ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scrub nurses play a crucial role in facilitating orthopaedic surgeries, and thus intraoperative scrub nurse turnover may disrupt the workflow of the surgical team and prolong duration of surgery (DOS). The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of intraoperative scrub nurse turnover on operative time of orthopaedic surgeries lasting less than 3h in duration. METHODS: Prospectively collected databases from two institutions were retrospectively queried to identify all orthopaedic procedures of maximum mean duration of 180min from March 4th, 2018 to August 31st, 2022. Cases were divided into two groups, those with scrub nurse turnover and those without. Propensity score matching was conducted to match groups by surgeon, hospital, patient age, gender, and ASA classification. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare mean DOS for each surgical procedure. Average treatment effect on treated (ATET) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Scrub nurse turnover significantly prolonged DOS for both bone forearm facture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (ATET=21.08, p=0.001), ankle ORIF (ATET=21.26, p<0.001), clavicle ORIF (ATET=16.16, p=0.028), femur intramedullary nail (ATET=11.52, p=0.003), rotator cuff repair (ATET=16.88, p<0.001), partial discectomy (ATET=10.52, p=0.001), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (ATET=5.69, p<0.001), anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) (ATET=8.80, p<0.001), lateral THA (ATET=7.02, p<0.001), and uncemented hip hemiarthroplasty (ATET=16.79, p=0.049). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative scrub nurse turnover significantly prolongs surgical times in orthopaedic surgeries lasting up to 3h in duration. This highlights the importance of developing strategies to prevent intraoperative scrub nurse turnover to improve OR efficiency and decrease healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Operating Rooms , Operative Time , Orthopedic Procedures , Personnel Turnover , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Operating Room Nursing , Efficiency, Organizational , Nursing Staff, HospitalABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to report the presenting characteristics and identify how best to distinguish bone and soft-tissue infections that mimic sarcomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 238 (211 osteomyelitis and 27 soft-tissue infections) patients referred to a tertiary sarcoma multidisciplinary team with suspected sarcoma who were ultimately diagnosed with a bone or soft tissue infection were included. Data from a prospectively collated database was analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of all possible bone and soft-tissue sarcoma referrals, a diagnosis of infection was made in 2.1% and 0.7%, respectively. Median age was 18 years in the osteomyelitis group and 46 years in the soft-tissue infection group. In the osteomyelitis group, the most common presenting features were pain (85.8%) and swelling (32.7%). In the soft-tissue infection group, the most common clinical features were swelling (96.3%) and pain (70.4%). Those in the soft-tissue group were more likely to have raised inflammatory markers. Radiological investigations were unable to discern between tumour or infection in 59.7% of osteomyelitis and 81.5% of soft-tissue infection cases. No organism was identified in 64.9% of those who had a percutaneous biopsy culture. CONCLUSIONS: This study has highlighted that infection is frequently clinically indistinguishable from sarcoma and remains a principle non-neoplastic differential diagnosis. When patients are investigated for suspected sarcoma, infections can be missed due to falsely negative radiological investigations and percutaneous biopsy. As no single clinical, biochemical or radiological feature or investigation can be relied upon for diagnosis, clinicians should have a low threshold for tissue biopsy and discussion in a sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting.
