A practical guide to the appropriate analysis of eGFR data over time: A simulation study.

In several therapeutic areas, including chronic kidney disease (CKD) and immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), there is a growing interest in how best to analyze estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data over time in randomized clinical trials including how to best accommodate situations where the rate of change is not anticipated to be linear over time, often due to possible short term hemodynamic effects of certain classes of interventions. In such situations, concerns have been expressed by regulatory authorities that the common application of single slope analysis models may induce Type I error inflation. This article aims to offer practical advice and guidance, including SAS codes, on the statistical methodology to be employed in an eGFR rate of change analysis and offers guidance on trial design considerations for eGFR endpoints. A two-slope statistical model for eGFR data over time is proposed allowing for an analysis to simultaneously evaluate short term acute effects and long term chronic effects. A simulation study was conducted under a range of credible null and alternative hypotheses to evaluate the performance of the two-slope model in comparison to commonly used single slope random coefficients models as well as to non-slope based analyses of change from baseline or time normalized area under the curve (TAUC). Importantly, and contrary to preexisting concerns, these simulations demonstrate the absence of alpha inflation associated with the use of single or two-slope random coefficient models, even when such models are misspecified, and highlight that any concern regarding model misspecification relates to power and not to lack of Type I error control.

Conditional power and information fraction calculations at an interim analysis for random coefficient models.

Random coefficient (RC) models are commonly used in clinical trials to estimate the rate of change over time in longitudinal data. Trials utilizing a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval with a confirmatory longitudinal endpoint to show clinical benefit is a strategy implemented across various therapeutic areas, including immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Understanding conditional power (CP) and information fraction calculations of RC models may help in the design of clinical trials as well as provide support for the confirmatory endpoint at the time of accelerated approval. This paper provides calculation methods, with practical examples, for determining CP at an interim analysis for a RC model with longitudinal data, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) assessments to measure rate of change in eGFR slope.

Drug Resistance Assessment Following Administration of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion Inhibitor Presatovir to Participants Experimentally Infected With RSV.

BACKGROUND: Presatovir is an oral respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion inhibitor targeting RSV F protein. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults experimentally infected with RSV (Memphis-37b), presatovir significantly reduced viral load and clinical disease severity in a dose-dependent manner. METHODS: Viral RNA from nasal wash samples was amplified and the F gene sequenced to monitor presatovir resistance. Effects of identified amino acid substitutions on in vitro susceptibility to presatovir, viral fitness, and clinical outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight treatment-emergent F substitutions were identified. Of these, 26 were tested in vitro; 2 were not due to lack of recombinant virus recovery. Ten substitutions did not affect presatovir susceptibility, and 16 substitutions reduced RSV susceptibility to presatovir (2.9- to 410-fold). No substitutions altered RSV susceptibility to palivizumab or ribavirin. Frequency of phenotypically resistant substitutions was higher with regimens containing lower presatovir dose and shorter treatment duration. Participants with phenotypic presatovir resistance had significantly higher nasal viral load area under the curve relative to those without, but substitutions did not significantly affect peak viral load or clinical manifestations of RSV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Emergence of presatovir-resistant RSV occurred during therapy but did not significantly affect clinical efficacy in participants with experimental RSV infection.

Phase 1 First-in-Human, Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose, and Food Effect Studies to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Presatovir for the Treatment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated respiratory tract infection is a leading cause of hospitalizations in infants for which no effective treatment exists. RSV infection is also an important cause of respiratory disease in adults and immunocompromised patients. Presatovir (GS-5806) is an orally bioavailable antiviral agent that inhibits fusion of RSV with host cell membranes. Here, results from 2 phase 1 studies that evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of presatovir in healthy adults following administration of single and multiple (7 days) once- or twice-daily ascending doses (first-in-human study) and in the presence or absence of food (food effect study) are described. Presatovir exhibited favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles that supported once-daily dosing. Presatovir exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner across the evaluated dose range (single doses 25-300 mg; multiple doses 10-75 mg once daily for 7 days). Administration of presatovir with a high-fat meal did not alter exposure, supporting administration without regard to a meal in further clinical studies. These data were subsequently used to inform presatovir dosing regimens in a phase 2a challenge study of adults experimentally infected with RSV. Collectively, results from phase 1 evaluations and a phase 2a challenge study support further clinical investigation of presatovir for the treatment of RSV infection.

Continuous alternating inhaled antibiotics for chronic pseudomonal infection in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled antibiotics are standard of care for treating chronic pseudomonal respiratory infections in cystic fibrosis patients, initially approved for intermittent administration. However, use of continuous inhaled antibiotic regimens of differing combinations is growing. METHODS: This double-blind trial compared continuous alternating therapy (CAT) to an intermittent treatment regimen. Subjects were treated with 3cycles of 28-days inhaled aztreonam (AZLI) or placebo 3-times daily alternating with 28-days open-label tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS). RESULTS: 90 subjects were randomized over 18months. Study enrollment was limited, in part because of evolving practices by clinicians of adopting a CAT regimen in clinical practice; consequently the study was underpowered. AZLI/TIS treatment reduced exacerbation rates by 25.7% (p=0.25; primary endpoint) and rates of respiratory hospitalizations by 35.8% compared with placebo/TIS (p=0.14). AZLI/TIS CAT therapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This trial illustrates challenges with studying treatment regimens in a constantly evolving CF care environment. Nonetheless, the results of this trial indicate that AZLI/TIS CAT is well tolerated and may provide additional clinical benefit in CF patients compared with intermittent use of TIS alone. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01641822.

Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis: final psychometric analyses and determination of minimal important difference scores.

BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B), a self-administered, patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life for patients with non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, contains 37 items on 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). METHODS: Psychometric analyses of QOL-B V.3.0 used data from two double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase III trials of aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI) in 542 patients with non-CF bronchiectasis and Gram-negative endobronchial infection. RESULTS: Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥0.70) and 2-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.72) were demonstrated for each scale. Convergent validity with 6 min walk test was observed for Physical and Role Functioning scores. No floor or ceiling effects (baseline scores of 0 or 100) were found for the Respiratory Symptoms scale (primary endpoint of trials). Baseline Respiratory Symptoms scores discriminated between patients based on baseline FEV1% predicted in only one trial. The minimal important difference score for the Respiratory Symptoms scale was 8.0 points. AZLI did not show efficacy in the two phase III trials. QOL-B responsivity to treatment was assessed by examining changes from baseline QOL-B scores at study visits at which protocol-defined pulmonary exacerbations were reported. Mean Respiratory Symptoms scores decreased 14.0 and 14.2 points from baseline for placebo-treated and AZLI-treated patients with exacerbations, indicating that worsening respiratory symptoms were reflected in clinically meaningful changes in QOL-B scores. CONCLUSIONS: Previously established content validity, reliability and responsivity of the QOL-B are confirmed by this final validation study. The QOL-B is available for use in clinical trials and routine clinical practice.

Oral GS-5806 activity in a respiratory syncytial virus challenge study.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of infant hospitalizations and is increasingly recognized as a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality. No accepted antiviral treatment exists. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of GS-5806, an oral RSV-entry inhibitor, in healthy adults who received a clinical challenge strain of RSV intranasally. Participants were monitored for 12 days. At the time of a positive test for RSV infection or 5 days after inoculation, whichever occurred first, participants were randomly assigned to receive GS-5806 or placebo in one of seven sequential cohorts. Cohorts 1 to 4 received a first dose of 50 mg of GS-5806 and then 25 mg daily for the next 4 days, cohort 5 received a first dose of 50 mg and then 25 mg daily for the next 2 days, cohort 6 received one 100-mg dose, and cohort 7 received a first dose of 10 mg and then 5 mg daily for the next 4 days. Dose selection for cohorts 5, 6, and 7 occurred after an interim analysis of data for cohorts 1 to 4. The primary end point was the area under the curve (AUC) for the viral load, which was assessed after administration of the first dose through the 12th day after inoculation. Secondary end points were mucus weight and symptom scores. RESULTS: Among the 54 participants in cohorts 1 to 4 who were infected with RSV, active treatment was associated with a lower viral load (adjusted mean, 250.7 vs. 757.7 log10 plaque-forming-unit equivalents [PFUe] × hours per milliliter; P<0.001), lower total mucus weight (mean, 6.9 g vs. 15.1 g; P=0.03), and a lower AUC for the change from baseline in symptom scores (adjusted mean, -20.2 vs. 204.9 × hours; P=0.005). The results were similar in cohorts 5, 6, and 7. Adverse events, including low neutrophil counts and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase, were more common among participants receiving GS-5806. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GS-5806 reduced the viral load and the severity of clinical disease in a challenge study of healthy adults. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01756482.).

Aztreonam for inhalation solution in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (AIR-BX1 and AIR-BX2): two randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of inhaled antibiotics in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis has not been established in randomised controlled trials. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI) in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and Gram-negative bacterial colonisation. METHODS: AIR-BX1 and AIR-BX2 were two double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials, which included patients aged 18 years or older who had bronchiectasis and history of positive sputum or bronchoscopic culture for target Gram-negative organisms. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either AZLI or placebo (1:1). Randomisation was done without stratification and the code was generated by a Gilead designee. In both studies, two 4-week courses of AZLI 75 mg or placebo (three-times daily; eFlow nebulizer) were each followed by a 4-week off-treatment period. Primary endpoint was change from baseline Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptoms scores (QOL-B-RSS) at 4 weeks. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers are NCT01313624 for AIR-BX1 and NCT01314716 for AIR-BX2. FINDINGS: We recruited participants from 47 ambulatory clinics for AIR-BX1 and 65 ambulatory clinics for AIR-BX2; studies were done between April 25, 2011, and July 1, 2013. In AIR-BX1, of the 348 patients screened, 134 were randomly assigned to receive AZLI and 132 to receive placebo. In AIR-BX2, of the 404 patients screened, 136 were randomly assigned to receive AZLI and 138 to receive placebo. The difference between AZLI and placebo for adjusted mean change from baseline QOL-B-RSS was not significant at 4 weeks (0.8 [95% CI -3.1 to 4.7], p=0.68) in AIR-BX1, but was significant (4.6 [1.1 to 8.2], p=0.011) in AIR-BX2. The 4.6 point difference in QOL-B-RSS after 4 weeks in AIR-BX2 was not deemed clinically significant. In both studies, treatment-related adverse events were more common in the AZLI group than in the placebo group, as were discontinuations from adverse events. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were dyspnea, cough, and increased sputum. Each was more common for AZLI-treated than for placebo-treated patients, but the incidences were more balanced in AIR-BX2. INTERPRETATION: AZLI treatment did not provide significant clinical benefit in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, as measured by QOL-B-RSS, suggesting a continued need for placebo-controlled studies to establish the clinical benefit of inhaled antibiotics in patients with this disorder. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

A preliminary quality of life questionnaire-bronchiectasis: a patient-reported outcome measure for bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) is the first disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure for patients with bronchiectasis. Content validity, cognitive testing, responsivity to open-label treatment, and psychometric analyses are presented. METHODS: Reviews of literature, existing measures, and physician input were used to generate the initial QOL-B. Modifications following preliminary cognitive testing (N = 35 patients with bronchiectasis) generated version (V) 1.0. An open-ended patient interview study (N = 28) provided additional information and was content analyzed to derive saturation matrices, which summarized all disease-related topics mentioned by each participant. This resulted in QOL-B V2.0. Psychometric analyses were carried out using results from an open-label phase 2 trial, in which 89 patients were enrolled and treated with aztreonam for inhalation solution. Responsivity to open-label treatment was observed. Additional analyses generated QOL-B V3.0, with 37 items on eight scales: respiratory symptoms; physical, role, emotional, and social functioning; vitality; health perceptions; and treatment burden. For each scale, scores are standardized on a 0-to-100-point scale; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. No total score is calculated. A final cognitive testing study (N = 40) resulted in a minor change to one social functioning scale item (QOL-B V3.1). RESULTS: Content validity, cognitive testing, responsivity to open-label treatment, and initial psychometric analyses supported QOL-B items and structure. CONCLUSIONS: This interim QOL-B is a promising tool for evaluating the efficacy of new therapies for patients with bronchiectasis and for measuring symptoms, functioning, and quality of life in these patients on a routine basis. A final psychometric validation study is needed and is forthcoming. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00805025; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Acute hyperkalemia associated with inhalation of a potent ENaC antagonist: Phase 1 trial of GS-9411.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) blockers are designed to increase airway surface liquid volume, thereby benefiting cystic fibrosis patients. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of ENaC blocker GS-9411, in healthy participants. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, residential, Phase 1 study evaluated inhaled GS-9411 (2.4, 4.8, and 9.6 mg) or placebo, dosed twice daily for 14 days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: GS-9411 was well tolerated; 86.1% of treated participants completed dosing (n=31/36). Cough and dizziness (27.8% participants each; most of mild severity) were the most commonly reported adverse events and occurred in both placebo and GS-9411 treatment groups. Arrhythmias were not observed for GS-9411-treated participants, and electrocardiographic changes were not considered clinically significant. Serum potassium levels exceeded the upper limit of normal (>5 mmol/L), 4 hr after the morning dose in GS-9411 (n=16/24) and placebo (n=4/12) treatment groups (38 incidences total). Retesting revealed levels had returned to normal within 2-3 hr. In urine electrolyte analyses, obtained 0-6 hr after the Day 1 morning dose, mean sodium/potassium ratios significantly increased from values 0-6 hr before dosing. Increased urine sodium/potassium ratios corresponded with high urine concentrations of active GS-9411 metabolites, which inhibited sodium reabsorption in the kidney, leading to the observed transient hyperkalemia in these participants. Inhaled GS-9411 was well tolerated except for the emergence of transient clinically significant hyperkalemia; this finding resulted in termination of further clinical development of this drug and will necessitate development of a new generation of ENaC blockers, which provide a sustained improvement in mucociliary clearance, while reducing renal exposure to ENaC blockade. Transient increases in mean urine sodium/potassium ratios appeared to be the first signal of electrolyte imbalances resulting from drug-induced block of ENaC in the kidney. The results of this study strongly suggest that clinical trials of novel ENaC blockers will require intensive measurement of plasma and urine electrolyte levels.

Inhaled aztreonam for chronic Burkholderia infection in cystic fibrosis: a placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with Burkholderia spp. infection have historically been excluded from efficacy trials of inhaled antibiotics, including aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI). METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial of continuous AZLI/placebo treatment was undertaken in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic Burkholderia spp. infection. All subjects also received usual medical care (determined by their physicians). Additional antibiotic use was not restricted. RESULTS: Baseline FEV1% predicted values ranged from 15.8% to 114.6%. No significant treatment differences (AZLI vs. placebo) were observed at week 24 for any endpoints, including FEV1% predicted, number of respiratory exacerbations requiring systemic/inhaled antibiotics, or hospitalizations. Continuous AZLI administration was well tolerated. Burkholderia spp. susceptibility to antibiotics commonly used in CF therapy showed little change. CONCLUSIONS: 24-weeks of continuous AZLI treatment did not significantly improve lung function in CF subjects with chronic Burkholderia spp. infection. Non-study antibiotic use may have confounded any potential AZLI effects.

Inhaled aztreonam lysine vs. inhaled tobramycin in cystic fibrosis: a comparative efficacy trial.

BACKGROUND: Open-label, parallel-group, international trial comparing aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI) and tobramycin nebulizer solution (TNS) for cystic fibrosis patients with airway Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: 273 patients (≥ 6 years); randomized to three 28-day courses (AZLI 75 mg [three-times/day] or TNS 300 mg [twice/day]); 28 off-days separated each course. RESULTS: 268 patients were treated (AZLI/TNS: 136/132). Mean baseline FEV1 was 52% predicted. Mean relative changes after 1 course (AZLI: 8.35%; TNS: 0.55%; p<0.001) and mean actual changes across 3 courses (AZLI: 2.05%; TNS: -0.66%; p=0.002) indicated AZLI statistical superiority vs. TNS. AZLI-treated patients had fewer respiratory hospitalizations (p=0.044) and respiratory events requiring additional antipseudomonal antibiotics (p=0.004); both treatments were well tolerated. 133 patients received 1 to 3 courses of AZLI treatment in the open-label extension-period (28-day courses separated by 28 days off-treatment); lung function improvements were comparable regardless of whether patients had received TNS or AZLI in the preceding comparative period. CONCLUSIONS: AZLI demonstrated statistical superiority in lung function and a reduction in acute pulmonary exacerbations compared to TNS over 3 treatment courses (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00757237).

Successful implementation of cognitive interviews in special populations.

The cognitive interview, with a focus on debriefing methods, was developed in the 1980s to identify sources of potential response error in surveys or questionnaires. With the release of the final US FDA guidance, titled 'Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims', cognitive interviews have gained importance and relevance both for concept elicitation and debriefing purposes in the context of instrument development. This article is intended as a guide for the researcher working with special populations in methods to foster successful cognitive interviews that meet FDA standards. While many of these techniques are broadly applicable, specific recommendations are provided for working with pediatric and cognitively challenged populations, as well as with individuals with communication difficulties.