Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(36): 973-978, 2023 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37676839

ABSTRACT

Eight cases of locally acquired, mosquito-transmitted (i.e., autochthonous) Plasmodium vivax malaria, which has not been reported in the United States since 2003, were reported to CDC from state health departments in Florida and Texas during May 18-July 17, 2023. As of August 4, 2023, case surveillance, mosquito surveillance and control activities, and public outreach and education activities continue in both states. U.S. clinicians need to consider a malaria diagnosis in patients with unexplained fever, especially in areas where autochthonous malaria has been recently reported, although the risk for autochthonous malaria in the United States remains very low. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of malaria can prevent severe disease or death and limit ongoing transmission to local Anopheles mosquitoes and other persons. Preventing mosquito bites and controlling mosquitoes at home can prevent mosquitoborne diseases, including malaria. Before traveling internationally to areas with endemic malaria, travelers should consult with a health care provider regarding recommended malaria prevention measures, including potentially taking malaria prophylaxis. Malaria is a nationally notifiable disease; continued reporting of malaria cases to jurisdictional health departments and CDC will also help ensure robust surveillance to detect and prevent autochthonous malaria in the United States.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Malaria , Animals , Humans , Texas/epidemiology , Florida/epidemiology , Malaria/epidemiology , Malaria/prevention & control , Health Personnel
2.
SN Appl Sci ; 4(2): 50, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35013720

ABSTRACT

Aedes aegypti, the Dengue and Zika vector, is a domestic mosquito that is difficult to control. The challenge lies in the mosquito's preference to lay its eggs in cryptic habitats such as fence post openings, buckets and bird baths, cups. Additionally, current methods of control are labor-intensive. We employed the WALS strategy to evaluate the operational efficacy of applying VectoBac WDG using a truck-mounted mister to control local populations of Ae. aegypti in urban settings with difficult-to-reach larval mosquito habitats. Our study was conducted in Cortez (Manatee County), Florida, USA (27° 27' N, 82° 40' W). We selected two study sites, one untreated control (21.9 ha) and one treatment site (23.1 ha) where historical data have shown high populations of Ae. aegypti based on weekly ovitrap surveillance. Weekly BGs and ovitraps (10-15 traps/site) were deployed to monitor adult population dynamics. A total of 50 bioassay jars were placed in the field each afternoon of the Bti application (8 application events) at fixed locations to collect droplets and gauge efficacy. We found significant reduction in female adults (P = 0.0002) and landing rate counts (P = 0.0058) as a result of treatment. Larval bioassays during the eight applications confirmed Bti deposit in a variety of coverage types regardless of placement in the yards. WALS applications with a truck-mounted mister can be effective at reducing disease carrying mosquito populations in residential areas and can be implemented in an integrated vector management program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42452-021-04893-x.

3.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 37(4): 242-249, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817613

ABSTRACT

Aedes aegypti is the predominant vector of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses. This mosquito is difficult to control with conventional methods due to its container-inhabiting behavior and resistance to insecticides. Autodissemination of pyriproxyfen (PPF), a potent larvicide, has shown promise as an additional tool to control Aedes species in small-scale field trials. However, few large-scale field evaluations have been conducted. We undertook a 6-month-long large-scale field study to compare the effectiveness and operational feasibility of using In2Care Mosquito Traps (In2Care Traps, commercially available Aedes traps with PPF and Beauveria bassiana) compared to an integrated vector management (IVM) strategy consisting of source reduction, larviciding, and adulticiding for controlling Ae. aegypti eggs, larvae, and adults. We found that while the difference between treatments was only statistically significant for eggs and larvae (P < 0.05 for eggs and larvae and P > 0.05 for adults), the use of In2Care Traps alone resulted in 60%, 57%, and 57% fewer eggs, larvae, and adults, respectively, collected from that site compared to the IVM site. However, In2Care Trap deployment and maintenance were more time consuming and labor intensive than the IVM strategy. Thus, using In2Care Traps alone as a control method for large areas (e.g., >20 ha) may be less practical for control programs with the capacity to conduct ground and aerial larviciding and adulticiding. Based on our study results, we conclude that In2Care Traps are effective at suppressing Ae. aegypti and have the most potential for use in areas without sophisticated control programs and within IVM programs to target hotspots with high population levels and/or risk of Aedes-borne pathogen transmission.


Subject(s)
Aedes , Insecticides , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Animals , Mosquito Control , Mosquito Vectors
4.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 33(3): 193-199, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28854105

ABSTRACT

Successful integrated vector management programs may need new strategies in addition to conventional larviciding and adulticiding strategies to target Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus, which can develop in small, often cryptic, artificial and natural containers. The In2Care® mosquito trap was recently developed to target and kill larval and adult stages of these invasive container-inhabiting Aedes mosquitoes by utilizing autodissemination. Gravid females that visit the trap pick up pyriproxyfen (PPF) that they later transfer to nearby larval habitats as well as Beauveria bassiana spores that slowly kill them. We assessed the efficacy of the In2Care mosquito trap in a semifield setting against locally sourced strains of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. We found that the In2Care mosquito trap is attractive to gravid Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus females and serves as an egg sink, preventing any adult emergence from the trap (P = 0.0053 for both species). Adult females successfully autodisseminated PPF to surrounding water-filled containers, leading to a statistically significant reduction in new mosquito emergence (P ≤ 0.0002 for both species). Additionally, we found effective contamination with Beauveria bassiana spores, which significantly reduced the survivorship of exposed Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus (P ≤ 0.008 for both species in all experimental setups). In summary, the In2Care mosquito trap successfully killed multiple life stages of 2 main mosquito vector species found in Florida under semifield conditions.


Subject(s)
Aedes , Mosquito Control , Pheromones , Aedes/growth & development , Animals , Beauveria/physiology , Female , Florida , Larva/growth & development , Species Specificity , Spores, Fungal/physiology
5.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc ; 18(1): 36-9, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11998928

ABSTRACT

Anvil 10+10 (hereafter Anvil) and Biomist 31:66 (hereafter Biomist) were applied by ground ultra-low volume (ULV) methods to determine the effectiveness of each formulation against Ochlerotatus sollicitans. Each formulation was tested at 50, 67, and 100% of respective maximum label dosage rates. Mosquitoes were exposed in cages on a 3 x 3 grid at distances of 30.5, 60.9, and 91.4 m. Mortality data were collected at intervals of 1, 4, and 12 h after treatment. No significant differences (P > or = 0.05) were found among formulations at applications of 100% of the label rate and no significant differences (P > or = 0.05) were found between Anvil applied at 100% of the label rate and Biomist applied at 50 and 67% of label rates. Ground ULV applications of Anvil at 100% label rate and Biomist at all tested rates were effective (> or = 95% mortality) adulticides. Applications of Anvil at 50 and 67% label rates were significantly less effective (P < or = 0.05) than applications of Biomist at equal percentages of the maximum label rate. Applications of Anvil at rates of 50 and 67% were not effective.


Subject(s)
Culicidae , Insecticides , Mosquito Control , Permethrin , Pesticide Synergists , Piperonyl Butoxide , Pyrethrins , Animals , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delaware , Insecticides/administration & dosage , Insecticides/economics , Permethrin/administration & dosage , Permethrin/economics , Pesticide Synergists/administration & dosage , Pesticide Synergists/economics , Piperonyl Butoxide/administration & dosage , Piperonyl Butoxide/economics , Pyrethrins/administration & dosage , Pyrethrins/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...