Remote neurological evaluation reliably identifies patients eligible to endovascular therapy while non-eligible to intravenous thrombolysis.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Early identification of suspected stroke patients who might be eligible for a reperfusion strategy is a daily challenge in the management of patient referrals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a remote medical assessment in identifying patients eligible for endovascular therapy (EVT) while not eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), compared with a decision based on bedside clinico-radiological data. METHODS: Patients admitted to the emergency department for acute neurological symptoms lasting for less than 24h were prospectively included. Assessment of the clinical severity and medical history was performed simultaneously by two vascular neurologists (VNs), one remotely using a mobile telemedicine solution (NOMADEEC), the other at the bedside. RACE score was calculated from the NIHSS score. At the end of the evaluation, both VNs quoted their treatment convictions (IVT/EVT). Final therapeutic decision following brain and vascular imaging was recorded and compared to remote and bedside predictions. The performances of three different conditions were evaluated: complete medical evaluation (NIHSS+medical history), NIHSS score alone, and RACE score alone. Remote and bedside performances were also compared. Diagnostic accuracy parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of each condition were estimated, along with their two-sided 95% binomial confidence intervals. RESULTS: Out of 215 enrolled patients, 186 had a complete evaluation, 91 (54.3%) were diagnosed with an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and 46 (24.7%) had an intracranial occlusion. Considering the three conditions evaluated remotely, RACE score-based decision provided the best sensitivity 54.6% [95% CI 23.4; 83.2]/specificity 80.6% [73.9; 86.2] combination. However, the complete medical evaluation had the best specificity (88.6% [82.9; 92.9] compared to RACE scores alone (P=0.038). Remote and bedside performances did not differ (κ=0.68 [0.59; 0.77]). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This real-life study performed in the setting of emergency demonstrates that remote medical evaluations including recording of extensive medical information and NIHSS examination to address patient's eligibility to revascularization treatment is swiftly feasible and is as effective as bedside prediction to EVT and/or IVT. Remote standardized medical evaluation might improve the decision of patients' primary orientation and avoid overcrowding of comprehensive stroke centres.

Management of stroke in patients on antithrombotic therapy: Practical issues in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.

Antithrombotic drugs (ADs) are the mainstay of secondary prevention of thrombotic vascular diseases. Management of patients under long-term treatment with ADs admitted for acute cerebrovascular disease, either ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), has become a frequent situation that might influence decision-making processes from diagnosis to therapeutic strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize current data from the literature to help clinicians in their decisions for stroke care in patients taking ADs. While a large body of data have made it possible to codify the management of patients presenting IS or ICH under antiplatelet drugs and vitamin K antagonists, the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) and future development of new antiplatelet drugs raise new problems. Development of rapid assessment tools measuring specific biological activity and reversion agents dedicated to each class of DOAs should make it possible to optimize individual therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the main steps of IS and ICH management from early identification of ADs, and use of dedicated biological assays, to the stepwise strategy to apply revascularization or reversal therapies and finally the resumption of ADs with a focus on individual clinical and radiological characteristics for more personalized care.

Influence of inflammatory status in the acute phase of stroke on post-stroke depression.

BACKGROUND: Thirty percent of stroke patients will suffer from post-stroke depression (PSD). Recent data suggest that inflammation accounts for a substantial amount of depression. Our primary objective was to assess the association between standard inflammation biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke and PSD at three months. The secondary objective was to elaborate a predictive model of PSD from clinical, biological and radiological data. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a single-centre cohort of stroke patients with a three-month follow-up. Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, leukocyte count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were tested at admission and at peak. Mood was assessed at three months using the depression sub-scale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Association between inflammation biomarkers and HADS was evaluated with multi-linear regression adjusted on clinical and radiological parameters. Logistic predictive models of PSD at three months, with and without inflammation biomarkers, were compared. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-eight patients were included, of whom 20.06% developed PSD. Baseline and peak values of all inflammatory markers were associated with the severity of PSD at three months. Area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve of PSD prediction was 0.746 (CI 95% 0.592-0.803) with selected inflammation biomarkers and 0.744 (CI 95% 0.587-0.799) without. CONCLUSION: Most inflammation biomarkers are weakly associated with PSD, adding negligible value to predictive models. While they suggest the implication of inflammation in PSD pathogenesis, they are useless for the prediction of PSD, underscoring the need for more specific biomarkers.

Contribution of routine cardiac biological markers to the etiological workup of ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Optimization of the detection of atrial fibrillation following stroke is mandatory. Unfortunately, access to long-term cardiac monitoring is limited in many centers. The aim of this study was to assess the potential usefulness of three routine biological markers, troponin, D-dimers and BNP, measured in acute stroke phase in the selection of patients at risk of cardio-embolic stroke. METHODS: Troponin, D-Dimers and BNP were measured within 48 h after admission for ischemic stroke in 634 patients. Stroke mechanism was defined at the 3 months follow-up visit using ASCOD classification using a standardized work-up. Association between clinical, radiological and biological markers and stroke mechanism was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: 159 patients (25.1% of total study population) had a cardiac mechanism. On multivariate analysis, admission initial stroke severity (OR 1.04, 95 CI% 1.004-1.07, p < 0.05) history of heart failure (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.19-7.73, p < 0.05), ECG abnormalities and high BNP value (OR 4.34, 95% CI 2.59-7.29, p < 0.05) were associated with pure cardiac stroke mechanism. CONCLUSION: High BNP value measured within 48 h after stroke admission is an independent predictor of cardiac stroke mechanism. Its measurement might be used to improve the selection of patients for whom further cardiologic investigations such as continuous long term ECG monitoring would be the most useful. BNP should be added to the standard admission-work-up for stroke patients.