Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing (ABMS) Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years because of its proposed advantages in terms of postoperative pain and periprosthetic dislocation risk. Description: The procedure is performed with the patient in the supine position. A minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach is utilized to access the hip. Fluoroscopy can be utilized intraoperatively to assess acetabular cup position, version, and inclination. Femoral canal fill and leg lengths can also be assessed with use of fluoroscopy. Alternatives: Nonoperative alternatives for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injections into the hip joint. Surgical alternatives to this procedure include the posterior approach (Moore or Southern), the direct lateral approach (Hardinge), and the direct anterior approach (Smith-Petersen). The Watson-Jones approach can also be performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position (unlike in our technique where the patient is supine). Rationale: The anterolateral (Watson-Jones) approach to the hip has been shown to be superior to the historically more common posterior approach with regard to length of hospital stay and dislocation risk1,2. Supine positioning for this approach offers multiple advantages compared with lateral decubitus positioning. Leg lengths can be assessed intraoperatively both fluoroscopically and with manual palpation of the medial malleoli. Cup position can be assessed radiographically as well3. Supine positioning also allows for easily reproducible patient positioning. Expected Outcomes: Compared with the historically common posterior approach to the hip for THA, the anterolateral approach to the hip leads to, on average, a lower risk of hip dislocation1,2. In a 2002 study by Masonis and Bourne, the dislocation rate for the posterior approach was 3.23% (193 of 5,981), whereas the dislocation rate was 2.18% (18 of 826) for patients who underwent THA via the anterolateral approach1. In a study by Ritter et al. in 2001, which followed patients for 1 year postoperatively, no patients in the anterolateral approach group experienced a dislocation compared with 4.21% of patients in the posterior approach group2. With use of the present technique, patients will benefit from the advantages of the anterolateral approach to the hip; however, they will also benefit from easy intraoperative leg length assessment and from radiographic assistance with regard to determining the appropriate position of the femoral and acetabular components3. In a study of 199 patients (including 98 patients who had intraoperative fluoroscopy and 101 who did not), 80% of implants in the fluoroscopy group were within the combined safe zone compared with 63% in the non-fluoroscopy group. However, this approach is not without its limitations. As mentioned in the above studies, dislocation remains a possible complication of the procedure, and a minimally invasive anterior-based approach can lead to intraoperative femoral fractures when exposure and releases are inadequate4. Femoral nerve palsies are also possible with excessive medial retraction during acetabular exposure. Additionally, the benefit of a reduction in the incidence of hip dislocation compared with a posterior approach might be overstated given improvement in posterior-approach dislocation rates if posterior soft-tissue repair is used5. Both direct anterior and anterolateral approaches have the same risks of fracture with poor exposure and of neurapraxia with excessive retraction, and there does not appear to be any difference in dislocation risk between these 2 approaches6. Important Tips: Although a pannus is more detrimental to a direct anterior approach, it could overlie the desired incision in the ABMS approach as well. The pannus could be held out of the field by taping it to the contralateral shoulder before preparing and draping.The preparative process is more time-consuming because both legs must be sterile for this procedure.Acetabular exposure often requires an assistant standing on the contralateral side of the table.Although not often needed, the obturator internus and gemelli might need to be released in order to ensure adequate exposure of the femur.If femoral canal exposure is still insufficient, a femoral suspension hook system might be needed. Acronyms & Abbreviations: ASIS = anterior superior iliac spineTFL = tensor fasciae lataeITB = iliotibial bandPOD = postoperative dayIV = intravenousBID = twice daily.

Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The Fragility Index (FI) and Reverse Fragility Index are powerful tools to supplement the P value in evaluation of randomized clinical trial (RCT) outcomes. These metrics are defined as the number of patients needed to change the significance level of an outcome. The purpose of this study was to calculate these metrics for published RCTs in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of RCTs in TJA over the last decade. For each study, we calculated the FI (for statistically significant outcomes) or Reverse Fragility Index (for nonstatistically significant outcomes) for all dichotomous, categorical outcomes. We also used the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate publication-level variables. RESULTS: We included 104 studies with 473 outcomes; 92 were significant, and 381 were nonstatistically significant. The median FI was 6 overall and 4 and 7 for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. There was a positive correlation between FI and sample size (R = 0.14, P = .002) and between FI and P values (R = 0.197, P = .000012). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest evaluation of FI in orthopedics literature to date. We found a median FI that was comparable to or higher than FIs calculated in other orthopedic subspecialties. Although the mean and median FIs were greater than the 2 recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines to demonstrate strong evidence, a large percentage of studies have an FI < 2. This suggests that the TJA literature is on par or slightly better than other subspecialties, but improvements must be made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; Systematic Review.

Neck and Back Sprain and Hand Flexor Tendon Repair Are More Common in Victims of Domestic Violence Compared With Patients Who Were Not Victims of Domestic Violence: A Comparative Study of 1,204,596 Patients Using the National Trauma Data Bank.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the most common orthopedic diagnoses and procedures among patients who experience domestic violence (DV) and to determine whether these were more common in patients who experienced DV compared with those who did not. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients were divided into two cohorts for comparison: victims of DV and all other patients. The main outcome measurements were a diagnosis of an orthopedic injury and/or a procedure performed for an orthopedic diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 1,204,596 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 3191 (0.26%) were victims of DV. Adult trauma patients with DV were more likely to have a diagnosis of neck and back sprain (odds ratio 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.60 to 2.44, P < 0.0001) and more likely to undergo surgical repair of the flexor tendon of the hand (odds ratio 2.76, 95% confidence interval 1.75 to 4.35, P < 0.0001) than patients without a diagnosis of DV. DISCUSSION: Patients who experience DV were more likely to have back and neck sprain and more likely to undergo repair of flexor tendon of the hand than those who do not experience DV.

Lower Dosing of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Is Not Associated With Improved Perioperative Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The choice of anesthesia plays a significant role in the success of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Isobaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is often used. However, dosing of bupivacaine has not been extensively studied and is usually at the discretion of the treating anesthesiologist and surgeon. The goal of this study was to determine what, if any, effect the dose of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia had on perioperative outcomes in TJA. METHODS: A total of 761 TJAs performed with bupivacaine spinal anesthesia by arthroplasty surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes evaluated were operation duration, estimated blood loss, length of stay (LOS) in the postanesthesia care unit, hospital LOS, discharge disposition, episodes of intraoperative hypotension, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and missed physical therapy sessions because of postoperative symptoms of hypotension. A Student's t-test was used for continuous variables, and a chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 761 patients, 499 (65.6%) received 15 mg isobaric bupivacaine while 262 (34.4%) received <15 mg (range = 7.5-14.5 mg, median = 12.5 mg). With the numbers available in this cohort, lower doses of bupivacaine were not associated with any significant differences between groups for any of the studied perioperative outcomes, including proportion of patients discharged home or LOS. CONCLUSION: Dosage of bupivacaine spinal anesthetic did not affect perioperative outcomes. Bupivacaine may not have a dose-related response curve in this regard, and if seeking to perform same-day or outpatient TJA, other agents may need to be considered, rather than smaller doses of bupivacaine.

Risk Factors for Anterior Tibial Tendon Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Though the tibialis anterior (TA) serves a vital role in ankle dorsiflexion, there is little information regarding risk factors and demographic information that might predispose one to tendinopathy or rupture. This study investigates the features of patients in a single institution who presented with either TA tendinopathy or rupture. The circumstances surrounding rupture were also noted. METHODS: ICD-9/10 codes were used to find patients who presented with TA pathology to 2 foot and ankle surgeons at 1 academic medical center from 2011 to 2018. Patient characteristics were noted, including age, sex, body mass index, and the presence of a gastrocnemius equinus contracture. Characteristics of patients with traumatic and atraumatic ruptures were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients presented between 2011 and 2018 (79 cases of tendinopathy and 15 ruptures). The average patient age was 56 years, and the ratio of women to men was 74:20 (3.7:1). With regard to those who experienced rupture, there were 2 ruptures directly related to athletic activity (traumatic), whereas 13 ruptures were found on examination with no overt history of injury (atraumatic). The average age for patients with traumatic ruptures was 39 years compared with 73 years for those with atraumatic rupture (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study investigates the features of patients in a single institution who presented with TA pathology. With regard to tendon ruptures, traumatic ruptures tend to occur in younger patients, whereas older patients are more likely to suffer atraumatic ruptures. Nonoperative treatment often appears to be effective for TA pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Quantifying the Surgeon's Increased Burden of Postoperative Work for Modern Arthroplasty Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty payment traditionally includes 118 minutes for postoperative rounds and 69 minutes for postoperative office visits, amounting to 187 minutes and 7 work relative value units. Rapid recovery, ambulatory procedures, and bundled payments have altered the burden of care, with multiple studies showing an increase in physician work. Policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic allow for precise documentation of patient touchpoints. We analyzed the duration of video, telephone, and text messaging to quantify modern arthroplasty work. METHODS: Consecutive primary hip, knee, and partial knee arthroplasties, performed 30 days before March 15, 2020 (date of practice closure), were included from a single institution, yielding 47 cases. We retrospectively quantified the duration of video telehealth documentation, telephone logs, and text messages over 90 days to calculate the postoperative work required in modern arthroplasty using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: An average of 9.4 touchpoints (2-14) by the surgeons occurred during the global period for this cohort, totaling 219 minutes (51-247 minutes). This included an average of 21 minutes of day-0 calls to family, 117 minutes for video visits, 52 minutes for phone calls, and 29 minutes for text messaging and wound photos. CONCLUSION: We found an undervaluation of 32 minutes of work. AAHKS leadership advocates for the fair payment of modern arthroplasty work. Cell phones have opened channels of contact that did not exist before, including phone accessibility, text messaging, and video calls. These data help defend against current payer efforts to cut work relative value units for arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.