Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(12): e959-e969, 2021 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33165566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report results of years 2 and 3 of consecutive cluster-randomized controlled trials of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Senegal. METHODS: We cluster-randomized (1:1) 20 villages to annual vaccination with IIV3 or inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) of age-eligible residents (6 months-10 years). The primary outcome was total vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed influenza illness (LCI) among age-eligible children (modified intention-to-treat population [mITT]). Secondary outcomes were indirect (herd protection) and population (overall community) vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: We vaccinated 74% of 12 408 age-eligible children in year 2 (June 2010-April 11) and 74% of 11 988 age-eligible children in year 3 (April 2011-December 2011) with study vaccines. Annual cumulative incidence of LCI was 4.7 (year 2) and 4.2 (year 3) per 100 mITT child vaccinees of IPV villages. In year 2, IIV3 matched circulating influenza strains. The total effectiveness was 52.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.3-67.0), and the population effectiveness was 36.0% (95% CI, 10.2-54.4) against LCI caused by any influenza strain. The indirect effectiveness against LCI by A/H3N2 was 56.4% (95% CI, 39.0-68.9). In year 3, 74% of influenza detections were vaccine-mismatched to circulating B/Yamagata and 24% were vaccine-matched to circulating A/H3N2. The year 3 total effectiveness against LCI was -14.5% (95% CI, -81.2-27.6). Vaccine effectiveness varied by type/subtype of influenza in both years. CONCLUSIONS: IIV3 was variably effective against influenza illness in Senegalese children, with total and indirect vaccine effectiveness present during the year when all circulating strains matched the IIV3 formulation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00893906.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Child , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Senegal/epidemiology , Vaccines, Inactivated
2.
Vaccine ; 38(47): 7526-7532, 2020 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012603

ABSTRACT

Data on influenza vaccine immunogenicity in children are limited from tropical developing countries. We recently reported significant, moderate effectiveness of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in a controlled, cluster-randomized trial in children in rural Senegal during 2009, a year of H3N2 vaccine mismatch (NCT00893906). We report immunogenicity of IIV3 and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) from that trial. We evaluated hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and polio antibody titers in response to vaccination of three age groups (6 through 35 months, 3 through 5 years, and 6 through 8 years). As all children were IIV naïve, each received two vaccine doses, although titers were assessed after only the first dose for subjects aged 6 through 8 years. Seroconversion rates (4-fold titer rise or increase from <1:10 to ≥1:40) were 74-87% for A/H1N1, 76-87% for A/H3N2, and 54-79% for B/Yamagata. Seroprotection rates (HAI titer ≥ 1:40) were 79-88% for A/H1N1, 88-96% for A/H3N2, and 52-74% for B/Yamagata. IIV responses were lowest in the youngest age group, and they were comparable between ages 3 through 5 years after two doses and 6 through 8 years after one dose. We found that baseline seropositivity (HAI titer ≥ 1:10) was an effect modifier of IIV response. Using a seroprotective titer (HAI titer ≥ 1:160) recommended for IIV evaluation in children, we found that among subjects who were seropositive at baseline, 69% achieved seroprotection for both A/H1N1 and A/H3N2, while among those who were seronegative at baseline, seroprotection was achieved in 11% for A/H1N1 and 22% for A/H3N2. The IPV group had high baseline polio antibody seropositivity and appropriate responses to vaccination. Our data emphasize the importance of a two-dose IIV3 series in vaccine naïve children. IIV and IPV vaccines were immunogenic in Senegalese children.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Poliomyelitis , Antibodies, Viral , Child , Child, Preschool , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Infant , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Seasons , Senegal , Vaccines, Inactivated
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(10): 1780-1788, 2019 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30689757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The population effects of influenza vaccination in children have not been extensively studied, especially in tropical, developing countries. In rural Senegal, we assessed the total (primary objective) and indirect effectiveness of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3). METHODS: In this double-blind, cluster-randomized trial, villages were randomly allocated (1:1) for the high-coverage vaccination of children aged 6 months through 10 years with either the 2008-09 northern hemisphere IIV3 or an inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). Vaccinees were monitored for serious adverse events. All village residents, vaccinated and unvaccinated, were monitored for signs and symptoms of influenza illness using weekly home visits and surveillance in designated clinics. The primary outcome was all laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza. RESULTS: Between 23 May and 11 July 2009, 20 villages were randomized, and 66.5% of age-eligible children were enrolled (3918 in IIV3 villages and 3848 in IPV villages). Follow-up continued until 28 May 2010. There were 4 unrelated serious adverse events identified. Among vaccinees, the total effectiveness against illness caused by the seasonal influenza virus (presumed to all be drifted A/H3N2, based on antigenic characterization data) circulating at high rates among children was 43.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.6-60.9%). The indirect effectiveness against seasonal A/H3N2 was 15.4% (95% CI -22.0 to 41.3%). The total effectiveness against illness caused by the pandemic influenza virus (A/H1N1pdm09) was -52.1% (95% CI -177.2 to 16.6%). CONCLUSIONS: IIV3 provided statistically significant, moderate protection to children in Senegal against circulating, pre-2010 seasonal influenza strains, but not against A/H1N1pdm09, which was not included in the vaccine. No indirect effects were measured. Further study in low-resource populations is warranted. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00893906.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccine Potency , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population , Senegal/epidemiology , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Young Adult
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(5): 777-785, 2019 08 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30481272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a Russian-backbone, live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) for immunogenicity and viral shedding in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial among Bangladeshi children. METHODS: Healthy children received a single, intranasal dose of LAIV containing the 2011-2012 recommended formulation or placebo. Nasopharyngeal wash (NPW) specimens were collected on days 0, 2, 4, and 7. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions and sequencing identified the influenza virus (vaccine or wild-type). On days 0 and 21, blood specimens were collected to assess immunogenicity using hemagglutination inhibition, microneutralization, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) and G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs); NPW specimens were also collected to assess mucosal immunogenicity using kinetic IgA ELISA. RESULTS: We enrolled 300 children aged 24 through 59 months in the immunogenicity and viral shedding analyses. Among children receiving LAIV, 45% and 67% shed A/H3N2 and B vaccine strains, respectively. No child shed A/H1N1 vaccine strain. There were significantly higher day 21 geometric mean titers (GMTs) for the LAIV, as compared to the placebo groups, in all immunoassays for A/H3N2 and B (log10 titer P < .0001; GMT Ratio >2.0). Among immunoassays for A/H1N1, only the mucosal IgA GMT was significantly higher than placebo at day 21 (log10 titer P = .0465). CONCLUSIONS: Children vaccinated with LAIV had serum and mucosal antibody responses to A/H3N2 and B, but only a mucosal IgA response to A/H1N1. Many children shed A/H3N2 and B vaccine strains, but none shed A/H1N1. More research is needed to determine the reason for decreased LAIV A/H1N1 immunogenicity and virus shedding. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01625689.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Virus Shedding , Administration, Intranasal , Bangladesh , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/analysis , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Nasopharynx/virology , Urban Population , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
6.
J Infect Dis ; 219(5): 746-749, 2019 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30357332

ABSTRACT

Rotaviruses bind to enterocytes in a genotype-specific manner via histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs), which are also detectable in saliva. We evaluated antirotavirus immunoglobulin A seroconversion ('vaccine take") among 166 Ghanaian infants after 2-3 doses of G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine during a vaccine trial, by HBGA status from saliva collected at age 4.1 years. Only secretor status was associated with seroconversion: 41% seroconversion for secretors vs 13% for nonsecretors; relative risk, 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.1; P = .016). Neither Lewis antigen nor salivary antigen blood type was associated with seroconversion. Likelihood of "take" for any particular rotavirus vaccine may differ across populations based on HBGAs.


Subject(s)
Histocompatibility Antigens/analysis , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Rotavirus/immunology , Seroconversion , Child, Preschool , Female , Genotype , Ghana , Humans , Infant , Male , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Saliva/chemistry
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(11): 1914-1920, 2017 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29028980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Influenza causes substantial morbidity in children worldwide, although influenza vaccine is seldom used in low-resource settings. More information on the clinical presentation of influenza and the efficacy of vaccine is needed to inform policy. METHODS: In 2013 we conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in children aged 24-59 months in Bangladesh (N = 1761). If participants met prespecified specimen collection criteria, we collected nasopharyngeal washes for testing by singleplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection (LCI). A panel of RT-PCR assays was used to detect noninfluenza respiratory viruses. Primary efficacy results have been reported. In this analysis of prespecified and post hoc objectives from the trial, we compared signs and symptoms between LCI and non-LCI cases and estimated the efficacy of LAIV against moderate-to-severe LCI and other prespecified non-LCI clinical outcomes including all-cause pneumonia and acute otitis media. RESULTS: The most common signs and symptoms of LCI were fever, cough, and runny nose. The combination of subjective fever and cough had a 63% sensitivity for LCI. The combination of measured fever, cough, and runny nose was most specific (90%) but had low sensitivity (32%) for LCI. The efficacy of LAIV against vaccine-strain moderate-to-severe LCI was 56.7% (95% confidence interval, 9.5%-79.2%). No statistically significant vaccine efficacy was found against the non-laboratory-confirmed clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: It was not possible to distinguish LCI from noninfluenza viral infections on clinical evaluations alone in this population of Bangladeshi children. LAIV was efficacious against moderate-to-severe LCI. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01797029.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae/isolation & purification , Vaccine Potency , Administration, Intranasal , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Cough/epidemiology , Cough/etiology , Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fever/epidemiology , Fever/etiology , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Nasopharynx/virology , Orthomyxoviridae/genetics , Orthomyxoviridae/immunology , Otitis Media/epidemiology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
8.
PLoS Med ; 14(4): e1002282, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28419095

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus vaccines are now globally recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), but in early 2009 WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization reviewed available data and concluded that there was no evidence for the efficacy or effectiveness of a two-dose schedule of the human rotavirus vaccine (HRV; Rotarix) given early at 6 and 10 wk of age. Additionally, the effectiveness of programmatic rotavirus vaccination, including possible indirect effects, has not been assessed in low-resource populations in Asia. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In Bangladesh, we cluster-randomized (1:1) 142 villages of the Matlab Health and Demographic Surveillance System to include two doses of HRV with the standard infant vaccines at 6 and 10 wk of age or to provide standard infant vaccines without HRV. The study was initiated November 1, 2008, and surveillance was conducted concurrently at Matlab Diarrhoea Hospital and two community treatment centers to identify children less than 2 y of age presenting with acute rotavirus diarrhea (ARD) through March 31, 2011. Laboratory confirmation was made by enzyme immunoassay detection of rotavirus antigen in stool specimens. Overall effectiveness of the HRV vaccination program (primary objective) was measured by comparing the incidence rate of ARD among all children age-eligible for vaccination in villages where HRV was introduced to that among such children in villages where HRV was not introduced. Total effectiveness among vaccinees and indirect effectiveness were also evaluated. In all, 6,527 infants were age-eligible for vaccination in 71 HRV villages, and 5,791 in 71 non-HRV villages. In HRV villages, 4,808 (73.7%) infants received at least one dose of HRV. The incidence rate of ARD was 4.10 cases per 100 person-years in non-HRV villages compared to 2.8 per 100 person-years in HRV villages, indicating an overall effectiveness of 29.0% (95% CI, 11.3% to 43.1%). The total effectiveness of HRV against ARD among vaccinees was 41.4% (95% CI, 23.2% to 55.2%). The point estimate for total effectiveness was higher against ARD during the first year of life than during the second (45.2% versus 28.9%), but estimates for the second year of life lacked precision and did not reach statistical significance. Indirect effects were not detected. To check for bias in presentation to treatment facilities, we evaluated the effectiveness of HRV against acute diarrhea associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli; it was 4.0% (95% CI, -46.5% to 37.1%), indicating that bias likely was not introduced. Thirteen serious adverse events were identified among recipients of HRV, but none were considered related to receipt of study vaccine. The main limitation of this study is that it was an open-label study with an observed-only control group (no placebo). CONCLUSIONS: The two-dose HRV rotavirus vaccination program significantly reduced medically attended ARD in this low-resource population in Asia. Protection among vaccinees was similar to that in other low-resource settings. In low-resource populations with high rotavirus incidence, large-scale vaccination across a wide population may be required to obtain the full benefit of rotavirus vaccination, including indirect effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00737503.


Subject(s)
Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Bangladesh , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Program Evaluation , Treatment Outcome , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Young Adult
9.
J Infect Dis ; 215(1): 34-41, 2017 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27803175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus (RV) is the leading cause of diarrhea-related death in children worldwide and 95% of RV-associated deaths occur in Africa and Asia where RV vaccines (RVVs) have lower efficacy. We hypothesize that differences in intestinal microbiome composition correlate with the decreased RVV efficacy observed in poor settings. METHODS: We conducted a nested, case-control study comparing prevaccination, fecal microbiome compositions between 6-week old, matched RVV responders and nonresponders in rural Ghana. These infants' microbiomes were then compared with 154 age-matched, healthy Dutch infants' microbiomes, assumed to be RVV responders. Fecal microbiome analysis was performed in all groups using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip. RESULTS: We analyzed findings in 78 Ghanaian infants, including 39 RVV responder and nonresponder pairs. The overall microbiome composition was significantly different between RVV responders and nonresponders (FDR, 0.12), and Ghanaian responders were more similar to Dutch infants than nonresponders (P = .002). RVV response correlated with an increased abundance of Streptococcus bovis and a decreased abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum in comparisons between both Ghanaian RVV responders and nonresponders (FDR, 0.008 vs 0.003) and Dutch infants and Ghanaian nonresponders (FDR, 0.002 vs 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The intestinal microbiome composition correlates significantly with RVV immunogenicity and may contribute to the diminished RVV immunogenicity observed in developing countries.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Rotavirus Infections/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteroidetes/isolation & purification , Case-Control Studies , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Ghana/epidemiology , Humans , Immunity, Mucosal , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Male , Microarray Analysis , Pregnancy , Rotavirus/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Streptococcus bovis/isolation & purification , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(suppl 4): S123-S133, 2016 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27838664

ABSTRACT

Implementation of effective interventions has halved maternal and child mortality over the past 2 decades, but less progress has been made in reducing neonatal mortality. Almost 45% of under-5 global mortality now occurs in infants <1 month of age, with approximately 86% of neonatal deaths occurring in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). As an estimated 23% of neonatal deaths globally are due to infectious causes, maternal immunization (MI) is one intervention that may reduce mortality in the first few months of life, when direct protection often relies on passively transmitted maternal antibodies. Despite all countries including pertussis-containing vaccines in their routine childhood immunization schedules, supported through the Expanded Programme on Immunization, pertussis continues to circulate globally. Although based on limited robust epidemiologic data, current estimates derived from modeling implicate pertussis in 1% of under-5 mortality, with infants too young to be vaccinated at highest risk of death. Pertussis MI programs have proven effective in reducing infant pertussis mortality in high-income countries using tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines in their maternal and infant programs; however, these vaccines are cost-prohibitive for routine use in LMICs. The reach of antenatal care programs to deliver maternal pertussis vaccines, particularly with respect to infants at greatest risk of pertussis, needs to be further evaluated. Recognizing that decisions on the potential impact of pertussis MI in LMICs need, as a first step, robust contemporary mortality data for early infant pertussis, a symposium of global key experts was held. The symposium reviewed current evidence and identified knowledge gaps with respect to the infant pertussis disease burden in LMICs, and discussed proposed strategies to assess the potential impact of pertussis MI.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Prenatal Care , Vaccination , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Cost of Illness , Developing Countries , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Global Health , Health Policy , Humans , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Immunization Programs , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Vaccination/methods , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/mortality
11.
Lancet Glob Health ; 4(12): e955-e965, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27746224

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Live attenuated influenza vaccines have been shown to significantly reduce influenza in diverse populations of children, but no efficacy studies have been done in resource-poor tropical settings. In Senegal, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a live attenuated influenza vaccine based on Russian-derived master donor viruses and licensed as a single dose. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, single-centre trial done near Niakhar, Senegal, generally healthy children aged 2-5 years were randomly allocated (2:1) to receive a single intranasal dose of masked trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine or placebo. The allocation sequence was computer-generated by PATH with block sizes of three. The manufacturer provided vaccine and placebo in coded vials to preserve blinding. Participants were monitored through the predictable influenza season in Senegal for adverse events and signs and symptoms of influenza using weekly home visits and surveillance in clinics. The primary outcome was symptomatic laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by any strain and occurring from 15 days post-vaccination to the end of the study. The primary analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01854632. FINDINGS: Between May 23, and July 1, 2013, 1761 children were randomly assigned, 1174 to receive live attenuated influenza vaccine and 587 to receive placebo. The per-protocol set included 1173 vaccinees and 584 placebo recipients followed up to Dec 20, 2013. Symptomatic influenza was laboratory-confirmed in 210 (18%) of 1173 recipients of live attenuated influenza vaccine and 105 (18%) of placebo recipients, giving a vaccine efficacy of 0·0% (95% CI -26·4 to 20·9). Adverse events were balanced between the study groups. Two girls who had received live attenuated influenza vaccine died, one due to anasarca 12 days postvaccination and one due to malnutrition 70 days postvaccination. INTERPRETATION: Live attenuated influenza vaccine was well tolerated in young children in Senegal, but did not provide protection against influenza. Further study in such populations, which might experience extended periods of influenza circulation, is warranted. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Administration, Intranasal/methods , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Male , Senegal , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects
12.
Lancet Glob Health ; 4(12): e946-e954, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27746226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rates of influenza illness and associated complications are high among children in Bangladesh. We assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of a Russian-backbone live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) at two field sites in Bangladesh. METHODS: Between Feb 27 and April 9, 2013, children aged 2-4 years in urban Kamalapur and rural Matlab, Bangladesh, were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio, according to a computer-generated schedule, to receive one intranasal dose of LAIV or placebo. After vaccination, we monitored children in weekly home visits until Dec 31, 2013, with study clinic surveillance for influenza illness. The primary outcome was symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza illness due to vaccine-matched strains. Analysis was per protocol. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01797029. FINDINGS: Of 1761 children enrolled, 1174 received LAIV and 587 received placebo. Laboratory-confirmed influenza illness due to vaccine-matched strains was seen in 93 (15·8%) children in the placebo group and 79 (6·7%) in the LAIV group. Vaccine efficacy of LAIV for vaccine-matched strains was 57·5% (95% CI 43·6-68·0). The vaccine was well tolerated, and adverse events were balanced between the groups. The most frequent adverse events were tachypnoea (n=86 in the LAIV group and n=54 in the placebo group), cough (n=73 and n=43), and runny nose (n=68 and n=39), most of which were mild. INTERPRETATION: This single-dose Russian-backbone LAIV was safe and efficacious at preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed influenza illness due to vaccine-matched strains. LAIV programmes might reduce the burden of influenza illness in Bangladesh. FUNDING: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Administration, Intranasal/methods , Bangladesh , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Male , Placebos , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects
13.
J Infect Dis ; 213(11): 1678-85, 2016 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26823335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recommended schedule for receipt of 2-dose human rotavirus vaccine (HRV) coincides with receipt of the first and second doses of diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccine (ie, 6 and 10 weeks of age, respectively). Alternative schedules and additional doses of HRV have been proposed and may improve vaccine performance in low-income countries. METHODS: In this randomized trial in rural Ghana, HRV was administered at ages 6 and 10 weeks (group 1), 10 and 14 weeks (group 2), or 6, 10, and 14 weeks (group 3). We compared serum antirotavirus immunoglobulin A (IgA) seroconversion (≥20 U/mL) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of participants (424 of 456) completed the study per protocol. In groups 1, 2, and 3, the IgA seroconversion frequencies among participants with IgA levels of <20 U/mL at baseline were 28.9%, 37.4%, and 43.4%, respectively (group 1 vs group 3, P = .014; group 1 vs group 2, P = .163). Postvaccination IgA GMCs were 22.1 U/mL, 26.5 U/mL, and 32.6 U/mL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (group 1 vs group 3, P = .038; group 1 vs group 2, P = .304). CONCLUSIONS: A third dose of HRV resulted in increased seroconversion frequencies and GMCs, compared with 2 doses administered at 6 and 10 weeks of age. Since there is no correlate of protection, a postmarketing effectiveness study is required to determine whether the improvement in immune response translates into a public health benefit in low-income countries. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT015751.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Female , Ghana , Humans , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Infant , Male , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology
14.
Vaccine ; 33(29): 3415-21, 2015 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25917680

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) have the potential to be affordable, effective, and logistically feasible for immunization of children in low-resource settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial on the safety of the Russian-backbone, seasonal trivalent LAIV among children aged 24 through 59 months in Dhaka, Bangladesh in 2012. After vaccination, we monitored participants for six months with weekly home visits and study clinic surveillance for solicited and unsolicited adverse events, protocol-defined wheezing illness (PDWI), and serious adverse events (SAEs), including all cause hospitalizations. RESULTS: Three hundred children were randomized and administered LAIV (n=150) or placebo (n=150). No immediate post-vaccination reactions occurred in either group. Solicited reactions were similar between vaccine and placebo groups during the first 7 days post-vaccination and throughout the entire trial. There were no statistically significant differences in participants experiencing PDWI between LAIV and placebo groups throughout the trial (n=13 vs. n=16, p=0.697). Of 131 children with a history of medical treatment or hospitalization for asthma or wheezing at study entry, 65 received LAIV and 66 received placebo. Among this subset, there was no statistical difference in PDWI occurring throughout the trial between the LAIV or placebo groups (7.7% vs. 19.7%, p=0.074). While there were no related SAEs, LAIV recipients had six unrelated SAEs and placebo recipients had none. These SAEs included three due to traumatic injury and bone fracture, and one each due to accidental overdose of paracetamol, abdominal pain, and acute gastroenteritis. None of the participants with SAEs had laboratory-confirmed influenza, wheezing illness, or other signs of acute respiratory illness at the time of their events. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, controlled trial among 300 children aged 24 through 59 months in urban Bangladesh, Russian-backbone LAIV was safe and well tolerated. Further evaluation of LAIV safety and efficacy in a larger cohort is warranted.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Bangladesh , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Respiratory Sounds , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects
15.
J Infect Dis ; 209(12): 1860-9, 2014 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24604819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) causes severe infections in humans. We generated 2 influenza A(H5N1) live attenuated influenza vaccines for pandemic use (pLAIVs), but they failed to elicit a primary immune response. Our objective was to determine whether the vaccines primed or established long-lasting immunity that could be detected by administration of inactivated subvirion influenza A(H5N1) vaccine (ISIV). METHODS: The following groups were invited to participate in the study: persons who previously received influenza A(H5N1) pLAIV; persons who previously received an irrelevant influenza A(H7N3) pLAIV; and community members who were naive to influenza A(H5N1) and LAIV. LAIV-experienced subjects received a single 45-µg dose of influenza A(H5N1) ISIV. Influenza A(H5N1)- and LAIV-naive subjects received either 1 or 2 doses of ISIV. RESULTS: In subjects who had previously received antigenically matched influenza A(H5N1) pLAIV followed by 1 dose of ISIV compared with those who were naive to influenza A(H5N1) and LAIV and received 2 doses of ISIV, we observed an increased frequency of antibody response (82% vs 50%, by the hemagglutination inhibition assay) and a significantly higher antibody titer (112 vs 76; P = .04). The affinity of antibody and breadth of cross-clade neutralization was also enhanced in influenza A(H5N1) pLAIV-primed subjects. CONCLUSIONS: ISIV administration unmasked long-lasting immunity in influenza A(H5N1) pLAIV recipients, with a rapid, high-titer, high-quality antibody response that was broadly cross-reactive across several influenza A(H5N1) clades. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01109329.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibody Affinity , Antibody Formation/immunology , Cross Reactions , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H7N3 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/therapeutic use , Young Adult
16.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A101-5, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520118

ABSTRACT

A double-masked, individually randomized Phase 3 clinical trial to assess the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV), RotaTeq™, was conducted in rural Matlab, Bangladesh (NCT00362648). A total of 1136 infants were enrolled and randomized to receive either vaccine or placebo in a 1:1 ratio administered with the standard EPI vaccines at a mean age of approximately 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Weight was collected at four time points (study vaccine doses 1, 2, and 3, and a close-out visit in March 2009 at 15-26 months of age), and birth weight was retrospectively collected from information contained on the mother's health card when available. Approximately one year following trial completion a separate study was conducted to collect anthropometry measurements, including weight and height. These measurements were linked with Phase 3 trial data and a post hoc analysis was conducted to assess the effects of rotavirus vaccination on malnutrition among enrolled children who could be located when they were between 27 and 38 months old. Among the 1033 (91%) children located, and measured, for this analysis height-for-age and weight-for-height Z scores were calculated and compared between vaccine and placebo recipients at the anthropometry follow-up 1-year post-trial, and weight-for-age Z scores were calculated at four trial time points in addition to the anthropometry follow-up. The data indicated that there was no effect of rotavirus vaccination on malnutrition in this population at any of the measured time points. PRV, estimated to have about 43% efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in this population, may not reduce the overall burden of diarrheal illness sufficiently among all vaccinees to appreciably measure impact on growth compared with non-vaccinees. Regardless of the impact on malnutrition indicators, rotavirus vaccines are an important intervention for reducing morbidity and mortality in children in developing countries.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Malnutrition/chemically induced , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Anthropometry , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Body Weight , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
17.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A131-9, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520122

ABSTRACT

Of the estimated half-million deaths from rotavirus globally each year, approximately one-third (N = 160,000 deaths) occur in the Indian subcontinent (defined as India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan). Two commercial vaccines are available for use and recommended by WHO, although the prohibitive vaccine price has limited their introduction into routine childhood immunization programs. New rotavirus vaccines are in late clinical development, including two advanced candidates in India. As significant shifts in rotavirus strain diversity have occurred in the past three decades and questions remain regarding whether strain replacement may occur following introduction of rotavirus vaccines, it is important to understand the temporal and regional strain diversity profile before vaccine introduction. We reviewed 33 peer-reviewed manuscripts from the Indian subcontinent and found that the most common G-types (G1-4) and P-types (P[4] and P[8]) globally accounted for three-fourths of all strains in the subcontinent. However, strains varied by region, and temporal analysis showed the decline of G3 and G4 in recent years and the emergence of G9 and G12. Our findings underscore the large diversity of rotavirus strains in the Indian subcontinent and highlight the need to conduct surveillance on a regional scale to better understand strain diversity before and after rotavirus vaccine introduction.


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Rotavirus/classification , Rotavirus/genetics , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Genotype , Humans , India , Molecular Epidemiology , Pakistan/epidemiology , Rotavirus/isolation & purification
18.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A159-66, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical severity scoring systems are used in rotavirus vaccine efficacy and effectiveness studies to define the primary endpoint, severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE). Understanding how scoring systems perform in diverse settings is critical for proper design and interpretation. This investigation aims to understand how the Vesikari scoring system (VSS) and Clark scoring system (CSS) categorize severe disease among children under 2 years of age using data from two Phase III efficacy trials conducted in five developing countries in Africa and Asia. METHODS: Signs and symptoms were collected on trial participants who presented to a medical facility with study-defined gastroenteritis. Severity scores were calculated using pre-established VSS and CSS criteria and compared to identify differences in the proportions of severe RVGE within regions and sites, and by gender and age. RESULTS: In Africa and Asia, 40.6% and 56.0% of rotavirus-positive episodes were severe according to the VSS, while 9.5% and 6.3% of episodes were severe according to the CSS (Fisher's Exact, p ≤ 0.001). Using the mean scores in these trials (VSS: ≥ 10 Africa, ≥ 11 Asia; CSS: Africa and Asia ≥ 10) as the severity thresholds, agreement between scoring system severity classifications improved substantially within each region (Africa: kappa = 0.67; Asia: kappa = 0.78) as compared to the original severity classification (Africa: kappa = 0.27; Asia: kappa = 0.10). Using the mean score, 17.1% and 9.5% of severe VSS cases in Africa and Asia, respectively, were classified as not severe according to the CSS and 14.7% and 9.5% of severe CSS cases in Africa and Asia were classified as not severe according to the VSS. CONCLUSION: The two scoring systems performed differently among developing country populations in Africa and Asia, with the VSS classifying more cases as severe in both regions. One accurate and reliable scoring system should be developed and implemented for all trials so that results may be more comparable.


Subject(s)
Rotavirus Infections/pathology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Africa , Asia , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage
19.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A7-14, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520139

ABSTRACT

Rotavirus is the leading cause of diarrheal disease in children under 5 years of age. It is responsible for more than 450,000 deaths each year, with more than 90% of these deaths occurring in low-resource countries eligible for support by the GAVI Alliance. Significant efforts made by the Alliance and its partners are providing countries with the opportunity to introduce rotavirus vaccines into their national immunization programs, to help prevent childhood illness and death. We projected the cost-effectiveness and health impact of rotavirus vaccines in GAVI-eligible countries, to assist decision makers in prioritizing resources to achieve the greatest health benefits for their populations. A decision-analytic model was used to project the health outcomes and direct costs of a birth cohort in the target population, with and without a rotavirus vaccine. Current data on disease burden, vaccine efficacy, immunization rates, and costs were used in the model. Vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries would prevent 2.46 million childhood deaths and 83 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from 2011 to 2030, with annual reductions of 180,000 childhood deaths at peak vaccine uptake. The cost per DALY averted is $42 for all GAVI countries combined, over the entire period. Rotavirus vaccination would be considered very cost-effective for the entire cohort of GAVI countries, and in each country individually, as cost-effectiveness ratios are less than the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Vaccination is most cost-effective and has the greatest impact in regions with high rotavirus mortality. Rotavirus vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries is very cost-effective and is projected to substantially reduce childhood mortality in this population.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , Rotavirus Infections/economics , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/economics , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Developing Countries , Diarrhea/economics , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/mortality , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Models, Statistical , Prevalence , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/mortality , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage
20.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A71-8, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520140

ABSTRACT

The oral, pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV), RotaTeq was assessed for prevention of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in young children in two multi-site, randomized, placebo-controlled field trials; one in Asia (Vietnam and Bangladesh) and the other in sub-Saharan Africa (Ghana, Kenya and Mali). The efficacy results for the Mali site of the multi-country trial are presented here. We randomly assigned infants in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3 doses of PRV/placebo at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Gastroenteritis episodes were captured passively at the local health centers and by home visits. The primary study outcome was severe RVGE, as defined by a score of ≥ 11 using the Vesikari Clinical Scoring System occurring ≥ 14 days after the third dose until the end of the study. Other efficacy analyses included efficacy against severe RVGE through the first year and during the second years of life, as well as efficacy after receiving at least one dose of vaccine. In total, 1960 infants were enrolled in the trial at the Mali site and sera were collected on a subset of infants (approximately 150) for immunogenicity testing. In the first year of follow-up, largely due to cultural practices to visit traditional healers as the first point of care, the point estimate of efficacy was unreliable: the per protocol vaccine efficacy against severe RVGE was 1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -431.7, 81.6); the intention-to-treat vaccine efficacy was 42.9% (95% CI: -125.7, 87.7). During the second year of follow-up, after the surveillance system was modified to adapt to local customs and health care seeking practices, the point estimate of per-protocol vaccine efficacy was 19.2% (95% CI: -23.1,47.3%). 82.5% of Malian infants (95% CI: 70.1,91.3%) who received PRV mounted a seroresponse (≥ 3-fold rise from baseline (prevaccination) to post-dose 3 vaccination) of anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A antibody, with a post third-dose geometric mean titer (GMT) of 31.3 units/mL. By contrast, only 20.0% of placebo recipients (95% CI: 10.0, 33.7%) developed a seroresponse and the post-third dose GMT was 3.2 units/mL. None of the serious clinical adverse events observed were considered to be vaccine-related.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Female , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/pathology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Male , Mali/epidemiology , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/pathology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...