Nurse practitioner care improves renal outcome in patients with CKD.

Treatment goals for patients with CKD are often unrealized for many reasons, but support by nurse practitioners may improve risk factor levels in these patients. Here, we analyzed renal endpoints of the Multifactorial Approach and Superior Treatment Efficacy in Renal Patients with the Aid of Nurse Practitioners (MASTERPLAN) study after extended follow-up to determine whether strict implementation of current CKD guidelines through the aid of nurse practitioners improves renal outcome. In total, 788 patients with moderate to severe CKD were randomized to receive nurse practitioner support added to physician care (intervention group) or physician care alone (control group). Median follow-up was 5.7 years. Renal outcome was a secondary endpoint of the MASTERPLAN study. We used a composite renal endpoint of death, ESRD, and 50% increase in serum creatinine. Event rates were compared with adjustment for baseline serum creatinine concentration and changes in estimated GFR were determined. During the randomized phase, there were small but significant differences between the groups in BP, proteinuria, LDL cholesterol, and use of aspirin, statins, active vitamin D, and antihypertensive medications, in favor of the intervention group. The intervention reduced the incidence of the composite renal endpoint by 20% (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.98; P=0.03). In the intervention group, the decrease in estimated GFR was 0.45 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year less than in the control group (P=0.01). In conclusion, additional support by nurse practitioners attenuated the decline of kidney function and improved renal outcome in patients with CKD.

Multifactorial intervention with nurse practitioners does not change cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Strict implementation of guidelines directed at multiple targets reduces vascular risk in diabetic patients. Whether this also applies to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. To evaluate this, the MASTERPLAN Study randomized 788 patients with CKD (estimated GFR 20-70 ml/min) to receive additional intensive nurse practitioner support (the intervention group) or nephrologist care (the control group). The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. During a mean follow-up of 4.62 years, modest but significant decreases were found for blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, anemia, proteinuria along with the increased use of active vitamin D or analogs, aspirin and statins in the intervention group compared to the controls. No differences were found in the rate of smoking cessation, weight reduction, sodium excretion, physical activity, or glycemic control. Intensive control did not reduce the rate of the composite end point (21.3/1000 person-years in the intervention group compared to 23.8/1000 person-years in the controls (hazard ratio 0.90)). No differences were found in the secondary outcomes of vascular interventions, all-cause mortality or end-stage renal disease. Thus, the addition of intensive support by nurse practitioner care in patients with CKD improved some risk factor levels, but did not significantly reduce the rate of the primary or secondary end points.

Differential effects of acute and sustained cyclosporine and tacrolimus on sympathetic nerve activity.

BACKGROUND: We studied the effect of acute and sustained cyclosporine and tacrolimus on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in groups of healthy male volunteers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Acute cyclosporine in normal dose (2.5 mg/kg) increased MSNA from 11 +/- 6 to 19 +/- 8 bursts/min (P < 0.05). Acute cyclosporine in high dose (10 mg/kg) increased MSNA from 13 +/- 6 to 25 +/- 4 bursts/min (P < 0.05) and increased heart rate and mean arterial pressure (heart rate from 64 +/- 8 to 74 +/- 6 b.p.m., MAP from 92 +/- 10 to 105 +/- 8 mmHg; both P < 0.05). Sustained cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 2 weeks) suppressed MSNA from 14 +/- 6 to 8 +/- 7 bursts/min (P < 0.05). Blood pressure increased from 89 +/- 6 to 98 +/- 6 mmHg (P < 0.05). Body weight increased and plasma renin activity was suppressed. Acute tacrolimus in regular dose (0.05 mg/kg) and high dose (0.20 mg/kg) had no effect on MSNA and blood pressure. Sustained tacrolimus (0.05 mg/kg b.i.d. for 2 weeks) had no effect on blood pressure, body weight and plasma renin activity, but decreased MSNA from 14 +/- 6 to 8 +/- 5 bursts/min (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sympathetic overactivity plays a role in the acute hypertensive action of cyclosporine. Cyclosporine given during 2 weeks increases blood pressure and suppresses MSNA, possibly by volume retention. Tacrolimus, in the presently applied dosages, does not cause hypertension or sympathetic overactivity. However, sustained tacrolimus also suppresses sympathetic activity, the reason of which is unclear.

Quality of care in patients with chronic kidney disease is determined by hospital specific factors.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines have set goals for risk factor management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. These goals are often not met. In this analysis, we set out to assess the quality of risk factor management in CKD and to identify factors that determine the quality of care (QoC). For that purpose, baseline data of the MASTERPLAN (Multifactorial Approach and Superior Treatment Efficacy in Renal Patients with the Aid of Nurse practitioners) study have been used. MASTERPLAN is a multicentre study which evaluates the effect of a multifactorial intervention in prevalent CKD patients on cardiovascular (CV) events and progression of kidney failure. METHODS: QoC was quantified using a score based on the number of 11 defined treatment goals on target. The maximum score per patient was 11. RESULTS: The average (±SD) QoC score was 6.7 (±1.5). The average score per centre ranged from 5.9 to 6.9. In a multivariable analysis, centre proved to be a significant, independent determinant of QoC with a difference up to 0.7 between centres. This difference remained when adjustments were made for those risk factors primarily treated by pharmacotherapy. Other factors that were significantly related to the QoC were estimated glomerular filtration rate, Caucasian race, diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy as cause of kidney disease and previous kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In CKD patients, risk factors for progression of kidney failure and CV events were inadequately controlled. Treatment centre proved to be an important determinant of QoC. This data may point towards the physician's interest and preference as important determinants of QoC. This is a potentially modifiable determinant of the quality of patient care [Trial registration ISRCTN registry: 73187232 (http://isrctn.org)].

Sympathetic hyperactivity in haemodialysis patients is reduced by short daily haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Haemodialysis patients often have sympathetic hyperactivity. The hypothesis of this study was that a switch from three times weekly to short daily dialysis could affect sympathetic hyperactivity. METHODS: We studied 11 patients (eight men; aged 46 +/- 8 years) stable on haemodialysis for at least 1 year before and 6 months after conversion from three times to six times weekly dialysis without increasing total dialysis time (short daily dialysis). Seven patients were restudied 2 months after switching back to three times weekly haemodialysis. RESULTS: Ultrafiltration volume per session decreased from 2.4 +/- 1.0 to 1.5 +/- 0.6 l (P < 0.05). The extracellular fluid volume (bromide distribution space) did not change. Mean arterial pressure (without medication) decreased from 113 +/- 11 to 98 +/- 9 mmHg (P < 0.05). Cardiac output (Doppler echocardiography) did not change, but peripheral vascular resistance decreased from 25.4 +/- 6.4 to 21.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg per min/l (P < 0.05), in conjunction with a decrease in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) from 39 +/- 19 to 28 +/- 15 bursts/min (P < 0.05). Ambulant 24 h blood pressure decreased and the nocturnal blood pressure dip increased during short daily dialysis. The seven patients who were switched back to alternate day haemodialysis showed a return of the high MSNA and peripheral vascular resistance. CONCLUSION: The study shows that sympathetic hyperactivity in haemodialysis patients is reduced by increasing the frequency of treatment sessions. This is probably because of the decrease in number or magnitude of the fluid fluctuations.

Sympathetic hyperactivity in hypertensive chronic kidney disease patients is reduced during standard treatment.

Standard treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients includes an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. CKD is often characterized by sympathetic hyperactivity. This study investigates the prevalence of sympathetic hyperactivity (quantified by assessment of muscle sympathetic nerve activity [MSNA]) in a sizable group of patients with CKD and assessed whether chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker normalizes increased MSNA. In 74 CKD patients (creatinine clearance 54+/-31 mL/min), MSNA, blood pressure, and plasma renin activity were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs except for diuretics. In a subgroup of 31 patients, another set of measurements was obtained after > or =6 weeks of enalapril (10 mg PO), losartan (100 mg PO), or eprosartan (600 mg PO). Patients as compared with control subjects (n=82) had higher mean arterial pressure (113+/-13 versus 89+/-7 mm Hg), MSNA (31+/-13 versus 19+/-7 bursts per minute), and log plasma renin activity (2.67+/-036 versus 2.40+/-0.32 fmol/L per second; all P<0.001). During angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy (n=31), mean arterial pressure (115+/-11 to 100+/-9 mm Hg) and MSNA (33+/-11 to 25+/-9 bursts per minute) decreased (both P<0.01) but were still higher than in control subjects (both P<0.01). Multiple regression analysis identified age and plasma renin activity as predictive for MSNA. In conclusion, sympathetic hyperactivity occurs in a substantial proportion of hypertensive CKD patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker treatment reduces but does not normalize MSNA.

Multifactorial approach and superior treatment efficacy in renal patients with the aid of nurse practitioners. Design of The MASTERPLAN Study [ISRCTN73187232].

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a greatly increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Recently developed guidelines address multiple risk factors and life-style interventions. However, in current practice few patients reach their targets.A multifactorial approach with the aid of nurse practitioners was effective in achieving treatment goals and reducing vascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and in patients with heart failure. We propose that this also holds for the CKD population. DESIGN: MASTERPLAN is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate whether a multifactorial approach with the aid of nurse-practicioners reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD. Approximately 800 patients with a creatinine clearance (estimated by Cockcroft-Gault) between 20 to 70 ml/min, will be included. To all patients the same set of guidelines will be applied and specific cardioprotective medication will be prescribed. In the intervention group the nurse practitioner will provide lifestyle advice and actively address treatment goals. Follow-up will be five years. Primary endpoint is the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary endpoints are cardiovascular morbidity, overall mortality, decline of renal function, change in markers of vascular damage and change in quality of life. Enrollment has started in April 2004 and the study is on track with 700 patients included on October 15th, 2005. This article describes the design of the MASTERPLAN study.

Rationale and design of the MASTERPLAN study: Multifactorial approach and superior treatment efficacy in renal patients with the aid of nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). In addition, patients with renal disease are exposed to a myriad of risk factors that increase their risk even further. The treatment of risk factors in these patients is paramount to reducing cardiovascular risk and for attenuating renal failure progression. It is well known that lifestyle interventions are difficult, and that medical treatment targets are seldom met. A multifactorial approach with the aid of nurse practitioners has shown to be beneficial for achieving treatment goals and reducing events in patients with diabetes mellitus and with heart failure. We propose that this will also hold for the CKD population. TRIAL DESIGN: A multicenter randomized clinical trial will be performed to study whether intensive medical care delivered by a nurse practitioner and a nephrologist will reduce cardiovascular risk compared to care provided by the nephrologist alone. The acronym MASTERPLAN describes the study: Multifactorial approach and superior treatment efficacy in renal patients with the aid of nurse practitioners. Eight hundred patients will be randomized to physician care or nurse practitioner support. For all patients the same set of guidelines and treatment goals will apply. Both groups will receive treatment according to current guidelines and have access to specific cardioprotective medication. Nurse practitioners will intensify therapy by promoting lifestyle intervention, and meticulous implementation of relevant guidelines. Patients will be followed-up for 5 yrs after baseline. Primary endpoints are all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and cardiovascular mortality.

Moxonidine normalizes sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with eprosartan-treated chronic renal failure.

Enalapril and losartan reduce but not normalize sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with hypertensive chronic renal failure (CRF). This study assessed the effect of chronic eprosartan on BP and sympathetic activity, and assessed the effect of moxonidine during chronic eprosartan treatment. In 11 stable patients with CRF (creatinine clearance 47 +/- 10 ml/min), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; peroneal nerve), BP, and baroreceptor sensitivity were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs (except diuretics) during chronic eprosartan therapy (600 mg for 6 wk) and in 9 patients after moxonidine (0.2 mg for 6 wk) was added. Normovolemia was controlled by diuretics and confirmed by extracellular fluid volume measurements. BP, heart rate, and MSNA were higher in patients than in 22 controls. During eprosartan therapy, mean arterial pressure (111 +/- 9 to 98 +/- 7 mmHg, P < 0.001), heart rate (71 +/- 10 to 65 +/- 8 bpm, P < 0.001), and MSNA (35 +/- 10 to 27 +/- 8 bursts/min, P < 0.001) decreased. After the addition of moxonidine (n = 9), a further reduction of mean arterial pressure to 89 +/- 7 mmHg (P < 0.05) and of MSNA to 20 +/- 10 bursts/min (P < 0.05) occurred. Sympathetic activity in patients with CRF can be normalized, and angiotensin II-independent sympathetic hyperactivity contributes to the pathogenesis of renal hypertension. Sympathetic hyperactivity is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes, implying that reduction might be beneficial to the patients. The addition of moxonidine to angiotensin II antagonist treatment might be appropriate.

Volume-independent mechanisms of hypertension in hemodialysis patients: clinical implications.

The renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems are often activated in hemodialysis (HD) patients; the pathogenesis of this condition is discussed. Medications aimed at reducing renin and sympathetic activity may improve the cardiovascular prognosis, independent of its effect on blood pressure. This knowledge has important implications for the choice of treatment in HD patients.

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus improves quality-of-life indices, renal graft function and cardiovascular risk profile.

Long-term use of cyclosporine after renal transplantation results in nephrotoxicity and an increased cardiovascular risk profile. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect. In this randomized controlled study in 124 renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on renal function, cardiovascular risk factors, and perceived side-effects were investigated after a follow-up of 2 years. After conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus renal function remained stable, whereas continuation of cyclosporine was accompanied by a rise in serum creatinine from 142 +/- 48 micromol/L to 157 +/- 62 micromol/L (p < 0.05 comparing both groups). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and a sustained improvement in the serum lipid profile, leading to a reduction in the Framingham risk score from 5.7 +/- 4.3 to 4.8 +/- 5.3 (p < 0.05). Finally, conversion to tacrolimus resulted in decreased scores for occurrence of and distress due to side-effects. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients is beneficial with respect to renal function, cardiovascular risk profile, and side-effects. Therefore, for most renal transplant patients tacrolimus will be the drug of choice when long-term treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor is indicated.

Sympathetic hyperactivity in chronic kidney disease: pathogenesis, clinical relevance, and treatment.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality importantly influence live expectancy of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD). Traditional risk factors are usually present, but several other factors have recently been identified. There is now evidence that CKD is often characterized by an activated sympathetic nervous system. This may contribute to the pathogenesis of renal hypertension, but it may also adversely affect prognosis independently of its effect on blood pressure. The purpose of this review is to summarize available knowledge on the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of renal hypertension, its clinical relevance, and the consequences of this knowledge for the choice of treatment.

Sympathetic nerve activity is inappropriately increased in chronic renal disease.

The hypothesis that in hypertensive patients with renal parenchymal disease sympathetic activity is "inappropriately" elevated and that this overactivity is a feature of renal disease and not of a reduced number of nephrons per se is addressed. Fifty seven patients with renal disease (various causes, no diabetes, all on antihypertensive medication) were studied, age range 18 to 62, creatinine clearance 10 to 114 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Antihypertensives were stopped, but diuretics were allowed, to prevent overhydration. Matched control subjects were also studied. The effect of changes in fluid status was examined in seven patients while on and after stopping diuretics and in eight control subjects while on low- and high-sodium diet. Seven kidney donors were studied before and after unilateral nephrectomy. Sympathetic activity was quantified as muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in the peroneal nerve. Mean arterial pressure, MSNA, and plasma renin activity were higher in patients than in control subjects, respectively (115 +/- 12 and 88 +/- 11 mmHg, 31 +/- 15 and 18 +/- 10 bursts/min, and 500 [20 to 6940] and 220 [40 to 980] fmol/L per s; P < 0.01 for all items). Extracellular fluid volume (bromide distribution) did not differ. Seven patients were studied again after stopping diuretics. MSNA decreased from 34 +/- 18 to 19 +/- 18 bursts/min (P < 0.01). Eight healthy subjects were studied during low- and high-sodium diet. MSNA was 26 +/- 12 and 13 +/- 7 bursts/min (P < 0.01). The curves relating extracellular fluid volume to MSNA were parallel in the two groups but shifted to a higher level of MSNA in the patients. In the kidney donors, creatinine clearance reduced by 25%, but MSNA was identical before and after donation. It is concluded that in hypertensive patients with renal parenchymal disease, sympathetic activity is inappropriately high for the volume status and that reduction of nephron number in itself does not influence sympathetic activity.

Improved cardiovascular risk profile and renal function in renal transplant patients after randomized conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus.

Cyclosporine is considered to contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients after renal transplantation. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect, but controlled data are scarce. In this prospective randomized study in 124 stable renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on cardiovascular risk factors and renal function were investigated. Follow-up was 6 mo. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated measurements. The serum creatinine level decreased from 137 +/- 30 micromol/L to 131 +/- 29 micromol/L (P < 0.01). Three months after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, mean BP significantly decreased from 104 +/- 13 to 99 +/- 12 mmHg (P < 0.001). Serum LDL cholesterol decreased from 3.48 +/- 0.80 to 3.11 +/- 0.74 mmol/L (P < 0.001,) and serum apolipoprotein B decreased from 1018 +/- 189 to 935 +/- 174 mg/L (P < 0.001). Serum triglycerides decreased from 2.11 +/- 1.12 to 1.72 +/- 0.94 mmol/L (P < 0.001). In addition, both rate and extent of LDL oxidation were reduced. The fibrinogen level decreased from 3638 +/- 857 to 3417 +/- 751 mg/L (P < 0.05). Plasma homocysteine concentration did not change. Three months after conversion, plasma fasting glucose level temporarily increased from 5.4 +/- 1.3 mmol/L to 5.8 +/- 1.9 mmol/L (P < 0.05). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a significant reduction of the Framingham risk score. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients has a beneficial effect on renal function, BP, serum concentration and atherogenic properties of serum lipids, and fibrinogen.

Deposition of nucleosomal antigens (histones and DNA) in the epidermal basement membrane in human lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: Antinuclear autoantibodies complexed to nucleosomes can bind to heparan sulfate (HS) in the glomerular basement membrane. This binding is due to the binding of the positively charged histones to the strongly anionic HS. Nucleosomes and histones have been identified in glomerular deposits in human lupus nephritis. We investigated whether nucleosomes are present in the basement membrane of nonlesional skin of lupus patients. METHODS: Skin biopsy samples from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (30 with active lupus nephritis and 15 with inactive disease) and controls (with parapemphigus or diabetes) were stained for IgG, histones, DNA, and nucleosomes. RESULTS: IgG deposits were found in 87% of the patients with lupus nephritis, in 33% of the patients with inactive disease, and in 71% of the parapemphigus patients. Using polyclonal antihistone antibodies, histones were detected in 87% of lupus nephritis patients, but in none of the other SLE patients or the diabetes controls (P < 0.0001). Among the parapemphigus controls, 14% of samples stained positive in one of the polyclonal antihistone stainings (P < 0.0001). Using monoclonal antibodies, histones and DNA were identified in 21% of the lupus nephritis patients. Although none of the other groups showed positive staining for nucleosomes, 7% of the lupus nephritis biopsy samples were positive using antinucleosome monoclonal antibodies. Colocalization of nucleosomal antigens and IgG was confirmed using confocal laser microscopy. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that nucleosome-mediated binding of autoantibodies to basement membranes may also occur at sites in the body other than in the glomerulus.

Enalapril and losartan reduce sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with chronic renal failure.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects on BP and sympathetic activity of chronic treatment with an angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an AngII receptor blocker in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). In ten stable hypertensive CRF patients (creatinine clearance, 46 +/- 17 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), plasma renin activity (PRA), baroreceptor sensitivity, and 24-h ambulatory BP were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs (except diuretics) after 6 wk of enalapril (10 mg orally) and after 6 wk of losartan (100 mg orally). The order of the three phases was randomized. Normovolemia was controlled with diuretics and confirmed with extracellular fluid volume measurements throughout the study. Both enalapril and losartan reduced MSNA (from 33 +/- 10 to 27 +/- 13 and 27 +/- 13 bursts/min, respectively; P < 0.05) and average 24-h BP (from 141 +/- 8/93 +/- 8 to 124 +/- 9/79 +/- 8 and 127 +/- 8/81 +/- 9 mmHg; P < 0.01). PRA was not different during the treatments. The change in BP and the change in MSNA during the treatments were correlated (r = 0.70 and r = 0.63, respectively; both P < 0.05). Baroreceptor sensitivity was not affected by the treatments. This is the first study to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and AngII blockade on MSNA. In hypertensive CRF patients, enalapril and losartan equally reduced BP and MSNA. Differences in modes of action of the two drugs did not result in differences in effects on MSNA, supporting the view that AngII-mediated mechanisms contribute importantly in the pathogenesis of sympathetic hyperactivity in these patients.

Pathogenesis and treatment of hypertension in polycystic kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension is common in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. It may contribute to cardiovascular risk and to progression of renal failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Apart from fluid overload and renin activation, hypertensive patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease also have increased sympathetic activity, regardless of renal function. Sympathetic hyperactivity not only contributes to the hypertension but may also increase cardiovascular risk independent of blood pressure. SUMMARY: Treatment for normalizing blood pressure and sympathetic activity should be started early in the course of the disease.

Withdrawal of cyclosporine or prednisone six months after kidney transplantation in patients on triple drug therapy: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study.

Uncertainty exists regarding the necessity of continuing triple therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) after kidney transplantation (RTx). At 6 mo after RTx, 212 patients were randomized to stop CsA (n = 63), stop Pred (n = 76), or continue triple drug therapy (n = 73). The MMF dose was 1000 mg twice daily, target CsA trough levels were 150 ng/ml, and Pred dose was 0.10 mg/kg per d. Follow-up was until 24 mo after RTx. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14 (22%) of 63 patients after CsA withdrawal compared with 3 (4%) of 76 in the Pred withdrawal group (P = 0.001) and 1 (1.4%) of 73 in the control group (P = 0.0001). Biopsy-proven chronic rejection was present in one patient in the control group, in nine patients after CsA withdrawal (P = 0.006 versus control group); and in four patients after discontinuation of Pred (NS). Graft loss occurred in two versus one patient after CsA or Pred withdrawal, respectively, and in two patients in the control group (NS). Patients who successfully withdrew CsA had a significantly lower serum creatinine during follow-up. Pred withdrawal resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure, and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio increased. In conclusion, rapid CsA withdrawal at 6 mo after RTx results in a significantly increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute and chronic rejection. Pred withdrawal was safe and resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure. However, patient and graft survival and renal function 2 yr after RTx were not different among groups.

Different effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The side effects of cyclosporine, nephrotoxicity and hypertension, contribute to long-term renal graft failure and cardiovascular morbidity in graft recipients. It is not clear whether tacrolimus is as nephrotoxic and hypertensive as cyclosporine. Data on this subject are not consistent because of differences in dosage and duration of treatment and the presence of comorbidity in the studied patients. A comparison of both drugs with respect to renal hemodynamics and blood pressure has not been performed yet in healthy subjects. METHODS: We studied blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and effective renal plasma flow in eight healthy subjects at baseline and after 2 weeks administration of cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in randomized order. Trough levels of either drug were within the currently recommended therapeutical range of 100-200 ng/ml for cyclosporine and 5-15 ng/ml for tacrolimus. RESULTS: Tacrolimus did not influence renal hemodynamic parameters, in contrast to cyclosporine. During cyclosporine, glomerular filtration rate decreased from 98+/-9 ml/min/1.732 to 85+/-10 ml/min/1.732 (P<0.05), and ERPF decreased from 597+/-108 ml/min/1.732 to 438+/-84 ml/min/1.732 (P<0.01). Mean arterial blood pressure increased from 93+/-8 mmHg to 108+/-10 mmHg (P<0.05) during cyclosporine and remained unchanged during tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tacrolimus given during 2 weeks in the currently advised dosage has no unfavorable effects on renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in healthy individuals. The use of tacrolimus in organ transplant recipients may in the long-term lead to better renal function and less cardiovascular morbidity than the use of cyclosporine.

Sympathetic activity is increased in polycystic kidney disease and is associated with hypertension.

Hypertension is common in patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD). This study addresses the hypothesis that sympathetic activity is enhanced in hypertensive PKD patients, not only when renal function is impaired but also when renal function is still normal. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, peroneal nerve), plasma renin activity (PRA), heart rate, and BP were studied in PKD patients with normal and with impaired renal function and in matched controls. In hypertensive patients with normal renal function, MSNA and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were higher than in normotensive patients (23 +/- 5 versus 15 +/- 7 bursts/min; 110 +/- 10 versus 90 +/- 3 mmHg; P < 0.05), whereas PRA and heart rate did not differ. In PKD with chronic renal failure (CRF) (creatinine clearance rate, 39 +/- 19 ml/min), MAP, MSNA and PRA were higher than in controls (resp, 116 +/- 7 versus 89 +/- 9 mmHg; 34 +/- 14 versus 19 +/- 9 bursts/min; 405 [20 to 1640] versus 120 [40 to 730] fmol/L per sec; all P < 0.05). Heart rate in PKD CRF did not differ from controls. MSNA correlated with MAP (r = 0.42; P = 0.01) and age with MSNA (r = 0.45; P < 0.01). Regression line of age and MSNA in patients was steeper than that in controls. This study indicates that MSNA is increased in hypertensive PKD patients regardless of renal function. The data support the idea that sympathetic hyperactivity contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension in PKD.