Advanced MRI metrics improve the prediction of baseline disease severity for individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common form of atraumatic spinal cord injury globally. Degeneration of spinal discs, bony osteophyte growth and ligament pathology results in physical compression of the spinal cord contributing to damage of white matter tracts and grey matter cellular populations. This results in an insidious neurological and functional decline in patients which can lead to paralysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirms the diagnosis of DCM and is a prerequisite to surgical intervention, the only known treatment for this disorder. Unfortunately, there is a weak correlation between features of current commonly acquired MRI scans ("community MRI, cMRI") and the degree of disability experienced by a patient. PURPOSE: This study examines the predictive ability of current MRI sequences relative to "advanced MRI" (aMRI) metrics designed to detect evidence of spinal cord injury secondary to degenerative myelopathy. We hypothesize that the utilization of higher fidelity aMRI scans will increase the effectiveness of machine learning models predicting DCM severity and may ultimately lead to a more efficient protocol for identifying patients in need of surgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single institution analysis of imaging registry of patients with DCM. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 296 patients in the cMRI group and 228 patients in the aMRI group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiologic measures: accuracy of machine learning algorithms to detect severity of DCM assessed clinically based on the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scale. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network registry with DCM were screened and 296 cervical spine MRIs acquired in cMRI were compared with 228 aMRI acquisitions. aMRI acquisitions consisted of diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer, T2-weighted, and T2*-weighted images. The cMRI group consisted of only T2-weighted MRI scans. Various machine learning models were applied to both MRI groups to assess accuracy of prediction of baseline disease severity assessed clinically using the mJOA scale for cervical myelopathy. RESULTS: Through the utilization of Random Forest Classifiers, disease severity was predicted with 41.8% accuracy in cMRI scans and 73.3% in the aMRI scans. Across different predictive model variations tested, the aMRI scans consistently produced higher prediction accuracies compared to the cMRI counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: aMRI metrics perform better in machine learning models at predicting disease severity of patients with DCM. Continued work is needed to refine these models and address DCM severity class imbalance concerns, ultimately improving model confidence for clinical implementation.

Temporal analysis of complication rates of cervical spine surgery for degenerative spine disease between younger and older cohorts using the CSORN registry: Is age just a number?

STUDY DESIGN: An ambispective review of consecutive cervical spine surgery patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) between January 2015 and September 2019. PURPOSE: To compare complication rates of degenerative cervical spine surgery over time between older (> 65) and younger age groups (< 65). More elderly people are having spinal surgery. Few studies have examined the temporal nature of complications of cervical spine surgery by patient age groups. METHODS: Adverse events were collected prospectively using adverse event forms. Binary logistic regression analysis was utilized to assess associations between risk modifiers and adverse events at the intra-, peri-operative and 3 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Of the 761 patients studied (age < 65, n = 581 (76.3%) and 65 + n = 180 (23.7%), the intra-op adverse events were not significantly different; < 65 = 19 (3.3%) vs 65 + = 11 (6.1%), p < 0.087. Peri-operatively, the < 65 group had significantly lower percentage of adverse events (65yrs (11.2%) vs. 65 + = (26.1%), p < 0.001). There were no differences in rates of adverse events at 3 months post-surgery (< 65 = 39 (6.7%) vs. 65 + = 12 (6.7%), p < 0.983). Less blood loss (OR = 0.99, p < 0.010) and shorter length of hospital stay (OR = 0.97, p < 0.025) were associated with not having intra-op adverse events. Peri-operatively, > 1 operated level (OR = 1.77, p < 0.041), shorter length of hospital stay (OR = 0.86, p < 0.001) and being younger than 65 years (OR = 2.11, p < 0.006) were associated with not having adverse events. CONCLUSION: Following degenerative cervical spine surgery, the older and younger age groups had significantly different complication rates at peri-operative time points, and the intra-operative and 3-month post-operative complication rates were similar in the groups.

Distal transradial access for targeted spinal angiography and embolization.

BACKGROUND: Spinal catheter angiography is commonly performed in the evaluation and treatment of spinal vascular lesions. The typical approach to spinal angiography consists of access through the femoral artery with the use of suitably shaped catheters for selective catheterization of the spinal segmental vasculature. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of distal transradial access through the "anatomical snuffbox" for targeted spinal angiography, for the investigation and treatment of selected spinal lesions. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent transradial spinal angiography and embolization was performed from August 2019 to January 2022. A total of eight patients were identified, who underwent targeted spinal angiography through distal transradial access. Outcome measures were documented in a tabular manner. RESULTS: Radial access was successful in all patients. Seven patients had vascular tumors of the spinal column and underwent tumor embolization followed by segmental artery occlusion prior to surgery. One patient had a spinal dural AV fistula that could not be embolized due to feeding vessel tortuosity and eventually went on to have a laminectomy. Mean fluoroscopy time was 31.4 min. There were no access site hemorrhagic complications. One patient experienced transient mild hand numbness during the period of hemostasis with the vascular compression device that resolved completely within 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Distal transradial access is a feasible and safe option for targeted spinal angiography and treatment in selected patients.

Atypical vertebral hemangioma: an aggressive form of a benign disease. Case Report and Literature Review.

Vertebral hemangiomas are an incidental and relatively common radiological finding and a benign tumor of vascular origin. VH are the most common spine tumors with an estimated incidence of 1.9-27% in the general population. Rarely, vertebral hemangiomas can exhibit extraosseous expansion with resulting compression of the spinal cord. Such lesions are termed aggressive or atypical vertebral hemangiomas (AVH) and account for less than 1% of spinal hemangiomas. A 68-year-old female was referred with progressive walking difficulty and sensory disturbances in her lower extremities. MRI imaging of the thoracic spine revealed a T1- and T2-weighted hyperintense lesion involving the T10 vertebra. Additionally, there was extraosseous extension of the tumor into the spinal canal, located both anterior and posterior to the spinal cord, causing severe spinal cord compression. A combined endovascular and surgical approach (arterial coil embolization and en bloc resection) for treatment was decided. Although vertebral hemangiomas are an incidental and relatively common radiological finding, the findings of our case were consistent with an aggressive hemangioma with atypical MRI and clinical prognostic characteristics. In summary, the present case highlights the need for multidisciplinary approach and in-depth knowledge of this rare pathologic entity.

Development and validation of a clinical prediction score for poor postoperative pain control following elective spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Thirty percent to sixty-four percent of patients experience poorly controlled pain following spine surgery, leading to patient dissatisfaction and poor outcomes. Identification of at-risk patients before surgery could facilitate patient education and personalized clinical care pathways to improve postoperative pain management. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a prediction score for poorly controlled postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in adult patients (≥ 18 years old) consecutively enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry. All patients underwent elective cervical or thoracolumbar spine surgery and were admitted to the hospital. Poorly controlled postoperative pain was defined as a mean numeric rating scale score for pain at rest of > 4 during the first 24 hours after surgery. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression on 25 candidate variables, selected through a systematic review and expert consensus, was used to develop a prediction model using a random 70% sample of the data. The model was transformed into an eight-tier risk-based score that was further simplified into the three-tier Calgary Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery (CAPPS) score to maximize clinical utility. The CAPPS score was validated using the remaining 30% of the data. RESULTS: Overall, 57% of 1300 spine surgery patients experienced poorly controlled pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Seven significant variables associated with poor pain control were incorporated into a prediction model: younger age, female sex, preoperative daily use of opioid medication, higher preoperative neck or back pain intensity, higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression score, surgery involving ≥ 3 motion segments, and fusion surgery. Notably, minimally invasive surgery, body mass index, and revision surgery were not associated with poorly controlled pain. The model was discriminative (C-statistic 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.77) and calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, p = 0.99) at predicting the outcome. Low-, high-, and extreme-risk groups stratified using the CAPPS score had 32%, 63%, and 85% predicted probability of experiencing poorly controlled pain, respectively, which was mirrored closely by the observed incidence of 37%, 62%, and 81% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate pain control is common after spine surgery. The internally validated CAPPS score based on 7 easily acquired variables accurately predicted the probability of experiencing poorly controlled pain after spine surgery.

Use of an Omental Flow-Through Flap for Recipient Vessels in the Reconstruction of a Lumbar Spine Defect: A Case Report.

CASE: Spine reconstruction after en bloc spondylectomy is challenging and may require multidisciplinary intervention. En bloc spine tumor resection with embolization of local recipient vessels for tumor control limits reconstructive options. Herein, we describe a case where combined efforts from orthopaedic, general, and plastic surgery teams permitted the successful reconstruction of a multilevel lumbar vertebral defect. CONCLUSION: A fibula-free flap within a titanium cage construct anastomosed to the left gastroepiploic vessels via a pedicled omental flow-through flap is a viable and novel method for reconstruction of a multilevel vertebral defect.

Fractures After Removal of Spinal Instrumentation: Revisiting the Stress-Shielding Effect of Instrumentation in Spine Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Many practicing spine surgeons believe that instrumentation can be removed during revision surgery in successful posterolateral or anterior spinal fusions, confirmed by computed tomography and intraoperative exploration. The stress-shielding effect of spinal instrumentation was well described in the late 1980s and 1990s but has not received recent attention. Despite the paucity of recent literature, concepts underlying the biology and biomechanics of the spinal fusion mass remain particularly salient given the increasing incidence of revision spinal fusion surgery. The aim of this study was to highlight a potential complication of instrumentation removal owing to stress shielding of instrumentation on the spinal column and fusion mass. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed, and a small case series was described. RESULTS: In 3 cases, despite apparent solid fusion demonstrated on preoperative computed tomography and confirmed by intraoperative exploration, new fractures developed after removal of instrumentation. In these cases, fracture occurred at the transition zone between the newly rigid instrumented area and previous fusion. This highlights the relative weakness of the fusion and may be explained by the stress-shielding effect of instrumentation within the fusion mass. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal instrumentation revision requires careful consideration, and routine implant removal should not be performed. The presence of a solid fusion on computed tomography and/or at intraoperative exploration may not justify implant removal in these cases. In cases of extension of a fusion, use of a bridging connection to the new implants should be considered. The cases presented demonstrate the consequences of the stress-shielding effect of implants on the spine and fusion mass.

Incidence and risk of delayed surgical site infection following instrumented lumbar spine fusion.

We reviewed a retrospective case series of patients with delayed infections after spinal fusion, and surveyed medical experts in Canada and the USA regarding their use of prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing invasive procedures following spine surgery. Infections after spinal fusion are a relatively common complication, which typically occur early in the postoperative period. Infections which occur more than 3months from the index procedure are rare and are often caused by atypical pathogens. The proportion of infections that required debridement and occurred 6 months after the index procedure was 4.3% (7/162). Over 85% of these infections were polymicrobial, with one third of those containing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The most common operative indications were either trauma or tumour, and most patients with a delayed infection had a distant chronic infection. The majority of spine experts do not routinely recommend prophylactic antibiotics for invasive procedures after spine fusion. In the multivariate analysis, experts were more likely to recommend antibiotics for patients undergoing a non-dental procedure, those who were diabetic, and those who were greater than 1year out from their procedure. In summary, the delayed presentation of infection after instrumented spinal fusion is a rare but serious complication. However, due to its infrequency, routine prophylaxis to prevent haematogenous seeding is likely unnecessary.

Expectations of recovery and functional outcomes following thoracolumbar trauma: an evidence-based medicine process to determine what surgeons should be telling their patients.

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to define the expected functional and health-related quality of life outcomes following common thoracolumbar injuries on the basis of consensus expert opinion and the best available literature. Patient expectations are primarily determined by the information provided by health care professionals, and these expectations have been shown to influence outcome in various medical and surgical conditions. This paper presents Part 2 of a multiphase study designed to investigate the impact of patient expectations on outcomes following spinal injury. Part 1 demonstrated substantial variability in the information surgeons are communicating to patients. Defining the expected outcomes following thoracolumbar injury would allow further analysis of this relationship and enable surgeons to more accurately and consistently inform patients. METHODS: Expert opinion was assembled by distributing questionnaires comprising 4 cases representative of common thoracolumbar injuries to members of the Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). The 4 cases included a thoracolumbar junction burst fracture treated nonoperatively or with posterior transpedicular instrumentation, a low lumbar (L-4) burst fracture treated nonoperatively, and a thoracolumbar junction flexion-distraction injury managed with posterior fusion. For each case, 5 questions about expected outcomes were posed. The questions related to the proportion of patients who are pain free, the proportion who have regained full range of motion, and the patients' recreational activity restrictions and personal care and social life limitations, all at 1 year following injury, as well as the timing of return to work and length of hospital stay. Responses were analyzed and combined with the results of a systematic literature review on the same injuries to define the expected outcomes. RESULTS: The literature review identified 38 appropriate studies that met the preset inclusion criteria. Published data were available for all injuries, but not all outcomes were available for each type of injury. The survey was completed by 31 (57%) of 53 surgeons representing 24 trauma centers across North America (15), Europe (5), India (1), Mexico (1), Japan (1) and Israel (1). Consensus expert opinion supplemented the available literature and was used exclusively when published data were lacking. For example, 1 year following cast or brace treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture, the expected outcomes include a 40% chance of being pain free, a 70% chance of regaining pre-injury range of motion, and an expected ability to participate in high-impact exercise and contact sport with no or minimal limitation. Consensus expert opinion predicts reemployment within 4-6 months. The length of inpatient stay averages 4-5 days. CONCLUSIONS: This synthesis of the best available literature and consensus opinion of surgeons with extensive clinical experience in spine trauma reflects the optimal methodology for determining functional prognosis after thoracolumbar trauma. By providing consistent, accurate information surgeons will help patients develop realistic expectations and potentially optimize outcomes.

Acute sciatica and progressive neurological deficit secondary to facet synovial cysts: A report of two cases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe two patients with lumbar facet synovial cysts causing sciatica and progressive neurological deficit. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 52-year-old female with bilateral sciatica and a neurological deficit that progressed to a foot drop; and a 54-year-old female with worsening sciatica and progressive calf weakness were seen at a major tertiary care centre. Diagnostic imaging studies revealed the presence of spinal nerve root impingement by large facet synovial cysts. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: Activity modification, gabapentinoid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications were unsuccessful in ameliorating either patient's symptoms. One patient had been receiving ongoing lumbar chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy despite the onset of a progressive neurological deficit. Both patients eventually required surgery to remove the cyst and decompress the affected spinal nerve roots. CONCLUSION: Patients with acute sciatica who develop a progressive neurological deficit while under care, require prompt referral for axial imaging and surgical consultation. Primary care spine clinicians need to be aware of lumbar facet synovial cysts as a possible cause of acute sciatica and the associated increased risk of the patient developing a progressive neurological deficit.

Reliability of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and comparison with the denis classification for injury to the thoracic and lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a series of thoracic and lumbar spine fracture cases to assess the reliability of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) in simulated clinical scenarios. OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of TLICS compared with the Denis classification system, and to assess differences based on rater characteristics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracolumbar injury severity score and TLICS have been subjected to reliability testing using less robust statistical analysis. Both systems have demonstrated poor to good reliability, with particularly weak agreement on the status of the posterior ligamentous complex. METHODS: Fifty-four spine fracture cases were selected from a chart review. These cases were scored on 2 occasions by 11 experts using both TLICS and the Denis classification systems. Reliability was assessed using a generalizability coefficient. The primary outcome was interobserver reliability. Secondary outcomes were intraobserver reliability, difference between orthopedic and neurosurgeons, as well as trainees and consultants, and correlation with treatment recommendations. RESULTS: TLICS demonstrated good interobserver agreement of 0.73 to 0.74. The posterior ligamentous complex component was the least reliable. The Denis classification also demonstrated good reliability between observers, but was least reliable for flexion-distraction injuries. In addition, interobserver reliability between the Denis classification and TLICS morphology subcomponent was strong. TLICS also predicted the need for operative treatment as determined by the experts scoring the injuries. CONCLUSION: TLICS is a reliable system for assessing fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine when used by experts. Similar to previous studies, the posterior ligamentous complex subcomponent score was the least reliable component. Reliability assessment using a generalizability coefficient is a robust method for validating fracture classifications.

An evidence-based medicine process to determine outcomes after cervical spine trauma: what surgeons should be telling their patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the available medical literature from 1980 to 2010 was conducted and combined with expert opinion from a recent survey of experts regarding cervical spine fractures. Using an objective, hierarchical approach, the best available evidence is presented for health-related quality-of-life outcomes for these injuries. OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based set of guidelines for cervical spine injuries in order to reduce variability in the information given to patients and their families. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients' expectations regarding quality-of-life outcomes are highly dependent on the information provided by surgeons early in the treatment course. Our previous work has demonstrated that there is substantial variability in what surgeons tell patients regarding outcomes of cervical spine injuries, thus patients' expectations will differ and outcomes vary. METHODS: Four common cervical spine injuries (C1 burst, Hangman fracture, odontoid fracture, and unilateral facet fracture) treated both surgically and nonsurgically were considered. We assessed the evidence regarding 5 health-related quality-of-life outcomes: time to return to work, activity level, hospital stay, the proportion of patients who are pain free and patients who have regained full range of motion at 1 year after the injury. RESULTS: Published outcome data were available for most injuries. Using consensus expert opinion and the literature, answers to each question were achieved. Overall, expert opinion was relatively homogeneous across injury types, suggesting that experts do not distinguish between specific injuries when advising patients of expected outcomes such as pain. CONCLUSION: By overcoming gaps in the literature with consensus expert opinion, our study provides surgeons and others with evidence-based medicine guidelines for patient-centered outcomes after cervical spine injury. This information can be presented to patients to frame expectations of typical outcomes during and after treatment to optimize patient care and quality of life.

Intramuscular myxoid lipoma in the proximal forearm presenting as an olecranon mass with superficial radial nerve palsy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Extremity lipomas may occur in any location, including the proximal forearm. We describe a case of a patient with an intramuscular lipoma presenting as an unusual posterior elbow mass. CASE PRESENTATION: We discuss the case of a 57-year-old Caucasian man who presented with a tender, posterior elbow mass initially diagnosed as chronic olecranon bursitis. A minor sensory disturbance in the distribution of the superficial radial nerve was initially thought to be unrelated, but was likely caused by mass effect from the lipoma. No pre-operative advanced imaging was obtained because the diagnosis was felt to have already been made. At the time of surgery, a fatty mass originating in the volar forearm muscles was found to have breached the dorsal forearm fascia and displaced the olecranon bursa. Tissue diagnosis was made by histopathology as a myxoid lipoma with no aggressive features. Post-operative recovery was uneventful. CONCLUSION: We present a case of an unusual elbow mass presenting with symptoms consistent with chronic olecranon bursitis, a relatively common condition. The only unexplained pre-operative finding was the non-specific finding of a transient superficial radial nerve deficit. We remind clinicians to be cautious when diagnosing soft tissue masses in the extremities when unexplained physical findings are present.

Using simulation modeling to improve patient flow at an outpatient orthopedic clinic.

We report on the use of discrete event simulation modeling to support process improvements at an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The clinic was effective in treating patients, but waiting time and congestion in the clinic created patient dissatisfaction and staff morale issues. The modeling helped to identify improvement alternatives including optimized staffing levels, better patient scheduling, and an emphasis on staff arriving promptly. Quantitative results from the modeling provided motivation to implement the improvements. Statistical analysis of data taken before and after the implementation indicate that waiting time measures were significantly improved and overall patient time in the clinic was reduced.