ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The range of software available to radiologists has increased enormously with the advancement of AI. A good example of this is software to determine ASPECTS in the treatment of potential stroke patients. OBJECTIVE: In this study, two software packages (eASPECTS from Brainomix and VIA_ASPECTS from Siemens) were tested and compared for their performance in the daily clinical routine of a maximum care provider with a 24/7 stroke unit. METHODS: A total of 637 noncontrast CT images were obtained from consecutive patients with suspected stroke, of whom 73 were finally diagnosed with MCA infarction. Differences in agreement and quantification of agreement were analysed, as well as the correlation and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy compared to raters. RESULTS: Compared to VIA_ASPECTS, eASPECTS shows good agreement and strong correlation with the raters. VIA_ASPECTS has lower accuracy and low specificity than eASPECTS but a higher sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Both software products have the potential to be decision support tools for radiologists. There are, however, differences between the two software products in terms of their intended use.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Stroke , Humans , Brain Ischemia/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Software , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a standard stroke treatment for patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs). A decisive factor for a successful outcome is, among other things, timely treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze several time points in relation to outcomes and/or surrogate parameters. Furthermore, our data was placed in the context of other clinical trial data. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 133 data sets from patients who underwent MT. The correlation of various time periods with parameters, such as the ASPECTS, NIHSS, mRS, and, particularly, the TICI score, was investigated. RESULTS: A correlation was found for both the NIHSS score at discharge and the TICI score with the time periods of arrival and/or start to groin puncture as well as with arrival to the end of the intervention and the duration of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study is consistent with large randomized clinical trials investigating stroke management and provides data from daily clinical practice.