ABSTRACT
This study evaluated protocols to eliminate acetone from dental adhesives and their effect on the kinetic of water sorption and percent of conversion of these adhesives. Experimental methacrylate-based adhesives with increasing hydrophilicity (R2, R3, R5) were used as reference materials. Primer-like solutions were prepared by addition of 50 wt% acetone. Acetone elimination was measured gravimetrically before and after: a spontaneous evaporation, an application of air-drying at room temperature or application of 40°C air-drying. Protocols were performed from 15 to 60 s. Specimens of adhesive/acetone mixtures were photo-activated and tested for degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Bonferroni's tests (α = 0.05). Complete acetone elimination was never achieved, but it was significantly greater after the 40°C air-drying application. Higher acetone elimination was observed for the least hydrophilic adhesive. Longer periods for acetone evaporation and heated air-stream can optimize polymerization and reduce the water sorption/solubility of adhesive system models.
Subject(s)
Air , Dental Cements , Models, Theoretical , Solvents/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , SolubilityABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution generated in a veneer restoration of an upper central incisor compared to intact teeth using the finite element analysis after applying a lingual buccal loading at the incisal edge. METHODS: Two models were developed: one model contained enamel, dentine, cementum, periodontal ligament, cortical and trabecullar bones, and the other model was a veneer restoration; both models were developed using MSC/Nastran software (MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA) as the pre- and post-processor. A 10-N load was applied at the incisal edge from the lingual to the buccal side to simulate oral conditions in this area (protrusion). RESULTS: Von Mises stresses were then analysed for three different regions: A-B (enamel elements under the veneer or second enamel layer), A'-B' (buccal enamel and/or veneer element layer) and C-D (lingual enamel elements layer). A higher stress mode was observed for both models at the lingual cervical region. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a veneer restoration on the incisors is a good alternative to mimic the behaviour of enamel under protrusion loading conditions. The use of veneers to replace enamel during rehabilitations is recommended.