Is proton beam therapy always better than photon irradiation? Lessons from two cases.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is increasingly used to treat cancers, especially in the paediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. As PBT becomes more accessible, determining when PBT should be used instead of photon irradiation can be difficult. There is a need to balance patient, tumour and treatment factors when making this decision. Comparing the dosimetry between these two modalities plays an important role in this process. PBT can reduce low to intermediate doses to organs at risk (OAR), but photon irradiation has its dosimetric advantages. We present two cases with brain tumours, one paediatric and one AYA, in which treatment plan comparison between photons and protons showed dosimetric advantages of photon irradiation. The first case was an 18-month-old child diagnosed with posterior fossa ependymoma requiring adjuvant radiotherapy. Photon irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) had lower doses to the hippocampi but higher doses to the pituitary gland. The second case was a 21-year-old with an optic pathway glioma. There was better sparing of the critical optic structures and pituitary gland using fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy over PBT. The dosimetric advantages of photon irradiation over PBT have been demonstrated in these cases. This highlights the role of proton-to-photon comparative treatment planning to better understand which patients might benefit from photon irradiation versus PBT.

Proton Beam Therapy in the Oligometastatic/Oligorecurrent Setting: Is There a Role? A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with conventional photon radiotherapy (XRT) are well-established treatment options for selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. The use of PBT for SABR-SRS is attractive given the property of a lack of exit dose. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role and current utilisation of PBT in the oligometastatic/oligorecurrent setting. METHODS: Using Medline and Embase, a comprehensive literature review was conducted following the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) criteria, which returned 83 records. After screening, 16 records were deemed to be relevant and included in the review. RESULTS: Six of the sixteen records analysed originated in Japan, six in the USA, and four in Europe. The focus was oligometastatic disease in 12, oligorecurrence in 3, and both in 1. Most of the studies analysed (12/16) were retrospective cohorts or case reports, two were phase II clinical trials, one was a literature review, and one study discussed the pros and cons of PBT in these settings. The studies presented in this review included a total of 925 patients. The metastatic sites analysed in these articles were the liver (4/16), lungs (3/16), thoracic lymph nodes (2/16), bone (2/16), brain (1/16), pelvis (1/16), and various sites in 2/16. CONCLUSIONS: PBT could represent an option for the treatment of oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease in patients with a low metastatic burden. Nevertheless, due to its limited availability, PBT has traditionally been funded for selected tumour indications that are defined as curable. The availability of new systemic therapies has widened this definition. This, together with the exponential growth of PBT capacity worldwide, will potentially redefine its commissioning to include selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. To date, PBT has been used with encouraging results for the treatment of liver metastases. However, PBT could be an option in those cases in which the reduced radiation exposure to normal tissues leads to a clinically significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities.

Single-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for sternal metastases in oligometastatic breast cancer: Technique and single institution experience.

INTRODUCTION: Due to size and close proximity to skin, the sternum is a complicated target for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). This is a retrospective case series of single-fraction SABR to sternal metastasis in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Between June 2014 and June 2018, ten breast cancer patients received 20 Gy in 1 fraction to a solitary sternal metastasis. Eligible patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, oligometastatic disease (defined as 1-5 metastases) and a controlled primary site. Patients were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, each patient case comprising of> 6 coplanar beams and 2-6 non-coplanar beams. Local control, pain response and adverse events were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median planned target volumes were 84.75cc (range, 14.4-197.8cc). The median conformity index was 1.29 (range, 1.2-1.49). At a median follow-up of 32 months, nine patients achieved in-field control. Two patients had triple negative disease, one of them developed marginal recurrence, and the other had in-field recurrence. Seven patients had sternal pain prior to SABR, and within 3 months after SABR treatment, the pain improved (n = 3) or resolved (n = 2). Four patients developed acute grade 1 and 2 skin reactions, and two patients had late grade 1 skin reactions. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Our case series demonstrates safety of SABR with associated disease control and analgesic benefit in selected patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. The marginal recurrence observed in this cohort suggests wider margins could be beneficial to account for microscopic disease.