Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 17739, 2023 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853013

ABSTRACT

Our study assessed DATASUS as a potential source for pharmacoepidemiologic studies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Brazilian population focusing on treatment patterns and determinants of initiating or switching to a novel therapy. This was a descriptive database study of RA patients with at least one claim of RA and ≥ 2 claims of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD); conventional synthetic (cs), biologic (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD with more than 6 months of follow-up from 01-Jan-2010 to 31-Dec-2020. Analyses were stratified for SUS-exclusive and SUS+ private user cohorts. We identified 250,251 patients with RA in DATASUS: mean age of 58.4 years, majority female (83%) and white (58%). 62% were SUS-exclusive and 38% SUS+ private. Most common bDMARDs were adalimumab and etanercept. Age (adjusted odds ratio 1.78 [50+]; 95% CI 1.57-2.01), SUS exclusive status (0.53; 0.47-0.59), distance to clinic [160+ km] (0.57; 0.45-0.72), and pre-index csDMARD claims (1.23; 1.08-1.41) were independent predictors of initiating a novel oral tsDMARD. Switching from bDMARD to tsDMARD, associations were similar, except for the direction of associations for SUS exclusive status (adjusted hazard ratio 1.10; 1.03-1.18), distance to clinic (1.18; 1.03-1.35), and number of previous bDMARD (0.15; 0.14-0.16). DATASUS is a source suitable for treatment-related analyses in RA reflecting the public health system in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Pharmacoepidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/chemically induced , Biological Products/therapeutic use
2.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 78, 2023 Jan 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Incidence and risk factors for seizures among women with advanced breast cancer (BC) and brain metastases are not well characterized across treatment-related or clinical subtypes. This study leveraged a large real-world dataset to describe incidence and risk factors for seizures in BRCA-associated metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: The Optum® de-identified electronic health records database was used. Females with a BC diagnoses between 2008 and 2018, with clinic visits 12 months before BC index date, evidence of BRCA mutation (BRCA+), evidence of metastasis, and no previous cancers were included. Analyses were stratified by the overall BRCA+ cohort and 4 molecular phenotypes: HER2+/HR- (human epidermal growth factor 2/hormone receptor), HER2-/HR+, HER2+/HR+, and triple negative BC (TNBC; HER2-/HR-). Seizures were identified using diagnosis codes and natural language processing. Incidence, occurrence rates, and cumulative incidence of seizures from the diagnosis of metastasis to the end of follow up were calculated. Comparisons were made between phenotypes and stratified on PARP inhibitor use, diagnosed brain metastases, history of seizures, and anticonvulsants use before BC. All comparisons included age at metastasis, number of prior lines of treatment, and metastasis location as covariates. RESULTS: 27.8% of 7941 BRCA+ patients had ≥1 seizure over a mean follow-up time of 2.35 years. Incidence and occurrence rates were 11.83 (95% CI: 11.35-12.33) and 201.3 (95% CI: 198.05-204.50), respectively, per 100 person-years. HER2-/HR+ and TNBC patients had the lowest and highest seizure incidence rates, respectively (10.94 [95% CI: 10.23-11.71] and 16.83 [95% CI: 15.34-18.46]). With HER2-/HR+ as the reference group in a competing risk analysis, TNBC (hazard ratio, HR = 1.35; 95%CI: 1.21, 1.52; p < 0.001) and HER2+/HR- (HR = 1.29; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.56; p < 0.01) patients had a greater risk of seizures. Patients with diagnosed brain metastases or a history of seizures had higher seizure rates. Incidence trended higher with PARP inhibitor use, but patient numbers were low. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel real-world evidence on seizure incidence rates in BRCA+ BC patients, even those without diagnosed brain metastases, and underscores the need to understand patients' tumor phenotypes when assessing seizure risk. These findings may have implications for clinical practice and assessment of benefit-risk ratios of new therapeutic agents.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Brain Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , United States , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Electronic Health Records , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , ErbB Receptors/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Seizures/drug therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2/therapeutic use
3.
BioDrugs ; 36(4): 521-535, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35771381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies utilizing administrative claims data have largely been unable to consider clinical factors that may be related to patterns of drug use among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: To understand predictors of treatment changes following initiation of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) using nation-wide electronic health record (EHR) data in the USA. METHODS: The Optum Immunology Condition EHR data (01/01/2011-09/30/2019) was used to identify a population of adult patients with RA initiating a TNFi as the first line biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). The primary outcome was any treatment change during the 1-year post-index period defined as cycling to a different TNFi or switching to non-TNFi biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of TNFi cycling and switching, examined separately. To identify predictors of DMARD treatment changes, we used a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Model c-statistics and odds ratios (ORs, 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of predictors were reported. RESULTS: We identified 24,871 patients with RA who initiated a TNFi. The mean age was 55.5 (± 13.7) years and 77.2% were female. Among the TNFi initiators, 22.2% experienced TNFi cycling or switching during the 1-year follow-up time. Predictors that are associated with higher likelihood of TNFi cycling or switching included female gender (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16-1.36) and glucocorticoid use (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21-1.40). In contrast, inflammatory bowel disease (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.78), psoriasis (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.95), recent use of methotrexate (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97), and vitamin D intake (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99) were negatively associated with TNFi cycling or switch. CONCLUSIONS: Gender, glucocorticoid use, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and vitamin D intake were identified as significant predictors of TNFi cycling or switching for TNFi initiators in the RA population. Predicting treatment change remains challenging even with large detailed EHR data. This study aimed to identify key determinants of treatment changes among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) as their first-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in routine care settings using a US nation-wide longitudinal electronic health record (EHR). Among 24,871 patients with RA who initiated a TNFi, 22.2% experienced TNFi cycling or switching during the 1-year follow-up time. Female patients and those who used glucocorticoids were more likely to experience TNFi cycling or switching, whereas inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, recent methotrexate use, and vitamin D intake were negatively associated with the outcome. However, predicting treatment change remains challenging even with larger detailed EHR data potentially due to unmeasured factors such as prescriber's preference or patient's belief in the medication.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Psoriasis , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Electronic Health Records , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Vitamin D/therapeutic use
4.
Oncol Ther ; 9(2): 471-488, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909273

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of pneumonitis, a treatment-related adverse event (AE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, has been studied in the United States mostly through clinical trials and retrospective chart reviews. Few analyses of real-world data have been published. This study of a large nationally representative health records database estimated the incidence and predictors of pneumonitis among treated NSCLC patients between 2008 and 2018. METHODS: The Optum® electronic health records (EHR) database includes data on over 80 million patients from more than 50 healthcare plans. The cohort of primary NSCLC patients was identified using ICD-9/10 codes. Natural language processing of unstructured data from physicians' notes facilitated extraction of biomarker (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] and programmed death ligand-1 [PD-L1]) status. Cumulative incidence was estimated as the proportion with pneumonitis overall, by clinical characteristics, and line of therapy (LOT) after diagnosis and treatment. Univariate analysis of incidence rates (cases/1000 person-years) enabled the identification of significant predictors of risk. Competing risk regression identified predictors of pneumonitis. RESULTS: The cohort included 81,628 patients. Overall, 19.0% developed pneumonitis during any LOT, with a cumulative incidence of 33.7% and 17.0% for patients with a prior history of pneumonitis and those without, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed several factors associated with pneumonitis (p < 0.05). While factors varied between LOTs, common factors included male gender, squamous histology, history of diabetes or pneumonitis, EGFR-negative status, monotherapy immunomodulatory drugs, or history of radiation therapy. Multivariable competing risk regression showed that male gender, history of pneumonitis, EGFR-negative status, use of other targeted therapies, use of immunomodulatory drugs, and history of radiation therapy predicted pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Pneumonitis is significantly associated with NSCLC treatment. Knowledge of its predictors identified in this study may help devise strategies to mitigate its impact, enhancing treatment adherence and improving outcomes.


Pneumonitis is a side effect of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Real-world data on its incidence in the United States is not extensive. In this study, the Optum® electronic health records database with data on over 80 million patients from more than 50 healthcare plans across the United States was used to estimate the incidence and predictors of pneumonitis in NSCLC patients treated between 2008 and 2018. A total of 81,628 NSCLC patients were identified using disease-specific codes. Physicians' notes in their health records were subjected to natural language processing to identify presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) receptors in tumors. Proportions of patients with pneumonitis overall, by clinical characteristics, and line of therapy (LOT) were calculated. Univariate analysis of incidence (cases per 1000 person-years) a multivariable competing risk regression helped identify risk predictors. Overall, 19.0% of patients developed pneumonitis during any LOT. Incidence was 33.7% and 17.0% in patients with and without prior pneumonitis, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed factors associated with pneumonitis, including male gender, squamous histology, history of diabetes or pneumonitis, EGFR-negative status, monotherapy immunomodulatory drugs, or history of radiation therapy. Multivariable competing risks regression analysis showed that male gender, history of pneumonitis, EGFR-negative status, use of other targeted therapies, use of immunomodulatory drugs, and history of radiation therapy were significantly associated with pneumonitis. Pneumonitis is significantly associated with NSCLC treatment. Knowledge of its predictors may help design interventions to lessen its impact, promoting compliance with treatment and improving outcomes.

5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33014209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have high lifetime risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer. The decision to embark on risk reduction strategies is a difficult and personal one. We surveyed an international group of women with BRCA mutations and measured choices and sequence of breast cancer risk reduction strategies. METHODS: Women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and no previous cancer diagnosis were recruited from the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, and from a national advocacy group. Using an online survey, we asked about cancer-risk reduction preferences including for one of two hypothetical medicines, randomly assigned, and women's recommendations for a hypothetical woman (Susan, either a 25- or 36-year-old). Sunburst diagrams were generated to illustrate hierarchy of choices. RESULTS: Among 598 respondents, mean age was 40.9 years (range 25-55 years). Timing of the survey was 4.8 years (mean) after learning their positive test result and 33% had risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) and bilateral mastectomy (RRBM), while 19% had RRBSO only and 16% had RRBM only. Although 30% said they would take a hypothetical medicine, 6% reported taking a medicine resembling tamoxifen. Respondents were 1.5 times more likely to select a hypothetical medicine for risk reduction when Susan was 25 than when Susan was 36. Women assigned to 36-year-old Susan were more likely to choose a medicine if they had a family member diagnosed with breast cancer and personal experience taking tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: Women revealed a willingness to undergo surgeries to achieve largest reduction in breast cancer risk, although this would not be recommended for a younger woman in her 20s. The goal of achieving the highest degree of cancer risk reduction is the primary driver for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in selecting an intervention and a sequence of interventions, regardless of whether it is non-surgical or surgical.

6.
Br J Cancer ; 123(2): 268-274, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32393849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have high lifetime risks of developing breast and ovarian cancers. We sought to estimate the prevalence of cancer-related distress and to identify predictors of distress in an international sample of unaffected women with a BRCA mutation. METHODS: Women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and no previous cancer diagnosis were recruited from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and from a national advocacy group. Using an online survey, we asked about cancer risk reduction options and screening, and we measured cancer-related distress using the Impact of Event Scale. RESULTS: Among 576 respondents, mean age was 40.8 years (SD = 8.1). On average 4.9 years after a positive test result, 16.3% of women reported moderate-to-severe cancer-related distress. Women who had undergone risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgery were less likely to have (moderate or severe) cancer-related distress compared to other women (22.0% versus 11.4%, P value = 0.007). Women recruited from the advocacy group were more likely to have cancer-related distress than other women (21.6% versus 5.3%, P value = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 16% of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation experience distress levels comparable to those of women after a cancer diagnosis. Distress was lower for women who had risk-reducing surgery.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Psychological Distress , Adult , Australia , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Canada , Female , Genetic Testing , Heterozygote , Humans , Middle Aged , Mutation/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Risk Factors , United Kingdom
7.
Cancer Med ; 8(1): 374-382, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30537194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior to 2018, intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BPs) were the only therapies recommended to prevent skeletal-related events for patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM). We examined patterns of IV BP initiation and interruption among patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) in the United States. METHODS: Electronic health records linked to administrative health insurance claims were used to identify adults with NDMM between 1 January 2011 and 30 April 2016. Patients were excluded for recent IV BP use or concurrent cancer. The incidences of IV BP initiation and interruption were estimated using competing risk regression. A generalized linear model was used to estimate risk factors for treatment initiation and interruption. RESULTS: Among the 547 patients with NDMM, 64% initiated MM therapy within 30 days of diagnosis. By one year, 65% (95% CI: 59, 70) of patients with appropriately timed anti-MM therapy had initiated an IV BP. Zoledronic acid was the most commonly initiated IV BP. Patients with Stage III MM were more likely to initiate an IV BP (adjusted risk difference (RD): 6.3; 95% CI: 2.7, 10.1), while those with eGFR <30 mL/min were less likely to initiate (RD: -9.7; 95% CI: -13.8, -5.8). Of the 264 patients who initiated an IV BP, 77% (95% CI: 71, 82) experienced an interruption within one year. Patients on concurrent anti-MM therapy were less likely to experience an interruption in IV BP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with NDMM do not initiate IV BPs, particularly those with renal complications. Interruptions of IV BPs were common.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
8.
Oncoimmunology ; 7(12): e1480301, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30524886

ABSTRACT

After a case report of profound clinical response in a melanoma patient following treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and RANK-ligand inhibitor denosumab, we identified similar patients from electronic health records (EHR) and described patient characteristics and outcomes. This 2017 observational study used Flatiron Health's EHR database from ~255 US cancer clinics. Included were advanced melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received denosumab within 30 days of CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) or PD1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) inhibitors start with a minimum of 6 months of follow up. Real-world tumor response (rwTR) was analyzed for scans available up to 30 days after concomitant therapy. Preclinical experiments evaluated sequencing of ICI, denosumab vs monotherapy or control. Melanoma (n = 66) patients received concomitant denosumab/ICI for a mean 4.0 months, 3.1 months for NSCLC (n = 241). Two-thirds of patients had best rwTR evaluable (complete [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], or disease progression [PD]). Longer mean duration of concomitant exposure was associated with overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) in melanoma (p = 0.0172), NSCLC (p < .0001), and combined cohorts (p < .0001). The disease control rate (ORR plus SD) was 56% amongst melanoma patients and 58% amongst NSCLC patients. Longer concomitant therapy was associated with increased overall survival, primarily in NSCLC (p < .0001). Preclinical data suggest that ICI initiated before or at same time as denosumab was optimal. Results provide proof-of-concept that rwTR is associated with concomitant denosumab/ICI. Crude survival analyses supported the association of concomitant therapy and improved outcomes outside of clinical trials and warrant comparative study.

9.
Clin Epidemiol ; 10: 1667-1677, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30532597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a condition characterized by high cholesterol levels and increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) that often goes undiagnosed. The Dutch Lipid Network Criteria (DLNC) are used to identify FH in clinical settings via physical examination, personal and family history of CHD, in addition to the presence of deleterious mutations of the LDLR, ApoB, and PCSK9 genes. Agreement between clinical and genetic diagnosis of FH varies. While an ICD diagnosis code was not available for coding FH until 2016, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) clinical concept codes, including genetic diagnoses, for FH have been utilized in electronic health records (EHRs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance of identifying FH via SNOMED and ICD-10 CM codes vs the DLNC in an EHR database. METHODS: Using the Practice Fusion EHR database, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated comparing an FH cohort identified via SNOMED and ICD-10 CM codes to one identified via the DLNC. RESULTS: Among 907,616 patients with hypercholesterolemia, 2,180 were identified as FH via SNOMED code (zero were identified via ICD-10 CM), 259 had a DLNC score 6-8 (probable FH), and 45 had a DLNC score >8 (definite FH). Compared to DLNC score >8, the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of the FH SNOMED code were 84.4%, 99.4%, and 6.4%, respectively. Compared to DLNC score ≥6, the sensitivity was 36.8% and the specificity was 99.5% with a PPV of 18.7%. CONCLUSION: Compared to the clinical criteria for FH, identification of FH patients via SNOMED diagnosis codes had high sensitivity and specificity, but low PPV. The discordance of these two techniques in identifying FH patients speaks to the challenges in identifying FH patients in large electronic databases such as administrative claims and EHR.

10.
Clin Epidemiol ; 10: 1349-1358, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30288124

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are recommended for women with bone metastasis from breast cancer to prevent skeletal-related events. We examined the usage patterns and identified the factors associated with the use of BMAs (denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonates) among women in the US. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Electronic health records from oncology clinics were used to identify women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer between 2013 and 2014. Patients were excluded if they had recently used a BMA or had concurrent cancer at an additional primary site. The incidence of BMA initiation, interruption, and reinitiation were estimated using competing risk regression models. A generalized linear model was used to estimate risk factors for treatment initiation and interruption. RESULTS: There were 589 women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer. By 1 year, 68% of these patients (95% CI: 64%, 71%) had initiated treatment with a BMA. Denosumab and zoledronic acid were the most commonly used agents, whereas pamidronate was used infrequently. Young women were more likely to initiate a BMA than older women (adjusted risk difference: 6.4 [95% CI: 1.5, 10.9]). Of the 412 patients who initiated a BMA, 46% (95% CI: 41%, 51%) experienced an interruption within 1 year. Seventy-four percent (95% CI: 68%, 79%) of patients who interrupted their treatment had reinitiated therapy within 1 year of interruption. CONCLUSION: The majority of women diagnosed with bone metastasis from breast cancer initiate a BMA within 1 year of diagnosis, but a large proportion, particularly among the elderly, do not use these therapies.

11.
J Bone Oncol ; 12: 96-100, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30148063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quantifying the incidence of giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is challenging because it is a rare, histologically benign bone tumor for which population-level statistics are unavailable in most countries. We estimated the 2017 incidence of GCT in China using a direct (registry-based) approach with available population-based data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The most recent age- and sex-specific incidence rates of GCT recorded in the Bone Tumor Registry in Japan (2015) were applied to 2017 age- and sex-matched populations projected by the United Nations for China in order to estimate 2017 incidence. An adjustment factor calculated using registry data suggesting that GCT may represent a greater proportion of bone tumors in China than in Japan (Guo, 1999) was applied to provide secondary estimates. RESULTS: Annual GCT incidence was estimated to be 1.49 per million population or 2094 new cases in China for 2017. A comparison of this estimated incidence with Japan (1.25 per million) and the United States (1.38 per million) indicates that the incidence is somewhat higher in China using identical methods. Secondary estimates suggest that GCT incidence in China may be as high as 2.57 per million or 3625 new cases in 2017. The corresponding 3-year limited-duration prevalence of GCT in China using a registry-based approach and general age-specific mortality is 6276 (secondary estimate: 10,876). CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging unique population-based registry data, we estimated that GCT is a rare disease in the Chinese population with an incidence ranging between 1.49 and 2.57 cases per million persons per year. Possible differences in diagnostic classification of GCT, urban-rural demographics, and the younger demographic distribution of the Chinese population may underlie observations that GCT, a condition that primarily affects young individuals (20-40 years of age), accounts for a higher proportion of skeletal tumors in China than in other regions.

12.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 171(2): 435-442, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808287

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In 2013, Angelina Jolie disclosed in the New York Times (NYT) that she had undergone risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy (RRBM) after learning that she was a BRCA1 mutation carrier. We examined the rates of BRCA testing and RRBM from 1997 to 2016, and quantified trends before and after the Jolie op-ed. METHODS: This observational study of insurance claims data representative of the commercially-insured US population (Truven MarketScan® database) measured BRCA testing and RRBM rates among females ≥ 18 years. Censoring events were breast cancer or ovarian cancer diagnosis, last follow-up date (September 2016), or death. Interrupted time series analyses were used to quantify trends before and after the op-ed. RESULTS: Angelina Jolie's NYT op-ed led to a statistically significant increase in the uptake of genetic testing and in RRBM among women without previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer in the US population, and in women who did not undergo testing for BRCA (P < 0.0001 for both). The rate (slope) of RRBM among women who were previously tested for BRCA (P = 0.70) was unchanged. After excluding women with in-situ tumors, the editorial's effect became less pronounced, suggesting that high-risk women with in-situ breast cancers were most influenced by Jolie's announcement. CONCLUSION: The Angelina Effect-a term coined by Time magazine to describe the rise in internet searches related to breast cancer genetics and counseling-represents a long-lasting impact of celebrity on public health awareness as significant increases in genetic testing and mastectomy rates were observed and sustained in subsequent years.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prophylactic Mastectomy/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Databases, Factual , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Heterozygote , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Mutation , Public Health Surveillance , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(8): 2833-2841, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29516168

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend that intravenous bisphosphonates be initiated in all patients with multiple myeloma for management of bone disease. The objective of this study was to describe real-world bisphosphonate treatment patterns. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using oncology electronic health record (EHR) data contained in Amgen's Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database, generated by Flatiron Health (New York, NY), representing over 1.5 million US oncology patients. Patients were newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma between January 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016. Timing of bisphosphonate administration, frequency, schedule, changes in dosing schedule, and discontinuations were calculated. Bisphosphonate treatment relative to renal function and anti-multiple myeloma therapy regimens were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 11,112 patients were enrolled in the study with a median follow-up of 687 days. Sixty-three percent received ≥ 1 bisphosphonate administration, primarily every 4 weeks (67.7%). Mean time from diagnosis to bisphosphonate administration was 106 days (median, 29). Most patients (58.2%) initiated treatment in first year after diagnosis and about half (51.9%) either discontinued or changed dosing. Patients with poorer renal function by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stage at baseline were less likely to receive bisphosphonates (eGFR stage 5 vs 1: 24 vs 72%) and more likely to have delayed initiation of bisphosphonate treatment from diagnosis (eGFR stage 5 vs 1: median 70 vs 25 days). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data from US oncology practices indicate that many patients with multiple myeloma may not receive optimal therapy for bone disease, particularly those with renal impairment.


Subject(s)
Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
14.
Clin Ther ; 40(4): 536-549.e3, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395290

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This observational study of oncologic clinical practices was designed to describe real-world patterns of use of emerging therapies (abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel, enzalutamide, radium-223, sipuleucel-T) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and to characterize their concomitant use with denosumab or zoledronic acid. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a database of electronic health records from oncology practices across the United States. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of prostate cancer (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] code 185/International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] code C61) before or concurrent with a visit between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015; follow-up was performed through June 30, 2016. From this population, we identified those who received an emerging therapy and a subset who also received denosumab or zoledronic acid. FINDINGS: A total of 71,606 men met the eligibility criteria, and 5131 (7%) received emerging therapy. In the emerging therapy cohort (at the time of the first use), median age was 75 years, median prostate-specific antigen value was 22.7 ng/mL, 56% had bone metastases, and 80% were docetaxel naive. Abiraterone and enzalutamide were the most commonly used first emerging therapies (52% and 31%, respectively), followed by sipuleucel-T (9%), cabazitaxel (5%), and radium-223 (1.5%). Of the emerging therapy cohort, 3121 patients (61%) received concomitant denosumab (70%) or zoledronic acid (35%); 5% received both. IMPLICATIONS: Among patients with prostate cancer treated in the United States, most of those treated with an emerging therapy between 2013 and 2015 also received denosumab or zoledronic acid, suggesting that the concomitant use of these therapy types is currently a common practice. Use of denosumab or zoledronic acid was higher in patients with verified bone metastases.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Denosumab/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Zoledronic Acid/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Retrospective Studies
15.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 44, 2018 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29306325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases commonly occur in conjunction with solid tumors, and are associated with serious bone complications. Population-based estimates of bone metastasis incidence are limited, often based on autopsy data, and may not reflect current treatment patterns. METHODS: Electronic medical records (OSCER, Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records, 569,000 patients, 52 US cancer centers) were used to identify patients ≥18 years with a solid tumor diagnosis recorded between 1/1/2004 and 12/31/2013, excluding patients with hematologic tumors or multiple primaries. Each patient's index date was set to the date of his or her first solid tumor diagnosis in the selection period. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to quantify the cumulative incidence of bone metastasis with follow-up for each patient from the index date to the earliest of the following events: last clinic visit in the OSCER database, occurrence of a new primary tumor or bone metastasis, end of study (12/31/2014). Incidence estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) are provided for up to 10 years of follow-up for all tumor types combined and stratified by tumor type and stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 382,733 study patients (mean age 64 years; mean follow-up 940 days), breast (36%), lung (16), and colorectal (12%) tumors were most common. Mean time to bone metastasis was 400 days (1.1 years). Cumulative incidence of bone metastasis was 2.9% (2.9-3.0) at 30 days, 4.8% (4.7-4.8) at one year, 5.6% (5.5-5.6) at two years, 6.9% (6.8-7.0) at five years, and 8.4% (8.3-8.5) at ten years. Incidence varied substantially by tumor type with prostate cancer patients at highest risk (18% - 29%) followed by lung, renal or breast cancer. Cumulative incidence of bone metastasis increased by stage at diagnosis, with markedly higher incidence among patients diagnosed at Stage IV of whom11% had bone metastases diagnosed within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: These estimates of bone metastasis incidence represent the experience of a population with longer follow-up than previously published, and represent experience in the recent treatment landscape. Underestimation is possible given reliance on coded diagnoses but the clinical detail available in electronic medical records contributes to the accuracy of these estimates.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Databases, Factual , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , United States/epidemiology
16.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 27(2): 229-238, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29316026

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the dynamics of treatment with 2 bone-targeting agents (BTAs)-denosumab and zoledronic acid-among men with bone metastases from prostate cancer. METHODS: Using electronic health record data from oncology practices across the US, we identified prostate cancer patients diagnosed with bone metastasis in 2012/2013 without evidence of BTA use within 6 months prior to diagnosis. We examined the risk and predictors of BTA initiation, interruption, and re-initiation. RESULTS: Among 897 men diagnosed with prostate cancer, the cumulative incidence of BTA initiation after bone metastasis diagnosis was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-37%) at 30 days, 64% (95% CI, 61-68%) at 180 days, and 88% (95% CI, 85-91%) at 2 years. Denosumab was initiated more frequently than zoledronic acid. Men with diabetes, more bone lesions, history of androgen deprivation therapy, or no hospice enrollment were more likely to initiate treatment. Following initiation, the cumulative incidence of treatment interruption was 17% (95% CI, 14-19%) at 60 days and 70% (95% CI, 66-74%) at 2 years, with interruption more likely among patients receiving emerging therapies for prostate cancer or enrolling in hospice. The cumulative incidence of re-initiation following interruption was 36.3% (95% CI, 32.7-40.2%) at 15 days, 49.8% (95% CI, 45.9-54.1%) at 30 days, and 81.0% (95% CI, 77.5-84.7%) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Bone-targeting agent therapy is initiated by the majority of men living with bone metastases following a prostate cancer diagnosis; however, the timing of initiation is highly variable. Once on treatment, gaps or interruptions in therapy are common.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , United States , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use
17.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(3): 807-812, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063388

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examined real-world utilization patterns of bone-targeted agents (BTA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adults with an MM diagnosis recorded in 2012-2014 were identified from electronic health records in the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. Patients received zoledronic acid (ZA) or pamidronate (PA) on/after first MM diagnosis recorded in the study period, had no BTA use in prior 6 months, and were followed through earliest of May 31, 2015 or last clinic visit. Patients with any solid tumor diagnosis were excluded. Time to BTA initiation, compliance (≥ 12 administrations in a year), switching, and non-persistence (switch or ≥ 90-day gap in therapy) were described by agent and follow-up period. RESULTS: Among 9,617 patients with MM, 3,735 (38.8%) received a BTA. Most patients (90.9%) received ZA, with first BTA use generally seen within 3 months of first observed MM diagnosis (ZA 76.1%, PA 75.1%). A minority of ZA (27.4%) and PA (23.0%) patients were compliant in Year 1, with lower compliance in Year 2 (19.8% and 15.6%, respectively). The median time to non-persistence was 16.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.4-17.4) months for ZA and 13.8 (95% CI 11.5-15.4) months for PA. Persistence was 86% at 6 months and 34% at 24 months for ZA, and 77% and 30% for PA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the possibility of suboptimal prevention of skeletal-related events due to non-compliant dosing and non-persistence after patients initiate BTA therapy.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Retrospective Studies
18.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 167(2): 517-528, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28948396

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We developed and validated algorithms to identify metastases and breast cancer recurrence in Danish medical registries. We computed the incidence rate (IR) and hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate predictors of these outcomes in stage II/III breast cancer patients. METHODS: We included all women in Denmark diagnosed during 1999-2011 with regional or stage II/III breast cancer. Demographic, tumor, and treatment data were ascertained from population-based health registries. To facilitate diagnostic work-up of the primary cancer, follow-up began 180 days after diagnosis and continued until recurrence/metastases, death, or 31 December 2012, whichever occurred first. We computed the positive predictive values (PPVs) of recurrence, bone metastases, and visceral metastases using medical records as a gold standard. We calculated the cumulative incidence, IR per 10,000 person years, and used Cox regression to compute the HRs and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each outcome. RESULTS: Among 23,478 patients, 7073 had regional stage and 16,405 had stage II/III breast cancer. The PPV for recurrence was 72.6% (95% CI 59.3, 83.3%). The PPVs for bone and visceral metastases were 92.3% (95% CI 69.3-99.2%) and 70.8% (95% CI 51.1, 85.9%), but had low sensitivity. Five-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, bone metastases, and visceral metastases were 18.4, 2.2, and 5.2%, with corresponding 5-year IRs of 540 (95% CI 524, 557), 60 (95% CI 55, 65), and 144 (95% CI 136, 152), respectively. Predictors of recurrence and metastases included age, stage, hormone receptor status, and cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Our algorithms show moderate to high PPVs for recurrence and metastases. The IRs of metastases were lower compared with other registry-based cohort studies, so may be underestimated in Danish registries.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models
19.
Pharmaceut Med ; 31(4): 257-266, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28824275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods for assessing prescriber knowledge can take several years to deliver results. This study was undertaken to obtain insights into the potential for using existing online communities to educate prescribers on therapy-related safety risks. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe approaches to measuring prescribers' knowledge of safety risk (osteonecrosis of the jaw) outlined in the European Medicine Agency's summary of product characteristics for denosumab (XGEVA®). METHODS: Short multiple-choice online instruments were administered as (1) a two-round cross-sectional survey fielded in January 2013-May 2015 (traditional, nine European countries, study duration: 3 years), (2) a survey targeting the online Medscape community (seven European countries, study duration: 3 weeks), and (3) a continuing medical education module with pre-/post-assessment in an online Medscape community (Medscape Education, USA). All respondents were oncologists; treated five or more patients with bone metastases from solid tumours in the previous 3 months; and prescribed denosumab within the previous 12 months. Medscape (a WebMD company, New York, NY, USA) is the leading online medical information resource, serving approximately 3 million physicians worldwide and 400,000 within Europe. RESULTS: In the traditional 29-month study, 420 (n = 210 per round; 14% of screened physicians) individuals participated. Knowledge levels exceeded 75% correct on five questions (incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw, concomitant risk factors and prevention of osteonecrosis of the jaw during denosumab treatment, importance of ensuring oral hygiene, and care for patients who have or develop osteonecrosis of the jaw) with less awareness of optimal osteonecrosis of the jaw treatment. The Medscape survey (n = 207; 32.1% of 645 eligible) provided similar results in a 3-week post-survey launch. The Medscape Education study (n = 264) documented knowledge acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments that target physicians through online platforms where they seek information about drug-related safety risks may result in increased efficiencies, informing regulators about prescribers' knowledge of safe use within weeks rather than years. Online communities or professional societies may provide venues in which to implement knowledge-acquisition surveys tied to training/education modules that address safety topics.

20.
Clin Epidemiol ; 9: 339-343, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28670142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The reported proportion of cancer patients who experience hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is low, particularly in the pediatric population, ranging between <1% and 5%. HCM can be observed with any type of tumor in children and occurs most commonly with leukemia. While HCM is a potentially fatal condition, the prevalence of HCM is not well understood in pediatric cancer patients. METHODS: Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified pediatric cancer patients with recorded corrected serum calcium (CSC) from 2003 through 2014. Hypercalcemic patients (CSC ≥10.8 mg/dL) were classified into 4 CSC levels. We estimated the annual prevalence of HCM using Byar's method. RESULTS: Among 517 pediatric cancer patients, leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors were the most frequent cancer types. The prevalence of HCM overall (grade 1 or higher) ranged from 0.24% to 0.81% between 2003 and 2014. There were too few cases to compare prevalence by type of cancer. CONCLUSION: We provide the first systematic analysis using a UK population-based data source to estimate the number of pediatric cancer patients affected with HCM by grade. Our findings showed that the prevalence of pediatric HCM was very low (0.24%-0.81%) over the 12-year study period, which is consistent with previous study of adult cancer patients in the UK (0.20%-0.67%).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...