Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(6): 732-737, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974631

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: First-line and second-line immunotherapy with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors both improve overall survival in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study explored survival differences between first-line and second-line PD-1 inhibition in advanced ESCC. METHODS: This registry study included 167 patients with advanced ESCC who were exposed to PD-1 inhibitors in either a first-line or a second-line setting between 15 January 2019 and 31 October 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints included overall tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS2. A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed using the nearest-neighbour method. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Sixty-one patients started first-line treatment with chemotherapy and a PD-1 inhibitor (Group 1), while 106 started chemotherapy as the first-line choice and received a PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line choice (Group 2). The median PFS was 7.1 months in Group 1 and 4.1 months in Group 2 (log-rank p = 0.001). The median PFS2 was 7.1 months in Group 1 and 7.4 months in Group 2 (log-rank p = 0.4). Before PSM, the median overall survival was 13.5 months in Group 1 and 14.1 months in Group 2 (log-rank p = 0.9), and the sensitivity analysis showed consistent results (14.0 vs. 14.1 months). After PSM, the median overall survival rates for Group 1 (n = 61) and Group 2 (n = 61) were 13.5 and 13.1 months (log-rank p = 0.7) respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with advanced ESCC who received first-line or second-line PD-1 inhibitors seemed to have comparable overall survival.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Lung Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/etiology , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Prospective Studies , Registries
2.
World J Clin Cases ; 10(36): 13313-13320, 2022 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36683614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracic para-aortic lymph node (TPLN) recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is rare and its impact on survival is unknown. We studied survival in patients with ESCC who developed TPLN recurrence. AIM: To study the survival in patients with ESCC who developed TPLNs recurrence. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for 219 patients who had undergone curative surgery for ESCC during January 2012 to November 2017 and who developed recurrences (36.29% of 604 patients who had undergone curative surgeries for ESCC). The patients were classified into positive (+) and negative (-) TPLN metastasis subgroups. We also investigated TPLN recurrence in 223 patients with ESCC following definitive chemoradiotherapy during 2012-2013. Following propensity score matching (PSM) and survival estimation, factors predictive of overall survival (OS) were explored using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among the patients with confirmed recurrence, 18 were TPLN (+) and 13 developed synchronous distant metastases. Before PSM, TPLN (+) was associated with worse recurrence-free (P = 0.00049) and OS [vs TPLN (-); P = 0.0027], whereas only the intergroup difference in recurrence-free survival remained significant after PSM (P = 0.013). The Cox analysis yielded similar results. Among the patients who had received definitive chemoradiotherapy, 3 (1.35%) had preoperative TPLN enlargement and none had developed recurrences. CONCLUSION: TPLN metastasis is rare but may be associated with poor survival.

3.
Inquiry ; 58: 469580211056213, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34806458

ABSTRACT

We performed a pairwise and network meta-analysis to compare pathological complete response (pCR) among neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. We searched PubMed for randomized clinical trials between January 1, 2000 and December 1, 2020. Abstracts from meetings were also searched. A frequentist random-effect model was applied to compare pCR and toxicities. The P-score was used to rank treatment effects. Nineteen trials with 16 treatments and 7794 patients were included. On the basis of SoC, the addition of carboplatin (OR = 1.82, 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.68, P < .01) and the addition of checkpoint inhibitors (OR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.32, P < .01) increased pCR in pairwise meta-analysis; compared with paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel did not improve pCR rates (OR = 1.81, 95% CI, .80 to 4.12, P = .16). The anthracycline-sparing regimen led to similar pCR compared with the anthracycline-containing regimen (OR = 1.50, 95% CI, .82 to 2.76, P = .19). In network meta-analysis, the addition of carboplatin plus a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab), carboplatin plus bevacizumab, and carboplatin plus veliparib ranked as the top three treatments for achieving pCR, with corresponding P-scores of .91, .84, and .72, respectively. Among patients with homologous recombination deficiency, the addition of carboplatin (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, .69 to 2.50, P = .41) or carboplatin plus PARP inhibitors (OR = 1.19, 95% CI, .58 to 2.47, P = .63) did not increase pCR. For triple-negative breast cancer, combining carboplatin with taxane-anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be the standard of care, and the combination containing checkpoint inhibitor is promising. However, their role in long-term oncologic outcome remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Network Meta-Analysis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
4.
Radiat Oncol ; 16(1): 201, 2021 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34641928

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop a nomogram model for predicting local progress-free survival (LPFS) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: We collected the clinical data of ESCC patients treated with CCRT in our hospital. Eligible patients were randomly divided into training cohort and validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with COX regression was performed to select optimal radiomic features to calculate Rad-score for predicting LPFS in the training cohort. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictive clinical factors for developing a nomogram model. The C-index was used to assess the performance of the predictive model and calibration curve was used to evaluate the accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 221 ESCC patients were included in our study, with 155 patients in training cohort and 66 patients in validation cohort. Seventeen radiomic features were selected by LASSO COX regression analysis to calculate Rad-score for predicting LPFS. The patients with a Rad-score ≥ 0.1411 had high risk of local recurrence, and those with a Rad-score < 0.1411 had low risk of local recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, CR status and Rad-score were independent predictive factors for LPFS. A nomogram model was built based on the result of multivariate analysis. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.745 (95% CI 0.7700-0.790) in training cohort and 0.723(95% CI 0.654-0.791) in validation cohort. The 3-year LPFS rate predicted by the nomogram model was highly consistent with the actual 3-year LPFS rate both in the training cohort and the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a prediction model based on radiomic features and clinical factors, which can be used to predict LPFS of patients after CCRT. This model is conducive to identifying the patients with ESCC benefited more from CCRT.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nomograms , Progression-Free Survival
5.
World J Surg Oncol ; 19(1): 127, 2021 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33874958

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most previous studies compared survival between left-sided and right-sided colon cancer without adjustment for clinicopathological parameters. We investigated the effect of sidedness on survival among patients with early-stage colon cancer, using a propensity score matching method. METHODS: The 18 registry custom data within the SEER database were used to identify patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer between 2010 and 2014. A propensity score matching analysis was performed using the nearest neighbor method. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine the prognostic factors. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, 25,094 (35.72%) patients were diagnosed with left-sided colon cancer and 45,156 (64.28%) with right-sided colon cancer. After propensity score matching, each cohort included 5118 patients, and the clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced. In the unmatched cohort, left-sided colon cancer had superior all-cause (χ2=315, P<0.01) and cancer-specific (χ2=43, P<0.01) survival than right-sided tumors. However, in the matched cohort, no difference was observed for all-cause (χ2=0.7, P=0.4) and cancer-specific (χ2=0, P=0.96) survival between left and right colon cancer. The Cox model did not indicate sidedness as a prognostic factor. In the subgroup analysis, stage II right-sided colon cancer had a better survival outcome, while stage III left-sided tumors had a better survival outcome. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics in this study, sidedness showed no impact on survival in early-stage colon cancer. However, sidedness was associated with prognostic differences in stages II and III early-stage colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , Survival Rate
6.
Radiat Oncol ; 15(1): 249, 2020 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121507

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a nomogram model to predict complete response (CR) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients using pretreatment CT radiomic features. METHODS: Data of patients diagnosed as ESCC and treated with CCRT in Shantou Central Hospital during the period from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected. Eligible patients were included in this study and randomize divided into a training set and a validation set after successive screening. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with logistic regression to select radiomics features calculating Rad-score in the training set. The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictive clinical factors for developing a nomogram model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the performance of the predictive nomogram model and decision curve was used to analyze the impact of the nomogram model on clinical treatment decisions. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups, 160 patients in training set and 66 patients in validation set. After LASSO analysis, seven radiomics features were screened out to develop a radiomics signature Rad-score. The AUC of Rad-score was 0.812 (95% CI 0.742-0.869, p < 0.001) in the training set and 0.744 (95% CI 0.632-0.851, p = 0.003) in the validation set. Multivariate analysis showed that Rad-score and clinical staging were independent predictors of CR status, with p values of 0.035 and 0.023, respectively. A nomogram model incorporating Rad-socre and clinical staging was developed and validated, with an AUC of 0.844 (95% CI 0.779-0.897) in the training set and 0.807 (95% CI 0.691-0.894) in the validation set. Delong test showed that the nomogram model was significantly superior to the clinical staging, with p < 0.001 in the training set and p = 0.026 in the validation set. The decision curve showed that the nomogram model was superior to the clinical staging when the risk threshold was greater than 25%. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a nomogram model for predicting CR status of ESCC patients after CCRT. The nomogram model was combined radiomics signature Rad-score and clinical staging. This model provided us with an economical and simple method for evaluating the response of chemoradiotherapy for patients with ESCC.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Nomograms , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
7.
Front Oncol ; 10: 430, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32351882

ABSTRACT

Background: This present study aimed to explore the prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and to develop a prognostic risk scoring model to predict prognosis in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. Methods: Retrospectively collected data of patients who received definitive radiotherapy for ESCC at Shantou Central Hospital between January 2009 and December 2015 were included for the analysis. The association between the level of LDH and neutrophil and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the prognostic predictors for patients with ESCC. Based on the results, we also developed a prognostic risk scoring model and assessed its predictive ability in the subgroups. Results: A total of 567 patients who received definitive radiotherapy for ESCC were included in the present study. The optimal cutoff values were 4.5 × 109/L, 3.25, and 220 U/L for neutrophil, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and LDH, respectively. A high level of LDH was significantly associated with advanced N stage (p = 0.031), and neutrophil count was significantly associated with gender (p = 0.001), T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p = 0.019), clinical stage (p < 0.001), and NLR (p < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis identified gender (p = 0.006), T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p = 0.008), treatment modality (p < 0.001), LDH level (p = 0.012), and neutrophil count (p = 0.038) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Furthermore, a new prognostic risk scoring (PRS) model based on six prognostic factors was developed, in which the patients were divided into three groups with distinct prognosis (χ2 = 67.94, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Elevated baseline LDH level and neutrophil count predicted poor prognosis for ESCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. A PRS model comprised of LDH, neutrophil count, and other prognostic factors would help identify the patients who would benefit the most from definitive radiotherapy.

8.
Clin Ther ; 42(2): 338-350.e4, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31937461

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were firmly established as front-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that harbored an activating EGFR mutation. Gefitinib or erlotinib was considered the standard of care. TKI-based combination therapy has been investigated and has shown encouraging results. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and meeting abstracts were screened for relevant studies between January 2000 and February 2019. Prospective randomized controlled trials were included that investigated EGFR TKIs (alone or in combination) in untreated patients with NSCLC whose tumors had sensitive EGFR mutations. A frequentist random effects network meta-analysis model was conducted to assess objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. P-score was used to rank treatment effects. FINDINGS: Seventeen trials involving 9 treatments and 4373 patients were included. Heterogeneity existed in the network analysis. For progression-free survival, the top 3 treatments were osimertinib, standard of care plus chemotherapy, and standard of care plus bevacizumab; corresponding p-scores were 0.88, 0.79, and 0.75, respectively. For overall survival, the top 3 treatments were standard of care plus chemotherapy, osimertinib, and dacomitinib; corresponding p-scores were 0.89, 0.85, and 0.64. TKI-based combination therapy caused more toxicity than a TKI alone. IMPLICATIONS: Osimertinib seemed to be a better option as upfront therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC in terms of efficacy and tolerability.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Network Meta-Analysis
9.
Radiat Oncol ; 14(1): 74, 2019 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of sex on prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) who underwent definitive radiotherapy remained unclear. The present study aimed to determine the impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with ESCC underwent definitive radiotherapy. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2015, patients with ESCC underwent definitive radiotherapy in Shantou Central Hospital were included in this study. The Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PFS and OS were compared between female and male patients. The Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics between female and male patients. RESULTS: A total of 683 ESCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy were included, with 497 male and 186 female patients. In the whole cohort, female patients had a significantly longer median PFS (14.0 months vs 10.6 months, P = 0.0001, HR = 0.688, 95% CI, 0.567-0.836) and OS (20.8 months vs 15.9 months, P = 0.0005, HR = 0.702, 95% CI, 0.575-0.857). In the matched cohort, female patients still had a significantly longer median PFS (13.5 months vs 11.6 months) and OS (19.6 months vs 16.1 months). Multivariate analysis showed that sex was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 0.746, 95% CI, 0.611-0.910, P = 0.004) and OS (HR = 0.755, 95% CI, 0.615-0.926, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This present study indicated that sex was an independent prognostic factor in Chinese patients with ESCC underwent definitive radiotherapy, with better survival outcome for women than men. Efforts should be made to investigate the underlying biological mechanism.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Propensity Score , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors
10.
Immunotherapy ; 11(4): 311-320, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30678553

ABSTRACT

AIM: To estimate efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors and rank treatment effects in non-small-cell lung cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS: Prospective randomized trials were included. p-score was used to rank treatment effects. RESULTS: A total of nine trials were identified, involving 5504 patients and three checkpoint inhibitors. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had the highest p-score of 0.95 among all the treatments, and was superior to pembrolizumab alone (hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79-0.95). Combination therapy had more grade 3-5 adverse events; but toxicity-related discontinuation and treatment-related death did not increase. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was likely to be the most effective treatment for patients with wild-type advanced NSCLC.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Network Meta-Analysis , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Analysis
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(1): e13909, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib and abemaciclib) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (everolimus) are effective agents for restoring endocrine sensitivity in patients with advanced breast cancer progression on prior aromatase inhibitors. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare these treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant publications between January 2000 and June 2018. Treatments were ranked based on a network meta-analysis. Ranking was determined by P-score. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was detected; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used. RESULTS: Six trials comprising 4063 patients formed the comparison network. Compared with everolimus plus exemestane, the combinations of palbociclib or abemaciclib with fulvestrant showed similar efficacies in PFS and no differences in ORR. For the CBR, palbociclib demonstrated improvement, while abemaciclib did not. Incidences of severe adverse events did not significantly differ. A total of 29%, 15.9%, and 4% of patients discontinued everolimus, abemaciclib, and palbociclib, respectively, due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: These results suggest similar efficacies between CDK4/6 inhibition and mTOR blockade; however, CDK4/6 inhibitors were associated with favorable toxicity profiles.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Postmenopause , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Aminopyridines/therapeutic use , Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Female , Fulvestrant/therapeutic use , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Pyridines/therapeutic use
12.
Asian J Surg ; 42(1): 350-355, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To compare overall survival in patients with clinical T1-3N0-1 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery or definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: We used propensity-score matching to derive 1:1 cohorts of surgery versus definitive CRT. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Survival functions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and survival distributions were compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to analyze the factors affecting overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients treated with surgery and 252 treated with definitive CRT were included. 129 (38.6%) of 334 patients had recurrence after surgery versus 118 (46.8%) of 252 after definitive CRT. Before matching, the median overall survival were 39.5 months (95% CI, 28.8-50.2) and 23.5 months (95% CI, 18.5-28.5) (P < 0.001) in the surgery and definitive CRT group, respectively. After matching (112 patients in each treatment group), median overall survival was 43.6 months (95% CI, 28.1-59.1) with surgery versus 19.3 months (95% CI, 14.4-24.2) with CRT (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, surgery was associated with better overall survival compared with definitive CRT.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagectomy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cohort Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Time Factors
13.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 107(5): 1540-1543, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30508530

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chylothorax after esophagectomy is uncommon but potentially fatal. We performed a retrospective study to assess the effect of olive oil administered orally before surgery on reducing chylothorax in patients who underwent minimal invasive esophagectomy. METHODS: Between May 2013 and December 2016, patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent minimal invasive esophagectomy were screened. Patients in the investigational group were preoperatively administered olive oil orally 8 hours before surgery, and patients in the control arm received no olive oil. We used a propensity score matching model to derive 1:1 cohorts. Statistical analysis was performed by using the t test or χ2 or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The propensity score matching model finally selected 384 of 425 patients, with 192 patients in each group. The patient characteristics were balanced. Oral olive oil was well tolerated. The thoracic duct identification rate was higher in the investigational group (100% versus 45.31%, χ2 = 141.78, p < 0.01). The investigational group was associated with a reduced incidence of ligation (7.81% versus 18.22%, χ2 = 8.03, p = 0.003). The incidence of chylothorax was significantly reduced in the investigational group compared with that of the control group (0% versus 3.12%, χ2 = 4.23, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative administration of olive oil is a simple and safe method to minimize chylothorax complicating minimal invasive esophagectomy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Chylothorax/prevention & control , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Olive Oil/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Chylothorax/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Preoperative Care , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(30): e11569, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30045282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred first-line treatment for nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with an activating EGFR mutation. Osimertinib, compared with erlotinib or gefitinib, showed an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in a recent trial. The authors compared EGFR TKIs in terms of PFS in a network meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases and meeting abstracts were screened for relevant studies between January 2009 and November 2017. A random-effect frequentist network meta-analysis model was conducted to assess PFS. P-score was used to rank treatment effects. RESULTS: Eleven trials with 3145 patients and 5 TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) were included. Heterogeneity and inconsistency existed in the network analysis. Gefitinib and erlotinib had similar effects (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.15). For all patients, the 3 TKIs with the highest probability of benefit were osimertinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib, with P-scores of 91%, 78%, and 46%, respectively. Compared with erlotinib or gefitinib, osimertinib was associated with improvement in men (HR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.68-0.92), non-Asians (HR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.40-0.98), smokers (HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.56-0.95), and those with a Del19 mutation (HR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.54-0.90); dacomitinib and afatinib showed no improvement. Toxicity profiles mostly overlapped in all the EGFR TKIs. Toxicity-related death was rare. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib was shown to be the best agent to achieve the longest PFS in NSCLC patients with an activating EGFR mutation. However, the benefit of osimertinib might be restricted to certain subgroups.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , ErbB Receptors , Piperazines/pharmacology , Acrylamides , Aniline Compounds , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Disease-Free Survival , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome
15.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 16870, 2017 12 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29203855

ABSTRACT

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a treatment option for patients with localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We investigated consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) in patients with ESCC who attained clinical complete response after dCRT. Between January 2009 and December 2012, medical records of ESCC patients treated with dCRT were retrospectively reviewed, and those who attained CCR were identified. Progression-free survival and overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to determine prognostic factors. Of the 522 patients treated with dCRT, 209 patients achieved CCR, with 67 receiving consolidation chemotherapy (the CCT group) and 142 receiving dCRT alone (the control group). CCT did not prolong progression-free survival (33.0 vs 18.0 months, P = 0.07, HR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.48-1.04); however, CCT improved the median overall survival (53.4 vs 27.0 months, P = 0.04, HR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.44-0.99) compared with dCRT alone. CCT remained a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in a multivariate analysis (HR = 0.59, P = 0.02); however, a propensity score analysis failed to show an additional overall survival benefit with CCT. In the present analysis, CCT did not improve progression-free survival but may have extended overall survival in ESCC patients who achieved complete clinical response after dCRT.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies
16.
Breast Cancer ; 24(3): 345-352, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28324247

ABSTRACT

To compare the addition of targeted agents to fulvestrant with fulvestrant alone in hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer progressed on previous endocrine therapy; a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials was performed. The PubMed, Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant publications reporting randomized controlled trials between January 2000 and June 2016. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity were assessed. Eight trials with a total of 2,470 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with fulvestrant alone, combination therapy improved PFS (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.72-0.87; P = 0.00), increased ORR (RR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.30-2.21; P = 0.00), and showed a trend of increase in DCR (RR = 1.27; 95% CI 0.96-1.69, P = 0.09). In network analysis, only CD4/6 and PI3K/m-TOR inhibitors showed significant treatment effects with a P-score of 0.9999 and 0.7615, respectively. Patients treated with combination therapy developed more grade 3 or greater toxic effects (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.13-1.36; P = 0.00). Combining targeted agents with fulvestrant showed benefit but with increased toxicity in patients with advanced breast cancer compared with fulvestrant alone. Biomarkers for treatment optimization are lacking. The CD4/6 and PI3K/m-TOR pathways merit further investigation.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Estradiol/analogs & derivatives , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Estradiol/adverse effects , Estradiol/therapeutic use , Female , Fulvestrant , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
17.
PLoS One ; 11(10): e0164663, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27741288

ABSTRACT

Capecitabine has been investigated in early breast cancer in several studies, but it was undefined that whether it could improve survival. To investigate whether the addition of capecitabine affected survival in patients with early breast cancer, a meta-analysis was conducted and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity were assessed. The PubMed, Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies between January 2006 and April 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or data for calculating HRs with 95% CI were derived. Seven trials with 9097 patients, consisted of 4 adjuvant and 3 neoadjuvant studies, were included in this meta-analysis. Adding capecitabine showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.02; P = 0.12), whereas a significant improvement in OS was observed (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; P = 0.008). A sub-analysis of DFS showed that benefit of capecitabine derived from patients with triple negative subtype and with extensive axillary involvement. Safety profiles were consistent with the known side-effects of capecitabine, but more patients discontinued scheduled treatment in the capecitabine group. Combining capecitabine with standard (neo)adjuvant regimens in early breast cancer demonstrated a significantly superior OS, and indicated DFS improvement in some subtypes with high risk of recurrence. Selection of subtypes was a key to identify patients who might gain survival benefit from capecitabine.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Databases, Factual , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Rate
18.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 92(16): 1133-7, 2012 Apr 24.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22781776

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the in vitro effects of anti-proliferation and apoptosis-inducing with different sequence regimens of zoledronic acid plus paclitaxel in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line HNE1 so as to explore the optimal sequence regimen of these two drugs and related mechanism. METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of different sequence schemes of zoledronic acid plus paclitaxel on HNE1 cells were detected by methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining flow cytometry (FCM) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay were used to measure the effects of zoledronic acid plus paclitaxel upon apoptosis. The expressions of mRNA of Bcl-2, Bax, Caspase3 and Caspase9 gene were detected by real-time quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and protein was detected by Western blot. RESULTS: All experiment groups enhanced the effect of anti-proliferation by MTT assay (P < 0.05); the treatment of zoledronic acid followed by paclitaxel was superior to the other two regimens (P < 0.05). As detected by FCM, the early apoptotic rate of control group was 2.59% ± 0.28% and the experiment groups were 13.89% ± 0.69%, 11.73% ± 0.54%, 23.97% ± 0.68%, 10.45% ± 0.16% and 8.59% ± 0.74% respectively (P < 0.05). TUNEL assay detected the late apoptosis of HNE1 cells and the experiment groups enhanced the effect of apoptosis-inducing (P < 0.05). The treatment of zoledronic acid followed by paclitaxel was superior to the other regimens (P < 0.05). Such an effect was due to the down-regulation of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and up-regulations of pro-apoptotic proteins Bax, Caspase3 and Caspase9 at the expression levels of mRNA and protein. There was a greater regulation in the group of zoledronic acid followed by paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid can enhance the in vitro effects of anti-proliferation and apoptosis-inducing for paclitaxel on HNE1 cell. The treatment of zoledronic acid followed by paclitaxel may be the optimal regimen. Synergistic induction of apoptosis is via the effects of Bcl-2 family and through the mitochondrial pathway.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Carcinoma , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Zoledronic Acid
19.
Med Oncol ; 29(5): 3374-80, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22729369

ABSTRACT

We investigated the apoptosis-inducing effect of zoledronic acid in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell HNE-1 and explore the potential mechanism. Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell HNE-1 was exposed to various concentrations (0-40 µmol/L) of zoledronic acid. Cell proliferation was studied by an MTT assay. Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry and TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry. Gene expressions were investigated by quantitative real-time PCR, and protein expressions were investigated by Western blot. The results showed zoledronic acid decreased cell proliferation not in a time- or dose-dependent fashion. TUNEL assay, together with Annexin V/propidium iodide FACS analysis, confirmed the increase in apoptotic HNE-1 cells treated with zoledronic acid. Cell cycle analysis showed a larger number of treated cells occupied the S-phase. Quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot revealed that the pro-apoptotic genes, Bad, Bax, and Caspase-9, were upregulated in treated HNE-1 cells, whereas the anti-apoptotic gene, Bcl-2, was downregulated in both mRNA and protein levels. In conclusion, zoledronic inhibits human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis via the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Blotting, Western , Carcinoma , Cell Line, Tumor , Flow Cytometry , Gene Expression/drug effects , Humans , In Situ Nick-End Labeling , Mitochondria/drug effects , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Zoledronic Acid
20.
Med Oncol ; 29(2): 714-20, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21431960

ABSTRACT

To demonstrate the effect of zoledronic acid in proliferation, invasion, and migration of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell HNE-1 and explore the potential role of VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9 proteins in vitro. Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell HNE-1 was exposed to various concentrations (0-40 µmol/l) of zoledronic acid. Zoledronic acid inhibited proliferation of HNE-1 cells though not in a dose-dependent manner. Zoledronic acid had exerted a dose-dependent effect on the migration and invasion of HNE-1 cells. Both expressions of mRNA and protein of MMP2, MMP9, and VEGF were reduced, respectively, detected by RT-PCR and Western blot assays. These data suggested that zoledronic acid not only inhibited growth but also invasion and migration of HNE-1 cells in vitro. The anti-cancer action of zoledronic acid was partially associated with the suppression of VEGF expression and secretion and downregulating the expression of MMP2 and MMP9.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Matrix Metalloproteinase 2/genetics , Matrix Metalloproteinase 9/genetics , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/metabolism , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/genetics , Blotting, Western , Carcinoma , Cell Adhesion/drug effects , Down-Regulation , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Matrix Metalloproteinase 2/metabolism , Matrix Metalloproteinase 9/metabolism , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasm Invasiveness , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/metabolism , Zoledronic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...