Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Arch Microbiol ; 202(5): 983-993, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31901964

ABSTRACT

The black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) is a vulnerable species, breeding exclusively on the high-altitude wetlands of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Bird species harbor diverse communities of microorganisms within their gastrointestinal tracts, which have important roles in the health, nutrition, and physiology of birds. Hitherto, virtually nothing was known about the gut microbial communities associated with wild black-necked cranes. For the first time, this study characterized the gut microbial community compositions, diversity, and functions of black-necked cranes from six wintering areas in China using the Illumina Miseq platform. The taxonomic results revealed that Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the four most abundant phyla in the gut of black-necked cranes. At the genus level, 11 genera including Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Carnobacterium, Pantoea, Enterococcus, Erwinia, Turicibacter, Bacillus, Phenylobacterium, Sanguibacter, and Psychrobacter were dominant. The differences in the gut microbial community alpha and the beta diversities of black-necked cranes among the six wintering areas were investigated. Furthermore, the representative microbial taxa and their predicted functions in each wintering location were also determined. These data represent the first analysis of the gut microbiome of black-necked cranes, providing a baseline for further microbiological studies and a foundation for the conservation of this bird.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Birds/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Actinobacteria/classification , Actinobacteria/genetics , Actinobacteria/isolation & purification , Animals , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteroidetes/classification , Bacteroidetes/genetics , Bacteroidetes/isolation & purification , Birds/physiology , China , Firmicutes/classification , Firmicutes/genetics , Firmicutes/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Microbiota , Proteobacteria/classification , Proteobacteria/genetics , Proteobacteria/isolation & purification , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Seasons , Tibet , Wetlands
2.
Microbiologyopen ; 8(5): e00725, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30296008

ABSTRACT

Gut microbiome contributes to host health by maintaining homeostasis, increasing digestive efficiency, and facilitating the development of immune system. Wild greylag geese (Anser anser) and ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea), migrating along the central Asian flyway, appear to be one of the most popular species in the rare birds rearing industries of China. However, the structure and function of the gut microbial communities associated with these two bird species remain poorly understood. Here, for the first time, we compared gut metagenomes from greylag geese to ruddy shelducks and investigated the similarities and differences between these two bird species in detail. Taxonomic classifications revealed the top three bacterial phyla, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria, in both greylag geese and ruddy shelducks. Furthermore, between the two species, 12 bacterial genera were found to be more abundant in ruddy shelducks and 41 genera were significantly higher in greylag geese. A total of 613 genera (approximately 70%) were found to be present in both groups. Metabolic categories related to carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and glycan biosynthesis and metabolism were significantly more abundant in ruddy shelducks, while greylag geese were enriched in nucleotide metabolism and energy metabolism. The herbivorous greylag geese gut microbiota harbored more carbohydrate-active enzymes than omnivorous ruddy shelducks. In our study, a range of antibiotic resistance categories were also identified in the gut microbiota of greylag geese and ruddy shelducks. In addition to providing a better understanding of the composition and function of wild birds gut microbiome, this comparative study provides reference values of the artificial domestication of these birds.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Ducks/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Geese/microbiology , Metagenome , Animals , China , Metagenomics
3.
J Basic Microbiol ; 58(6): 543-553, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668076

ABSTRACT

In this study, we characterized for the first time the gut microbiota of Greylag geese (Anser anser) using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology. The results showed that the phyla Firmicutes (78.55%), Fusobacteria (9.38%), Proteobacteria (7.55%), Bacteroidetes (1.82%), Cyanobacteria (1.44%), and Actinobacteria (0.61%) dominated the gut microbial communities in the Greylag geese. Then, the variations of gut microbial community structures and functions among the three geese species, Greylag geese, Bar-headed geese (Anser indicus), and Swan geese (Anser cygnoides), were explored. The greatest gut microbial diversity was found in Bar-headed geese group, while other two groups had the least. The dominant bacterial phyla across all samples were Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, but several characteristic bacterial phyla and genera associated with each group were also detected. At all taxonomic levels, the microbial community structure of Swan geese was different from those of Greylag geese and Bar-headed geese, whereas the latter two groups were less different. Functional KEGG categories and pathways associated with carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, and amino acid metabolism were differentially expressed among different geese species. Taken together, this study could provide valuable information to the vast, and yet little explored, research field of wild birds gut microbiome.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Geese/classification , Geese/microbiology , Phylogeny , Animals , Animals, Wild , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/metabolism , Base Sequence , Biodiversity , China , DNA, Bacterial , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Microbial Consortia/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Sequence Analysis , Species Specificity
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(4): 637-641, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28169827

ABSTRACT

In May 2016, a highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus strain caused deaths among 3 species of wild migratory birds in Qinghai Lake, China. Genetic analysis showed that the novel reassortant virus belongs to group B H5N8 viruses and that the reassortment events likely occurred in early 2016.


Subject(s)
Animal Migration , Animals, Wild , Anseriformes , Charadriiformes , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , China/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/genetics , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Phylogeny , Reassortant Viruses
5.
Genome Announc ; 5(5)2017 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28153901

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus hominis belongs to a group of coagulase-negative staphylococci and is an opportunistic pathogen, usually found on the skin and mucous membranes. Studies involving S. hominis isolated from wild birds are scarce. Here, we report a 2.365-Mb draft genome sequence of S. hominis BHG17, isolated from the feces of a bar-headed goose.

7.
Microbiologyopen ; 6(2)2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27998035

ABSTRACT

Bar-headed goose (Anser indicus), a species endemic to Asia, has become one of the most popular species in recent years for rare bird breeding industries in several provinces of China. There has been no information on the gut metagenome configuration in both wild and artificially reared Bar-headed geese, even though the importance of gut microbiome in vertebrate nutrient and energy metabolism, immune homeostasis and reproduction is widely acknowledged. In this study, metagenomic methods have been used to describe the microbial community structure and composition of functional genes associated with both wild and artificially reared Bar-headed goose. Taxonomic analyses revealed that Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the four most abundant phyla in the gut of Bar-headed geese. Bacteroidetes were significantly abundant in the artificially reared group compared to wild group. Through functional profiling, we found that artificially reared Bar-headed geese had higher bacterial gene content related to carbohydrate transport and metabolism, energy metabolism and coenzyme transport, and metabolism. A comprehensive gene catalog of Bar-headed geese metagenome was built, and the metabolism of carbohydrate, amino acid, nucleotide, and energy were found to be the four most abundant categories. These results create a baseline for future Bar-headed goose microbiology research, and make an original contribution to the artificial rearing of this bird.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/classification , Bacteroidetes/classification , Firmicutes/classification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Geese/microbiology , Metagenome/genetics , Proteobacteria/classification , Actinobacteria/genetics , Amino Acids/metabolism , Animals , Bacteroidetes/genetics , Base Sequence , Biological Transport/genetics , Carbohydrate Metabolism/genetics , Feces/microbiology , Firmicutes/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Metagenomics/methods , Proteobacteria/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
8.
J Basic Microbiol ; 56(11): 1299-1307, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27365218

ABSTRACT

Swan goose (Anser cygnoides) is currently one of the most popular economic wildfowl for rare birds breeding industries in several provinces of China. However, the farmed Swan geese, reared in artificial environment and fed on both natural and artificial diets, display a reduced reproductive rate compared to wild species. Little is known about the gut microbiota of this species, which could play a role in nutrient and energy metabolism, immune homeostasis and reproduction. The present comparative study was designed to provide a first characterization of gut microbial communities related to both wild and farmed Swan geese by 16 S rRNA sequences using the Illumina HiSeq platform. The results showed that dominant microbial components in both groups consisted of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. The abundances of these four phyla were not statistically different between the groups. At the genus level, significantly decreased abundance of Clostridium and increased abundance of SMB53, Enterococcus and Paenibacillus were observed in farmed group compared to wild group. The marked differences of genus level group-specific microbes create a baseline for future Swan goose microbiology research and make a valuable contribution to forming relationships between gut microbiota and domestic bird reproduction.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Geese/microbiology , Actinobacteria/isolation & purification , Animals , Animals, Wild/anatomy & histology , Bacteria/classification , Bacteroidetes/isolation & purification , China , Computational Biology , Diet , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Firmicutes/isolation & purification , Geese/anatomy & histology , Geese/physiology , Phylogeny , Proteobacteria/classification , Proteobacteria/isolation & purification , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
9.
Genome Announc ; 4(3)2016 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27174262

ABSTRACT

Bacillus megaterium is a soil-inhabiting Gram-positive bacterium that is routinely used in industrial applications for recombinant protein production and bioremediation. Studies involving Bacillus megaterium isolated from waterfowl are scarce. Here, we report a 6.26-Mbp draft genome sequence of Bacillus megaterium BHG1.1, which was isolated from feces of a bar-headed goose.

10.
Microbiologyopen ; 5(2): 287-95, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26842811

ABSTRACT

Elucidating the spatial dynamic and core gut microbiome related to wild bar-headed goose is of crucial importance for probiotics development that may meet the demands of bar-headed goose artificial breeding industries and accelerate the domestication of this species. However, the core microbial communities in the wild bar-headed geese remain totally unknown. Here, for the first time, we present a comprehensive survey of bar-headed geese gut microbial communities by Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology using nine individuals from three distinct wintering locations in Tibet. A total of 236,676 sequences were analyzed, and 607 OTUs were identified. We show that the gut microbial communities of bar-headed geese have representatives of 14 phyla and are dominated by Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The additive abundance of these four most dominant phyla was above 96% across all the samples. At the genus level, the sequences represented 150 genera. A set of 19 genera were present in all samples and considered as core gut microbiome. The top seven most abundant core genera were distributed in that four dominant phyla. Among them, four genera (Lactococcus, Bacillus, Solibacillus, and Streptococcus) belonged to Firmicutes, while for other three phyla, each containing one genus, such as Proteobacteria (genus Pseudomonas), Actinobacteria (genus Arthrobacter), and Bacteroidetes (genus Bacteroides). This broad survey represents the most in-depth assessment, to date, of the gut microbes that associated with bar-headed geese. These data create a baseline for future bar-headed goose microbiology research, and make an original contribution to probiotics development for bar-headed goose artificial breeding industries.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Geese , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Metagenome , Metagenomics , Seasons , Animals , Biodiversity , Computational Biology , Metagenomics/methods , Tibet
11.
Microbiol Res ; 182: 59-67, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26686614

ABSTRACT

The bar-headed goose is currently one of the most popular species for rare birds breeding in China. However, bar-headed geese in captivity display a reduced reproductive rate. The gut microbiome has been shown to influence host factors such as nutrient and energy metabolism, immune homeostasis and reproduction. It is therefore of great scientific and agriculture value to analyze the microbial communities associated with bar-headed geese in order to improve their reproductive rate. Here we describe the first comparative study of the gut microbial communities of bar-headed geese in three different breeding pattern groups by 16SrRNA sequences using the Illumina MiSeq platform. The results showed that Firmicutes predominated (58.33%) among wild bar-headed geese followed by Proteobacteria (30.67%), Actinobacteria (7.33%) and Bacteroidetes (3.33%). In semi-artificial breeding group, Firmicutes was also the most abundant bacteria (62.00%), followed by Bacteroidetes (28.67%), Proteobacteria (4.20%), Actinobacteria (3.27%) and Fusobacteria (1.51%). The microbial communities of artificial breeding group were dominated by Firmicutes (60.67%), Fusobacteria (29.67%) and Proteobacteria (9.33%). Wild bar-headed geese had a significant higher relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, while semi-artificial breeding bar-headed geese had significantly more Bacteroidetes. The semi-artificial breeding group had the highest microbial community diversity and richness, followed by wild group, and then the artificial breeding group. The marked differences of genus level group-specific microbes create a baseline for future bar-headed goose microbiology research.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Geese/microbiology , Animals , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Biodiversity , Breeding , China , Geese/genetics , Geese/growth & development , Phylogeny
12.
Virol J ; 12: 63, 2015 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25880060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a small rabbit-like mammal that lives at high altitudes in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau and is in close contact with birds. Following the outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 during 2005 in the migratory birds of Qinghai Lake, two clades of H5N1 have been found in pikas. However, the influenza virus receptor distribution in different tissues of this animal and its susceptibility to influenza A viruses have remained unclear. METHODS: The sialic acid receptor distribution tropism in pika was investigated using fluorescent Sambucus nigra and biotinylated Maackia amurensis I and II. Furthermore, the replication of three influenza A viruses H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1 in this animal was examined by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. Morphological and histopathological changes caused by infection were also analyzed with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining. RESULTS: Human influenza virus-recognizing SAα2,6Gal receptors are widely expressed in the lung, kidney, liver, spleen, duodenum, ileum, rectum, and heart, whereas avian influenza virus-recognizing SAα2,3Gal receptors are strongly expressed in the trachea and lung of pika. M1 could be detected in the lungs of pikas infected with H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1 by either immunostaining or RT-PCR, and in the brain of H5N1-infected pikas. Additionally, three subtypes of influenza A viruses were able to infect pika and caused varying degrees of pneumonia with epithelial desquamation and alveolar inflammatory cell infiltration. Slight pathological changes were observed in H1N1-infected lungs. A few small bronchi and terminal bronchioles were infiltrated by lymphocytic cells in H3N2-infected lungs. In contrast, serious lung damage, such as alveolar capillary hyperemia, edema, alveolar collapse, and lymphocytic infiltrations was observed in H5N1-infected group. Furthermore, neural system changes were present in the brains of H5N1-infected pikas. CONCLUSIONS: SAα2,6Gal receptors are extensively present in many of the tissues and organs in wild plateau pika, whereas SA2,3Gal-linked receptors are dominant on the tracheal epithelial cells. H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1 were able to infect pika and caused different degrees of pathogenic changes in the lungs. Altogether, these results suggest that wild pika has the potential to be a host for different subtypes of influenza A viruses.


Subject(s)
Animal Diseases/metabolism , Animal Diseases/virology , Influenza A virus , Lagomorpha/virology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism , Animal Diseases/genetics , Animal Diseases/pathology , Animals , Female , Influenza A virus/classification , Influenza A virus/genetics , Organ Specificity , Receptors, Cell Surface/genetics
13.
Sci Rep ; 4: 6345, 2014 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25242001

ABSTRACT

Extensive surveillance of influenza A viruses in different avian species is critical for understanding its transmission. Here, a breeding colony of Little Egrets and Black-crowned Night Herons was monitored both serologically and virologically in a city park of Jiangxi in 2009. A portion of herons had antibodies against H7 (52%), H5 (55%) and H9 (6%) subtype avian influenza virus (AIV) in egg yolk samples, and 45% had antibodies against different AIV serotypes (H5, H7 or H9) simultaneously. Greater numbers of samples with anti-AIV H5N1 recombination-4 (Re-4, clade 7) antibodies were measured compared with those containing anti-H5N1 Re-1 (clade 0) and Re-5 (clade 2.3.4) antibodies. Eight strains of H5 and 9 strains of H9 were isolated from poultry of nearby markets. These results indicate wild birds are at risk from infection and co-infection with H7, H5, and H9 subtypes. Investigation of wild bird infection might provide an early warning sign of potential novel AIVs circulating in the nearby poultry industry and even in human society.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H7N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/virology , Influenza, Human/virology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , Birds/virology , China/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H7N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H7N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/blood , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Influenza, Human/blood , Influenza, Human/transmission
15.
J Gen Virol ; 89(Pt 3): 697-702, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18272760

ABSTRACT

Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus has swept west across the globe and caused serious debates on the roles of migratory birds in virus circulation since the first large-scale outbreak in migratory birds of Lake Qinghai, 2005. In May 2006, another outbreak struck Lake Qinghai and six novel strains were isolated. To elucidate these QH06 viruses, the six isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analyses show that QH06 viruses are derived from the lineages of Lake Qinghai, 2005. Five of the six novel isolates are adjacent to the strain A/Cygnus olor/Croatia/1/05, and the last one is related to the strain A/duck/Novosibirsk/02/05, an isolate of the flyway. Antigenic analyses suggest that QH06 and QH05 viruses are similar to each other. These findings implicate that QH06 viruses of Lake Qinghai may travel back via migratory birds, though not ruling out the possibility of local circulation of viruses of Lake Qinghai.


Subject(s)
Animal Migration , Birds/physiology , Disease Outbreaks , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Phylogeny , Animals , Birds/virology , Chickens/virology , China , Genome, Viral , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/genetics , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/virology , Mice , Neuraminidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Neuraminidase/genetics , Neuraminidase/immunology , Poultry Diseases/virology , Sequence Analysis, DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL