 12 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, national roll-out of a population-based, screening mammography program took place in 2007-2010. We report on outcome of the first four biennial invitation rounds. METHODS: Data on screening outcome were retrieved from the 2015 and 2016 national screening quality reports. We calculated coverage by examination; participation after invitation; detection-, interval cancer- and false-positive rates; cancer characteristics; sensitivity and specificity, for Denmark and for the five regions. RESULTS: At the national level coverage by examination remained at 75-77%; lower in the Capital Region than in the rest of Denmrk. Detection rate was slightly below 1% at first screen, 0.6% at subsequent screens, and one region had some fluctuation over time. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constituted 13-14% of screen-detected cancers. In subsequent rounds, 80% of screen-detected invasive cancers were node negative and 40% ≤10 mm. False-positive rate was around 2%; higher for North Denmark Region than for the rest of Denmark. Three out of 10 breast cancers in screened women were diagnosed as interval cancers. CONCLUSIONS: High coverage by examination and low interval cancer rate are required for screening to decrease breast cancer mortality. Two pioneer local screening programs starting in the 1990s were followed by a decrease in breast cancer mortality of 22-25%. Coverage by examination and interval cancer rate of the national program were on the favorable side of values from the pioneer programs. It appears that the implementation of a national screening program in Denmark has been successful, though regional variations need further evaluation to assure optimization of the program.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/mortality , Mammography/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/mortality , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Rate
3.
Clin Epidemiol ; 5: 81-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23526262

ABSTRACT

The Danish Quality Database of Mammography Screening (DKMS) was established in 2007, when screening was implemented on a nationwide basis and offered biennially to all Danish women aged 50-69 years. The primary aims of the database are to monitor and evaluate the quality of the screening program and - after years of follow-up - to evaluate the effect of nationwide screening on breast cancer-specific mortality. Here, we describe the database and present results for quality assurance from the first round of national screening. The steering committee for the DKMS defined eleven organizational and clinical quality indicators and standards to monitor the Danish breast cancer screening program. We calculated the relevant proportions and ratios with 95% confidence intervals for each quality indicator. All indicators were assessed on a national and regional level. Of 670,039 women invited for mammography, 518,823 (77.4%) participated. Seventy-one percent of the women received the result of their mammography examination within 10 days of screening, and 3% of the participants were recalled for further investigation. Among all detected cancers, 86% were invasive cancers, and the proportion of women with node negative cancer was 67%. There were 36% women with small cancers, and the ratio of surgery for benign lesions to malignant lesions was 1:6.3. A total of 80% of women with invasive cancers were treated with breast conserving therapy. Screening interval and interval cancers were not relevant in the first round, and data regarding radiation dose were not available at the time of evaluation. Overall, the quality indicators showed satisfactory quality in the first round of national breast cancer screening in Denmark. The DKMS is a potentially valuable tool for improving quality and conducting research in the field of breast cancer screening.

6.
Dan Med Bull ; 58(6): C4287, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21651881

ABSTRACT

Mammography screening is offered healthy women, and a high standard on professional and organizational level is mandatory not only in the screening programme but even in the diagnostic work-up and treatment. The main goal is to achieve a substantial reduction in disease specific mortality, but it is not possible to evaluate the effect on mortality until several years later, and continuously monitoring of the quality of all aspects of a screening programme is necessary. Based on other European guidelines, 11 quality indicators have been defined, and guidelines concerning organizational requirements for a Danish screening programme as well as recommendations for the radiographic and radiological work have been drawn up.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans
8.
Acta Oncol ; 43(1): 20-6, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15068316

ABSTRACT

One hundred and twenty-four patients with palpable tumours underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and subsequent axillary lymph node dissection. Ultrasound of the axilla was used as part of the diagnostic work-up on all patients and those with lymph node metastasis verified by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were not included. For identifying the SLNs, a combination of Tc-99m-labelled human albumin (Solco-ALBU-RES) and blue dye (Patent Blue V) was used. No lymphoscintigraphy was performed. The SLN was successfully identified in 122 out of 124 (98%) patients and 66 (54%) patients were found to have metastatic involvement of the axillary lymph nodes. In 52 (79%) of these patients, the SLNs were the only nodes involved, 28 (54%) had micrometastasis only. The false-negative rate was 1.5%. This method has proven valid in the staging of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. The advanced techniques of serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining further improve the diagnostic advantage offered by the SLNB, as it increases the possibility of diagnosing micrometastatic deposits.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cohort Studies , Coloring Agents , Female , Frozen Sections , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Intraoperative Care/methods , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care/methods , Prognosis , Radioisotopes , Radionuclide Imaging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...