Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Acad Pediatr ; 22(7): 1158-1166, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35247645

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Self-efficacy is a crucial factor in enabling pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) to deliver recommended care to children with overweight and obesity. This study, conducted with a large, national sample of PCPs, aimed to identify key factors, which may contribute to PCP self-efficacy for obesity-related care, from a list of previously reported barriers and facilitators. METHODS: A national random sample of American Academy of Pediatrics members was surveyed in 2017 (analytic n = 704). Factor analysis was used to identify self-efficacy variables from relevant indicators and assess fit. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to identify key predictors of PCP self-efficacy from reported facilitators or barriers to care, including characteristics of the PCP, practice, community, and payment systems. RESULTS: Two PCP self-efficacy variables were identified: health risk assessment and patient-centered counseling. Both were positively predicted by relevant training, the belief that pediatricians play an important role in obesity, and awareness of barriers to payment for dietitians or weight management programs. Both were negatively predicted by a perceived lack of available PCP time for counseling and inadequacy of available referral resources to assist with treatment. Additional predictors of counseling self-efficacy included PCP beliefs that they are paid for treatment (+) and that patients/families lack time for healthy behaviors (-). Electronic health record clinical decision supports or registries and patient social disadvantage were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest multiple potential roles and strategies for local and national organizations seeking to facilitate improvements to PCP self-efficacy in caring for children with overweight and obesity.


Subject(s)
Overweight , Self Efficacy , Child , Counseling , Humans , Obesity , Overweight/therapy , Primary Health Care/methods
2.
J Nutr Educ Behav ; 52(1): 31-38, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31759892

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assess pediatrician practices around growth and nutrition for children under 2 years. DESIGN: 2017 cross-sectional survey of a national random sample of the American Academy of Pediatrics members. SETTING: US. PARTICIPANTS: Practicing primary care pediatricians and residents (n = 698). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: World Health Organization growth chart use, solid food introduction recommendations, healthy behaviors discussion. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were calculated for nutrition-related questions. McNemar tests compared recommendations on the introduction of different solid foods at <6 months; chi-square tests of independence examined outcomes by pediatrician and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Most respondents (82.2%) reported using the World Health Organization growth charts at all well visits. Nearly half (45.3%) recommended solid food introduction at 6 months; 48.2% recommended <6 months. Cereals were more frequently recommended at <6 months than fruits/vegetables or meats (P <.001). Topics most frequently discussed were limiting juice (92.3%), and sugar-sweetened beverages (92.0%), avoiding restrictive and permissive food practices (30.7%), and avoiding food as a reward (29.1%) were least discussed. Pediatricians in hospital/clinic settings discussed healthy behaviors less than group or solo/2-physician practices. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: For children under 2 years, most pediatricians reported using recommended growth charts and discussing healthy behaviors. Fewer discussed responsive feeding topics. Results for guiding solid food introduction were mixed. Continued efforts to support pediatricians' work could improve the implementation of recommended practices.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Growth Charts , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Physician-Patient Relations
4.
J Pediatr ; 211: 78-84.e2, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113716

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare primary care pediatricians' practices and attitudes regarding obesity assessment, prevention, and treatment in children 2 years and older in 2006 and 2017. STUDY DESIGN: National, random samples of American Academy of Pediatrics members were surveyed in 2006, 2010, and 2017 on practices and attitudes regarding overweight and obesity (analytic n = 655, 592, and 558, respectively). Using logistic regression models (controlling for pediatrician and practice characteristics), we examined survey year with predicted values (PVs), including body mass index (BMI) assessment across 2006, 2010, and 2017 and practices and attitudes in 2006 and 2017. RESULTS: Pediatrician respondents in 2017 were significantly more likely than in 2006 and 2010 to report calculating and plotting BMI at every well-child visit, with 96% of 2017 pediatricians reporting they do this. Compared with 2006, in 2017 pediatricians were more likely to discuss family behaviors related to screen time, sugar-sweetened beverages, and eating meals together, P < .001 for all. There were no observed differences in frequency of discussions on parental role modeling of nutrition and activity-related behaviors, roles in food selection, and frequency of eating fast foods or eating out. Pediatricians in 2017 were more likely to agree BMI adds new information relevant to medical care (PV = 69.8% and 78.1%), they have support staff for screening (PV = 45.3% and 60.5%), and there are effective means of treating obesity (PV = 36.3% and 56.2%), P < .001 for all. CONCLUSIONS: Results from cross-sectional surveys in 2006 and 2017 suggest nationwide, practicing pediatricians have increased discussions with families on several behaviors and their awareness and practices around obesity care.


Subject(s)
Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Pediatric Obesity/therapy , Pediatricians , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Overweight , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
Acad Pediatr ; 16(4): 394-400, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little information is available to gauge residents' perceived receipt of comprehensive training and preparedness to manage children with obesity in practice. METHODS: A national, random sample of 1000 graduating pediatric residents were surveyed in 2013 on childhood overweight/obesity and preparedness to prevent and treat obesity. A composite training measure was created by summing the number of areas (10 possible) where training on overweight/obesity was received. Multivariable logistic regression explored relationships of resident and training characteristics to residents' belief that their own counseling on prevention and treatment of overweight/obesity is very effective (vs somewhat/slightly/not effective). RESULTS: Of 625 survey respondents (63% response), most (68-92%) reported receipt of training in each of 10 assessed areas on overweight/obesity prevention, assessment, and treatment. Most residents did not desire more training in the assessed areas; however, 54% wanted more training in motivational interviewing. About one-fourth believed that their own counseling on the prevention of overweight/obesity (26%) and treatment of obesity (22%) was very effective. Residents who rated their ability to use motivational interviewing as very good/excellent were more likely to rate their counseling on both the prevention and treatment of overweight/obesity as very effective (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.63-7.13; and aOR 4.69, 95% CI 2.72-8.07, respectively). Residents who received training in all 10 assessed areas were also more likely to rate their counseling on both prevention and treatment as very effective (aOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.61-4.14; aOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.46-3.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive training on overweight/obesity and inclusion of training in motivational interviewing may help residents feel better prepared to care for children with overweight/obesity.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Pediatrics/education , Adult , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Motivational Interviewing , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Pediatric Obesity/therapy , Self Efficacy , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Nutr Educ Behav ; 46(5): 341-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24953435

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Wisconsin Farm to School (F2S) programs in increasing students' fruit and vegetable (FV) intake. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental baseline and follow-up assessments: knowledge and attitudes survey, food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and lunch tray photo observation. SETTING: Wisconsin elementary schools: 1 urban and 8 rural. PARTICIPANTS: Children, grades 3-5 (n = 1,117; 53% male, 19% non-Caucasian). INTERVENTION(S): Farm to School programming ranging from Harvest of the Month alone to comprehensive, including school garden, locally sourced produce in school meals, and classroom lessons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, attitudes, exposure, liking, willingness; FFQ-derived (total), and photo-derived school lunch FV intake. ANALYSIS: t tests and mixed modeling to assess baseline differences and academic-year change. RESULTS: Higher willingness to try FV (+1%; P < .001) and knowledge of nutrition/agriculture (+1%; P < .001) (n = 888), and lunch FV availability (+6% to 17%; P ≤ .001) (n = 4,451 trays), both with increasing prior F2S program exposure and across the year. There was no effect on overall dietary patterns (FFQ; n = 305) but FV consumption increased among those with the lowest intakes (FFQ, baseline very low fruit intake, +135%, P < .001; photos: percentage of trays with no FV consumption for continuing programs decreased 3% to 10%, P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Farm to School programming improved mediators of FV consumption and decreased the proportion of children with unfavorable FV behaviors at school lunch. Longer-term data are needed to further assess F2S programs.


Subject(s)
Food Preferences , Fruit , Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Vegetables , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Food Services , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Wisconsin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...