Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 4(2): 115-33, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17600481

ABSTRACT

The use of antimicrobial compounds in food animal production provides demonstrated benefits, including improved animal health, higher production and, in some cases, reduction in foodborne pathogens. However, use of antibiotics for agricultural purposes, particularly for growth enhancement, has come under much scrutiny, as it has been shown to contribute to the increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria of human significance. The transfer of antibiotic resistance genes and selection for resistant bacteria can occur through a variety of mechanisms, which may not always be linked to specific antibiotic use. Prevalence data may provide some perspective on occurrence and changes in resistance over time; however, the reasons are diverse and complex. Much consideration has been given this issue on both domestic and international fronts, and various countries have enacted or are considering tighter restrictions or bans on some types of antibiotic use in food animal production. In some cases, banning the use of growth-promoting antibiotics appears to have resulted in decreases in prevalence of some drug resistant bacteria; however, subsequent increases in animal morbidity and mortality, particularly in young animals, have sometimes resulted in higher use of therapeutic antibiotics, which often come from drug families of greater relevance to human medicine. While it is clear that use of antibiotics can over time result in significant pools of resistance genes among bacteria, including human pathogens, the risk posed to humans by resistant organisms from farms and livestock has not been clearly defined. As livestock producers, animal health experts, the medical community, and government agencies consider effective strategies for control, it is critical that science-based information provide the basis for such considerations, and that the risks, benefits, and feasibility of such strategies are fully considered, so that human and animal health can be maintained while at the same time limiting the risks from antibiotic-resistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Veterinary Medicine/methods , Animal Husbandry/standards , Animals , Bacteria/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Food Microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Veterinary Medicine/standards
2.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 2(3): 212-20, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16156702

ABSTRACT

To determine effects of exposure of parental animals to antibiotics on antibiotic resistance in bacteria of offspring, sows were either treated or not treated with oxytetracycline prior to farrowing and their pigs were challenged with Salmonella enterica Typhimurium and treated or not treated with oxytetracycline and apramycin. Fecal Escherichia coli were obtained from sows, and E. coli and salmonella were recovered from pigs. Antibiotic resistance patterns of isolates were determined using a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) analysis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and electroporation were used to characterize the genetic basis for the resistance and to determine the location of resistance genes. Treatments had little effect on resistance of the salmonella challenge organism. The greatest resistance to apramycin occurred in E. coli from pigs treated with apramycin and whose sows had earlier exposure to oxytetracycline. Resistance to oxytetracycline was consistently high throughout the study in isolates from all pigs and sows; however, greater resistance was noted in pigs nursing sows that had previous exposure to that drug. The aac(3)-IV gene, responsible for apramycin resistance, was found in approximately 90% of apramycin-resistant isolates and its location was determined to be on plasmids. Several resistant E. coli bio-types were found to contain the resistance gene. These results indicate that resistance to apramycin and oxytetracycline in E. coli of pigs is affected by previous use of oxytetracycline in sows.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella typhimurium/drug effects , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Animals, Suckling , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Nebramycin/analogs & derivatives , Nebramycin/pharmacology , Nebramycin/therapeutic use , Oxytetracycline/pharmacology , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Random Allocation , Salmonella Infections, Animal/drug therapy , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Swine , Swine Diseases/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL