[Survivorship care plan (SCP) : The viewpoints of women with breast cancer and their general practitioners]. / Programme personnalisé d'après cancer (PPAC) : vision des patientes atteintes de cancer du sein et de leur médecin traitant.

BACKGROUND: The French National Cancer Institute recommends the use of survivorship care plans (SCP) for all cancer survivors. Developing useful SCP's requires understanding of what survivors and their providers need and how SCP's can be implemented in practice. We conducted a study to assess the delivery of SCP comprehensive binders for breast cancer women (BCW) and their general practitioners (GP) in a Cancer center from January 2019. METHODS: SCP binders, containing a full range of information on topics related to post-cancer care to survivor-specific information and referrals, were given to BCW during a post-treatment dedicated consultation. Then a letter, containing the treatment summary and 5-year follow-up schedule, was sent to their GPs. Comprehensive binder delivery assessment was carried out using item checkbox, and anonymous open-answered, self-reported questionnaires were sent by email to BCW and their GPs. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rates were 81.3% for BCW (n = 109/134) and 48.6% for their GPs (n = 52/107). Most BCW (85%) reported that SCP binders provided useful and comprehensive information. However, some of them (18%) felt abandoned and anonymous during the post-treatment follow-up. Most GPs found SCP letters from our anti-cancer center physicians to be useful for their patients, 38% of them had used this information to assure transition of care with other care providers. In addition, GPs were unanimous to express their feeling that this SCP could improve the long-term surveillance of BCW. There was a high concordance between BCW survivors' and PCP' answers, especially regarding SCPs as a communication bridge between GPs and BCW survivors. Response results concerning use of the binders: to talk about them: 59% for BCW vs. 51% for GPs, and to show them: 35% for BCW vs. 31% for GPs. CONCLUSION: The opinions of BCW survivors' and PCP' opinions about the use of SCP's by our Cancer Center seems to be favourable. It is essential to implement and develop SCP's as a key tool in long-term surveillance and support for cancer patient survivors and they are a useful instrument for care providers in communication and transition.

5-year overall survival after early breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: A retrospective case-control multicentre French study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP) is rare, but the prevalence is expected to rise. Long-term follow-up data regarding this clinically challenging condition are scarce. The main objective of this multicentre case-control French study was to compare the survival between pregnant patients and matched controls. METHODS: Patients from 27 centres diagnosed between 2000 and 2009 with histologically proven invasive breast cancer occurring during pregnancy were retrospectively included. Controls were matched to BCP patients on age, clinical T stage, hormone receptor, HER2, administration of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and pathological node involvement in the absence of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven BCP patients and 253 controls were included. Median age was 33 and 35 years, respectively. Both populations were managed similarly, except for less frequent sentinel node dissection (p = 0.026) and taxane administration (p = 0.03) among BCP patients. Median follow-up was 7.5 years. Survival rates were similar between both BCP and control patients: 5-year OS rates were 83.1% (95% CI: 74.5-89.0) vs 85.5% (95% CI: 80.4-89.4), respectively, p = 0.31; 5-year DFS rates 60.0% (95% CI: 50.1-68.6) vs 68.5% (95% CI: 62.3-73.9), respectively, p = 0.12 and 5-year MFS rates 71.0% (95% CI: 61.3-78.6) and 74.5% (95% CI: 68.6-79.5), respectively, p = 0.21. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with BCP were not significantly different as compared to those of matched non-pregnant controls. A proper management of women diagnosed with BCP is crucial.

Evaluate the subjective experience of the disease and its treatment in the partners of young women with non-metastatic breast cancer.

The impact of the disease experience on the quality of life of the relatives of patients with cancer is now well documented. However, few scales specifically address the partners' subjective quality of life. This study aims to validate a questionnaire assessing the impact of cancer on the quality of life of the partners of young women with breast cancer. Partners (n = 499) of women aged <45 when diagnosed with a non-metastatic breast cancer completed a self-reported questionnaire generated from non-directive interviews led in an initial study. The structure of the scale was examined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity were assessed. The final Partner-YW-BCI contained 36 items and assessed eight dimensions of the subjective experience of partners: (1) feeling of couple cohesion, (2) negative affectivity and apprehension about the future, (3) body image and sexuality, (4) career management, (5) deterioration of the relationships with close relatives, (6) management of child(ren) and of everyday life, (7) financial difficulties, and (8) sharing and support from close relatives. The scale showed adequate psychometric properties, and will help clinicians to identify the problems of partners and to respond to them by an optimal care management.

The subjective experience of young women with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Young Women with Breast Cancer Inventory.

BACKGROUND: The subjective experience of young women with breast cancer has some particular features linked to the impact of the disease and its treatment on their age-related issues (e.g. desire for a child, couple relationship, career management). Despite these specific concerns, no questionnaire currently targets the young breast cancer patient's quality of life, subjective experience or common problems when facing cancer. This study presents the psychometric validation of an inventory that aimed to measure the impact of breast cancer on the quality of life of young women (<45 years of age) with non-metastatic disease. METHODS: 546 women aged <45 years when diagnosed with a non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited in 27 French cancer research and treatment centers. They answered a self-reported questionnaire created from verbatim collected by non-directive interviews carried out with 69 patients in a first qualitative study. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted in order to obtain the final structure of the scale. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with quality of life questionnaires currently used (QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-BR23 module) were then assessed. RESULTS: The YW-BCI36 contains 36 items and highlights 8 factors: 1) feeling of couple cohesion, 2) negative affectivity and apprehension about the future, 3) management of child(ren) and of everyday life, 4) sharing with close relatives, 5) body image and sexuality, 6) financial difficulties, 7) deterioration of relationships with close relatives, and 8) career management. Psychometric analyses indicated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.76 to 0.91) and temporal reliability (Bravais-Pearson correlations ranging from 0.66 to 0.85). As expected, there were quite strong correlations between the YW-BCI36 and the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 scores (r ranging from 0.20 to -0.66), indicating adequate concurrent validity. CONCLUSIONS: The YW-BCI36 was confirmed as a valid scale for evaluating the subjective experience of breast cancer in young women. This instrument could help to identify the problems of these women more precisely, in order to respond to them better by an optimal care management. This scale may improve the medical, psychological and social care of breast cancer patients.

[Breast cancer chemoprevention. Rational, trials results and future]. / Chémoprévention du cancer du sein. Justificatifs, résultats des essais et perspectives.

Breast cancer (BC) is the first female cancer in France, accounting for 49,240 new cases in 2004. Approximately 80% of those tumors have positive hormone receptors (HR). Tamoxifen was used in four chemoprevention randomized trials, as well as another SERM (Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulation), raloxifen. This review analyses the updated results of these trials. All trials have shown that the risk of developing HR positive BC was reduced by tamoxifen or raloxifen, but without impact on HR negative BC and overall survival. Moreover, several unfavorable side effects (thrombo-embolic accidents and uterine cancers) have been observed. A new assessment of BC risk factors seems necessary, including not only family history and some histopathological abnormalities (e.g. atypical hyperplasia), but also new elements such as high bone and breast density and thoracic irradiation at young age (Hodgkin's disease). Indeed, tamoxifen efficacy seems optimal in very "high-risk" women. Therefore, the creation of a new and most comprehensive "risk model" is necessary as well as a tailored SERM use (maybe with other compounds), in order to optimize results and reduce potential side effects.

Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Depression is misdiagnosed and undertreated among breast cancer population. Risk factors for depression in the 5 years after diagnosis are related more to the patient rather than to the disease or its treatment. The breast cancer stage (early and advanced) is not statistically significant in terms of rates of psychosocial distress except for recurrence. Risk factors of depression might impair quality of life such as fatigue, past history or recent episode of depression after the onset of cancer, cognitive attitudes of helplessness/hopelessness, resignation. Body image impairment from mastectomy and sexuality aftermath generates higher rates of mood disorders. The link between increased risk of breast cancer and depression is controversial among the literature. Some studies suggest a protective factor, others find a relation between stress, immunity and cancer occurrence or even mortality. Breast cancer survivors report a higher prevalence of mild to moderate depression with a lower quality of life in all areas except for family functioning. Treatment of depression in breast cancer women improves their quality of life and may increase longevity. Antidepressant medications remain the cornerstone of depression treatment. The hypothetical link between their prescription and increased breast cancer risk is not supported by literature's data.

[Role for aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in menopaused women: facts and questions in 2005]. / Place des inhibiteurs de l'aromatase dans le cancer du sein de la femme ménopausée, en situation adjuvante: les acquis et les incertitudes en 2005.

After a dominant role for more than 30 years, tamoxifen has been progressively replaced by aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in the menopaused woman. We present here a recall of the mechanisms of action involved together with a review of clinical trials leading to the current situation. Giving trial results in detail, we discuss the current evidence as well as open questions. The populations concerned and trial methodologies are analyzed. Comparative tolerance is detailed. Several questions remain open, either due to the lack of evidence to be obtained from ongoing trials or sufficient follow-up. The evidence presented is commented in light of the American (ASCO) and European (Saint-Gallen) or French (Saint-Paul) guidelines.

[Identification and management of hereditary breast-ovarian cancers (2004 update)]. / Identification et prise en charge des prédispositions héréditaires aux cancers du sein et de l'ovaire (mise à jour 2004).

BACKGROUND: Since the last recommendations, up to 2500 new references had been published on that topic. METHODOLOGY: On the behalf of the health Minister, the Ad Hoc Committee consisted of 13 experts carried out a first version revisited by five additional experts who critically analyzed the first version of the report. MAIN UPDATING: Breast and ovarian cancer seem to be associated with fewer deleterious mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 than previously thought. The screening of ovarian cancer is still not an attractive option while in contrast MRI may be soon for these young women with dense breast, the recommended option for breast cancer screening. The effectiveness of prophylactic surgeries is now well established. French position is to favor such surgeries with regard to a quality of life in line with the expected benefit, and providing precise and standardized process described in the recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Due to methodological flaws, the low power and a short follow-up of the surveys, this statement cannot however aspire to a high stability.

["Standards, Options and Recommendations 2001" for radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic infiltrating breast cancer. Update. National Federation of Cancer Campaign Centers (FNCLCC)]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations 2001 pour la radiothérapie des patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein infiltrant non métastatique, mise à jour. Fédération nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer (FNCLCC).

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of french cancer centers (FNCLCC), the 20 french cancer centers, and specialists from french public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for non metastatic breast cancer patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 148 independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article presents the chapter radiotherapy resulting from the 2001 update of the version first published in 1996. The modified 2001 version of the standards, options and recommendations takes into account new information published. The main recommendations are: (1) Breast irradiation after conservative surgery significantly decrease the risk of local recurrence (level of evidence A) and the decrease in the risk of local recidive after chest wall irradiation is greater as the number of risk factors for local recurrence increases (level of evidence A). (2) After conservative surgery, a whole breast irradiation should be performed at a minimum dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (standard, level of evidence A). (3) A boost in the tumour bed should be performed in women under 50 years, even if the surgical margins are free (standard, level of evidence B). (4) Internal mammary chain irradiation is indicated for internal or central tumours in the absence of axillary lymph node involvement (expert agreement) and in the presence of lymph node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1). (5) Sub- and supra-claviculr lymph node irradiation is indicated in patients with axillary node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1).

[Decision committees in oncology: from standard to actual cases]. / Des traitements standard aux cas particuliers: la place des comités de décision thérapeutique en cancérologie.

Medical decision making, especially in oncology, is more and more assisted by pre-established therapeutic protocols. But applying these protocols for particular cases is sometimes difficult; then, local expertise intervenes. For solving these difficult cases, Alexis-Vautrin like other centers, organizes committees for therapeutic decisions. This paper aims to describe, from a field study, the tools for medical decision making and the difficulties of using them. These result of the analysis of decision committee for breast cancers in a center using of protocols, which the first were established twenty years ago. This analysis was carried out by a team of oncologists and ergonomists; it stresses on collective decision making as a mean for adapting rules and exchanging knowledge. Furthermore, these findings lead to discuss using of decision committee for advancement and particularization of protocols themselves.

Iatrogenic risks of endometrial carcinoma after treatment for breast cancer in a large French case-control study. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC).

Since tamoxifen is widely used in breast cancer treatment and has been proposed for the prevention of breast cancer, its endometrial iatrogenic effects must be carefully examined. We have investigated the association between endometrial cancer and tamoxifen use or other treatments in women treated for breast cancer in a case-control study. Cases of endometrial cancer diagnosed after breast cancer (n = 135) and 467 controls matched for age, year of diagnosis of breast cancer and hospital and survival time with an intact uterus were included. Women who had received tamoxifen were significantly more likely to have endometrial cancer diagnosed than those who had not (crude relative risk = 4.9, p = 0.0001). Univariate and adjusted analyses showed that the risk increased with the length of treatment (p = 0.0001) or the cumulative dose of tamoxifen received (p = 0.0001), irrespective of the daily dose. Women who had undergone pelvic radiotherapy also had a higher risk (crude relative risk = 7.8, p = 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk was higher for tamoxifen users (p = 0.0012), treatment for more than 3 years (all p < 0.03) and pelvic radiotherapy (p = 0.012). Women who had endometrial cancer and had received tamoxifen had more advanced disease and poorer prognosis than those with endometrial cancer who had not received this treatment. Our results suggest a causal role of tamoxifen in endometrial cancer, particularly when used as currently proposed for breast cancer prevention. Pelvic radiotherapy may be an additional iatrogenic factor for women with breast cancer. Endometrial cancers diagnosed in women treated with tamoxifen have poorer prognosis. Women who receive tamoxifen for breast cancer should be offered gynaecological surveillance during and after treatment. A long-term evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of tamoxifen as a preventive treatment for breast cancer is clearly warranted.

[Seasonal affective disorders, a new clinical category]. / Les troubles affectifs saisonniers, une nouvelle catégorie clinique.

Seasonal affective disorders have recently been individualized by American authors. According to these authors, this subgroup of affective diseases deserve to be regarded as a clinical category owing to its specific symptoms, its epidemiological features and its response to treatment. They are characterized by the triad: hypersomnia, hyperoxia, weight gain, associated with usual symptoms of depression. Moreover, contrary to the bipolar manic-depressive psychosis, they seem to predominate among women. Finally, phototherapy, the various protocols of which are discussed here, is said to be effective. The influence of latitude combined with the effectiveness of phototherapy has led to original pathogenic hypotheses, among which the presence of a chronobiological disorder (abnormality of the season-induced circadian rhythm), although attractive and supported by a strict clinical study, has yet to be demonstrated. Also hypothetical is the role played by melatonin: is this hormone the principal "mediator" or an epiphenomenon?

[Tyrer's Brief Scale for Anxiety used with outpatients. First validation in the French language]. / L'échelle brève d'anxiété de Tyrer en pratique extrahospitalière. Première validation en langue française.

The brief scale for anxiety of Tyrer is a subdivision of the comprehensive psychopathological scale. We studied a serie of 105 anxious outpatients treated for chronic or reactive anxiety, without depressive or psychotic symptoms. We confirm its sensitivity to change, prove its concurrent validity in regard to the Hamilton anxiety rating scale and demonstrate that the brief scale for anxiety is a reliable instrument to assess anxiety with outpatients. Nevertheless the assessment of its internal validity raises the question of the item's selection at the time of the elaboration of the rating scales according to the scale's purpose. Indeed, must we attempt to register all the symptoms of the anxious syndrome, with the risk of including less specific items? Or must we choose the most characteristic and specific items with the risk of obtaining a more reductionist inventory, but more reliable in a "transnosographic" perspective?