Clinical practice recommendations for infectious disease management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) - 2023 SPILF.

In march 2020, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) published an update of the 2015 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infection (DFI). While we (the French ID society, SPILF) endorsed some of these recommendations, we wanted to update our own 2006 guidelines and specifically provide informative elements on modalities of microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic treatment (especially first- and second-line regiments, oral switch and duration). The recommendations put forward in the present guidelines are addressed to healthcare professionals managing patients with DFI and more specifically focused on infectious disease management of this type of infection, which clearly needs a multidisciplinary approach. Staging of the severity of the infection is mandatory using the classification drawn up by the IWGDF. Microbiological samples should be taken only in the event of clinical signs suggesting infection in accordance with a strict preliminarily established protocol. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be chosen according to the IWGDF grade of infection and duration of the wound, but must always cover methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Early reevaluation of the patient is a fundamental step, and duration of antibiotic therapy can be shortened in many situations. When osteomyelitis is suspected, standard foot radiograph is the first-line imagery examination and a bone biopsy should be performed for microbiological documentation. Histological analysis of the bone sample is no longer recommended. High dosages of antibiotics are recommended in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis.

Survey on infectious disease telephone hotlines in primary care: General practitioners' satisfaction and compliance with advice.

OBJECTIVES: Infectious disease (ID) advice is a major part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The objective of this study was to assess general practitioners' (GPs)' opinions and compliance with advice given by ID hotlines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter survey was based on the 7-day assessment of initial advice requested by GPs to a hotline set up by volunteer hospital ID teams to record advice for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the GPs' satisfaction with the advice given by ID specialists. RESULTS: Ten ID teams participated in the study and recorded 4138 requests for advice, of which 1325 requests included a proposal for antibiotic therapy and justified a follow-up call at seven days. Only 398 follow-up calls (30%) were carried out because many GPs were not reachable. GPs were very satisfied with ID hotlines: 58% considered them indispensable and 38% very useful. The recommendations provided by ID specialists were followed by GPs in more than 80% of cases. The two main motivations for GPs to call the hotline were to get quick advice (86%) and to receive help in managing a patient (76%). CONCLUSIONS: The ID telephone consultations and advice systems for GPs are highly appreciated and are effective in terms of following the recommendations.

SPILF update on bacterial arthritis in adults and children.

In 2020 the French Society of Rhumatology (SFR) published an update of the 1990 recommendations for management of bacterial arthritis in adults. While we (French ID Society, SPILF) totally endorse this update, we wished to provide further information about specific antibiotic treatments. The present update focuses on antibiotics with good distribution in bone and joint. It is important to monitor their dosage, which should be maximized according to PK/PD parameters. Dosages proposed in this update are high, with the optimized mode of administration for intravenous betalactams (continuous or intermittent infusion). We give tools for the best dosage adaptation to conditions such as obesity or renal insufficiency. In case of enterobacter infection, with an antibiogram result "susceptible for high dosage", we recommend the requesting of specialized advice from an ID physician. More often than not, it is possible to prescribe antibiotics via the oral route as soon as blood cultures are sterile and clinical have symptoms shown improvement. Duration of antibiotic treatment is 6 weeks for Staphylococcus aureus, and 4 weeks for the other bacteria (except for Neisseria: 7 days).

Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine: need of a reasoned and effective vaccine campaign.

OBJECTIVES: A strong COVID-19 vaccine campaign is needed to reach the herd immunity and reduce this pandemic infection. STUDY DESIGN: In the Foch Hospital, France, in February 2021, 451 healthcare workers were vaccinated by a first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine. METHODS: Adverse effects were reported to our pharmaco-vigilance circuit, by an online and anonymous questionnaire following the first weeks of the vaccinal campaign to healthcare workers. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four (60.8%) of them reported multiple adverse effects. Main adverse effects reported were feverish state/chills (65.7%), fatigue/physical discomfort (62.4%), arthralgia/muscle pain (61.0%) and fever (44.5%). CONCLUSIONS: On March 2021 many European countries suspended AstraZeneca vaccine for one week due to safety uncertainty. Thus, confidence in its efficacy is undermined. However, the benefit/risk balance is clearly in favor of vaccination.

Home intravenous antibiotherapy and the proper use of elastomeric pumps: Systematic review of the literature and proposals for improved use.

Over several decades, the economic situation and consideration of patient quality of life have been responsible for increased outpatient treatment. It is in this context that outpatient antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) has rapidly developed. The availability of elastomeric infusion pumps has permitted prolonged or continuous antibiotic administration by dint of a mechanical device necessitating neither gravity nor a source of electricity. In numerous situations, its utilization optimizes administration of time-dependent antibiotics while freeing the patient from the constraints associated with infusion by gravity, volumetric pump or electrical syringe pump and, more often than not, limiting the number of nurse interventions to one or two a day. That much said, the installation of these pumps, which is not systematically justified, entails markedly increased OPAT costs and is liable to expose the patient to a risk of therapeutic failure or adverse effects due to the instability of the molecules utilized in a non-controlled environment, instability that necessitates close monitoring of their use. More precisely, a prescriber must take into consideration the stability parameters of each molecule (infusion duration, concentration following dilution, nature of the diluent and pump temperature). The objective of this work is to evaluate the different means of utilization of elastomeric infusion pumps in intravenous antibiotic administration outside of hospital. Following a review of the literature, we will present a tool for optimized antibiotic prescription, in a town setting by means of an infusion device.

Fosfomycin, from susceptibility to resistance: Impact of the new guidelines on breakpoints.

The fosfomycin breakpoint using the disc diffusion method (DDM) changed in the 2019 CA-SFM/EUCAST guidelines v2 (24mm versus 19mm). We assessed its impact on categorization of Enterobacterales recovered from urine samples in emergency departments. A total of 7749 and 2348 strains were tested using the DDM and the broth microdilution method (BMD), respectively. The DDM with the 19-mm breakpoint was in accordance with the BMD. Using the 24-mm breakpoint, the overall rate of fosfomycin resistance in Enterobacterales increased by three-fold (5.6% vs 18.1%, P<0.01) and reached 2.8% and 86.5% in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively. French guidelines for the management of community-acquired UTI remain appropriate. The accuracy of the methods for routine fosfomycin susceptibility testing should be assessed. The role of fosfomycin in the treatment of documented CA-UTI due to Enterobacterales other than E. coli should be evaluated considering its rate of resistance and recent data reporting low accuracy.

Efficacy of cefoxitin versus carbapenem in febrile male urinary tract infections caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: a multicenter retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis.

Cefoxitin has demonstrated good in vitro activity against extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) and is regarded as a carbapenem-sparing beta-lactam alternative in urinary tract infections. Its efficacy has never been compared to carbapenems in male UTIs. Our study aimed to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of cefoxitin (FOX) and carbapenems (CP) in febrile M-UTI due to ESBL-Ec (F-M-UTI). We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with F-M-UTI treated with FOX or CP as definitive therapy, between January 2013 and June 2015, in six French acute care teaching hospitals. The clinical and microbiological efficacies of FOX and CP were compared using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for propensity scores. Of the 66 patients included, 23 patients in FOX group and 27 in CP group had clinical assessment at follow-up. Median follow-up after end of treatment was 63 days (interquartile range 26-114). Clinical success was observed for 17/23 (73.9%) and 22/27 (81.5%) patients and microbiological success for 11/19 (57.9%) and for 6/12 (50.0%) patients in FOX and CP groups respectively. We did not find any significant difference for clinical (OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.12; 6.70]) neither microbiological (OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.05; 14.00]) success between CP and FOX groups in univariate and multivariable models. In the FOX group, high dose with use of continuous infusion was associated with clinical success. These results add evidence that FOX is an effective alternative treatment to carbapenems for M-UTI caused by ESBL-Ec, particularly when high doses and continuous infusion are used.

Antibiotics and chronic kidney disease: Dose adjustment update for infectious disease clinical practice.

Antibiotic prescription in chronic kidney disease patients poses a twofold problem. The appropriate use of antibacterial agents is essential to ensure efficacy and to prevent the emergence of resistance, and dosages should be adapted to the renal function to prevent adverse effects. SiteGPR is a French website for health professionals to help with prescriptions to chronic kidney disease patients. A working group of infectious disease specialists and nephrology pharmacists reviewed the indications, dosing regimens, administration modalities, and dose adjustments of antibiotics marketed in France for patients with renal failure. Data available on the SiteGPR website and detailed in the present article aims to provide an evidence-based update of infectious disease recommendations to health professionals managing patients with chronic kidney disease.

Impact of the French Infectious Diseases Society's (SPILF) proposals for shorter antibiotic therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the practices of French infection specialists related to antibiotic therapy duration between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: We conducted two identical surveys (in 2016 and 2018) targeting hospital-based infection specialists (medical physicians, pharmacists) who gave at least weekly advice on antibiotic prescriptions. The questionnaire included 15 clinical vignettes. Part A asked about the durations of antibiotic therapies they would usually advise to prescribers, and part B asked about the shortest duration they would be willing to advise for the same clinical situations. RESULTS: We included 325 specialists (165 in 2016 and 160 in 2018), mostly infectious disease specialists (82.4%, 268/325), members of antibiotic stewardship teams in 72% (234/325) of cases. Shorter antibiotic treatments (as compared with the literature) were advised to prescribers in more than half of the vignettes by 71% (105/147) of respondents in 2018, versus 46% (69/150) in 2016 (P<0.001). Guidelines used by participants displayed fixed durations for 77% (123/160) of cases in 2018 versus 21% (35/165) in 2016. Almost all respondents (89%, 131/160) declared they were aware of the 2017 SPILF's proposal. CONCLUSION: The release of guidelines promoting shorter durations of antibiotic therapy seems to have had a favourable impact on practices of specialists giving advice on antibiotic prescriptions.

Impact of rapid diagnostic tests on the management of patients presenting with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: Pathogens are usually identified from blood cultures using a two-step procedure: Gram staining on the day of bacterial growth (D0), followed by identification and susceptibility testing the following day (D1). We aimed to evaluate the use of rapid tests performed on D0 in patients presenting with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with≥1 positive monomicrobial blood culture with Gram staining suggestive of an Enterobacteriaceae were prospectively included. Two successive strategies were evaluated: i) conventional strategy (CS), ii) combination of a rapid identification test and third-generation cephalosporin susceptibility testing (rapid strategy, e.g. RS). RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included (CS=42; RS=41). Compared with CS, the median delay of identification was significantly shorter with RS (22 hours [20-27] vs. 47 hours [42-53]; P<0.001). Patients in the RS group more frequently received an effective (82.9% vs. 73.8%, P=0.43) and appropriate (70.7% vs. 54.7%, P=0.17) antibiotic therapy on D1. Moreover, all five RS patients infected with a non-susceptible strain received an effective therapy on D1 versus only three of eight CS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Use of rapid testing was associated with a reduced time to result availability. This strategy should be useful to initiate an early effective and appropriate therapy and to improve the care of patients.

Proposal for shorter antibiotic therapies.

OBJECTIVES: Reducing antibiotic consumption has now become a major public health priority. Reducing treatment duration is one of the means to achieve this objective. Guidelines on the therapeutic management of the most frequent infections recommend ranges of treatment duration in the ratio of one to two. The Recommendation Group of the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) was asked to collect literature data to then recommend the shortest treatment durations possible for various infections. METHODS: Analysis of the literature focused on guidelines published in French and English, supported by a systematic search on PubMed. Articles dating from one year before the guidelines publication to August 31, 2015 were searched on the website. RESULTS: The shortest treatment durations based on the relevant clinical data were suggested for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, central venous catheter-related and uncomplicated primary bacteremia, infective endocarditis, bacterial meningitis, intra-abdominal, urinary tract, upper reproductive tract, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue infections, and febrile neutropenia. Details of analyzed articles were shown in tables. CONCLUSION: This work stresses the need for new well-conducted studies evaluating treatment durations for some common infections. Following the above-mentioned work focusing on existing literature data, the Recommendation Group of the SPILF suggests specific study proposals.