How do people perceive different advice for rotator cuff disease? A content analysis of qualitative data collected in a randomised experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how people perceive different advice for rotator cuff disease in terms of words/feelings evoked by the advice and treatment needs. SETTING: We performed a content analysis of qualitative data collected in a randomised experiment. PARTICIPANTS: 2028 people with shoulder pain read a vignette describing someone with rotator cuff disease and were randomised to: bursitis label plus guideline-based advice, bursitis label plus treatment recommendation, rotator cuff tear label plus guideline-based advice and rotator cuff tear label plus treatment recommendation. Guideline-based advice included encouragement to stay active and positive prognostic information. Treatment recommendation emphasised that treatment is needed for recovery. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Participants answered questions about: (1) words/feelings evoked by the advice; (2) treatments they feel are needed. Two researchers developed coding frameworks to analyse responses. RESULTS: 1981 (97% of 2039 randomised) responses for each question were analysed. Guideline-based advice (vs treatment recommendation) more often elicited words/feelings of reassurance, having a minor issue, trust in expertise and feeling dismissed, and treatment needs of rest, activity modification, medication, wait and see, exercise and normal movements. Treatment recommendation (vs guideline-based advice) more often elicited words/feelings of needing treatment/investigation, psychological distress and having a serious issue, and treatment needs of injections, surgery, investigations, and to see a doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Words/feelings evoked by advice for rotator cuff disease and perceived treatment needs may explain why guideline-based advice reduces perceived need for unnecessary care compared to a treatment recommendation.

IDENTIFICATION AND CLINICAL VALIDATION OF HYPOXIA-INDUCIBLE FACTOR 1α PROTEIN AS THE POTENTIAL BIOMARKER IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS.

ABSTRACT: Objective: Sepsis is a complex disease characterized by an inflammatory response and tissue hypoxia. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) expression level is regulated by hypoxia and inflammation. This study aimed to explore the correlation between HIF-1α expression level and sepsis by bioinformatics analysis and clinical investigation. Methods: Bioinformatics tools were used to identify differentially expressed genes between sepsis and nonsepsis groups using the Gene Expression Omnibus data set. A clinical investigation was carried out to validate HIF-1α protein level in 54 nonseptic patients and 173 septic patients who were followed up for 28 days. Results: Bioinformatics analysis revealed that HIF-1α messenger RNA level was significantly different between septic and nonseptic patients ( P < 0.05). Consistent with the study hypothesis, higher HIF-1α levels in plasma were found in septic patients compared with those in nonseptic patients. The diagnostic accuracy for sepsis, as quantified by the area under the curve, was 0.926 (0.885-0.968) for HIF-1α expression level combined with oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO 2 /FiO 2 ), white blood cell, and blood urea nitrogen. The HIF-1α expression level was also significantly correlated with the severity of the disease. The results of the restricted cubic splines model indicated a U-shaped relationship between HIF-1α expression level and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses indicated that septic patients with the elevated HIF-1α expression levels had shorter length of ICU stay versus those with the lower HIF-1α expression levels. Conclusion: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression level can be used for diagnosing disease, assessing severity, and predicting length of ICU stay in septic patients.