A Novel Urine-Based Assay for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis: Multi-Institutional Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: CellDetect is a unique histochemical stain enabling color and morphological discrimination between malignant and benign cells based on differences in metabolic signature. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to validate the performance of this assay in a controlled, blinded, multicenter study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study, conducted in nine hospitals, included patients with documented history of bladder cancer, monitored for urothelial carcinoma (UCC) or scheduled for bladder cancer surgery. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cystoscopy and/or biopsy were used as a reference standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. Smears were stained by CellDetect and interpreted by two cytologists blinded to the patient's final diagnosis. The findings were compared with those of standard urine cytology and BTA stat. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Two hundred and seventeen voided urine specimens were included. Ninety-six (44%) were positive by histology and 121 (56%) were negative by either cystoscopy or histology. The overall sensitivity of CellDetect was 84%. Notably, the sensitivity for detecting low-grade nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer tumors was greater than this of BTA stat (78% vs 54%) and more than two-fold higher compared with standard cytology (33%, p ≤ 0.05). The specificity was 84% in patients undergoing routine surveillance by cystoscopy. At a median follow-up of 9 mo, 21% of the patients with positive CellDetect and negative reference standard developed UCC, which was significantly higher compared with the 5% of the true negative cases. Limitations include the lack of instrumental urine samples and the lack of patients with nongenitourinary cancers in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the performance of CellDetect as a urine-based assay to identify UCC in patients with history of bladder cancer. The high sensitivity was maintained across all cancer grades and stages without compromising the assay specificity. Further studies are required to test whether this novel stain can be incorporated in routine bladder cancer surveillance as a noninvasive alternative to cystoscopy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Surveillance of bladder cancer requires frequent invasive procedures. In the present study, we validate the ability of a novel biomarker to accurately identify early-stage tumors in urine specimens for the noninvasive monitoring of patients with history of bladder cancer.

A novel urine cytology stain for the detection and monitoring of bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: CellDetect® is a unique platform technology comprising a proprietary plant extract and 3 dyes that enables color discrimination between malignant (red) and benign (green) cells based on specific metabolic alterations exclusive to the former. Preclinical studies and clinical trials demonstrated the applicability of the new technology in many cell culture lines and various cancers. We explored its performance characteristics in bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an open label, 2-step study at tertiary medical centers. The study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed or a history of urothelial carcinoma. Step 1 involved staining archived biopsies. Slides were evaluated by 2 independent pathologists, who determined the concordance of the new staining technology with the hematoxylin and eosin based diagnosis. Step 2 included staining urine specimens with the new method and comparing findings to the patient final diagnosis and the results of standard urine cytology. RESULTS: A total of 58 archived biopsies were collected. The concordance of staining using the new platform technology with the hematoxylin and eosin based diagnosis was 100%. The new method applied to 44 urine smears showed 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity to detect urothelial carcinoma. Compared to standard urine cytology the new technology had overall superior sensitivity (94% vs 46%), particularly for low grade tumors (88% vs 17%, each p <0.005). There was no significant difference in specificity between the 2 staining techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Findings show the capability of CellDetect to accurately identify urothelial carcinoma. This indicates that the technology can be further developed to provide an alternative urine cytology test with diagnostic value that may have significant clinical benefits.

Screening for cervical neoplasia: a community-based trial comparing Pap staining, human papilloma virus testing, and the new bi-functional Celldetect® stain.

Although cytological screening for cervical neoplasia has lowered mortality rates, current screening methods are plagued by sub-optimal sensitivity and/or specificity. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the new CellDetect® staining technology as a potential screening tool. This initial, non-blinded study, utilized samples are taken at a community-based clinic. The diagnostic results using CellDetect® were compared with the performance of Pap staining and human papilloma virus (HPV) testing on the same material, as well as the follow-up biopsies. These data were statistically analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, predictive value (N.P.V and P.P.V), and inter-observer agreement. Bi-functional CellDetect® staining revealed morphological details and tinctorial properties that permitted recognition of neoplasia even at low magnification. Performance-wise, CellDetect® demonstrated non-inferiority for all statistical parameters to both Pap and HPV tests. Importantly, superior sensitivity compared with Pap staining was observed, as well as higher specificity than HPV testing with near equivalent sensitivity. We conclude that CellDetect® is a promising approach to early detection of cervical cancer because of its bi-functional capabilities that afford high sensitivity and specificity. The data suggest that this new methodology warrants further and more extensive clinical evaluation.

The endless differential diagnosis of acute obstructive renal failure: unusual challenges for the sharp-sighted clinician.

Obstruction of urine outflow can result from mechanical blockade as well as from functional defects. In adults, urinary tract obstruction is due mainly to acquired defects, such as pelvic tumors, calculi, and urethral stricture. In childhood it is mostly due to congenital malformations. In this article we present two rare cases of acute obstructive renal failure that presented with hydronephrosis. These cases underline the wide range of causes that may lead to this clinical feature.

Combined morphologic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of voided urine samples for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer in patients with benign urine cytology.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is among the 5 most common malignancies worldwide. Patients with bladder cancer are closely followed with periodic cystoscopies and urine cytology analyses due to the significant risk of tumor recurrence. The UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test demonstrated higher sensitivity over urine cytology in detecting bladder cancer by most comparative studies. METHODS: In the current study, the diagnostic usefulness of a combined cytology and FISH analysis approach was tested using the Duet automatic scanning system in patients with benign urine cytology who were being monitored for recurrent urothelial carcinoma or being assessed for various urologic symptoms. RESULTS: By combining the benefits of conventional cytology with molecular diagnostics, a more sensitive detection of bladder cancer was attained. All patients who had positive cystoscopy concomitantly with urine sampling were detected by combined analysis. Additional patients that developed transitional cell carcinoma during a follow-up period of 24 months had a previous positive result on combined analysis. Only 2 patients with a negative combined analysis result presented with late disease recurrence (20 months and 22 months, respectively, after the negative test). Therefore, negative combined analysis was found to be predictive of a lack of disease recurrence for at least 12 months. In this timeframe, the overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive values of the combined analysis test were 100%, 65%, 100%, and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given the absolute sensitivity and NPV of the combined analysis test, the management of patients with a negative combined analysis result might be revised and allow for more flexible assessment and management of bladder cancer patients relying more on urine bound tests.

Combined analysis of morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization significantly increases accuracy of bladder cancer detection in voided urine samples.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a combined analysis approach that involves cytologic evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for detecting cancer cells in voided urine samples using an automated scanning station. METHODS: Voided urine samples from 41 patients suspected of having transitional cell carcinoma were stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa stain, scanned for atypical or suspicious cells, destained, and hybridized with a mixture of fluorescent-labeled probes. Samples were tested using either the UroVysion probe or by a mix of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 centromeric probes. A case was regarded as positive when at least one cell was abnormal in both aspects, morphology and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were evaluated concomitantly by cytology, cytoscopy, and biopsy, if indicated. RESULTS: Overall, 26 samples were positive by combined analysis. Biopsy-proven transitional cell carcinoma was positive by combined analysis in all cases (100%) and in 13 cases (61.9%) by cytology (P = 0.0133). The advantage of the combined analysis was noted mostly in low-grade and superficial tumors for which the sensitivity of cytology reached 30% (P = 0.023) and 27.27% (P = 0.0133), respectively. Specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that combined analysis for the presence of transitional cell carcinoma cells is a powerful tool, providing high sensitivity and specificity, and may offer a new scheme for bladder cancer management.