Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eval Health Prof ; 35(2): 182-98, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22222416

ABSTRACT

While advances in medical treatment and technologies have the potential to improve the delivery of health care, their use typically involves making multiple, complex decisions. Patients and their medical providers may share in the decision-making processes and balance a variety of criteria and/or attributes in the pursuit of improved health. This necessitates a stronger understanding of the role of human behavior in health care processes and presents a timely opportunity to use decision analysis tools to contribute to this important aspect of health care operations. This article reports on the application of multiattribute preference elicitation to identify postsurgical rehabilitation setting options for elective hip and knee replacement patients and their discharge planning team prior to placement in these settings. These preferences are analyzed to identify trends in emphases across patients and the discharge planning team, including a comparison with actual outcomes to determine the extent of congruence with each other, an important component of patient-centered care. Variances are identified in what patients and the discharge planning team expected and what actually happened. Reasons for these variances are discussed.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/rehabilitation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Decision Support Techniques , Aged , Decision Making , Female , Health Status Indicators , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Discharge , Patient Satisfaction , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , United States
2.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother ; 9(6): 442-450.e1, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22055208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Academic detailing in nursing homes (NHs) has been shown to improve drug use patterns and adherence to guidelines. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary intervention that included academic detailing on adherence to national nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) guidelines related to use of antibiotics. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effects of a 2-year multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention targeting implementation of national evidence-based guidelines for NHAP. Interventions took place in 8 NHs in Colorado; 8 NHs in Kansas and Missouri served as controls. Interventions included (1) educational sessions for nurses to improve recognition and timely treatment of NHAP symptoms and (2) academic detailing to clinicians by pharmacists regarding diagnostic and prescribing practices. Differences in antibiotic use between groups were compared after 2 intervention years relative to baseline. RESULTS: A total of 549 episodes of NHAP were evaluated in the intervention group and 574 in the control group. Compared with baseline, 1 facility in the intervention group significantly improved in guideline adherence for optimal antibiotic use (P = 0.007), whereas no facilities in the control group improved. The mean adherence score for optimal antibiotic use in intervention NHs increased from 60% to 66%, whereas the control NHs increased from 32% to 39% (P = 0.3). Mean adherence to guidelines recommending antibiotic use within 4 hours of NHAP diagnosis increased from 57% to 75% in intervention NHs but decreased from 38% to 31% in control NHs (P = 0.0003 for difference). There was no difference between intervention and control NHs for guideline adherence regarding optimal duration of antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of this multifaceted study to repeatedly remind nursing staff of the importance of timely antibiotic administration contrasts with its limited academic detailing interaction with clinicians. This difference within the intervention may explain the differential impact of the intervention on antibiotic guideline adherence.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Drug Administration Schedule , Education, Nursing, Continuing/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Kansas , Missouri , Patient Care Team , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Professional Role , Time Factors
3.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 12(7): 499-507, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21450174

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether a comprehensive approach to implementing national consensus guidelines for nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) affected hospitalization rates. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, mixed-methods, multifaceted, unblinded intervention trial. SETTING: Sixteen nursing homes (NHs) from 1 corporation: 8 in metropolitan Denver, CO; 8 in Kansas and Missouri during 3 influenza seasons, October to April 2004 to 2007. PARTICIPANTS: Residents with 2 or more signs and symptoms of systemic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI); NH staff and physicians were eligible. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted, including academic detailing to clinicians, within-facility nurse change agent, financial incentives, and nursing education. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects' NH medical records were reviewed for resident characteristics, disease severity, and care processes. Bivariate analysis compared hospitalization rates for subjects with stable and unstable vital signs between intervention and control NHs and time periods. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using content coding. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates for stable residents in both NH groups remained low throughout the study. Few critically ill subjects in the intervention NHs were hospitalized in either the baseline or intervention period. In control NHs, 8.7% of subjects with unstable vital signs were hospitalized during the baseline and 33% in intervention year 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .10). Interviews with nursing staff and leadership confirmed there were significant pressures for, and enablers of, avoiding hospitalization for treatment of acute infections. CONCLUSIONS: Secular pressures to avoid hospitalization and the challenges of reaching NH physicians via academic detailing are likely responsible for the lack of intervention effect on hospitalization rates for critically ill NH residents.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/methods , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/nursing , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorado/epidemiology , Cross Infection/nursing , Decision Trees , Humans , Kansas/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Missouri/epidemiology , Nursing Staff/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 11(5): 365-70, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20511104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Determine whether a comprehensive approach to implementing national consensus guidelines for nursing home acquired pneumonia (NHAP), including influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, improves resident subject and staff vaccination rates. METHODS: Quasi-experimental, mixed-methods multifaceted intervention trial conducted at 16 nursing homes (NHs) from 1 corporation (8 in metropolitan Denver, Colorado; 8 in Kansas and Missouri) during 3 influenza seasons, October to April 2004 to 2007. Residents with 2 or more signs and symptoms of systemic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and NH staff and physicians were eligible. Subjects' NH records were reviewed for vaccination. Each director of nursing (DON) completed a questionnaire assessing staffing and the number of direct care staff vaccinated against influenza. DONs and study liaison nurses were interviewed after the intervention. Bivariate analysis compared vaccination outcomes and covariates between intervention and control homes, and risk-adjusted models were fit. Qualitative interview transcripts were analyzed using content coding. RESULTS: No statistically significant relationship between the intervention and improved resident vaccination rates was found, so other factors associated with improved rates were explored. Estimated direct patient care staff vaccination rates were better during the baseline and improved more in the intervention NHs. Qualitative results suggested that facility-specific factors and national policy changes impacted vaccination rates. CONCLUSIONS: External factors influence staff and resident vaccination rates, diluting the potential impact of a comprehensive program to improve care for NHAP on vaccination.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Nursing Homes , Nursing Staff , Patients , Aged , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Midwestern United States , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 63(10): 1105-11, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18948562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nursing home (NH)-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) causes excessive mortality, hospitalization, and functional decline, partly because many NH residents do not receive appropriate care. Care structures like nurse/resident staffing ratios can impede or abet quality care. This study examines the relationship between nurse/resident staffing ratios, turnover, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treating NHAP. METHODS: A prospective, chart-review study was conducted among residents of 16 NHs in three states with > or = 2 signs and symptoms of NHAP during the 2004--2005 influenza season. NH medical records were reviewed concurrently for functional status, comorbidity, NHAP severity, and guideline adherence. Ratio of licensed nurse and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hours per resident per day (hrpd) and ratio of newly hired nursing staff/year to current nursing staff were provided by Directors of Nursing. Associations among guideline adherence, nurse and CNA hrpd, and turnover were assessed using multiple regression to adjust for case mix, facility characteristics, and clustering of residents in facilities. RESULTS: Mid (1.7-2.0) and high (> 2.0) CNA hrpd were significantly associated with better pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates. More than 1.2 licensed nurse hrpd was significantly associated with appropriate hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 12.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-43.8) and guideline-recommended antibiotics (OR 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.7). A > 70% turnover was inversely related to timely physician notification (OR 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) and appropriate hospitalization (OR 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.26). CONCLUSIONS: NHAP treatment guideline adherence is associated with nurse and CNA hrpd and stability. An NH's ability to implement evidence-based care may depend on adequate staffing ratios and stability.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/nursing , Guideline Adherence , Nursing Staff/supply & distribution , Pneumonia/nursing , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorado/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Nursing Homes , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
6.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 54(11): 1694-700, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17087696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of a multifaceted strategy to translate evidence-based guidelines for treating nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) into practice using a small intervention trial. DESIGN: Pre-posttest with untreated control group. SETTING: Two Colorado State Veterans Homes (SVHs) during two influenza seasons. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six residents with two or more signs of lower respiratory tract infection. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted, including a formative phase to modify the intervention, institutional-level change emphasizing immunization, and availability of appropriate antibiotics; interactive educational sessions for nurses; and academic detailing. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects' SVH medical records were reviewed for guideline compliance retrospectively for the influenza season before the intervention and prospectively during the intervention. Bivariate comparisons-of-care processes between the intervention and control facility before and after the intervention were made using the Fischer exact test. RESULTS: At the intervention facility, compliance with five of the guidelines improved: influenza vaccination, timely physician response to illness onset, x-ray for patients not being hospitalized, use of appropriate antibiotics, and timely antibiotic initiation for unstable patients. Chest x-ray and appropriate and timely antibiotics were significantly better at the intervention than at the control facility during the intervention year but not during the control year. CONCLUSION: Multifaceted, evidence-based, NHAP guideline implementation improved care processes in a SVH. Guideline implementation should be studied in a national sample of nursing homes to determine whether it improves quality of life and functional outcomes of this debilitating illness for long-term care residents.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/nursing , Guideline Adherence , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Pneumonia/nursing , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Pneumonia/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...